McCain Calls Obama "Decent Family Man", Demands Civility
Arizona Sen. John McCain's presidential campaign has become mired in a controversy over its aggressive personal attacks on Illinois Sen. Barack Obama, which has put the Republican candidate in a supremely awkward position. During a week in which rallies held for his candidacy have featured allegations that Sen. Obama is somehow linked to domestic terrorists or has suspicious overseas supporters, more than once audience members have shouted out threats to Sen. Obama's life.
Now, Sen. McCain, who had promised to run a "respectful" campaign, finds himself facing a rising tide of media antipathy, mounting criticism that to continue provoking such responses may constitute a violation of federal law and be considered "incitement", and the general perception that the campaign is more about anger than issues. So Sen. McCain appears to have made an effort to do the decent thing, and put a stop to it.
At a town-hall meeting event, when a woman said she can't trust Obama because she suspects he's an "Arab", Sen. McCain said "No, no ma'am." He corrected her, and said Sen. Obama "is a decent family man with whom I happen to have some disagreements". He also rebuked a man who claimed to be "scared... to bring up a child" with Obama in the White House, saying that there is no reason to fear an Obama presidency.
Specifically: "I have to tell you he is a decent person and a person that you do not have to be scared of as president of the United States". This seemed to deflate some in the audience, and McCain was even booed for defending his opponent, but McCain explained in sensitive tones that Obama would be a fine president, but that he's running against Obama because of course, as a Republican, he thinks he'd be a much better one.
He called on his supporters to be "respectful", said that's what this campaign was supposed to be about, a respectful debate of the issues by two qualified individuals. "If you want a fight, we will fight," he told supporters calling for more attacks on Obama, adding "But we will be respectful. I admire Senator Obama and his accomplishments. I don't mean that has to reduce your ferocity. I just mean to say you have to be respectful."
McCain by calling for civility is returning to the roots of his campaign, which like Sen. Obama's had initially sought a less partisan environment. The Arizona senator also said it was important to understand that his questioning of Obama's past isn't intended to instill fear about Obama, but rather is meant to be a call for Obama to tell the truth about "relationships" with people who are part of the Chicago political environment he came through.
Some critics say this point is disingenuous, that McCain is falsely accusing Obama of lying about a relationship which has never been more than Obama has acknowledged. And Obama has addressed the issue openly, in the past, but that McCain's charges are unfair in that they are intended to give the impression that Obama lied, simply because his version of events differs from McCain's allegations.
It could be argued McCain had no choice. Increasingly, it was observed that the rhetoric at his rallies seemed designed to stoke fear and anger, and the reaction of the crowds was not limited to isolated individuals. True, there are only two specific cases known where individuals shouted "Kill him!" and "Off with his head!", but the mood was clearly moving in that direction, and a US senator is aware, one would assume, there are federal laws banning rallies that move people to violence or to call for violence.
On Friday, commentary began to shift in that direction, with some supporters of Sen. Obama asking whether there was a legal responsibility on the part of the McCain campaign to make sure that campaign rhetoric did not amount to "incitement", a legal term related to riot law. A spokesperson for McCain's campaign scolded Democrats and the media for "attacking" those "supporters" who expressed "views" outside the mainstream, and the notion that the campaign sought to defend the right of individuals to call for the Democratic candidate's death may have been the last straw.
Polling throughout the week seemed to indicate McCain was losing independent voters and even moderates in his own party with the smear tactics, but more specifically with the unsavory atmosphere that was growing up around some campaign rallies. Gov. Palin had come to be seen as a "rabble-rouser", and several well-known conservative commentators said the Republican party was supposed to be above this kind of politics, calling on the campaign to "rein in" the vice-presidential candidate.
In the end, Sen. McCain did the right thing. There is no room in American politics for race-baiting, for stoking fears based on ethnicity, or even, for that matter, on running a campaign that counts on fear and confusion giving a candidate an edge. McCain had previously stood up for that, but his presidential campaign seemed to have gotten away from his long-held principles. Yesterday, he took a step toward restoring order, and perhaps made the case for reserving these last weeks for a healthy debate of real issues.
