The Little Buddy Child Tracker:
Keep tabs on your child at all times with this small but sophisticated device that combines GPS and cellular technology to provide you with real-time location updates. The small and lightweight Little Buddy transmitter fits easily into a backpack, lunchbox or other receptacle, making it easy for your child to carry so you can check his or her location at any time using a smartphone or computer. Customizable safety checks allow you to establish specific times and locations where your child is supposed to be — for example, in school — causing the device to alert you with a text message if your child leaves the designated area during that time. Additional real-time alerts let you know when the device's battery is running low so you can take steps to ensure your monitoring isn't interrupted.
Yours for just $99.99 from BestBuy.
Where to start? Well, how about here: if you stick a GPS tracker in your kid's backpack, you've just paid $100 to know where your kid's backpack is at all times. Or their lunchbox. Unless the "other receptacle" is their rectum, or you've somehow figured out how to staple the device to their forehead, you're not actually tracking your child's person.
And what happens if you kid wanders out of his or her "designated area"? Do you call the police? Drop what you're doing and race across town, only to learn that Junior traded backpacks with a classmate? What happens if the transmitter stays static for longer than it expect? Do you assume your child is lying dead in the schoolyard -- or that Princess left her kiddie lojack in her locker to go grab an unauthrorized latte with friends after school? The tracker gives you information without context, rendering it useless.
Devices like the "Little Buddy" play into the worst fears and darkest instincts of parents. This is essentially the same thing people attach to their dog's collar in case Fido jumps the fence. If a government agency were tracking your movements, you'd call it a violation of your civil rights; if a stranger or a pervert was doing it, you'd call it stalking. But a loving parent? No, you're just "monitoring" you child. You're just making sure they're safe.
It's tempting to launch into a diatribe about how, when I was a kid growing up, we didn't wear helmets or have cell phones or routinely wear seat belts, and we spent most of out time outside, frolicking like free-range squirrels. That's partially true.
The flip side of the story is more important. The spring before I turned 10, two 12-year old girls in a neighboring town were raped and beaten by two teenage boys as they walked home through a wooded area. One girl died that day, and her friend survived with horrible injuries. Two years after that, my former sixth grade teacher was shot and killed by her husband. A year after that, I was hit by a car while crossing a busy street to my bus stop.
These things mark us. How could they not? I internalized my parents' fear of what happened to those poor girls in the woods that day. Nearly 30 years after the fact my classmates and I still mourn the passing of our teacher. I still freak out a bit when I have to cross a busy street. But I've come to understand that a big part of growing up is learning that we are fragile and we are mortal. My father once pointed out to me that if we stopped to think about all the bad things that could happen to us on any given day, we'd never get out of bed.
In the spirit of full disclosure: no, I don't have children, and yes, if I did, maybe my perspective would be different. I don't think so. The loss of a child is awful even for us childless folk to contemplate, and it's natural to want to do everything you think you can do to prevent it. But since perfect safety is impossible, it makes more sense to teach our children to be aware of their surroundings and their limitations, say a prayer, and allow them to experience life in all its joys and all its tragedies.


Salon.com
Comments
BTW, that's what it feels like to be a parent.
It also means that parents have more anxiety to alot to each kid.
I agree with the spirit of this post, but in a world as (relatively) safe as suburban America, parents are always going to worry about those minimal risks that remain.
It is just evolution at work.
You know how kids want to be pierced? I wanted to make a piercing that was a tracking device, like the Animal planet shows, the kid gets what it wants and the parents get what they want. Win, win.
I have a teenager though so how about a device that makes him disappear until he's 19? I'd pay for that.
As the mother of three children, I am constantly on the defensive about being too lax with certain things. I know moms who stand at the bus stop with their 13-year-olds until the bus comes--and the bus stop is their driveway!
People always say, "it's a different world today," meaning things are a lot worse than in the past. But I don't buy it. I recently read a study saying that the statistics of kidnappings are relatively the same today as they were 30 years ago. It's the parents' fear that has changed.
I'm with you--be smart, have faith, and let the kids live their lives.
Amen to that! I live in SoCal now but my kids grew up in small cities in Wisconsin and Iowa. If I were to have kids now I think that I would be sorely tempted to move back to the Midwest in a small city where I know that I could still "turn my kids loose" and not worry so much about their "safety" from pedophiles, etc.
And, the only "solution" will be to go one step beyond what we do with dogs and that is to micro-chip kids with under the skin GPS devices. And then what? We'll still have the issues you talked about in your post.
Good thoughts. Thanks.
Well, welcome to the exception. I couldn't agree more with every single word you said. You beautifully capture the point that children (and adults) face hardships in spite of ourselves, and we grow from them and sometimes we die from them but mainly we can't control them and therefore we shouldn't disproportionately allow them to restrict our living. I think you're right on with this post, despite having no kids of your own.
To all would-be inventors: the big engineering hurtle with implantable GPS chips is a power source. So, before grabbing those tranquilizer darts, we'd have to come up with a way to recharge the chips off, what, chicken fingers, french fries, and pizza grease?
Lainey: thank you! I feel like you just gave me a gold star! :-)
Billy Glad: I understand what you're saying, but I respectfully disagree. Us childless folk have to live in the same society with what parents are raising. We all benefit from generations of healthy, self-confident, independent children. If you give a kid one of these devices, you're telling them that a) you don't trust them and/or b) they shouldn't trust the world. There are bad messages, and they foster the development of fearful -- or rebellious -- young adults.
Also, I would point out, there's a larger privacy issue here. Best Buy isn't going to be asking you to present your children before selling you this device. There's a big difference between a GPS-enabled phone, where you at least have to jump a couple of hoops and pay some extra money to activate it, and a flash-drive sized tracker that you can pick up on your way to the grocery store. There are very few situations where monitoring a human being via satellite is justified. It shouldn't be cheap and it shouldn't be easy.
I can see this being a good thing in a teen car (especially with a speeding function), but otherwise, it seems a bit paranoid.
This device does require activation and has a monthly fee. Personally, I think the cellphone is the better idea (and more useful to boot).