Yes, I took one of the more provocative thoughts from the lengthy New York Times Sunday Magazine piece:
... and used it for the headline.
Contributing writer and author Daniel Bergner delves into the current state of scientific research into what turns women on, sexually. "What provokes sexual responses from women?" would have been a more accurate headline than “What do women want?” which seems like a larger and even more unanswerable question, bringing, as it does, shoes and chocolate into the range of choices, rather than keeping more strictly to perhaps baser instincts and desires.
I'm guessing that OSers will generally have a less misogynistic response than Times commenters thus far ...
And I don't want to step on Bergner's toes, or even my own ... but I thought this meaty bone ought to be savaged.
Men? Women? What do women want?
The article for me, evoked a memory of a former lover who craved being overpowered in most of her fantasies. She had trouble finding men who would take this information into account in real life. One told her: "I have too much respect for you to treat you that way."
He didn't last the night.
I stayed around rather longer.


Salon.com
Comments
There are no right answers. What is good for one doesn't suit another.
Lumping all women together to try and find the 'key' to happiness doesn't work. People should be addressing the wants of their partners as individuals.
In the particular case I mention I didn't have to guess, and it was us addressing a need. I'm not extrapolating to any other relationship ... not even any of my own.
If you want to be Mr. Nice Guy, do the dishes, make dinner occasionally, compliment her hair, her outfit, her essence.
When you want sex - peel away all the layers of civility and day time voices and expect or dare to demand, that she feel the same, here and now.
So not hesitate, do not test the waters. Go in for the prize and just do it. Sweep her off her feet, literally, let her know you mean man sex business and shock her by knowing that she is as frenzied as you are. Expect the sex beast in her. Be the beast if you want her inner beast to rip your clothes off.
Save conversation for later.
Just a thought.
They want men to stop treating them like they all want the same thing. Women are incredibly complicated, and fiercely individual. Yes, they can be typed, yes, they can be categorized, and yes, there are trends and near-universals. The question to ask women is not, "What do women want?"... it's "What do you want?"
My lover wants to take charge sometimes, and other times, she enjoys me completely running ramshackle over her body. She wants us to make love and for me to show that I really care how she feels. Yes, I do "bring it" in the sack, but what has made me successful is attuning to what each partner wants individually, rather than assuming that there is some kind of universal sexual skeleton key or a one-size-fits-all (ahem) approach.
Men: If a woman wants to be thrown around like a rag doll and blown away by a big powerful man... fantastic! Do it! Have your way with her. You just can't assume that's what she wants. Dialogue-- frank, positive discussion about sexual attitudes and habits-- really helps.
I like this discussion. Thanks.
The problem with these things, these types of articles is that they try to lump 'everyone' into the same box and it just doesn't fit. At. All.
It removes the nuances that make us unique.
I read the bit in Salon.com about the article and thought that I was reading a paper on the sex habits of mice... So sterile and removed it was...
There are women that want it rough, that want it gentile, that can only be attracted to men with beards or only clean shaven... There are women that prefer no sex, at all...
When people try to apply generalizations to larger groups of people they fall flat on their faces.
Isn't an article like this going to feed another wave of the macho 'ladies men' like in the seventies?
A woman wants to be treated the way they want to be treated. Some of the more surprising fantasies come from the most surprising sources.
Talking about what each wants is the best way to start. It took a long time for my wife to tell me her 'secret' fantasy. When we finally got down to it, we were able to scratch that itch and I learned something about the woman I married. That was priceless...
Communication and less science and warped 'facts' from articles like this is what I'd prescribe. Get to know the person under (or on top of) you.
Don't just 'do it'... Pigs just 'do it'. Humans can do it with style... Women are complicated, and sex is messy... If you do it right...
So not hesitate, do not test the waters. Go in for the prize and just do it. Sweep her off her feet, literally, let her know you mean man sex business and shock her by knowing that she is as frenzied as you are. Expect the sex beast in her. Be the beast if you want her inner beast to rip your clothes off.
Save conversation for later."
WOW! Some hot grandma! There is hope for us all...
It may not even overlap much. It's a superb mystery, sometimes.
-What do they say they want, generally?
-What do they really want, generally, if they trust in and lust for the man they're with?
-What do they want, initially, when the loving begins?
-What do the find they want, if the preliminaries are expert and the heat is rising?
-What do they want with un-named, non-specific man?
-What do they want with you, you marvelous, instincive lover-man, you?
It all depends on the man and the moment.
By the way, Just Cathy is just marvelous. You've spent a lot of nights and mornings grinning, haven't you, Cathy? Nothing better for a man than to be with a woman who's certain about what *she* wants.
The rest is just details.
As to your btw ... anecdotally, you are special, but not unique. :-)
... and immediately thought that might be all some men need, whatever else they were shown. ;-)