Analysis has alternated between saying McCain has been the victim of his own campaign's overzealous attacks, having to fall on his sword to save his honor, and saying that he had to reclaim the moral high-ground, lest he be left wallowing in some political nether-region where Obama would scarcely need to seek him out or answer his charges. But John McCain deserves credit for trying to put the brakes on what was becoming a slide into the muck and a dangerous precedent. [CafeSentido.com]


Salon.com
Comments
Far too little, far too late.
Plus, McCain will not his campaign's tactic of "raising doubts about Obama's fitness."
Plus, racism is their last, best hope.
It's all they've got left and they're gonna go with it
In addition, I strongly, strongly suspect that the campaign is paying people to spread these ugly rumors via email. Salon carried a (pretty dumb but illuminating) piece a few weeks ago in which a Danish woman confessed to creating letters to the editor for the campaign out of whole cloth.
How much easier to create "rumors" and email them or post them far and wide?
Until he calls all of this crap off, once and for all, he's guilty as charged. There is more than one way to incite riot, after all.
What has become the Church of the Angry Base the McCain/Palin revival is showing it’s true colors. Rev. John and the Deacon of Deception (Palin) have promoted anger to advance their cause. Now the Rev. has seen the light of hate he’s exposed within the ranks of his blind followers. He needs to dim the spotlight exposing his soul !
I'm sure McCain made a deal with himself and said if this is what I gotta do to get elected, then I'll do it. Only he hoped it would be Republican surrogates who would do the dirty work. But since the economic crisis knocked the slime machine of it's game the only entity which could change the subject of media coverage was the McCain campaign itself. It was risky and a gamble, something McCain is prone to do, and it has now backfired. People don't like to see slime with the candidate's fingerprints on it. That crosses a line.
It's indicative of the man and his character that he'd try something like this. Just like the Palin pick, she's falling apart under further scrutiny after the initial hoopla.
McCain is an angry old man. If he doesn't want me to think that, then he should stop acting like one.
So he's not even exhausted the space of things that are within his own control, much less demanded (in the sense that Random House, via dictionary.com, offers: to ask for with proper authority, to claim as a right, to ask for peremptorily or urgently, or to call for or require as just, proper, or necessary).
I do think we should try to really praise him for any step he does take, so that he's encouraged to do those. We need even the small gains because violence hangs in the balance. But he should do more.
I also find it curious that McCain answered the woman's statement that Obama might be Arab by saying that Obama is a decent family man. Is being Arab mutually exclusive of being a decent family man? Once you ruin your reputation, as McCain so willingly has, you can't rehabilitate it in 3 weeks, especially with weak and disingenuous protests of high-mindedness. McCain doesn't have enough years left to redeem himself or convince us that he was not totally complicit in the racially tinged and vile attacks of his campaign and his supporters.
In attacking, dehumanizing or demonizing Obama, so many dangerous messages are sent. It begins with ignoring his status of one of only 100 Senators in the legislature, an insult to the people of Illinois and the government of the American people, and ends with the Governor of Alaska stirring up hatred and "otherness" that could be a very intentional foundation for the racist scum in our society to attempt assassination.
McCain once had a reputation for respectful politicking. Obviously it was too altruistic for either party handlers or the misguided nuts to the far right among the electorate. If he can indeed "rein in" the horrific viciousness of what the Governor of Alaska and Republican strategists seem to intend he will be a true hero.
Parting thought: the one who began this cranked up, excessive attack style of painting your opposition as "other" and planting seeds of doubt, hatred and fear in reference to your opponent was Lee Atwater.
According to Wikipedia: Atwater was "political consultant and strategist to the Republican party. He was an advisor of U.S. Presidents Ronald Reagan and George H. W. Bush. He was also a political mentor and close friend of Republican strategist Karl Rove. " Enough said about the origin of this spiteful, cowardly approach to politics. What a legacy: making the dirty game of politics even dirtier.
