Thought Possible

notes & magnifications, by J.E. Robertson
Editor’s Pick
OCTOBER 11, 2008 5:41AM

McCain Calls Obama "Decent Family Man", Demands Civility

Rate: 13 Flag

Arizona Sen. John McCain's presidential campaign has become mired in a controversy over its aggressive personal attacks on Illinois Sen. Barack Obama, which has put the Republican candidate in a supremely awkward position. During a week in which rallies held for his candidacy have featured allegations that Sen. Obama is somehow linked to domestic terrorists or has suspicious overseas supporters, more than once audience members have shouted out threats to Sen. Obama's life.

Now, Sen. McCain, who had promised to run a "respectful" campaign, finds himself facing a rising tide of media antipathy, mounting criticism that to continue provoking such responses may constitute a violation of federal law and be considered "incitement", and the general perception that the campaign is more about anger than issues. So Sen. McCain appears to have made an effort to do the decent thing, and put a stop to it.

At a town-hall meeting event, when a woman said she can't trust Obama because she suspects he's an "Arab", Sen. McCain said "No, no ma'am." He corrected her, and said Sen. Obama "is a decent family man with whom I happen to have some disagreements". He also rebuked a man who claimed to be "scared... to bring up a child" with Obama in the White House, saying that there is no reason to fear an Obama presidency.

Specifically: "I have to tell you he is a decent person and a person that you do not have to be scared of as president of the United States". This seemed to deflate some in the audience, and McCain was even booed for defending his opponent, but McCain explained in sensitive tones that Obama would be a fine president, but that he's running against Obama because of course, as a Republican, he thinks he'd be a much better one.

He called on his supporters to be "respectful", said that's what this campaign was supposed to be about, a respectful debate of the issues by two qualified individuals. "If you want a fight, we will fight," he told supporters calling for more attacks on Obama, adding "But we will be respectful. I admire Senator Obama and his accomplishments. I don't mean that has to reduce your ferocity. I just mean to say you have to be respectful."

McCain by calling for civility is returning to the roots of his campaign, which like Sen. Obama's had initially sought a less partisan environment. The Arizona senator also said it was important to understand that his questioning of Obama's past isn't intended to instill fear about Obama, but rather is meant to be a call for Obama to tell the truth about "relationships" with people who are part of the Chicago political environment he came through.

Some critics say this point is disingenuous, that McCain is falsely accusing Obama of lying about a relationship which has never been more than Obama has acknowledged. And Obama has addressed the issue openly, in the past, but that McCain's charges are unfair in that they are intended to give the impression that Obama lied, simply because his version of events differs from McCain's allegations.

It could be argued McCain had no choice. Increasingly, it was observed that the rhetoric at his rallies seemed designed to stoke fear and anger, and the reaction of the crowds was not limited to isolated individuals. True, there are only two specific cases known where individuals shouted "Kill him!" and "Off with his head!", but the mood was clearly moving in that direction, and a US senator is aware, one would assume, there are federal laws banning rallies that move people to violence or to call for violence.

On Friday, commentary began to shift in that direction, with some supporters of Sen. Obama asking whether there was a legal responsibility on the part of the McCain campaign to make sure that campaign rhetoric did not amount to "incitement", a legal term related to riot law. A spokesperson for McCain's campaign scolded Democrats and the media for "attacking" those "supporters" who expressed "views" outside the mainstream, and the notion that the campaign sought to defend the right of individuals to call for the Democratic candidate's death may have been the last straw.

Polling throughout the week seemed to indicate McCain was losing independent voters and even moderates in his own party with the smear tactics, but more specifically with the unsavory atmosphere that was growing up around some campaign rallies. Gov. Palin had come to be seen as a "rabble-rouser", and several well-known conservative commentators said the Republican party was supposed to be above this kind of politics, calling on the campaign to "rein in" the vice-presidential candidate.

