.

Heather Ryan

Heather Ryan
Location
Eugene, Oregon, US
Birthday
December 20
Bio
"Imagine," says writer TK Dalton, "a knocked up Bookslut, Salam Pax with a dead beat ex instead of Raed. That's Terrible Mother." She's also a quick-thinking, smart-mouthed single mother to three kids. By day, she teaches writing to college freshmen and sophomores. By night, she cooks, cleans, parents and writes. She is, despite vehemently claiming to be one, not a hipster, but does have an MFA in Fiction from the University of Oregon, which she earned by duct-taping her children to chairs and feeding them bottles of Benadryl (not necessarily in that order). Terrible Mother still lives in Oregon, where she deals her snarky brand of parenting humor to her friends. "Another single mother blog?" says novelist Roby Connor. "Someone get this lady some Jesus."

MY RECENT POSTS

Editor’s Pick
SEPTEMBER 11, 2008 11:56AM

In Which I Attempt to Make a Discussion of Taxes Interesting

Rate: 28 Flag

Last year, I spent a little over $13,000 on childcare. I know this, because I have my tax documents sitting on the desk. My adjusted gross income was a few hundred dollars shy of 27k. This figure doesn’t include either the SSI I receive for Ivan ($617 a month for 2007) or the child support I receive ($415 a month*). Even with those figures included, though, I spent a third of my gross income on childcare.

There is a story waiting to be written about the costs of good quality childcare, and the fact that, as outrageous as it seems, the amount I paid for the care my kids received was reasonable. There’s a story waiting to be written about how childcare providers are not making money hand-over-fist, either. And a story about how, according to the wonderful Katha Pollit, childcare in America is “for women—women who if middle-class shouldn’t have jobs and if low-income shouldn’t have kids.”

This is, instead, about something murkier and more problematic, an issue that often inspires sleep rather than outrage. It’s about bureaucracy used as a weapon.

Late winter of this year, I gathered up all my tax documents and moseyed down to my accountant. And by “accountant” I mean the guy I always see at H&R Block. He’s good, a younger guy who can explain things really well. He’s also got a super sense of humor and laughs at my jokes. I make it a point to see him every tax season. This year he spent some time explaining what kinds of things I could deduct as a writer, and what I should do to take more of them next year. He explained the rules of about the use of a home office and a computer. He high-fived me when I mentioned the book I’m working on and we joked about the various ways I could fandangle a movie deal out of something I would write (“How about Roseanne meets Jack-Ass?” “I feel like that might be gauche, don’t you? “All I’m saying is you can’t say it’s been done before!”).

It's Tax Time!

One of the things we do during these yearly meetings is discuss my childcare expenses. First year I went to him, back when I was in the midst of the divorce and Giselle was still in pre-school, I shook my head as he entered the childcare amounts into the computer.

“What?” he asked.

“It’s so high,” I said.

Rob looked through some of my papers, thought for a moment, and then said, “it isn’t, really. Three kids, one of them full-time. A lot of people spend more.” He typed a few more numbers, and then added, “And Ivan is disabled, right? You can’t just send him anywhere.”

He was right. Ivan is autistic, and even a “mild” autistic like Ivan needs well-trained caregivers and a low teacher-kid ratio. He needs structure and a way to escape over-stimulation—which are hard criteria to meet at “lower end” daycares. The places the kids have gone are all part of the university where I attended school and now work. In essence, they are subsidized in small and large ways by the university, and they have better resources at a lower cost because of it.  I wasn’t overspending on childcare; I was getting a deal.

This year, Rob and I discussed the fact that while the childcare cost was high, it represented a good chunk of full-time care for three kids, something I wasn’t going to have to do this summer. Rob also said, “You’ll get a lot of this back. The Working Family Credit** is really for people like you.”

