janicephelpswilliams

janicephelpswilliams
Location
Harbor Springs, Michigan, USA
Birthday
May 07
Title
Illustrator, Book Designer, Writer
Bio
Janice Phelps Williams is a book designer, illustrator, and writer. Learn about services for authors and publishers, as well as her artwork and books at www.janicephelps.com.

MY RECENT POSTS

NOVEMBER 11, 2012 5:45AM

United States of America

Rate: 2 Flag

It’s Sunday morning and this was a long week at the end of a long presidential campaign in the United States of America. When I awoke this morning and began preparing the coffee pot, going through the motions of water, filter, and grounds, my mind muddled through words like: division, anger, hope, plans, confidence, disappointment, differences, communication, planning, listening, assumptions, win, lose, apathy, passion, confusion, opinion. There are also words like: future, target, money, poverty, rights, entitlement, argument, taxes, war, consensus, error, habit, belief.

“All the world's a stage, / And all the men and women merely players; / They have their exits and their entrances…” wrote Shakespeare, and it seemed true this week, when the TV pundits, so eager to tell us “This Is A Very Important Event!”, to shout at us of its importance and to put before us many experts who passionately told us how important it all was...and the more they shouted the less important it began to feel to our numbing minds. But, yes, it was very important. And now it is past. And now for everyone--for all of us--the rest of the story. 

 

United States of America. The very word “united” implies a division, for you cannot unite something that is already one. Something that is already one, like one person, or one thought, or one tree, cannot be united with itself. We are united because we are different. Because there are lines. And all the lines are manmade. Property lines. State and county lines. Party lines. None of these lines were here on this land we now call America a thousand years ago. All of these lines were created by us. They can be strengthened or destroyed by us. 


IMG_5351

 

We are the United States of this land, America, but only a generation more than 200 years old. And that is the good news and the sobering news. Look at all we’ve accomplished in 200 years. Look at what other countries of the world accomplished in 400, in 800 years. We didn’t invent government, but we did create something unique for its time and enduring yet today. A Constitution. A Bill of Rights. And an sense of who we are, together, that evolves, changes, and gives birth to what will be the truth of who we are as a nation in 2013, 2113, and 2213. 

 

Did our forefathers and -mothers consider a nation for their descendants in 2013? I think they did. They knew they were not just reacting to something in the present, but building something for the future. They didn’t have television or easy access to books or the Internet, but what they did have was a sense of history, community, mortality, and the future. 

 

What about us? Do we envision the United States of America in 2213? How can we build on what unites us and on what we know of history and dream of for our descendants to create a United States of America that will be: in government “a shining light on a hill,” in hopeful minds an inspiring thought, and in our place on earth one of physical beauty and preservation?

This is what is before us now. To take the parts that we are, the parts represented by words such as: anger, hope, plans, confidence, disappointment, differences… and continue on as the United States of America.

 

The government website for the US Constitution states: “The work of many minds, the Constitution stands as a model of cooperative statesmanship and the art of compromise.”

 

You can only have cooperation and compromise when there are differences. United States of America. That’s what we are. That’s what moves us forward.

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
There are lots of assumptions here based on language alone, ignoring both reality and the multiplicities of linguistic definition. That can be delusive and dangerous. Philosophy is often led astray by assuming and accepting some of the peculiarities of language which have little or no relationship to reality.
a great line: "What about us? Do we envision the United States of America in 2213? "
alot of people will say, oh but how could we: imagine the
technological differences.

Well, as you say, those old boys in the 18th century would
have considered you mad if you mentioned light speed communication, of images and words...
evolution,
or relativitity.

yet we consider THEM as quite sane, even sacred, back then.

some things never change..
most of what is said about the constitution is a lie. but there was some compromise.

unfortunately, the constitution was put out of reach of the people, and even the members of the political elite find amendment so difficult that, 223years later, america's political structure is as close to that of georgian britain as hamilton and madison could contrive.

it was their intent that the rich would drive american policy, and k street is a vibrant demonstration of their success.
Thank you, Pam, Jonathan, Jan, James!, and Al for your comments. I appreciate each one.

Jan Sand, I could think about this sentence all day: "Philosophy is often led astray by assuming and accepting some of the peculiarities of language which have little or no relationship to reality."

James: It is odd, now that you mention it, that when we think 200 years into the future the first thing we think of is advancement in technology, as if that defines us as human beings. Of course, it is only a tool to take us where we choose to go. Unless the very invention of devices is changing us in ways that we do not even realize; ways that will alter the choices we might have made without them... Hmm... perhaps I will leave this train of thought to the sci-fi writers and those who think on these things... And put in a good word for the study of Humanities.
Thank you, Pam, Jonathan, Jan, James!, and Al for your comments. I appreciate each one.

Jan Sand, I could think about this sentence all day: "Philosophy is often led astray by assuming and accepting some of the peculiarities of language which have little or no relationship to reality."

James: It is odd, now that you mention it, that when we think 200 years into the future the first thing we think of is advancement in technology, as if that defines us as human beings. Of course, it is only a tool to take us where we choose to go. Unless the very invention of devices is changing us in ways that we do not even realize; ways that will alter the choices we might have made without them... Hmm... perhaps I will leave this train of thought to the sci-fi writers and those who think on these things... And put in a good word for the study of Humanities.