iamsurly

iamsurly
Location
Los Angeles, California, USA
Birthday
October 22
Title
ex-heiress
Bio
Charming young lady, with sharp tongue and vocabulary of a seasoned longshoreman, who carries in her handbag worn and tattered membership cards to the Mayflower Society and Daughters of the American Revolution, for which her dues are in arrears.

MY RECENT POSTS

Iamsurly's Links

Vintage Recipe Cards
Meet My Family
Me and My Attitude
Straight Girl's Guides and Other Rainbow Flavored Posts
Editor’s Pick
DECEMBER 21, 2009 1:38PM

Walk Around In The All-Together & Go To Jail-Do Not Pass Go!

Rate: 31 Flag

Okay... this is another hit from the Realm of Things I Do Not Understand.


Erick Williamson

 Mr. Williamson, a resident of Fairfax County, Virgina was convicted for indecent exposure for being naked in his own home. Yeah, you heard me.  Convicted. The story, as I understand it, is that two women who were walking/driving down the street looked in his windows, saw him wandering from room to room in his own house sans clothing, while he was packing boxes, and had him arrested.  Color me confused.

Now, I'll grant ya, that it would be nice if people closed their windows when they are running around nude.  Not everyone needs to get an eyeful of your bits and bobs.  Not everyone has any business showing them off.  I know I don't, and I close my windows. However, if you are nosy enough to be staring in my windows while I'm vacuuming nude, well that's your problem, you nosy bitch. I'm not one to parade around nude to begin with.  However, I do go from my back deck to my hot tub stark naked in the summer.  Not wanting to give the neighbors a shock, I've planted some bougainvillea on a trellis for privacy.  They can still see me, if they make an effort, but if you're going to go out of your way to look in my yard, you get what you get.  You don't have the right to call the cops on me unless I'm simultaneously doing something illegal like harvesting my opium crop.

My mother is a nudist.  She doesn't belong to any official group and doesn't go to official functions.  But she's rarely dressed in her own home, or is usually half-dressed.  She even does dangerous things like fry potatoes naked. Over the years many of my friends, both male and female, have seen most, if not all, of her bits and bobs.  When I was in the ninth grade she got implants and proceeded to flash everyone I knew, including my then boyfriend, Jim.  I think he's still scarred.  Once, she locked herself in the bathroom while taking a shower and couldn't get the door open again.  So, being a thinker, she climbs out the bathroom window into the front yard only to confront the mail man while she was without a stitch on.  She smiled, collected the mail, and wished him a nice day.  He didn't sue.  He didn't even file for workman's comp. I wouldn't have blamed him if he did.

So, because of two busy bodies that I suspect have issues, Erick Williamson now has a record and probation.  This just makes me want to say "What the fuck?"  Did we somehow make a quantum leap to another time period and we're now living in Victorian America?  When did we decide that it's up to the nosy neighbors, who are looking in our windows rather than keeping their eyes on the road while they drive, to determine what we can wear in our own homes?  Whatever happened to a right to privacy? Whatever happened to minding your own fucking business.

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
What the fuck, indeed! I hope he has a good attorney, if there really is any such animal out there.
Wow! I think this is my first "FIRST!"!
It is much easier to deal with being all self righteous than it is to deal with a world going to hell. People are just stupid. The poor guy probably didn't think he would even need a lawyer for something so small..umm well you know what I mean...add this to a growing list of WTF is going on!
This is an outrage. Those two Mrs. Kravitz types ought to be ostracized. Ridiculous and absurd that this happened and even worse that precious court time was given to this.
Hi Surly,
As a card-carrying social nudist, this is an item I blogged on, and we have quite a few commentors wieghing in on this.
My take is that Mr. W made noise to expressly call the women's attention to himself, and his roommate called his attention to the open drapes. In my experience, an exhibitionist always has a fall back plan to excuse his behavior in case he is caught. I have my suspicions about Mr. W.
You make a reasonable effort not to be seen as do I. Mr. W. "forgot" to do that.
Oh, quit your bitchin' and get back in the hot tub. I'm waiting!!
People being murdered, assaulted, raped, robbed, children starving, people freezing to death on the streets and in their homes. Horrible crimes against humanity and there is a town in Virginia that has not only the time, but the funds to prosecute a man for being naked in his own home? Are there moron awards? they really are going to be tough this year if they do, at least a three way tie. This has prompted me to place a warning sign in my windows, Do not look at naked man in house.
I love what he said about if he was looking in her window "we'd be having a whole other conversation"!
Does anyone have his address or is it too late....gawd, some of us would LIKE to see him naked.
I heard it the way o'stephanie did. This guy was not just "walking around in his house naked". He was PARADING himself in front of his exposed picture window, naked, and singing loudly and making other loud noises to call attention to himself. I also got the impression that the unexpected voyeurs were WALKING down the sidewalk, not driving down the street.
This man is not a nudist. He's an exhibitionist, who wants people to be shocked.
“If I was looking in her window, I think we’d be having a whole different conversation,” he said. "

Women would *close the drapes*.