Which is what we both thought. In the previous year, for my 2006 taxes, my refund had been held up significantly because the state of Oregon demanded I send proof of payment. I had included in my return documents from my childcare providers showing the amount I paid. Despite this, I had to send further proof, in the form of an accounting sheet of every single charge made to my account, and every payment. My childcare providers keep records like this, and the office managers printed them up, signed them, and we sent them in.

This year, as Rob and I finished up my return, he thumbed through the childcare expense paperwork. The kids had gone to two centers, but had spent the most time at one, and I had asked the office manager to print up a break down of charges by child, and by type of charge, and then sign it. Rob looked over it now, and said, “They’re going to flag it anyway.”

“Why?”

“It’s what they do. They flag almost all of the Working Family Credit returns now.”

He was right. Months later, I received a letter from the Oregon Department of Revenue. Not only was the information I had provided not enough, it wasn’t even within the realm of what they now demanded. They wanted a copy of every single check I had written to a childcare provider for the year. They also wanted a copy of every single bank statement for the year, and on said bank statements, every corresponding check had to be highlighted.

It might be a good time to point out that my childcare providers were all part of the University of Oregon. Also known as the State of Oregon. Also known as a relative of the agency who was committing the childcare expense version of the Spanish Inquisition. In essence, if a state agency can issue a document detailing expenses, and a state employee can sign said document, and then another state employee can cast considerable doubt upon the veracity of said document, then we’ve got a problem, Houston. That isn’t just the basis of this small system; it’s the basis of the entire government! That’s how it freakin’ works, for god’s sakes! People sign documents and they send them and if you need more of a verification YOU CALL THEM. What, are we back in the Stone Age now?

The only reasonable assumption from this behavior is that the state simply doesn’t want to make good on these refunds. Rob the Accountant repeated this in idea and spirit several times. “Everyone gets these flagged. And a lot of people just can’t get everything together to get their money.”

Even knowing the system was trying to screw me and not make coffee in the morning, I had a hard time tracking down all of that paperwork. Most of the bank statements were in one place, but the going through all the duplicate checks was something approaching a nightmare. By this time, spring term was in full swing. I was working full-time teaching 74 students, and some weeks I approached the 60-hour mark. I ran the kids around, took them to soccer or friends’ houses or the dentist. I sat on the Parent Teacher Council, working to keep our neighborhood school open. I wrote a handful of essays for a few jobs. I, essentially, tried to live three lives at one time while gathering tax information for the Department of Revenue.

I am now convinced there’s a special section of Hell where one has to do this, forever and ever. Because it sucked, and sucked mightily.

And it meant that the documents didn’t all get compiled until early August. I had to go over them several times to make sure they were all there, and I was forced to go to my bank for two statements that I could not locate. I spent an epoch searching for two checks that I never found the duplicates for, but decided that, in the end, this lack of evidence would only result in a potentially smaller refund.

Not what I'm spending my rebate on

In the interim, though, the State of Oregon had changed my refund. From $5716 to $300. The letter, which I had to read several times, said I could appeal the decision, though.

I took all of my information down to my tax office. Rob was on a long vacation, which meant another accountant helped me. There was a 30-day window for appeal, and we were near the end of it (the smaller refund had come while I was gone at my writing retreat). We faxed over the appeal.

And I never heard anything else.

Yesterday, I called the Oregon Department of Revenue. The guy who helped me said there wasn’t anything in the records about my appeal and fax, but that there wouldn’t be because “[they] don’t keep records like that.”

“But,” I said, “how do you know if you’ve received something from a taxpayer?”

“Oh, it comes through the system eventually. But it’s never, like, noted on the file until a decision has been made.”

“But, what about the deadlines people have to meet?”

“Did you send yours in before the 30 days?”

“Yeah.”

“Well, it should be fine. I mean, like, I can’t confirm it’s here or anything. But as long as you trust your accountant…”

“How long will it take to go through?”

“Oh, lots of people are in the same boat as you are. We’re backed up. So about 3-4 months.”

