The Shepherd

Jason Hill at Open Salon

Jason D. Hill

Jason D. Hill
Location
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Birthday
June 10
Title
Associate Professor of Philosophy
Company
De Paul University
Bio
Jason D. Hill, Ph.D is an academic philosopher and fiction writer. He is the author of 3 books: "Becoming A Cosmopolitan: What it means to be a Human Being in the New Millennium." (Rowman&Littlefield, 2000); "Beyond Blood Identities: Post Humanity in the 21st Century," (Lexington Books, 2009) and "When We Should Not Get Along: Cosmopolitanism and Cultural Differences," (Anthem Press, January 2011). He has written for salon magazine, and penned several newspaper editorials in Europe and the United States. He was born and raised in Jamaica and in 1985, at the age of 20, came to America to become an artist. He has just completed his novel called, "Jamaica Preacher Man."

Jason D. Hill's Links

Post Humanity
New list
SEPTEMBER 16, 2009 12:54PM

Child-Centric Parents: What to Do About Them

Rate: 13 Flag

I love kids. Honestly. For years I dreamed of adopting one, but my partner has no interest in being a parent and, truth be told, the happier I became with my own life the less I wanted a child. We have a lot of friends with children. In fact, most of our friends have children—and we love them to death. But we also have—even among those beloved friends—a number of child-centric friends.

These are friends who are unable to build boundaries when it comes to pursuing the everyday activities of their lives and the whims and desires (not needs) of their children. This is the person who while in deep discussion will tolerate all sorts of interruptions from a child who wants the parent to come and play with the train now. I’m not saying children should not be allowed to interrupt adult conversation. I am saying that there are two words: “Excuse me,” that all children should be taught before they are inserted in the public space. The child- centric parent likes being watched and likes knowing that you know she or he likes being watched—watched tickling the child, kissing the child, and getting on the floor and crawling on all fours with the child. It’s all about ‘look at me being a good parent.’ It’s really about ‘look at ME!’ only it’s a legitimate plea because it is mediated by the child.

The child-centric parent will leave your house when the child demands he wants to go home now; cancel a long-planned Sunday at the beach because little Colin wants to play with his blocks and he’s really, really into playing right now. God forbid you interfere with what the child wants in the moment, in every moment that she or he utters some unintelligible sound that is elevated to the level of elocution-in-the-making. Sometimes children just babble and gurgle and make strange sounds for no other reason than they are learning the art of communication. The child-centric parent takes every sound literally to heart.

Let me say that in America parenting is rough. There is rarely an extended family to absorb the extra-demands of the child, and since time has to be heavily structured most working parents legitimately want to get the most out of their time with their children. Child-centric parents are not bad people. It is not a moral issue, rather, in several cases an understandable weakness of will. Society is as much to blame as are the parents themselves. If we had more social networks that offered time-support to parents then parents would probably feel less guilty in saying No to every demand. Children can survive the word No. They adapt and move right along. I’ve seen it happen many times.

It seems, though, that there is some degree of narcissism on the part of some parents. They are vicariously living through the child in the sense that they are manufacturing a world where the child’s every desire, need and whim gets catered to. Psychically they are reliving the world they longed for but never had. Parenting becomes a performance, a stage-show in which the parents are the lead actors and the kids the bit players. The frustrating thing about this kind of parent is that it’s really not about the child. It’s about their sublimated need for glory and affirmation. Which in all honesty every parent should receive—affirmation, that is, given the near virtual isolation in which child rearing takes place.

But it’s not parenting that needs glorification. Part of the solution lies in reassuring parents that their near pandemic fear that their child will hate them if they learn to broker his or her demand has no basis in reality. But this has to be done gently and with compassion. As I said, parents have it rough. For my part, I intend to do as much baby sitting as possible. Children need alternate realties that are as supportive as home base. That way they learn the art of navigating among a multiplicity of cues of multiple caregivers who care for them as deeply as if they were their own.

Author tags:

family

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
It's not so much that the child will hate you, it's a question of convenience. I wasn't insanely child-centric, but a parent is often concerned about things like irrational tantrums and naps etc. especially with babies and very youn kids. It's a pain in the ass to have to play with a kid enlessly for hours. You deperately want them to sleep and keep quiet. The alternative is way too much work. I often said the same things you say above, but as soon as I had a kid I understood.

R.
I agree with John's comment. Also, I would add to the "Society's to blame" part: in the 70s and 80s, parenting styles came under fire in the media. A lot of attention was drawn (rightly so) to child abuse and child safety. The result of that was parents everywhere unsure of what was a proper boundary by which to raise a child. "Is spanking ok, or not?" Child are, by design, boundary pushers. They test the limits of what they can get away with. When you have parents whose upbringing has been questioned (and essentially challenges their instincts), the result is the child leading the parent.

There is a undercurrent of a parenting movement that is starting to take root. I dont' know what it's called, but the essence of it is is that it's ok for parents to balance the guidance they read in books and in the media with what they feel in their gut. A book called "The Good ENough Parent" encourages parents to fall back on what they know and their instincts (provided it doesn't put the child in harm's way).

I think more opinions like yours need to be shared with the general public in order for us to halt the "child-lead" parenting trend. Good job on bringing to our attention. Rated.
I love this article! I have raised three sons who are all getting on with their lives now, and it's fun to watch them come into their own. There is a delicate balance of love and over- indulging every whim that becomes quite the parent trick. I think one of the keys for parenting is that your kids need to know that you will follow through on what you tell them without bribery. You need to be open to their opinions and wants but also know when to draw the line. And, you need to show them that you do have a life separate from their every need. Sometimes, they do need to wait in line and then get your undivided attention. Thanks for writing this.
I'm a big believer in rules, manners, and discipline. Indulgence may please the child (and the parent) momentarily, but it leads to countless problems down the road. Good post!
My brother and his girlfriend sat behind a man who literally barked like a dog at his child to amuse said child.

On an airplane.

All the way from Atlanta to San Diego.

Rated.
THanks for the comments folks. It was written in a generous spirit and with good intentions.
I really like this post. I have 5 children and we've tweaked the boundaries a little with each one with them finally self-destructing for a short time with the smallest (who are twins). I can tell you that the reason I was most likely to heed a demand from one of them is the fear that they would break down and embarrass me in front of my peers ... which just creates a cycle of expectation on their part and giving them license to manipulate me. It comes together faster for some parents than for others and it doesn't come at all for a few, but I think in the end, most parents respond to their kids with the best of intentions - none of them want to be seen as push-overs or hard-asses ... we just want to appear to be as loving and in control as we feel in our own heads. By the way, after 15 years and 5 kids (and I am an "older" parent), I still get my ass handed to me on occasion ... such is life!
Great post Jason!
Good article. I often suspect that the main reason parents run into trouble with children is that they interact with them on such an alien basis, in comparison to how they interact with adults. Usually, it bears no pretense that it is for the child's benefit, as in the case of parents who give their child items and then demand control over them after the child accepts them. In the situation you address it seems the child is taught it's own desires carry greater value than the plan for the day, which if the child was an integral part of, should not be the case.

I really believe if children are given responsibilities and expectations in an equal ratio of respect, most issues would be solved.

A relationship of mutual respect can go a long way in countering the potential for passive-aggressive type behavior or resentment.
I think your piece is both accurate and thoughtful- Have you read ImSurly's post about the way people speak of the "childless"? - taking together that make for a really powerful statement.