And if you don't believe in karma, know that Atwater died young of brain cancer.
http://open.salon.com/content.php?cid=27262
This is like watching a train wreck occur in slow motion. I hold my breath each time I turn on my computer, or TV or radio, waiting for dreadful "breaking news." How could the Republicans do this do this country? They have gleefully run the wire, now they claim any lighting of the same is inadvertent and misconstrued? Really? Do they think we are all as dumb as the under-educated rabble that support this team?
I agree-- too little too late, and trying to put out a forest fire with a watering can.
When he shakes his head at that woman who calls Obama an Arab, it's like he's embarrassed that his most dedicated followers--the only ones left now that he's scared off the rational people of this country with the promise of bad policy--are actually that uninformed. It seems that the people who are still supporting McCain, for the most part, are people who always have and always will vote Republican, and right now they are proving "liberal elites" right about their stereotyped prejudice and lack of education. There are many, many very intelligent Republicans out there, but this video is not doing them any favors, and McCain's face says it all. It's like he can't even believe who he's surrounded by now, but he's so far down the rabbit hole he can't find his way out again.
By retired social worker - Sep 3rd, 2008 at 1:26 am EDT
Also listed in: Military Officers for Obama | Obama Pride | OH Greene Team 07C04
Just watched the Minnesota Convention. Well for those who missed it, "Don't look twice" in the words of popular singer/songwriter Phil Collins.The opening video was laughable... staking their claim in being the party of proud war veterens; playing the battle hymn of the republic and doing so implying that their respected opposion is somehow unpatriotic!
Here's a link to the you tube music video. Imagine Barack Obama's profile in the picture in place of Phil Collins.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ftlYLcEW_I4
Now that's a video!
Dan in Dayton
Thanks for having "open eyes"
Last timre I checked McCain wasn't the one who stared the race baiting.
It is BS that no one can even question Obama without being labeled a "bigot" . . .if that is not "playing the card" I don't know what is.
As much as I disaggree with Obama, I think it is awesome that we as a country HAVE come this far that a black man can run for the highest office. I'll drink to that.
I for one am sick of the entire issue, let's leave race out of this and just get on with the election . . . . oh wait, that's not politically correct is it?
He has reached out to people who may have previously been unwilling to work with an African American; he has explained the complicated family history, in which he was raised by a mostly white family, in a turbulent America where his race could have been a serious obstacle.
The events of this past week were the result of what appears to have been a deliberate attempt to plant in voters' minds the idea that Obama is not only suspicious and "different", but potentially "dangerous" to America, and linked to terrorists.
The fact that supporters of McCain "connected the dots" and began to associate his ethnic heritage with some sort of obvious "threat", and that this sparked anger, may have been an unforeseen consequence, but to say that somehow the race issue was raised by Obama would be say that he "deserves" such attacks because he happens to be who he is. That is precisely what we as a nation should be striving to overcome, as LadyMiko notes, and as Sen. McCain seems to have recognized, in correcting supporters' bias and/or confusion.
That being said, don't forget either that he did allow these attacks to continue all the way up to this point. Forgive, but do not forget.
BTW, I can't recall Obama himself crying "racism" at every little criticism like some have mentioned on here. Maybe some Obama supporters, I suppose...
McCain attempts a disingenuious insidious attempt at token sensitivity, because he does nothing to put out the misplaced rage against Arabs.
Why would he not say, “No, ma’am, he’s not an Arab, and I need to state unequivocally that Barack Obama is a Christian, a man of integrity, and a patriotic American. If you believe otherwise, you are misinformed. If he WERE of the Muslim faith, that would NOT be a reason to fear him or to malign his character or patriotism. Our outrage should NOT be directed against people of other faiths, but against anyone who would employ violence against another for their beliefs, and that means us as well.”
Too much self-awareness would really make them mad.