On the letter I received from the Department of Revenue was the notation that after 30 days, I could only appeal through the Oregon Tax Court, and only by requesting a complaint form. I had 120 days to file that documentation if an appeal hadn’t been received. If one had, then it was 90 days. Essentially, if I waited to see if the Oregon Department of Revenue had received the documents and appeal, and if they lost it, or misplaced it, or it wasn’t received, then I’d likely lose my rights for appeal, and, as the final sentence of the letter said all “adjustments [would be] final.” In my case, that would be a loss of $5,416.

“I’m supposed to trust that you’ll process it on time and that you even have it now?”

“I’m sure if your accountant sent it, we have it. I just can’t confirm it.”

“You’re asking me to take an awfully large gamble. If I trust your office, and I’m wrong, the time for appeal will pass, and I’ll have no recourse.”

“You can fax it to me,” he said, “but I’ll just route it to the right person.”

“It’s already past the 30 days for the original method of appeal. Faxing it to you won’t help if you hadn’t received it.”

He paused. “Oh. Yeah. I hadn’t thought of that.”

I submit, for the record, that the only thing worse than hearing “I hadn’t thought of that” from the Tax Guy is “Uh-oh, I think the condom broke.” Not that I know or anything.

I hung up shortly thereafter and promptly called the Oregon Tax Court’s Magistrate Division, the place where I’ll have to file an appeal. A complaint form is headed to my hot little hands as we speak, and I imagine that it will again suck, and suck mightily, to complete it.

This is a fairly dull tale, except for the specific elements which provide the drama. One, when your adjusted gross income is $27k, $5,700 is a lot of money. I’ve been dreaming of that money, needing it desperately. My Subaru has 207,000 miles on it, is dripping oil like a penguin off the shore of Alaska, and is 17 years old. I have no computer of my own. I’m behind on everything. That money—it was what I’ve counted on all these months to help with a few big ticket items that I’d have an impossible time buying otherwise.

More than that, the summer is winding down, in its own brutal way. I have three weeks before my first paycheck comes in again. I have money out there funneling slowly toward me for writing, but it’s taking forever. Rent is overdue. The electricity bill is overdue. Ivan’s medical bills will surely start rolling in soon, and I’m hoping that the combination of my insurance and the state insurance he’s on (because of his disability) will cover all or most of it. That refund is not some “charity;” it’s mine. And I can’t get to it, no matter what I do. That’s the rub here: explaining the circumstances is time consuming and difficult and dry, and a little boring. But the consequences of what is happening are huge.

I keep thinking, too, of what I’ve been told about these credits. Rob, my accountant, who tells me that the state simply makes it harder and harder for these taxpayers to get their refunds every year. Eric, the tax guy who noted, with no small amount of nonchalance, the numbers of people who are “in the same boat” I am. How many people would have sufficiently meticulous records for childcare costs? How many people who make $27,000 even hire an accountant who could help them? How many of these people just either don’t understand or don’t have the resources to meet these demands? The state of Oregon is engaging in robbery made possible by a confusing and irresponsible bureaucracy. It’s not a sex scandal in the Oval Office, or a pregnant teenager, but it’s affecting thousands of families. I imagine that other families in other states face the same kinds of problems, something everyone should be concerned with.

*hr***

*John is mandated by the state to pay $415 a month in child support, but has, for about a year, paid $475. I pleaded for extra money to cover the kids’ asthma medications and whatnot.

**Working Family Credits are in many states in similar forms. In Oregon, it allows a family who qualifies to get up to 40% of what they paid in childcare costs back.

***Am I a glutton for punishment for contining to talk the poverty talk? I might be. But it's all I think about now, and probably will think about for the next month or so, until we're out of it.

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
As close to making tax-talk riveting as anyone has ever come.