In the end, Sen. McCain did the right thing. There is no room in American politics for race-baiting, for stoking fears based on ethnicity, or even, for that matter, on running a campaign that counts on fear and confusion giving a candidate an edge. McCain had previously stood up for that, but his presidential campaign seemed to have gotten away from his long-held principles. Yesterday, he took a step toward restoring order, and perhaps made the case for reserving these last weeks for a healthy debate of real issues.

Analysis has alternated between saying McCain has been the victim of his own campaign's overzealous attacks, having to fall on his sword to save his honor, and saying that he had to reclaim the moral high-ground, lest he be left wallowing in some political nether-region where Obama would scarcely need to seek him out or answer his charges. But John McCain deserves credit for trying to put the brakes on what was becoming a slide into the muck and a dangerous precedent. [CafeSentido.com]

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Re: "John McCain deserves credit for trying to put the brakes on what was becoming a slide into the muck and a dangerous precedent."

Far too little, far too late.

Plus, McCain will not his campaign's tactic of "raising doubts about Obama's fitness."

Plus, racism is their last, best hope.

It's all they've got left and they're gonna go with it
I'll believe McCain is truly sincere when he pulls his "terrorist" ads.

In addition, I strongly, strongly suspect that the campaign is paying people to spread these ugly rumors via email. Salon carried a (pretty dumb but illuminating) piece a few weeks ago in which a Danish woman confessed to creating letters to the editor for the campaign out of whole cloth.

How much easier to create "rumors" and email them or post them far and wide?

Until he calls all of this crap off, once and for all, he's guilty as charged. There is more than one way to incite riot, after all.
You reap what you sow…
What has become the Church of the Angry Base the McCain/Palin revival is showing it’s true colors. Rev. John and the Deacon of Deception (Palin) have promoted anger to advance their cause. Now the Rev. has seen the light of hate he’s exposed within the ranks of his blind followers. He needs to dim the spotlight exposing his soul !
You're giving the man more credit than he deserves. He's putting the breaks on it because it has backfired. And now he just looks like he cannot even control the tone of his campaign.

I'm sure McCain made a deal with himself and said if this is what I gotta do to get elected, then I'll do it. Only he hoped it would be Republican surrogates who would do the dirty work. But since the economic crisis knocked the slime machine of it's game the only entity which could change the subject of media coverage was the McCain campaign itself. It was risky and a gamble, something McCain is prone to do, and it has now backfired. People don't like to see slime with the candidate's fingerprints on it. That crosses a line.

It's indicative of the man and his character that he'd try something like this. Just like the Palin pick, she's falling apart under further scrutiny after the initial hoopla.

McCain is an angry old man. If he doesn't want me to think that, then he should stop acting like one.
I would say McCain's "Arab" retort was more like an arsonist trying to put out a wildfire with a watering can.
I think it's a little strong to say he "demanded" civility. He spoke briefly of civility, and in a manner that seemed sincere and even a little concerned, and under the circumstances that's an improvement I've applauded him for. But he didn't go on to belabor the point as nearly as the videos I've seen have suggested (though I haven't seen a full video of that rally). Frankly, when I saw what he was doing I had a momentary hope he was following the plan I outlined in my article An Inconvenient Hate a day or so earlier. But as others here have already noted, he has not pulled his ads nor taken his VP-select out of attack mode.

So he's not even exhausted the space of things that are within his own control, much less demanded (in the sense that Random House, via dictionary.com, offers: to ask for with proper authority, to claim as a right, to ask for peremptorily or urgently, or to call for or require as just, proper, or necessary).

I do think we should try to really praise him for any step he does take, so that he's encouraged to do those. We need even the small gains because violence hangs in the balance. But he should do more.
I don't see how it's remotely plausible to applaud McCain's supposed demands for civility. McCain is like a man who opened Pandora's Box and then said, "Hey, could you guys close it for me?" There's no acknowledgment that he may have been just a teensy weensy bit responsible for the ugliness that has erupted. He's not taking down the slime ads. He's not calling off his attack dogs. If McCain was truly "respectful" of Obama and wanted his supporters to also show respect, then he would have said this the minute his rallies started getting out of hand. In fact, he wouldn't have encouraged such behavior in the first place. McCain is respectful now because he sees that his attack strategy has been political suicide.

