Live Free, Die Dumb: War on Education in New Hampshire
The 2012 legislative season is barely out of the gate, but New Hampshire has sprinted to the lead in crazy, potentially destructive lawmaking.
On Wednesday, the state's Tea Party-dominated House voted 255-112 and the Senate 17-5 to override Governor John Lynch's July veto of H.B. 542, a law which allows parents to demand alternative school curriculum for anything they find objectionable. Called the "Parental Conscience Act" by supporters, it throws down the welcome mat to every right-wing, anti-evolution, Holocaust-denying, New World Order conspiracy nutbag-with-child the Granite State.
Under H.B. 542, parents can reject everything from methodology to the topics and assigned readings covered in individual classes and direct their school district to provide their preferred system or text or belief.
"Even though the law requires the parent to pay the cost of alternative, the school district will still have to bear the burden of helping develop and approve the alternative," Gov. Lynch noted in his statement on his veto last summer. "Classrooms will be disrupted by students coming and going, and lacking shared knowledge."
Matthew Chingas, an educational fellow at the Brookings Institution, tells the International Business Times that Lynch and the bill's opponents may be over-estimating the bill's impact, saying that it all depends how the law in interpreted and it will really only be damaging if it's used by parents who have "squabbles" with specific subjects, like evolution or sex education.
But, of course, this bill was tailor-made for parents who want to engage in "squabbles" over evolution, sex education, and anything else that challenges their religious or political worldview.
The original bill arose out of a "squabble" between a student and his parents against his high school for making him read Barbara Ehrenreich's "Nickled and Dimed: On (Not) Getting By In America," for his personal finance course.
The family objected to her language and particularly to a passage where she writes: "It would be nice if someone would read this sad-eyed crowd the Sermon on the Mount, accompanied by a rousing commentary on income inequality and the need for a hike in the minimum wage. But Jesus makes his appearance here only as a corpse; the living man, the wine-guzzling vagrant and precocious socialist, is never once mentioned, nor anything he ever had to say. Christ crucified rules, and it may be that the true business of modern Christianity is to crucify him again and again so that he can never get a word out of his mouth."
When the school refused to ban the book, the family ultimately pulled their son out and are now homeschooling.
HB 542 essentially forces the self-designed curriculum of homeschooling to the public school system...and that's only part of the wider agenda of conservatives in New Hampshire. They are attempting to systematically gut one of the oldest public school systems in the United States.
For example, HB 542 originally contained a provision that would lift compulsory attendance regulations. That provision will be introduced as its own bill later this session. A failed bill last session would have let parents reduce their property taxes by taking their children out of the public school system; another would have lowered the age at which a child could legally drop out.
Pending bills seek to pull New Hampshire out of Federal funding for schools and to give businesses tax credits for establishing scholarships at private schools. A truly bizarre bill seeks to amend the state constitution to permit the state to stop funding the public schools and shunt funds to religious schools.
On the curriculum level, the multiple bills demanding the teaching of Creationism that failed last year will be back on the agenda for this year. Just yesterday, representatives unveiled HB 1148, requiring that the teaching of evolution include "the theorists' political and ideological viewpoints and their position on the concept of atheism."
The bill's sponsor, Rep. Jerry Bergevin, told the Concord Monitor that he wants "the full portrait of evolution and the people who come up with the ideas to be presented. It's a worldview, and it's godless." He managed to tie the teaching of evolution to the Communist menace, the Nazis, modern China, and the Columbine massacre.
Meanwhile, HB 1457 would require teachers to "instruct pupils that proper scientific inquire [sic] results from not committing to any one theory or hypothesis, no matter how firmly it appears to be established, and that scientific and technological innovations based on new evidence can challenge accepted scientific theories or modes." Which is true as a general scientific principle, but in this case is code for "intelligent design."
There will always be conflicts between parents and school districts over curriculum and philosophy and quality of education. But what's happening in New Hampshire is nothing less than a form of child abuse, pure and simple.
These are attempts to create an educational system where children are never exposed to ideas that challenge their thinking about what it means to be a citizen, or a churchgoer, or to have a sexual identity, or a link in an amazing chain of development that made us into beings that can argue about sex and politics and religion. It locks them from birth in a singular mindset that brooks no argument and allows no real intellectual growth. It doesn't just stop the teaching of evolution. It stops their evolution.


Salon.com
Comments
@Jonathan - I look forward to your take on it! You always have interesting stuff to share,
@Written - I know the feeling :-(
And private K-12 education was one of the biggest failures in American history, in every sense.
Rated.
In a democracy the people speak. Even those who are unqualified, and chaos ensues, as you pointed out.
Thank you for your post. It's enlightening.
r
Rated♥
Mass ignorance is much safer for those who fear the people and democracy and are obsessed with increasing their control and power.
I'll bet that many of the parents who want to have a choice in education are complaining about things like a one-sided view of "global warming" (there are reputable scientists, really, who disagree), or sex education with a moral imprint that is not suitable to their children, or the idea of emphasizing, say, that Tchaikovsky was "gay" when the average school kid is like five and could benefit more from an emphasis on classical music than sexuality. (For the "record", Tchaikovsky did not WANT his sexuality to be public knowledge, although he was not ashamed of it either. But, hey, why let personal privacy get in the way of a political opportunity?)