If even part of it is true, he needs jailing. A seven year old boy being walked to school? As he was packing up, I'd think he'd lived there long enough to know that the school-run went past his house... and to close the drapes or get dressed whilst the school run was on.

The fact he didn't cover up at school opening/closing times rings a rather large bell for me; I don't think this is simple nudism, I think this is something more, and moreover, something nasty.
That don't make no sense!
I will tell my boyfriend to stop streaking through the living room. Luckily we don't live in a state that is so damn puritanical...yet.
@stephanie and catnmus - as I read it the first woman was driving past his house, hears singing and looks into his windows. She made the decision to look. I have a lot of neighbors who sing and play death metal in their homes, and I don't necessarily look when I hear it. Particularly not when I'm driving - my eyes belong on the road.

The second woman heard "rattling" as she walked past. She looked - I get that. However she went around the corner and looked again. She made the decision to look at second time and see him.

There's nothing to indicate that the route that the woman took is a frequently traversed path for innocent school children - and NO indication that he was intentionally exposing himself to her son.

He may be an exhibitionist - but in so far as I can tell, he has no history of such behaviour. It seems more like he had the bad judgment to be loudly prancing about nude on this particular day.

I just think there are far more criminal acts in this world to waste tax dollars on - and I think the women bear responsibility for looking in his windows. Dead right if he'd have spotted them in theirs he would have been hauled off for being a peeping Tom and wound up on a sex offenders list.
::running off to close drapes and turn down music::
Isn't going upto someone's window and peeking in without being invited called "trespassing"?
The guy was packing? Maybe he was doing it to be a shithead, like "I'm out of here! Check this out folks!" Maybe (obviously) the neighborhood is a bunch of fuddy-duddies and he thought it would be fun to mess with people before he left for good.
Maybe he's a Matthew McConahey-ite (I don't care how you spell his name) and he just enjoys being nude and playing some bongos.
Maybe he's just a pervert.
Maybe the women he was (allegedly) shouting to should have pointed and laughed. That would have stopped his antics.
Our own homes will soon be prisons in which no one is allowed to smoke, have sex, be naked or think for themselves. No fun allowed! It might offend someone.
Maybe those women were disappointed that they didn't get more for their money. Like several more inches. I do wonder what Exhibit A was when it came to the evidence.
Welcome to America, where people with hang-ups turn their issues into everybody's issues.

Unfortunately, there is nothing about this story that surprised me at all. Utterly predictable.
surly,

I spoke from my persepctive as a card-carrying nudist. And no nudist I know of does not check first to make sure that there is privacy from the textile world to enjoy nudity. You seem to miss the quote from his roommate who warned him that he could be seen from the road, a conversation Mr W denies. He denies it because it would mean he did not take "reasonable efforts" to shield others.

I am a lifelong nudist. If anyone should defend nudity, it is me; however, this guy is not a nudist. In fact, guys like this who accuse others of voyeurism, give nudism a bad name.

It is winter. The guy doesn't have his nude beach to flex his muscles, so he uses his picture window to flash a school llibraian and a 7-yar-old kid. Sorry. Not a nudist, just a naked guy who likes to be looked at.
Good gravy! and they weren't prosecuted for being peeping tammies?
ok, so now I read the article via the link and it seems to be a case of he said. From the article, I do think he's made a mistake by parading nude in front of a picture window - that seems not to be in the realm of the "privacy of his own home." Privacy assumes he wants to be private. In front of a picture window with the drapes open implies he wants to show you his privates. Not quite the same.

However, according to Virginia law, I do think he's in the right. He was neither lewd nor in a public space. I also think it was silly of the local authorities to waste their time arresting him and to waste their money taking him to court over something that was so vague legally. A knock on the door and a warning is all that was necessary.
The first time I heard about this was from my roommate, who happens to spend a lot of time on discussion forums frequented by other gun enthusiasts. My first thought was that this was being spun as yet another tale of the evils of Big Government by Right Wingnuts and that The Truth was probably a bit more complicated. According to the Washington Post, "From Williamson's Fairfax County neighborhood to Web sites around the world that picked up the story, the arrest fueled jokes, anger and more than a few there-but-for-the-grace-of-God-go-I confessions. ut the two versions of what happened that morning reveal the complexity of cases in which the line between public and private space can be as thin as a windowpane. Fairfax police say Williamson wanted to be noticed, positioning himself so that the mother and child would see him not once, but twice." [Washington Post, Monday, October 26, 2009, "Man disputes indecent-exposure charge"] I'm still inclined to assume that the scandal at the heart of this case is a wee bit smaller than Mr. Williamson would have us believe.
This is as ridiculous as Monsanto successfully suing a farmer for patent violation when their seeds contaminated his fields. You know, just doing what seeds do.

