it's girly time

come on in, the water's warm

Gypsy Island Girly

Gypsy Island Girly
Location
Denver, Colorado, USA
Birthday
March 27
Title
Writer/Editor
Company
Imagine This:
Bio
Life motto: "The greatest thing you'll ever learn is just to love and be loved in return." I'm a playful, spirited lovesick chick that loves to roam foreign countries (although seem to always have "security issues"; like Woody Allen, I tend to tear up tickets when confronted with "authority"). Almost got put into the clinker because I supposedly "attacked" a security guard, when I was only grabbing my water bottle back, pissed. I take no prisoners. Only willing romantics.

MY RECENT POSTS

Gypsy Island Girly's Links

New list
SEPTEMBER 22, 2009 12:23AM

Tampering with the Tampon Police

Rate: 2 Flag

All I can say is, we are blessed for the younger generations and their fearless spirits (otherwise interpreted as nonchalant attitudes)!  Driving to drop my teenage daughter off at school the other morning, I received an earful of my own stagnant and prudish ways.   As she placed her wrapped tampon in clear view in my car, I said to her, “You can put it in the glove box.  No one else needs to see it.”

She wisely responded with, “Why, will we be subjected to the “Tampon Police?”  If only I had been so precocious, when I was younger.  Come to think of it, even now, as an aging—albeit vibrantly healthy—silly mom.  I mean, don’t I have “better” things to worry about?

Her comment brought joy to the early morning and was such a telling statement about where her generation is and where we have arrived from, just a few “moons” ago.

As a young girl, my mother never once discussed sex, with me.  I was blessed enough to find out about Planned Parenthood, where I received all the guidance from counselors to learn about birth control.  The trials and tribulations I learned along my journey.  Even as one grown woman to another, my mother, at a frisky 88, still doesn’t feel comfortable talking about sex.

I realize that not all moms were tight-lipped about sex with their own daughters.  Yet the silent teachings were so entrenched in me, that the best way I could talk about menstruation, bodily parts and sexual feelings were to read books, together, especially books by mother/daughter teams.  

That way, the ideas that are in the books generated a whole new conversation and way of saying it, for me.  Funny, I have always felt comfortable talking about sex; suddenly—maybe it’s because it now “involves” my own baby girl—I can’t fathom just where to begin, or continue or end.  It’s rather ironic as I was comfortable in the role of a “gypsy goddess” rebellious type all throughout high school and now I’m finding myself to be “tight-lipped.”  Is it because I don’t want my daughter doing the things that I found myself doing, when I was her age?  Perhaps.

Thank the gods (and goddesses) that kids are learning this sort of information at school, from their peers, from books, movies and teachers.  Probably what I have to teach and share with my daughter is ancient (well, of course it is!) and she’s better off learning from others.  I do make myself available to questions, however.  I just feel that my answers are sometimes censored, not meaning to be.

The other night I attended a board meeting that I participate on.  Our group’s ages are across the board, from thirties to fifties.  We met outside, on one of the member’s deck, sitting around his patio table.  The weather turned a bit chilly and another member was not dressed for the drop in temperature.  Suddenly she blurted out, “My panties aren’t cold, but my socks are!”  Her comment took me off-guard.  Weren’t we at a professional meeting?  I mean, why would her panties be cold, in the first place (I wanted to ask her).  I asked her to repeat herself and she found it humorous, stressing the word, “panties” just for my benefit.  This woman is a younger generation than mine, by 17 years.  Perhaps that explains her forthrightness.

Am I that old-fashioned?

This morning while listening to National Public Radio, they were talking about the Janet Jackson episode, where her clothing suddenly misaligned with her body—malfunctioned is the word that they used, sort of sounding like a robot, to me—and her left breast was exposed on national television, prime-time, during football season commercial time.

Unfortunately, I missed seeing her breast—I suppose I need to work on my football interests if I want to see things like that—because I would have liked to see what all the fuss was about.  Is her breast uncommonly erected, somehow?  Does it adorn a beauty mark in just the “right” spot?  A sensational tattoo, perhaps?