I hold that talking the poverty talk needs to happen. I do think you should forward a copy of this blog entry to our state representative. And you should steel yourself for the reaction of the interwebs, who will surely agree not with Pollit's critique, but with the spirit of what she was critiquing.
$13K on child care? I'm spending close to $40K on child care this year. Sixty percent of my take home pay goes to the babysitter and her share of the taxes.
My husband has this theory that part of the consequences of the anti-government government we now enjoy is that they are eroding their own systems from the inside out to do exactly what you've described here in this kafkaesque situation: complicate every procedure to wear people down so they'll just give up. It's maddening that you have to prove and reprove and reprove again that for which you have perfectly suitable proof. Please keep talking about these things. It's important to document what's happening to the country.
Good Lord Heather, no wonder some people go postal. I got angry reading this, really angry and I'm not in Oregon and not connected by blood or marriage. As good as this is, HR, I hope it doesn't get ported over to RegularSalon so you won't have to endure people telling you to get a better paying job and quit complaining.
I'm told that the situation is similar with ssi claims: every claim is denied at first. If you persist, they'll let you be seen (and possibly denied again).

Having a case isn't good enough. There are large swaths of the government that just don't want to live up to the rules, and so they don't.

My money is on Undertow's husband's theory being correct.

It is helpful to remember that in SOME countries, governments actually do live up to their own laws. Alas, we just ended up with a lemon.
As I read of the Kafkaesque system you had to go through I couldn't help thinking about companies like Halliburton that have overcharged the federal government and received no-bid contracts, etc. which runs contrary to the rules. I imagine a lot of other state governments handle any situation like yours in a similar fashion which makes for a lot of wide spread hardship with the onerous paperwork and the long waiting period for any refunds.
Thank you, Heather. I am angry on your behalf, and I am sending as many positive vibes as I can to you and your family (and sending a few barbs to the ignorant bureaucrats).
bbd: So, the Corporate Clones who comment on Regular Salon want everyone to get a "good job" like they have and be as miserable as they are, just so they won't hear us whining about being poor? To them: "Getting those robotic parts greased lately?"
Wow, just think what it would be like to have the government take over the healthcare system...
You dog, McGarrett!

Heather--so sorry. And it makes sense that someone living in poverty can think of nothing else. Don't apologize for it.

I just wanted to say, and I know you address this in your post a bit, that those on the child-care provider end are facing similar issues. It's ironic, isn't it? I've thought about going into the business--I'm good, to be honest, and have all kinds of ideas about how to really provide good care. I've been teaching for years, and I have three kids of my own who are getting older, and I thought, "You know what? The thing I've done best from beginning to end, is raise kids. I love them at every age, including very young, and I'd do things that other places don't, like take them hiking around the nearby lake, and fossil hunting, and sled riding, and to the historical village nearby. It would be so different from the storefront, warehouse-looking, childcare chains around here."

But guess what? I couldn't afford to do it. The cost of insurance, the amount people are willing (or able) to afford: I just couldn't make it work.

Women's work. It just doesn't pay.
To be fair (@McGarrett and undertow): the experiences I've had that are closest to this are ones with insurance companies about paying for health care. So, it's really not about government incompetence. Or at least, the government does not have a monopoly on it.
You make taxes interesting because your writing is excellent. It inspired me to open an account to tip because well I want to. But apparently I can't for two days.

I'll be back. I do hope the situation improves for you. I know what you do for a living and it is not for the fainthearted.
Outstanding article. It is truly a shame that great work like this is not rewarded with the typical $250 Salon payment. This is better than anything I've read on Salon in a couple weeks.
Well, *^#)_. I feel like kicking something or shooting someone on your behalf.

I second Mike on the forward a copy to our state rep. Heck, try for an op-ed piece in the Oregonian.
I feel the need to say "holy shit". That's totally out of control. We don't qualify for any of the credits, but I always assumed that the people who needed them would be able to get them.

Now I'm vicariously pissed.
Excellent post, and my apologies for your trials. Taxes make me hyperventilate.

And by the way, THIS is what should be talked about in this election, not some (I'm holding back rather mightily here)
l-i-p-s-t-i-c-k. (exhale breath and breathe...)