I also find it curious that McCain answered the woman's statement that Obama might be Arab by saying that Obama is a decent family man. Is being Arab mutually exclusive of being a decent family man? Once you ruin your reputation, as McCain so willingly has, you can't rehabilitate it in 3 weeks, especially with weak and disingenuous protests of high-mindedness. McCain doesn't have enough years left to redeem himself or convince us that he was not totally complicit in the racially tinged and vile attacks of his campaign and his supporters.
I was raised to believe that the other party in a two part democratic republic was "the loyal opposition" : the other side of the coin, the balance to whatever your party's philosophy might be, a force to be reckoned with and in the best cases, a source from which to learn. I always respected Presidents who had some of the opposition in their cabinets as intentionally keeping themselves from needing "yes" men ("yes-people) as the only reality check in the room.

In attacking, dehumanizing or demonizing Obama, so many dangerous messages are sent. It begins with ignoring his status of one of only 100 Senators in the legislature, an insult to the people of Illinois and the government of the American people, and ends with the Governor of Alaska stirring up hatred and "otherness" that could be a very intentional foundation for the racist scum in our society to attempt assassination.

McCain once had a reputation for respectful politicking. Obviously it was too altruistic for either party handlers or the misguided nuts to the far right among the electorate. If he can indeed "rein in" the horrific viciousness of what the Governor of Alaska and Republican strategists seem to intend he will be a true hero.

Parting thought: the one who began this cranked up, excessive attack style of painting your opposition as "other" and planting seeds of doubt, hatred and fear in reference to your opponent was Lee Atwater.

According to Wikipedia: Atwater was "political consultant and strategist to the Republican party. He was an advisor of U.S. Presidents Ronald Reagan and George H. W. Bush. He was also a political mentor and close friend of Republican strategist Karl Rove. " Enough said about the origin of this spiteful, cowardly approach to politics. What a legacy: making the dirty game of politics even dirtier.

And if you don't believe in karma, know that Atwater died young of brain cancer.
Please help with asking Saturday Night Live to refuse to have Sarah Palin as a guest until she publicly decries and denounces those who are doing the "kill him" shouts:

http://open.salon.com/content.php?cid=27262
Why do the words horse, barn and door come to mind?

This is like watching a train wreck occur in slow motion. I hold my breath each time I turn on my computer, or TV or radio, waiting for dreadful "breaking news." How could the Republicans do this do this country? They have gleefully run the wire, now they claim any lighting of the same is inadvertent and misconstrued? Really? Do they think we are all as dumb as the under-educated rabble that support this team?
I'm glad he at least tried to walk it back, a bit. But he should have told Palin to cool it immediately when she first tried this tactic. Cut off sound to her mike, pushed her aside and nipped the whole question in the bud.

I agree-- too little too late, and trying to put out a forest fire with a watering can.
Loki - Newt refined what Atwater started, with his "language as a mechanism of control" memo, specifying words you should tie to self and to opponent.
Just another insincere flip/flop from McCain. There isn't a sincere bone in this "man's" body. Don't buy into it. I'm glad he said it because I keep praying no nut job will try and kill either Barack Obama or Joe Biden, or anyone else for that matter, but I'm not buying it John McAingry.
If you want to read a really good insight into the mind and make-up of McCain, please, I urge you to read this story from Rolling Stone. http://www. rollingstone. com/news/coverstory/make_believe_maverick_the_real_john_mccain/page/1
There was a time that I was pining for a Kerry/McCain ticket. Anyone else out remember feeling that way? He was the guy that Bush smeared with a race baiting whisper campaign. He was the guy who fought for campaign reform in order to give voters a better chance to look at issues instead shady accusation. He was the guy you wanted because you didn't really think that Clinton was that great in the first place. He was a third way. The candidate for the issue based voters with a pragmatic world view and a hopeful disposition. He was the realist who we thought understood the problems well enough to formulate an appropriate answer. What happened to that guy? And why did he decide to pander to the dwindling number of constituents that think Bush is a great president? I think the answer is that he was intimidated by the shear charisma of Barack Obama. And in a poorly thought out move to try to match pizazz with pizazz, he chose Sarah Palin. Now he's in the uncomfortable position of being the standard bearer of a segment of the conservative base that he himself disdained. And in doing so he has lost his own authenticity. His sincerity. His moral compass. Now he wanders adrift in America's hinterlands surrounded by low brow bigots, anti-intellectuals, and the uninformed rural poor. Very sad.
It is obvious "traitor JoeLieberman" is running Mr. McCains campaign. Isreali/American interests and capital have been very opposed to Obama because he is not sufficiently pro- Isreal, which is the the only other country mentioned by McCain/Palin in this campaign. It is a very subtle form of cultural imperialism.
Does anybody else read remorseful surprise on McCain's face?