If taxpayers would give parents - whose job it is to educate their kids - the chance of leaving schools that are bad and/or do not share their values - you know, the types of schools that replace notes with numbers to find a new way to teach music (one of my nieces went to that one) they wouldn't need laws like this.
Vouchers anyone? Or are educational choices only for the rich?
And people who don't believe that slavery was a root cause of the Civil War.
Or in evolution.
Or that humans have ANY role in global climate change.
I personally know Republicans that don't believe women have the right to choose, or should have access to birth control.
I know Republicans who believe that homosexuality is evil and think that ALL Muslims are terrorists.
I know people who believe President Obama was born in Kenya despite all evidence and simple logic.
I even know a couple of people who think that Sesame Street is a government-funded boondoggle to indoctrinate children into Socialism.
I know people who believe that the contrails from planes cause disease and that FEMA is planning huge concentration camps for US citizens.
In short, there are a lot of people (of all political stripes) out there who believe in a lot of different, quirky, misogynistic, homophobic, unsubstantiated and just plain crazy things, and these are not people I want in the driver's seat in our public schools.
the curriculum hasn't actually been changed. its just that the new law makes it easier to opt into home schooling if a parent wants it.
is that correct?
so, is your post a rant against home schooling?
Having lived in the State of California for well over forty years and taught for the State for at least twenty years, I am heartened and encouraged by the programs that exist in New Hampshire Schools.
The conservative group that strives to pass negative amendments to our state constitution are sincerely in the minority. Like any other place, they will be radical individuals but those individuals are really in the minority.
This is about public schools being required to teach individual student a curriculum demanded by an individual parent.
You wrote --yeah, I have actually met a couple of Holocaust deniers in my time.
And people who don't believe that slavery was a root cause of the Civil War.
Or in evolution.-- (etc.)
How much do you want to bet that every single one of these people was a public school student?
Do you really think that, if a student has a creationist parent, his beliefs will be determined by whether he is homeschooled or goes to public schools? Somehow I find that idea implausible.
"But what's happening in New Hampshire is nothing less than a form of child abuse, pure and simple."
Wow. Based on actual evidence and reasoning, and too much experience, I tend to think that public schools are abusive. But you're the one who wants to lock kids up and force them to suffer through twelve years of unnecessary drudgery, so I guess that automatically means you don't support child abuse.
http://sudburyschooling.com/
Sorry, it's a strong statement. I can't help having a strong reaction.
I suspect they have not met many people on the right AND/OR traditional Christians or Jews.
There are, of course, Holocaust Deniers (and remember that Oliver Stone is came close to denying the Holocaust was HONOURED by Salon ) on the right AND left, but to imply that homeschooling parents are primarily of this bent is, I'd submit, slander.
So have I. Some on the left too. But my point is that implying this is the average home-schooling parent is absurd.
Author, "And people who don't believe that slavery was a root cause of the Civil War."
Me too. I've met them. They are nearly always on the left. But implying this is the average home-schooling parent is absurd.
Author - "Or in evolution. "
Yeah, I've met them too. I have no problem with evolution. But it is still a theory. I have no problem either if the schools teach about the controversy. But it is probably best for people who don't believe in it, evolution, to just pull their kids from that class. I'd never do that - but they ain't my kids.
Author " Or that humans have ANY role in global climate change." Yep, there are people who believe that. Some of them very good scientists. I'd bet you've never met a leftist who thinks those scientists should be discussed in public schools.
Author, "I personally know Republicans that don't believe women have the right to choose, or should have access to birth control."
SO? You thought there was no controversy about abortion? Been on an island? Don't think parents should pass on their values to their kids? You teach yours that you like the right to choose, and others will teach the opposite.
I'm sure there are people who don't believe in birth control - although even the Catholics simply don't believe in ARTIFICIAL birth control - but maybe this is a reason you (and the left) as well as they (and the right) should not be in control of this issue IN SCHOOLS and that parents - remember them (?) - should handle this, or not, on their own.
I know Republicans who believe that homosexuality is evil and think that ALL Muslims are terrorists.
On homosexuality - some Democrats think that too. It is their right. They also have the right to pass it on to their kids. Sorry, I don't maybe like it, but there you go.
And I have never met anyone who thought all Muslims are terrorists. But I've met plenty on the left who believe Islamic terror (which usually kills Muslims first, by the way) is not a problem really.
Author "I know people who believe President Obama was born in Kenya despite all evidence and simple logic."
Yeah, that is dumb. But I know people on the left who think JFK was killed by pretty much anyone other than L. Oswald acting alone and that is also despite OVERWHELMING evidence and simple logic. (Many also believe 9/11 was a government plot. ) Yet their wacky ideas here would not be questioned by you I suspect if they wanted to homeschool or influence the curricula.
And on and on - my point is that someone on the right - or just tradition-minded - is painted with the broad brush of "HOLOCAUST DENIER" if they want to homeschool and that is, well, slanderous. The average home-schooling parent probably just wants to get away from leftist baloney and have their kid actually learn something. Or so they believe. Are they right? I think so. You can think they are wrong. But please, EVIL? Holocaust Deniers? Quit already with the demonization. It is so old.