You need your own national ad, and at the end the tag should be:

"We are the American People and We Approved This Message...Now DO Something About It!"
@EasyWind- you are correct about SSI/SSDI. They deny everyone. Then you have to wait a year or more for a hearing in front of an administrative law judge. And after that? You can try to appeal, but you can't appeal on the merits, only on a legal argument.

And here's the real burn: the Gov't has consistently reduced the funding for SSI and SSDI- but kept the qualification level the same. So SSI and the ALJs have pressure to not approve as many applications because the funding isn't there. So people who clearly qualify for SSI and SSDI under the disability standards are routinely not approved just because there isn't enough money to go around.
Undertow--that's a pretty solid theory. I hadn't thought about it before, but it does make sense. In America, too, there's this weird sense, especially prevalent among goverment workers, that if you're trying to "use the system" you're somehow suspect. Even if that system was set up for use. By you.

Bbd, I'm frustrated for sure, but it's so little help to be angry. I am going to write an email this afternoon to my state reps and senators, with a link to this piece. Maybe that will help. But when taking on any sort of government agency, let alone one associated with revenue, it's almost impossible.
Easy wind, we ended up getting SSI for Ivan and it was difficult, but I think at that point, he was much more autistic (whatever that means) and so it was easier than it would be now. I've heard similar stories from people. Maybe it was just that I was so persistant and because I really had good documentation for it. But I do recall that it was a nightmare.

Hi Designator. One of the difficult things about this situation is that I *know* full well that other branches of the government don't require their "customers" to jump through the hoops that I am. It's infuriating.

Lairdeg, thanks for the well-wishes.

McGarrett--I know you meant this as a great side comment, and I think it is, because we have to consider how our government would run something like healthcare. Although Lainey makes an excellent point: right now, health insurance companies are giving the government a run for their money in the "kafkaesque scenarios" they require members to act in. Would it be any worse if the government ran it?

Americans are weird about government and, relating back to what undertow said, I think it shows in the way these programs are adminstrated.
Lainey--I know that childcare providers don't have an easy time of it at all. I used to think they must be making good money, but the reality is that they aren't. I sat on one of the childcare center's board of directors for awhile, as the treasurer no less, so I learned pretty quick how financially stretched even really excellent, well-cared for child care centers are.
Dorinda, thanks for the kind words. What we both do (teach writing) is definitely not for the fainthearted. And thanks, too, Ulrich, though I'm not sure this piece is Salon-worthy quite yet. I appreciate the compliments though.

And, everyone, you should all know that Laurie is the reason I even have use of a laptop. I'm thinking, LLD, that Mike is right (loathe as I am to admit it in public).
Anger is good, labrat. It will get me through filling out that damned appeal for the Oregon tax court.

OREGON TAX COURT! Even writing that phrase makes me wonder what damn planet on I'm on where *I* need to go to a TAX COURT!

KEB, I agree. Since the Palin Incident, as I am calling it, there's been so much less in the way of true discussion of the issues. The federal government just bailed out Fanny and Freddy in an attempt to prevent another Great Depression from happening, and we're talking about Palin's hotness? That makes me want to bury my head in my hands.

Kirs--thanks for posting that tidbit re: SSI. I hadn't realized that before, but it makes sense.
Okay, I have, for the first time ever, replied to everyone's comments on a blog entry.

I did this because Mike always does and HE CANNOT WIN.

Or something.
Damn, girlfriend, awfully well done. Not just clear prose, but the way it just kinda kept going, piling on, one incomprehensible indignity after the next. If you write fiction, you should be good to, 'cause making a tax story this engaging ain't easy.

You succeeded, I think, because although the context is taxes and childcare, it's a story about people, mostly one hard working mom.

There were a few years as a non-custodial dad that I paid about 60% of gross to child care (it was called pre-school with extended aftercare). Lots of rice. The system is nuts, and it is gamed. To paraphrase the preface to Christopher Lasch's final book, it doesn't take much looking around to see how hostile our society is to children and those who care for them.