When he shakes his head at that woman who calls Obama an Arab, it's like he's embarrassed that his most dedicated followers--the only ones left now that he's scared off the rational people of this country with the promise of bad policy--are actually that uninformed. It seems that the people who are still supporting McCain, for the most part, are people who always have and always will vote Republican, and right now they are proving "liberal elites" right about their stereotyped prejudice and lack of education. There are many, many very intelligent Republicans out there, but this video is not doing them any favors, and McCain's face says it all. It's like he can't even believe who he's surrounded by now, but he's so far down the rabbit hole he can't find his way out again.
I find so many of you clueless. I am a colored person, if you have the tech see me throught their computer, you will see my colored face typing this comment. This has been turned into a race factor by the Obama and the majority of the african americans that just want to see a black face in the whitehouse. These tactics were done by the thug style of the obama machine. They want whites to feel guilty and as I can see it is working. I come from the era of the 60s. I was a child and I also had to sit in the back of the bus and put up with haterd and racism. But, I didn't see this type of hate in all these years until this man Obama came into the picture. If you challenge him about his disqusting associations, he calls "racism". If you challenge him about his tactics concerning "acorn", he calls it "racism. The americans are tired of this and if I was Mccain, I would continue to challenge the annointed messiah of Farranukun. I have seen my neighborhood become racist due to the outcries of the whites. I dont' blame them. Being colored and all I understand their frustations. I don't blame them for having resentment. Who put it there? It wasn't like this before. Then some of you have the nerve to get on this blog and accuse the Republican party. Did you forget they are the ones that freeded my people? Did you forget that? We will be slaves if it wasn't for the Republicans. Or did the Democrats forget to tell the african americans this? Mccain should have just said to the voter, "Well..we don't talk or call people names" and walk away from the situation, not giving that opponent any credit. He is guilty of bringing us in this anger. Period. Acorn is his doing and they are an embarassment to my race! It is the african americans who run this agency and it is the african americans who have done everything to make the whites resent them. Period! Why can't we get a straight answer from this man? Bill Ayers is a concern, especially when Obama's story has changed a hundred time to suit him. His two ex-rooms from Pakinstan- , Muhammad Hasan Chandoo and Wahid Hamid, both from Pakistan are suppose to be in charge of his internet spying, is this true? The question should be asked of the interference of our IP addresses and if this is true. Valerie Jarrett, was Michele Obama's boss. She is now Obama's chief advisor and he does not make any major decisions without talking to her first. Where was Jarrett born? Ready for this? Shiraz, Iran! Everybody that is in the back picture of Obama's life is a muslim. We are at war with the radicals- we should know about this guy's association- whether they are good or bad- we need to know. But, some of you just want to vote historically and can't get off your asses to investigate the man and his association. Don't blame the Republicans for this mess, blame yourselves!
"Another Day in Paradise"
By retired social worker - Sep 3rd, 2008 at 1:26 am EDT
Also listed in: Military Officers for Obama | Obama Pride | OH Greene Team 07C04
Just watched the Minnesota Convention. Well for those who missed it, "Don't look twice" in the words of popular singer/songwriter Phil Collins.The opening video was laughable... staking their claim in being the party of proud war veterens; playing the battle hymn of the republic and doing so implying that their respected opposion is somehow unpatriotic!
Here's a link to the you tube music video. Imagine Barack Obama's profile in the picture in place of Phil Collins.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ftlYLcEW_I4

Now that's a video!

