The New Depression (or "Brother, can you spare a dime?"
Surviving the New Depression, or "Brother, can you spare a dime?"
My mother was an Okie, the daughter of a country preacher from Oklahoma who lost the family farm in the Dust Bowl and became a migrant farm worker. Her parents lived through the Depression and survived the migration West to Bakersfield.
I remember her stories about getting by on very little: when she had an earache, her mother would pee into a spoon and pour it into her ear: they could not afford to see a doctor, and this was how you cured an earache on your own back then. (As a side note, a later study indicated this remedy did actually work, due to some compound contained in women's urine.)
As a mother in Marin County in the 70's, she still held onto traces of this Depression-era, Dust Bowl frugality. If she got a run in a leg of her pantyhose, she would cut it off at the line at the top of the thigh, and keep it. She often left the house wearing beneath her pantsuit two pairs of one-legged pantyhose, her abdomen double-armored by control-top nylon. She kept a jar of buttons, even though I only ever saw her replace a missing button once in my entire childhood.
I did not know until I was 17 that chili was something thick and rich, like a stew. My mother used to open the family-sized can of Dennison's chili, spoon it into a pot, fill the empty can to the brim with water, and add that to the pot, stirring to make what I would now call "chili soup." Back then, though, as far as I knew, this was how chili was intended to be made and eaten. My first taste of unadulterated chili was shocking: too rich, too solid, and far too greasy.
My mother was simply trying to stretch the food as far as it would go, even though we were not in any danger of being poor. I looked down on these tendencies of my mother, in all my teenaged self-obsession and arrogance. Now, I am revisiting my memories, calling my mother for tips, and finding my own ways of stretching a dollar.
Things are tight, and by all accounts, they are going to get significantly worse before they get better. We're all going to have to change how we live our lives in ways that even just last year would have seemed unimaginable.
I am going to write a series of blog posts on this topic, to share what I am doing to save money and make it through what some are calling the New Depression. I've already posted a short piece about the economics of making soymilk at home. I will be transforming my front yard into a victory garden, and planting my back yard with as many edibles as I can possibly fit back there, and will write about those efforts as they happen.
This piece is on the first major, money-saving step I decided to take: Cancelling cable.
Decision: Getting rid of cable. Savings: $75 a month.
Many of you will probably react to this idea in the following way: No. No! Getting rid of cable? An impossibility! What will my kids do? I may have to give up many things, but they will have to pry my TV remote from my cold, dead, starved hands! This was certainly my reaction for a long time. Then I did the math, and looked at the way technology works now. $75 a month for basic cable + the HBO package is $900 a year. Nine hundred dollars. That is a fairly significant expense. $900 could go a long way towards offsetting the increase in food prices, paying the heating bills this winter, or just to go into savings for real emergencies.
I learned that I can watch full episodes of current seasons of a lot of my favorite shows online-- for free. YouTube has all the Project Runways. Hulu has House. ABC online shows the new Boston Legal episodes.
We also have the "DVD library" phenonomenon that so many of us and our families have adopted in recent years. We collect hundreds of movies, just to have them. I owned maybe 80 movies on tape and DVD, collected over time. My sister has hundreds of them, shelves full of them, some still in the original shrink wrap, and few of them watched more than once...AND she has cable.
OK, I said. I'll get rid of my cable service, but just for a short period of time, as an experiment. If I want to watch a movie, I will put on one of the movies I've already spent money to buy. All those "Special Edition" DVDs with the audio commentaries and additional features that I spent extra money on? I'll actually watch the extra features and see the movie again with the commentary running.
When I run out of those, I'll borrow movies from my sister's extensive collection; better yet, I'll go over there and watch them with her, to throw a little "family bonding" into the mix. If I have to watch a show "live," I'll go watch it at her house. For those few shows I cannot live without, I'll just buy them used from Amazon Marketplace for around $20 a season, and still come out ahead.