The best thing about the news report is that while they are—still! After several years!—working on the correct disciplinary action to the network, the only sane words I heard coming from a judge, were, “Nor is it offensive to community standards.”  A fabulous “win,” if you ask me.  Finally, some sense is made out of a natural body part that was exposed for a matter of a few seconds, in the first place. 

It has always bothered me that Americans are seemingly obsessed with the physical attractiveness (or unattractiveness, however they see it) of their bodies; yet also fear them, on a certain level.  Or perhaps they fear rejection from everyone else about their looks.  There seems to be a push and pull attitude; wearing outfits that expose bodily parts to look sexy, yet shying away from any contact with another body, even if it is just bumping into someone else on the train or bus.  Let’s not stand/sit or be too close, most Americans say with their body language.  Yet underneath their clothing is a come-on-over-to-my-place attitude.  I feel blessed that while my daughter is extremely liberal in many facets, she is conservative in her choice of clothing.

So while the younger generation is basically laughing at us old fogies for our close-minded tunnel visions, at least there are still some of us fogies left that are willing to leave their intellectual and emotional doors open. Bring it on, panty woman.

 

 

 

 

  

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
This is one of your best posts! Exploring the sexual attitude of the American sexual being is fraught with land mines, yet you've managed to weave your way through. We are a mixed bag of nuts, that's for sure.
Welcome back!

Television is a great gauge of how societal norms have changed. We’ve come a long way since the days of, “I love Lucy”. They were married, but slept in separate beds. America collectively gasped when we first heard a toilet flush on, “All in the family”.
The next generation pushed the envelope even further. From pre-marital sex, to same sex relationships, it all gets pumped right into our living rooms on a nightly basis (Have you seen “Family Guy”!).

Hopefully, all of this exposure has helped to desensitize the subject, allowing the current generation of kids to grow up with a better understanding of their sexuality, so that they are able to make informed and responsible choices about their bodies. As for us “old fogies”, we will just have to grin and bear it.
thank you, michael. yah, we are most definitely a mixed bag of nuts. this happened a year ago and since i haven't written that much lately (except for my new business/service blog at: http://at2727.wordpress.com/), thought i'd put it up so as not to completely leave the loop! hope you're doing grrreat! with love.
hey there, spin. thank you for the welcome--life's just been so experiential, i haven't been writing except for my new blog: http://at2727.wordpress.com. we don't watch t.v. at all. ever. it's such a waste of our time...too busy living life. (not to say that you're not living life, guy. it's just not something we do.) so we learn on our paths, in real life. my favorite way. and...oh! sometimes with movies. with love.
I once worked with someone who did not own a TV set. Until I met her, I did not think it was possible. As a conversationalist, I mostly watch for social reasons. Believe me, you are not missing anything.
thanks, doc. i didn't think so. (we actually do have a large screen for movies, though.)
I'm sure you daughter's openness about this is based on the fashion trends of the day, even in high school. When I was in high school it practically made our day if we got a good look all the way up a skirt or down a blouse and we saw major underwear.

These days, guys are blessed by low rise jeans with actual butt crack showing, and low cut tops and loose fitting bras that reveal more boobage than guys my age ever knew existed when we were students.

Another personal example. At my 30 year high school reunion, I actually told a former classmate, now a middle aged woman, that I remember when she was the first girl I remember seeing who would not wear a bra. It made her chuckle, although she knows I have a good sense of humor. But even I know it wasn't really funny, or even appropriate for me to say that. It showed me how society has changed for me to get away with saying that.

(As a side note, she no longer looks anywhere near as good as she did back then, such to the point even I was glad she now wears a bra.)
london, you crack me up!...as an aries, i say what i think/mean/feel and don't always think about consequences. i don't think that what you said was "wrong" or inappropriate in any sense of the meaning--so what if you noticed she wasn't wearing a bra? usually it's pretty obvious and why would she want to cover that fact? (ha, guess that's a pun, there...) thank you for writing.