There are 10 vaccines that are on the American Academy of Pediatrics vaccine schedule for children under 5 years old. Those vaccines are:
Hep B, HIB, Pc (Prevnar), DTaP, Rotavirus, Polio, MMR, Chickenpox, Hep A, Flu
This is our schedule: HIB, DTaP, Polio, MMR, Flu (w/o thimerosal). Hep B @ 10-13 and Chickenpox @ 13 if not yet acquired immunity naturally.
Why?
In my opinion, HIB, DTaP, Polio and MMR are pretty clear cut life-saving vaccines. Flu is a necessity as both of my kids are in day care and as of this winter, I will be working in the medical field. I don't want to get my patients sick. Vaccinating the kids against flu will help cut down my exposure.
Now for why I don't do (or delay) the remaining vaccines:
Hep B: Those at risk for Hep B are primarily drug users, the sexually active, and those who work in the medical field. My children under 10 will be none of the above. Hep B is an important vaccine. Both my husband and I have received the entire series, and my children will as well when they are old enough for it to matter.
Hep A: This vaccine was not added to the schedule until 2006. Hep A is not serious for children. The symptoms in children are flu-like GI symptoms, and only 30% of kids under 6 even have symptoms. It's more serious in teens and adults. However, practically all adults make a full recovery. Hep A is not fatal in children.
Chickenpox: Chickenpox kills about 55 people a year. The majority of people for whom chicken pox is fatal are teens and adults, the elderly, and the immuno-compromised. My children are not immuno-compromised, and so, in the event they do not acquire natural immunity to the disease, they will be vaccinated at 13. Additionally, it is unclear how the varicella vaccine will affect (or is currently affecting) the epidemiology of shingles.
Prevnar: The reason why we do not do Prevnar is serotype replacement. There are 7 strains of disease in the current prevnar vaccine (PCV7). It's purpose is to prevent invasive pneumococcal disease. The vaccine has been efficient in preventing these strains from causing invasive disease. However, this left an open niche. Other strains jumped up to fill the open spots. (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17922399) If I had an immuno-compromised child, I would do prevnar. As it is now, I do not.
Rotavirus: Between 20 and 75 infants die of rotavirus each year in the United States. My main problem with this vaccine comes from the fact that it is so new. The prior version of rotavirus vaccine was approved by the FDA, and then went on to cause intussesception. I'm going to watch this one and see where it goes. Right now I don't think that 20-75 deaths a year are enough to convince me to vaccinate against this disease given the newness of this vaccine.


Salon.com
Comments
Do you have the vitamin k at birth in America?
When I volunteered in the hospital, they had me get boosters to prevent the preemies from getting sick, but that was more than 10 years ago...
Decline in pneumonia and acute otitis media after the introduction of childhood pneumococcal vaccination in liguria, Italy.
Ansaldi F, Sticchi L, Durando P, Carloni R, Oreste P, Vercelli M, Crovari P, Icardi G.
Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Italy.
The effect of the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine immunization programme on pneumococcal-associated or potentially pneumococcal-associated hospital admissions in the Italian region of Liguria was assessed. Hospital admission rates were compared in subjects belonging to birth cohorts before and after the introduction of widespread immunization for 0 - 2-year old children with a seven-valent conjugate vaccine (PCV7). Significant reductions in hospitalization rates for all-cause and pneumococcal pneumonia and for acute otitis media were observed in subjects born after widespread uptake of the vaccine. The preventive fraction (a measure of vaccine effectiveness) ranged from 15.2% for all cause pneumonia to 70.5% for pneumococcal pneumonia. This study contributes to the growing body of information that supports the beneficial effect of PCV7 vaccination.
PMID: 19094434 [PubMed - in process]
===============================
Early studies, _ca_ 2000, showed above to be true -- but the 'herd effect' had not taken hold. It is inevitable that when a niche opens up, there will be another organism which will exploit that space. Influenza type A may be ready to make this jump -- and H5N1 is the common one that we all look at to make the frontal breach of cross species jumps. Once you start breaking the 'herd effect' then you are endangering others -- about 3 years ago MMR had been rejected on a ridge about 30 miles from here. They closed the schools for two weeks as MMR made it around the J curve -- suddenly all three country health vans were standing room only in that rural area. While YOUR children may not be immuno-compromised -- what do you know about the person who is standing next to you -- or who washed their hands, and then was jostled to grab a public door handle, stair railing, etc --- sometimes things take awhile to begin to work -- so while 19F was still showing problems last year, (2007) but which were diminishing by the third shot, this year, there seems to be a building toward the threshold of a 'herd effect' --
You can think of it this way too -- which the forcing of a serotype into more and more niches -- it's like the Battle of the Bulge -- you let it in -- other sereotypes are being stopped, and then when you find a very effective 19F -- you cut it off, and destroy it through a herd effect -- but that still leave Flu A out there and H5N1 -- the real worry -- and what is the effect of PVC7 on that? We don't know yet -- perhaps it will bestow a bit of immunity through many of the similar membrane proteins.
perhaps -- but brushing off the immuno-compromised, and the aged, for studies where p's are in the p=.1xx and stating that your child is not likely to come into contact with hep B body fluids seems a bit callus and naive.
The last I heard they were looking at adding 6 more serotypes (for PCV13) to the vaccine to account for the decreased effectiveness. I was told that it was beneficial to the individual to get the vaccine, but detrimental to the herd as it was increasing serotype replacement and possibly contributing to scarier bugs.
France has an extremely high-quality system of health care. And they take antibiotics like candy. Why so few vaccines?
Chicken pox is a serious illness for kids, even if they don't die. My kids still carry their scars on their faces. Pregnant women can get very sick and pass the disease on to their fetuses, with serious consequences. Again, the CDC has excellent question and answers re this.
You left out any discussion of HPV vaccines, which can reduce cervical, certain oral and anal cancers. And eliminate anxiety about abnormal pap smears and their expensive and worrisome work-up.
Choosing not to vaccinate or to vaccinate selectively is a religious decision, not a science based decision nor one made in the best interests of our children. I only hope they grow up to be smarter than we are.
Less than 100 people die per year of chicken pox. Chicken pox is not a fatal illness in children who are not immuno-compromised. Pox marks are superficial and personally I know of no one who is disfigured by them as you describe. I'm not going to vaccinate my children for a disease which is not a threat to them before it is necessary.
Chicken Pox- 200 serious cases expected over 1st 12 years. That's a disease risk (serious) of 1 in 25,000.
Hepatitis B- 130 expected cases, disease risk 1 in 40,000
And then, the risk of one child having a severe vax reaction over the entire series, 12 years, is 1 in 2600.
It's not worth it to vax my kids for hep b or cp. Every vax given is a risk for a reaction. If I can limit the number of vaccines, I can limit the risk of reaction.
If rota were proven to be safe, (in other words, if it had been on the market longer) it would be worth it to give rota (serious disease risk 1 in 100). If Prevnar were shown to not be experiencing serotype replacement, it would be worth it to give prevnar (serious disease risk 1 in 500). But the numbers don't add up for hep b or CP under the age of 12. And hep a? Hep a isn't even serious in kids. For adults, the disease risk is 1 in 25,000. So this disease doesn't even apply to my children.
Alaska doc: Come on now, do you really think "religious" is an accurate adjective for what holly has written? I admire her critical thinking - if only more health care consumers did so.
One question, you mention a non-thimerosal vaccine. Forgive my ignorance but hasn't thimerosal been removed from vaccines in the US?