Peace.
My grandson lives in Portland with his folks. His mommy pays child support to the father of his half brother. They extract this from her check directly.

He is only 8 years old, so Summer programs are a must for kids his age and he attends a pretty good one with arts programs that are strong and field trips that are engaging. He spent 5 weeks in two visits to our house this Summer as well. I don't know how much money this saved his folks, but I can imagine that it was a lot, judging by their gratitude for our willingness to have him here with us. I don't think they could afford three kids in programs at once. I can't imagine the expense of it.

I do know that they have run into similar hold ups in refunds from the State of Oregon. I also know that Lainey is not alone in experiencing incredible arguments, delays and red tape with Insurance companies. I don't think this is a problem that is confined to the categories that we usually think of as government operated or privately operated. I think this is the kind of attitude that is reflected in large entities whether they be public agencies or private corporations. It's the insulation of the largeness and the hopelessness of not feeling like what one does can change the environment. Those folks just hand out the same familiar hopelessness they have internalized, it is the air that they breathe and they are not aware of it, they just think that this is the way that it is and that it will continue to be. It's pretty depressing and I am sorry it gets into your life. It sounds like your life is challenging enough.
Unfortunately this kind of nonsense goes on all the time. My husband and I adopted 2 special needs kids from China. ( both with bilateral clubfoot, one with also a mild form a spina bifida)

The state of Maryland offers $2000 per special needs child, so times 2 that's a sizable sum in our income bracket, not to mention that the 2 adoptions cost over $30, 000. However, Maryland won't grant the funds unless you provide a "certificate of abandonment" 6 weeks prior to the adoption finalization. The problem with that is, unlike the U.S., China doesn't provide that document until you sign papers in China, and this has always been the case. The Maryland gov't knows this. So - NO child adopted from China can receive this money.

Ever.

I wrote all my state Reps and I didn't even get a response. With all the demands on our time from the adoption process I wasn't able to pursue the issue any further.

In addition - the much touted federal "Adoption Tax Credit" is nonsense for anyone in our bracket as well. After claiming all of our usual deductions, we got back a grand total of $333 of an eligible $14,000 per child. At least we have 2 good health insurance policies that will pay for our little girl's spinal surgery that she's having later this week at Johns Hopkins.

Forget about childcare or even an occasional babysitter . It just isn't possible.

Ooh - that was rather long winded, sorry!

Thank you for the post, these things need to be discussed.
It's interesting that the government is paying people to deny apparently valid claims. At least I think bureaucrats are people too, but I might be wrong on this point. And they use the same kinds of tactics as insurance companies. That's why they're called bureaucrats rather than public servants (unless you mean the type that serve themselves at the public expense).

For someone who is struggling this doesn't seem like very productive use of your time. All of that wasted time could be put to better use. Is this a new method to increase GDP that I'm not aware of?

I would hope that someone takes an interest in your situation. Maybe someone at your university. Maybe someone at a publishing house. At the risk of stating the obvious, it's real hard to make it as a single mom on that salary. But I want to believe that someone is going to look at your character, see your value, and give you a chance. The most disguting thing is to feel sorry for you and look the other way.
this isn't boring. your story is the king lear story of our day. why are women forced to carry such a huge load in paying for child care when this is something the state should help with. And it's revolting beyond belief that they are auditing people like you on purpose. Is this the republican government's idea of a joke?

I'm so sorry.
of course i mean king lear in the sense of tragedy...not really the specifics. just grabbing for a generic big name tragedy and that one came up. ergh. They don't properly audit corporations with offshore tax shelters now, but they audit families filing for a refund on the money they spend on childcare. I still can't get my brain around it.
Definitely do not quit the poverty talk. So many working adults are in the same boat like you and should not be treated so cavalierly by our government agencies. I say if you pay taxes on time then we're due the same speedy treatment when it comes to receiving our refunds too. No stalling and unfair deadlines.
I Hope you get your refund quickly.