Heather Michon

Heather Michon
Location
Virginia,
Birthday
June 25
Bio
Follow me on Twitter @heathermichon

Editor’s Pick
MARCH 27, 2012 11:20AM

No Table For Helen Thomas?

Rate: 6 Flag

Helen Thomas at 2010 WHCA DinnerIn late February, Helen Thomas wrote a letter to the board of the White House Correspondents Association.

"As the first woman president to preside over the WHCA, and one of a few women who were instrumental in successfully convincing President Kennedy to boycott the dinner, it is very important to me to celebrate the 50th anniversary of this monumental feat with my family and close friends this year."

 "I was told that past presidents are entitled to 2 tickets, and that because I retired from working at the White House when I was 90 years old, I am no longer eligible to purchase the table I have had for years. Even though I have retired, I continued to write a weekly column for the Falls Church New Press," she continued.

"I would appreciate -- particularly this year as we celebrate the 50 year anniversary of women being admitted to the WHCA dinner -- to share this celebration with my family and close friends one last time."

The argument apparently found little support in the ranks of the WHCA. Current president Caren Bohan of Reuters tells the Huffington Post that "the board decided in 2010 to set a policy that, as a courtesy to past presidents only, they would be eligible to purchase two tickets even if they are no longer covering the White House. Usually, people need to be members of the WHCA to purchase tickets on behalf of their news organizations."

The WHCA has every right to set the rules for their events, and since the annual April gala has become one of the hottest tickets in town, those rules have had to get tighter and tighter to accommodate bigger and bigger names.

Yet, in a year when the still unsettled status of women in society has been so present in the public mind, it seems tone-deaf not to yield to Thomas’s request to celebrate a milestone in WHCA history.

When Thomas joined the White House beat in 1960, she and her fellow female reporters were welcome to pay their annual $2 dues to the WHCA, but they were barred from attending the annual dinner.

As with all-male bastions like the National Press Club, the dinner was one of those places where Washington newsmakers and journalists drank and smoked and gossiped and passed along those tips that made for above-the-fold stories in tomorrow’s early edition.    

Thomas and her some of her female colleagues wanted in to that elite group, and in the spring of 1962 went directly to President Kennedy to argued that “he should not attend the dinner if we couldn’t.” Kennedy agreed, and for the first time in 42 years, women were allowed to join.

Contrary to the fears of her male counterparts, the world did not come to an end, and a dozen years later Thomas became the first female president of the organization. She’s one of only nine women to hold the post in the group’s 98-year history. 

Since the purpose of the dinner is to "acknowledge award-winners, present scholarships, and give the press and the president an evening of friendly appreciation," it would seem that giving a little extra space for Thomas to celebrate her professional achievement would not be a hardship. After all, the ballroom at the Washington Hilton seats around 3,000 people.

But the logic seems to go something like this: sell some extra seats to Thomas, and where does Uggie, the dog from The Artist, sit?

Over the last decade, the “nerd prom” of yesteryear has turned into the Charles Atlas of Washington galas. Media outlets buy out whole tables and try to one-up another in packing those precious seats with superstar behinds.

And those toned backsides are increasingly happy to join. “It's a fashionable fly-in for Hollywood types who need a red carpet to be photographed on between Coachella and Cannes,” the Washington Post’s Reliable Source blog noted in 2010. Pre-parties and after-parties have almost outshadowed the main event, and there are probably as many celebrities in attendance as actual reporters.

This could be looked at as a sign that the media, politicians and celebrities have turned into a single megalopolis. The United States of Clooney. It could also be a sign that most DC journalists are, in fact, giant nerds who go bonkers over the idea of meeting Steve Buscemi. Either way, it has increasingly little to do with honoring one’s peers. 

This year’s dinner is about a month away, and the WHCA could well change its mind. At the very least, one hopes they have the grace to acknowledge those women who first fought for their place at those tables.

