We all know the arguments by now so I won't repeat them. But what I will say is simply this: In order for a Muslim community center being built several blocks away from the 9/11 site to be disrespectful of those who suffered on 9/11, one must first believe that the Muslim community as a whole were somehow responsible for the 9/11 attacks. No one takes issue with the two churches that overlook the 9/11 site. Nor would there be any argument against the building of a Jewish community center. So the issue here is simply that there are enough people who have not managed to separate the Muslim community from the extremists who attacked us on September 11, 2001.
This is not an issue of sensitivity to loss and suffering. It is an issue of sensitivity to fear and doubt and a gross misunderstanding of what it means to be Muslim and what it means to be a terrorist. It is mired in misconception. There can be no insensitivity regarding this issue without religious inequality. They are simply inseparable. If they were not, no one would take offense. No, one has to believe that Muslims were somehow responsible for the attacks and that allowing the building of a Muslim community center near (not on, mind you) Ground Zero would somehow be an act of support for the attacks themselves.
It is not. The men who attacked us may have been Muslim (and that faith, like all others, has many different interpretations and sects), but the men and women building the community center did not fly planes into the World Trade Center Towers. No more than the Jewish population in Germany during the 30's and 40's was trying to destroy that country and its values. Or that all members of the NRA supported the Columbine massacre.
This needs to stop. Instead of taking out your anger on Muslims, look a bit deeper at the anger and loss created by the events of 9/11 and try to put them into a proper perspective that doesn't instigate more hatred and misunderstanding. The men who attacked us on 9/11 did not understand who we were. As a nation. As a people. Let's not make the same mistake they did.
In the meantime, go HERE to watch John Stewart once again put things clearly into perspective.



Salon.com
Comments
Your magic wand...it's merely your a imagination with a stick in it. And it is no more or less dangerous than the magic wand of any other person or group.
I have listened to and read hundreds of opinions on this issue, have followed it VERY closely, and have yet to find one explanation opposing the building of this community center that appears to come from a place of logic. It is either claiming insensitivity or actually claiming that there might be a connection between these particular Muslims and the 9/11 terrorists.
I grew up in the city and lost a close cousin in the first tower. I am surrounded by friends who have lost significant loved-ones. That pain, 9 years later, is still fresh. But that is not an excuse for what I am seeing here. And until you or someone else offers me another way of seeing it, I only have what is being written and reported on and said to me in person to go on. And given that, my opinion and position has not changed. In order for a Muslim community center to not be wanted near Ground Zero, one needs to somehow connect Muslims (or at least these particular Muslims) with the events of 9/11. Otherwise, where is the issue?
I am open to hearing your response and hope you can offer me another way of seeing this. Until such a time, I will continue to point out a certain level of hypocrisy that I see between what some Americans say they stand for and what they actually do in action. So far as I'm concerned, it is important to do so.
Your entire blog is all opinion sweetie, backed up by the meanderings of a comedian that you have given the appearance of being someone you take seriously. You are entitled to your opinion. It is not my desire to enlighten you to the point of altering your perspective. My point is that it isn't up to you to dismiss the emotions and perspective of others. People feel what they feel. You spend your time "following closely" what others say so that you can wave that wand and call it all a lie all the while calling the people who offer an opposing opinion belittling names. How does that distinguish you?
You spout nothing more than an opinion then delude yourself that because you thought it and wrote it down that it is a fact and the rest of us are given notice to "prove" our opinions to satisfy you. Again you are entitled to your opinion, but believe it or not so is everyone else. If you don't find the other guy's feelings or thoughts agreeable to yours, so what. That doesn't mean yours count more or his don't count at all. That is the definition of dismissive and is the whole point of your blog. You are not here to enlighten. You are here to post not only what you think but to make sure you spell out that the rest of the free thinking world is not worthy of the right to feel and think what they do (without factual proof anyway).
And I have to say, your rebuttal offered nothing to "enlighten" me to change my mind about you being dismissive.
As for enlightening you, I stated my opinion and made comparisons in my initial post. As for John Stewart, yes, I find him both funny and, quite often, not far off the mark. There is most certainly a dark comedy going on there. You seem to be suggesting that he is my only (or, at least, favored) source of info. I chose to include his bit because I find it both amusing and informative and I wanted to share it. And I like him and this is my blog.
You seem to have issues that go far deeper than what I have written here. Again, you seem to have expectations that my blog should be something other than what it is. And you call having a point of view about which I (or anyone else) feel strongly a "disease." Interesting. A good disease to have, in my opinion. Yes, I believe people should feel strongly about issues. And they should converse, write, talk and share their opinions on issues that may, if not addressed, promote a racist, hateful mindset. What's happened here with the whole "mosque" issue has called out the elephant in the room which is that there are many people in this country who seem to equate Islam with terrorism. My opinion remains that there is no solid reason beyond misconception and fear in allowing the prevention of that community center being built. But, as I've said before, if there's another reason that I have somehow missed, that has yet to be expressed to me, I truly want to hear it.
But your rant here seems to be based in an anger toward me personally that, from where I stand, doesn't address much of anything. Your only opinion seems to be about me and others "like me." That said, please continue to post your thoughts. I welcome them. I will not, however, continue to respond unless you can offer me something of substance. If I am wrong in my opinions, if I am misguided, misinformed, delusional--any or all of the above-- please correct me and my thinking. Again, I am open to it. I desire it. But so far you've taken no stand, made no points, and argued only that I wave a dismissive magic wand.