I cut the cable cord at the beginning of July. Six months later, I have saved an astonishing (t0 me) $450, and have not missed having all those TV shows and movies on tap. My fiancé and I still watch our movies and TV shows, and don't feel media-deprived in the slightest. Better yet, sometimes we leave the TV off and accomplish things with that time instead. Catch up on all those magazine subscriptions. Work on a motorcycle repair project in the garage. Listen to music. We sometimes even...read.
Even without the coming economic storm, surely we don't ALL need to have full cable packages in our individual homes and apartments. Can't we go see a friend or family member who has cable, and watch a show with them? Would it be so bad to bring a movie you own over to your mother's house and spend the afternoon with her? There is still time to rent free movies from the library (while we still have libraries). We can watch full, new episodes of your favorite shows online for free. Then there are our long-neglected books. Beautiful, stirring, and entertaining literature, just waiting for us to remember it exists.
With all these resources, and saving close to a thousand dollars a year, is it really that much of a deprivation to cancel your cable, if only for a couple of years until things start to look up?
Try it. You'll thank me.
Tips gratefully accepted, for those so moved.

Salon.com
Comments
I am sooo happy you are writing these. They ROCK!!
rated, of course
And best of all--no commercials. Good luck.
As for cable, smart move. Mad Magazine summed it up when they wrote that `you're paying for repeats'!!!!
My tv blew up a few years ago [the thing couldn't handle the crap either] and I don't miss it. DVD's are cheap, plentiful and I've actually started enjoying books again. Read at one's leisure, no boring adds, etc.
Good luck in your new found independence
The less we spend as consumers, the less production capacity is needed. The less production is needed, the less producers are needed, the more layoffs there are, the more people there are who really can't afford to spend money. The more people without means, the less consumption, the more layoffs etc in a nasty spiral. So if you do have it right now, and you are not facing the likelihood of layoff, then you are not doing anyone any favors by refusing to spend.
If you haven't yet done so, I'd like to highly recommend getting one of those inexpensive DTV converter boxes. More than HDTV, broadcasters can also program up to 4 Standard def channels, and if cable numbers start to fall precipitously, I'd be surprised if the content providers - at least the ones who run ads on their cable channels - don't explore this alternate "free" delivery method... especially for those with broadcast ties - ESPN & Disney with ABC affiliates, Comedy central with CBS, etc.
I've lived without cable for decades. I grew up in a home without a phone, and when we finally got one, it was a "party line" shared with neighbors. Giving up cable should be like putting just a little water back into your thick greasy chili.
Now tv...that's a different story.
Sweet Husband provides for the family by working in the television production industry. Studio work. So does my oldest son. I'm hoping that not too many people cut back on cable or we may starve! Do it for us people! Keep that cable and cut back on other things! Ha. Just kidding. Do what you have to to survive. We'll figure it out along with the rest of you.
Great post and I'm looking forward to the next installment.
"But there is NO social virtue in living that way during hard times. The less we spend as consumers, the less production capacity is needed. The less production is needed, the less producers are needed, the more layoffs there are, the more people there are who really can't afford to spend money. The more people without means, the less consumption, the more layoffs etc in a nasty spiral. So if you do have it right now, and you are not facing the likelihood of layoff, then you are not doing anyone any favors by refusing to spend."
Well, yes, to a point. I certainly agree about the social virtue point - people should live comfortably if they can, frugally if they can't.
But I must demur about the second part of your comment. The problem that is driving this economic crisis is not too much spending, but rather the fact that the western world, led by the USA, has been largely in deficit financing mode since the 1970's. Both governments and individuals have been living on borrowed money, and what is happening now is that it is catching up with us. In particular, it is resulting in the drop in housing prices, after they arrived at such inflated values that they became investment vehicles to buy and flip rather than to live in. Reduced spending may contribute to the ongoing pain, but the cause is much deeper.
If you want to read
[Sorry for the double comment posting. I guess I pressed post before I finished writing!!]
And I've been spending the same monthly amount for someone to host a blog (with lots of bells & whistles) for me that I have been neglecting for quite some time.
$40/month does add up to $480/year. Something to heat the house with...