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
And of course this is in no ways retaliation for Ms. Thomas' statements regarding Israel and the Palestinians. :rolleyes:
Having met Helen in my Washington days, I would say she should be invited, based on her legacy in the press. However, the controversy stirred by her might be the reason she is being left out of the table situation. She can still purchase two tickets and is welcomed to do so. In light of her letter to the board, her age, and her past service, the refusal regarding the table is unsettling. It makes its own statement of prejudice, to her statement regarding Jews and Israel in the past. Does that make it a correct action? Here is her letter to them:

"As the first woman president to preside over the WHCA, and one of a few women who were instrumental in successfully convincing President Kennedy to boycott the dinner, it is very important to me to celebrate the 50th anniversary of this monumental feat with my family and close friends this year.
Please refer to the statement on the WHCA website, "Until 1962, the dinner was open only to men even though the membership included women. That changed when, at the prodding of Helen Thomas of UPI, President John F. Kennedy said he would not attend the dinner unless the ban on women was dropped."

I was told that past presidents are entitled to 2 tickets, and that because I retired from working at the White House when I was 90 years old, I am no longer eligible to purchase the table I have had for years. Even though I have retired, I continued to write a weekly column for the Falls Church New Press.

I would appreciate -- particularly this year as we celebrate the 50 year anniversary of women being admitted to the WHCA dinner -- to share this celebration with my family and close friends one last time."
While I abhor Ms. Thomas' statements abt Jews and Israel, I do think she should be offered a seat at the 50th anniv celebration.

r.
Great coverage as always, Heather.
Another quote from that article might add some light to this non-controversy. As it happens, other past-presidents - and others - have not been allowed to purchase a table.
Before respondents here accuse the WHCA board of being Zionist tools, they might look at the Board and trace their prior comments.

"Reuters' Caren Bohan, the current WHCA president, explained in an email to The Huffington Post why Thomas would not be granted her own table at the event.

“The board decided in 2010 to set a policy that, as a courtesy to past presidents only, they would be eligible to purchase two tickets even if they are no longer covering the White House," Bohan wrote. "Usually, people need to be members of the WHCA to purchase tickets on behalf of their news organizations."

The White House Correspondents Association dinner is the one event each year for which Hollywood descends on Washington D.C., making it a very tough ticket to get.
Demand has only increased in recent years as new media outlets have begun making requests for tables in the already jam-packed ballroom. It's not uncommon for news organizations to get offered fewer tables than requested.

Julie Mason, a Sirius XM host and secretary of the WHCA, said it would be "logistically impossible" to allow every past WHCA president to get their own table. '
And, of course, she is attending with a friend- she is just not allowed to purchase an entire table.
This might have been made clearer in the article posted here - as it was in the HuffPost article from which is was copied.
I think she deserves a seat at the event, considering her legacy in the field.
Just to clarify a couple of points:

I personally don't think this has much to do with Helen's past comments as much as an attempt to keep tables open for media outlets.

But it's still sad. Thomas is not asking for a table for FREE - she's asking to buy a table at $125+ a head. One of the main reasons they have this event is to raise money for journalism scholarships, so it really shouldn't matter if it Thomas and her friends or a WaPo editor and the cast of Glee (or whatever people watch these days).

I also find Julie Mason's statement that it would be "logistically impossible" to allow every past WHCA president to get their own table, because I doubt that "every past WHCA president" has asked for one.

All that aside, the bottom line is that Thomas is going to be 92 years old in August. She knows this is probably her last visit to the dinner, and it's a meaningful one for her. I wish the WHCA, which she was a member of for more than fifty years, could show a little sensitivity to that.
Oops, left out a word or two:

I also find Julie Mason's statement that it would be "logistically impossible" to allow every past WHCA president to get their own table slightly ridiculous, because I doubt that "every past WHCA president" has asked for one.
Helen Thomas is an institution in and of herself. The WHCA should allow, in light of both Ms. Thomas' age and the significance of the anniversary, her to attend this dinner. All the reasons listed in the article were very well thought out.
I will repeat again - for those who don't read all the comments - Helen Thomas does have a seat at the banquet, in fact she has two. Her request to buy a table of ten was turned down. She has the right to buy two, and has, because she is a past-president of the organization.
And you Traveler, who sees anti semitism under every rock and bush, now can conceive of the ideal that the opposite could be happening.

Interesting that is.