Heather Michon

Heather Michon
Location
Virginia,
Birthday
June 25
Bio
Follow me on Twitter @heathermichon

MY RECENT POSTS

Editor’s Pick
MAY 28, 2009 3:00PM

Ignoring Queen and Country At Normandy

Rate: 14 Flag

What if you planned a commemoration of the 65th anniversary of the Allied invasion of Normandy and then forgot to invite the only living head of state who actually served in the War?

 

Second Subaltern Elizabeth Winsor

 


Among those not on the guest list for the commemorations in France on June 6 is Junior Commander Elizabeth Windsor of the Women's Auxiliary Territorial Service....better known as Her Majesty, Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God, of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and of Her other Realms and Territories Queen, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith.

The Queen is reportedly very upset that she did not receive an invitation to visit France during the anniversary -- as a head of state, protocol dictates that she can only go where officially invited -- and that her government was so haphazard in its planning for the event.  

Two days ago, the French government announced that she was "naturally welcome in her capacity as head of the British state," but did not follow up with an formal invitation. And even thought the Queen travels with a relatively small entourage, it would simply not be possible to work out the logistics of such a visit with little more than a weeks' preparation.

The French agenda has been clear from the beginning. Government spokesman Luc Chantel said last week that this was "first and foremost a Franco-American ceremony given the recent election of President Obama." The President is wildly popular in France, and Nicolas Sarkozy wants every opportunity to be photographed at his side. Mr. Sarkozy even used his speech at VE-Day commemorations in May to heap praise on Obama and the U.S. efforts during the War. Through no fault of his own, Barack Obama -- born in 1961 -- has thus become the focal point of the anniversary of the 1944 battle.

The British government accepted this with nary a whimper. (Officially, the country only participates in the 25th, 50th, 60th and 100th commemorations of historical events, but could be expected to join more fully in other meaningful anniversary years.) It made little or no diplomatic efforts to win an invitation for the Queen or any other Royal. It offered to cover the travel expenses of those veterans living on tight pensions only within the last few weeks, long after most ferries and hotels had fully booked up. The Normandy Veterans Association says that, as a result, at least 400 veterans will not be able to attend, and given the relative age of its membership, this is no small number.  Prime Minister Gordon Brown will be representing his country at the quiet British commemorations, "away," a French government source told the Daily Mail "from the American beaches, as is appropriate. This is very much a Franco-American occasion"

But here's the problem with the whole "Franco-American" thing: the Normandy invasion was an Allied effort. The 83,000 British and Canadian troops who stormed the Juno, Sword and Gold beaches represented more than half of those who landed that day. Of those 83,000, a total of 17,556 British and 5,316 Canadians died there. Poles, Belgians, Czechs, Greeks and Dutch forces also sent troops, while Norwegians contributed naval support and Australian and Kiwi planes patrolled the skies. All contributed, all suffered, and all deserve equal honors.

The failure of the French to invite the Queen is bad form, but forgivable. Marginalizing the role of the British forces is simply, utterly unforgivable.  The average age of British WWII veterans is 84. Their numbers dwindle by the day. So most of these gentlemen will not be around for the 70th anniversary, or the 75th. For many, this is the last opportunity to take part in a major commemoration of their sacrifices and the sacrifices of their comrades.

Hopefully, the White House will take note of this and assure that when the President speaks, he will honor all those who fought. And since he and the Queen got along so fabulously this spring, couldn't he stop by London and offer her a lift?

------

Like it? Reddit, Digg it, StumbleUpon it!     

    

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Could be a deliberate snub.
After all, a French sub smashed into a British sub in very, very suspicious circumstances last February.
You are quite right about the Allies and D-Day. American supremacy in Europe really began on June 7, when there only then more American troops on Normandy than the British, and even then the British were vital with Montgomery at Caen. rated, for an important remembrance of things past.
have you seen the Memorial in Viriginia. It needs to be finished completely, but is still moving, when you see those Allied flags.
I was there and had a horrible feeling when I saw those flags and was like, W in Iraq and Rumsfled's stupid comments have endangered so much for so little.
Could be a deliberate snub.
After all, a French sub smashed into a British sub in very, very suspicious circumstances last February.
You are quite right about the Allies and D-Day. American supremacy in Europe really began on June 7, when there only then more American troops on Normandy than the British, and even then the British were vital with Montgomery at Caen. rated, for an important remembrance of things past.
have you seen the Memorial in Viriginia. It needs to be finished completely, but is still moving, when you see those Allied flags.
I was there and had a horrible feeling when I saw those flags and was like, W in Iraq and Rumsfled's stupid comments have endangered so much for so little.
Makes you understand why the average American yahoo loathes the French so much. Ewww.
Well put, rated. Great photo of the Queen; somehow instantly recognizable and distinctive.
Too funny. At a time when the EU is still trying to convince the British to sign up, they snub the Queen and all the liberators of France. I guess they forgot all about the Battle of Brittan that kept the Germans at bay and laid the foundation for D-Day.
The daily mail offers two explanations.