I dunno, it seems to me that if someone is looking in your windows, that's an invasion of privacy. If they take offense, well, that's their problem.

I hope he appeals.
This is why: There were no drapes in the house preventing prying eyes from invading the space inside his home. And that is just what happened one day when a mom and her seven year old child walked by before 6am in the morning. It was dark at that time in the early morning and he was making coffee in the house as usual each day. They report seeing him through his open door and a window.
Mind your own fucking business, indeed.
Who the hell were the 2 women?
This makes me think of the incident that occured on Halloween at the end of my street.

The guy, in his 50's, was reported to be standing in front of the window and opening the door for trick-or-treaters wearing nothing but a G-string. When the police came to question him, they found binoculars and a webcam in a second story room that looks down on the neighbor across the street.

The neighbor is an attractive recently divorced woman with a 7 year old daughter and 3 year old son. The guy told the police he intended to marry her.

It was not the first time the police had been called for similar activity. He was arrested.

I haven't heard whether he was charged with anything. I hope he ultimately spends some time in jail.
I'm sure women don't get arrested for being nude at home...just guys! That's because the cops were guys.... Rated
Whether he was an exhibitionsit or just a guy who likes to hang out at home, it still seems like the women made the choice to look into his personal space and the authorities spent time arresting this guy when there were plenty of other more pressing crimes being committed.
Police State Lives
maybe the real reason the women reported them was that they were offended by his magnificent schlong
:p
What, what? Damn, there is a waste of the court's time if I've ever heard it. These two ladies need to get laid.
Good god, did y'all notice the location - VIRGINIA? As tight-ass and puritan a state as you can imagine. Now, Fairfax is in 'blue' Northern VA, so it's a mix of newcomers who couldn't give a rat's ass what you do in your home, and people whose relatives came over on the damn Mayflower.

As for male nudity, this country is the most prudish of all, I think. We need to see MORE of the beautiful male body, bits 'n bobs *and* twigs 'n berries in the same venues where you'd see a woman's lovely nude form. We seriously need to get OVER ourselves. And, I bet he's cute! Rated.
The problem here is that the system is out of control. Under NO circumstances should a person viewed naked in their own home, drapes open or not, be cause for them to be asked a question by a cop, let alone arrested, tried and convicted of "indecent exposure." Such statutes specifically stipulate that such exposure is *deliberate*, *public* and *offensive in and of itself to community standards*. So no, just standing there in your picture window should not be an arrestable offense.

There may be some blue law in action here, or perhaps even a recent law that stretches the definition of "indecent" WAY too far. If it's the former or the latter, it would be a good one to take all the way to the Supreme Court. Even a gaggle of reactionaries like the current voting majority would have to rule that this was a ludicrous conviction, and that *might* put an end to blue laws once and for all.
Holy cow! As a 13-year old walking to school in Seattle, there was a guy that rented a room in a motel to purposely expose himself to girls walking by, and he was arrested. Rightly so. He was a sick freak.

Being naked in your own home, unless you are purposely exposing yourself to entice others or give yourself a sick thrill, is fine fine fine.

I am naked as I type this. (and my legion of animals may not sleep well tonight, but they don't know any lawyers....)

Balance, folks. everything in balance.......
Well that's it, I'm taking my pants off.

At least the guys attractive! I wonder if there's a sort of homeowners association tied in. The whole thing stinks to me.

First--and this is a post in and of itself--Americans need to TALK with their neighbors before calling the police. A simple: "hey I can see your dangle, could you put some pants on?" would have saved the taxpayers and plenty of others time and money.

I'm with you Naked Man.
Uh, BTW: anybody see markinkentuckiana's comment? Man. That is creepy. Creeeeeeepy.
I'm not sure an arrest was warranted, but a warning probably was.

Most parents do not want to be placed in a situation in which their young child is exposed to the full monty, without the opportunity to prepare them for it. Shouldn't they have the right to expect that full frontal nudity is not going to confront them on their walk to or from school? Would you let your 7-year old peruse a Playboy, Playgirl, Penthouse or Hustler magazine? Maybe so, but would you want a stranger abruptly making that decision for you?

The guy should have been warned to close the curtains to the street, at least before and after school, or to put up a fence if he wants to run around naked anytime. If he continues, then maybe an arrest is appropriate. His freedom to pursue floppy, naked happiness shouldn't interfere with anyone else's freedom to pursue a nudity-free walk to school.
I love your Mom -- bits, bobs, and all. And good luck with opium harvest.