Dan in Dayton
Jeb:

Thanks for having "open eyes"

Last timre I checked McCain wasn't the one who stared the race baiting.

It is BS that no one can even question Obama without being labeled a "bigot" . . .if that is not "playing the card" I don't know what is.

As much as I disaggree with Obama, I think it is awesome that we as a country HAVE come this far that a black man can run for the highest office. I'll drink to that.

I for one am sick of the entire issue, let's leave race out of this and just get on with the election . . . . oh wait, that's not politically correct is it?
I think people misunderstand the nature of the events of this week. They were not "started" by Barack Obama's campaign, nor has his campaign even once "played the race card". It would be difficult to find any political campaign that has taken such pains to avoid that sort of "division". In fact, they have campaigned (really, look at their literature, read his speeches) on a message of post-bias and post-interest-group politics, and Obama has called on people to view the United States of America as a single, inclusive nation, where race, ethnicity, gender, do not determine how you behave or what you can achieve.

He has reached out to people who may have previously been unwilling to work with an African American; he has explained the complicated family history, in which he was raised by a mostly white family, in a turbulent America where his race could have been a serious obstacle.

The events of this past week were the result of what appears to have been a deliberate attempt to plant in voters' minds the idea that Obama is not only suspicious and "different", but potentially "dangerous" to America, and linked to terrorists.

The fact that supporters of McCain "connected the dots" and began to associate his ethnic heritage with some sort of obvious "threat", and that this sparked anger, may have been an unforeseen consequence, but to say that somehow the race issue was raised by Obama would be say that he "deserves" such attacks because he happens to be who he is. That is precisely what we as a nation should be striving to overcome, as LadyMiko notes, and as Sen. McCain seems to have recognized, in correcting supporters' bias and/or confusion.
Jeb: when you make these comments, does it matter that you're a colored person? Should I take your opinion that Barack is to blame more seriously than if you were caucasian?
I only hope that these confused and frightening McCain supports will forget to vote. I sometimes wonder is representative democracy is the best system. Maybe there is something to be said for a plutocracy. At the very least all television should be prohibited from covering political events. If they want to make a stump speech, they need to find an actual stump. TV makes us stupid. Or maybe it's our schools. The first amendment is silent on electronic speech. They can freely assemble crowds, and print screeds till the cows come home, but no more TV for politicians. A mis-informed citizenry is much worse that an uninformed citizenry.
Look, I'm just happy that he's doing something close to how he started his campaign. That's ideally how we really should conduct ourselves in politics, even in a race as important as this one. Be courteous to your opponent, and understand that while his ideas or beliefs may not match yours, that both of your voices should be heard. We should praise him for attempting restraint, even if he hasn't been very kind lately, because we want more of that restraint.
That being said, don't forget either that he did allow these attacks to continue all the way up to this point. Forgive, but do not forget.
McCain did the right thing and it's my hope he follows up on it during the next debate. Win or lose, he understands there will be life, for both himself and the rest of the country, after Nov. 4.
I appreciate McCain's comments, even if it is too little, too late.

BTW, I can't recall Obama himself crying "racism" at every little criticism like some have mentioned on here. Maybe some Obama supporters, I suppose...
Whew - he's NOT an Arab - we can put away our pitchforks since he's instead DECENT! We thought he was ARAB -we didn't have any idea that he was DECENT!

McCain attempts a disingenuious insidious attempt at token sensitivity, because he does nothing to put out the misplaced rage against Arabs.

Why would he not say, “No, ma’am, he’s not an Arab, and I need to state unequivocally that Barack Obama is a Christian, a man of integrity, and a patriotic American. If you believe otherwise, you are misinformed. If he WERE of the Muslim faith, that would NOT be a reason to fear him or to malign his character or patriotism. Our outrage should NOT be directed against people of other faiths, but against anyone who would employ violence against another for their beliefs, and that means us as well.”

Too much self-awareness would really make them mad.