1. It suggests it relates to the poor war time reputation of the family of the French President.

2. It suggests that making it a French American event would help him politically as President Obama is popular in France. In such a situation, they suggest, The French President would benefit fom being well photographed with Barak Obama. The links below are to the Daily Mail


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1189067/So-did-YOUR-dad-war-Sarkozy.html


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1189071/Stephen-Glover-A-diminutive-egomaniac-stain-Nazi-collaboration-French-forgive-saving-War.html
I am no monarchist (alright, I did have a Princess Diana tea mug and tea towel), this is a scandal. My father and uncles fought in the Royal Air Force (dear auld Dad), and to snub the Queen (she puts the Royal in RAF), is to snub British veterans.

I like lots of French things, but not this one.
Yikes. The French going all casual....a reigning Monarch "naturally welcome"?!?
Must be raining fire somewhere, mass hysteria, dogs and cats living together...
What's next, an e-vite?
Rated, especially as my grandfather was there on D+2.
So, who would be the party responsible? The French, for not inviting the Queen? Or the Brits, for not doing something about it sooner?

I guess it would have to go to the French, if you ask me. You can't invite yourself to an event. That wouldn't be right.

I guess things have really changed. If Bush were still President, does anyone doubt that perhaps the French would have invited his father but not him?
i LOVE the french, and i LOVE the brits. can't they all get along?
send a formal invite to liz, tell brown to go suck an egg, and tell barack and michelle to tell them they won't come unless queenie is there.

everyone busted their butts in WWII. let's not spoil it.
The French have always been an arrogant lot.
I don't think Australia has been invited,either.
It's like the rest of the world owes them thanks for the privilege of saving them.

As the great novelist Travenian put it:

"But one has to be fair; one has to understand the Gallic notion of resistance. Any hotelier who overcharged a German was in the Resistance. Each whore who gave a German soldier the clap was a freedom fighter. All those who obeyed while viciously withholding their cheerful morning bonjours were heroes of liberty!"
At a time when the EU is still trying to convince the British to sign up, they snub the Queen and all the liberators of France.

Erm, to be fair, the UK has been in the EU since the 1970s...and only after two previous snubs by (you betcha!) Charles de Gaulle. He believed British entry would be a trojan horse for American involvement in European integration.

RickyB, you're snubbing an entire country of nearly 65 million because of either the arrogance of one man (Sarkozy) or the cock-up of underlings beneath him.

I agree, this whole thing has been a farce. President Sarkozy should personally apologise to the Queen.
Oh, and PS: you've also got to recall that most of this information started thanks to the Daily Mail--and frankly, I'm not one to place too much currency on their rumour-mongering anyway.

The Press Association--by not just speculating on the Queen's personal feelings--gave the following not too long ago:

'A spokeswoman said: "Neither the Queen nor any other members of the royal family will be attending the D-Day commemorations on June 6 as we have not received an official invitation to any of these events. We would like to reiterate that we have never expressed any sense of anger or frustration at all, and are content with all the arrangements that are planned."'
She didn't have a deferment...she is not being ungracious here.
How cool would it be if Elizabeth II just crashed the party with her entourage, made a mess, and didn't pay for anything?

I know, I know--that's such a gross American celebrity thing to do. But she's over 80, damn it. Over 80, served in the war, she should be allowed to to anything she wants. Fuck 'em all if they can't take it.
Again, not really much of a story here. You can get a clearer picture here:



'In reality, we are told that there is no anger and no perceived snub. The Royal family had not expected to be invited and had not put out feelers, a senior British official told me. The Queen attended ceremonies in Normandy for the 50th and 60th anniversaries, but the 65th was not planned as an international event.'
What a fascinating story! Some many possible explanations, back room scenarios & conspiracies.
The only one that makes sense to me is this:
FRENCH: We fucked up! So sorry! Queen, please come - we will serve a fine claret and make your room oh so comfie!
BRITS: Thanks for the apology. We remember very clearly all the blood we left on your soil, first in the "Great War" and then of course WWII. We accept, because we are ever so polite and gracious! And because its nice to drop by and get your ass out of the fire a third time.
AMERICANS: Here's an 8x10 glossy of Michele & Barack. We are kind of busy now cleaning other fuckups, including but not limited to those we caused but could use both of your help in getting free of. Hope you have a wonderful party.
By the way, fine Euro-types. Wanna buy a car?
"RickyB, you're snubbing an entire country of nearly 65 million because of either the arrogance of one man (Sarkozy) or the cock-up of underlings beneath him."

Mmmm, but look me in the eye and tell me the shoe doesn't fit :)
Oh and please don't forget that the French have never forgiven us Brits for failing to get run over by the Germans in 1940.
RickyB, no. :)

'Oh and please don't forget that the French have never forgiven us Brits for failing to get run over by the Germans in 1940.'

Yes, there was a small thing called the English Channel... ;-)
OK, gentle readers, I did not mean for this to turn into a French-bashing thing. It's not. I think this is more specifically about the re-shaping of a historical narrative to fit modern political goals, at the expense of those who actually fought.

Whoever planned the June 6 commemorations did not take into account that time is marching by very quickly for the WWII generation, and they should still be first and foremost in any of these events.
I saw it as more about snubbing the monarchy than the Brits, though it could have been the latter, or both.

And I am DELIGHTED to see the queen "snubbed." The monarchy is a ridiculous institution and there's no place for it at a celebration of one of the great historical triumphs of/for Democracy. (ie, not a triumph of/for a privileged, hereditary ruling class. Ugh. Disgusting.)

If she wants to attend as an individual, fine, but if she were invited, the institution comes with her.

Hmmmmmm. This is getting lengthy. I better just go write a post about it.