Well, are you ready to be outraged? Have you noticed all those white gurlz, excuse me, young white women, who are miscegenating...coupling with young Negro hoodlum toughs. It's all the rage. I see a lot of that walking through the downtown shopping malls in my 'hood. A friend's wife recently told me that the entire maternity ward in her hospital celebrated when a real 100% white baby was born recently...all the other lil rugrats delivered there, thanks to white tax payer dollars, are of a non-white background...Arab, Latino, African, Asian, what have you.
So, what's up? Why are a lot of nice middle class white girls attracted to blacks? Why is black so goddamned cool?...with their hip hop, gangsta rap, jive, soul brudder claptrap? Huh? Why? Cuz white society has completely lost its self-confidence, moorings, vitality, reason for being, etc., that's why. The black underclass rebellious subculture is COOL and very appealing to white girls bored out of their minds with rationality, equality, respect...all the qualities they get from their civilized white families. The girls want a little excitement in their lives...a little roughstuff, a shove, a slap, bitch slap, of course. They get all wet thinking of primal maleness...which nice young white men are no longer allowed to express, because of feminist political correctness. The nice white girls have been taught in their college classes that the white male superstructure, that created computers, lasers, rocket ships, synthetic tampons, Las Vegas, air travel vomit bags, the auto industry, modern medicine, chemicals, plastics, inexpensive food, TV, etc. is exploitative, oppressive, fascist...but the white girls and blacks use its products and advances because,well, thass all taken for granted, and the big buck niggers are now all the cultural rage.
A black man is seen by these stupid white girls as a 'fellow victim' of the white patriarchy. The white girls think they can find psychological solidarity, coupled with a great big one-eyed trouser python, in the form of a grunting and disgruntled bad boy black man-boy. Then, in a little while, as they get punched up more than just a little bit and their starry eyed politically correct so-called post-modern feminist-based relationship gets completely shit on by the angry black boy buck, who no longer has the sizzling sex appeal of a misunderstood Mandingo plantation boy genius, they get dumped and are usually left with a little nigger baby to 'love' and take care of. Ha ha ha. And the so-called 'racist' white taxpayer base keeps funding this insanity, because look at Obama...what a WONDERFUL black man he is, and all the lil black chillun can go to Harvard and be our political leaders in the future just like he did, if only nasty middle aged white men weren't so diabolically 'racist'.
We're all racist? Really? So it's not allowed to make a sociological observation about the nihilism and self-destructiveness of most African-American culture? And why was Mr. Obama elected by a lot of white folks in the first place?...starting with the Democratic Iowa caucus of 2008? Huh? Maybe it was because all those white Iowans were gratified that here was a well-spoken, rational, intelligent, seemingly competent, BLACK man. Oh Hallelujah!...the Lord has given us a NICE, decent black man who isn't just interested in getting welfare, drinking Ripple, and swinging around his humongous black cock...uggh, shudder, enough to choke that first Afrikan tree-monkey, Patient Zero, and start the long chain of AIDS infection world-wide. Thanks Africa! More recently the Republicans have 'aped' this infatuation with cool blackness by becoming enamored with 'their' candidate, Mr. Herman Cain. Well, that nigger can't keep his cock in his pants either, and he loves to sexually harass white women...case closed. (By the way, a word of explanation. My liberal use of the dreaded 'n' word, nigger, is in keeping with the predilection of African/American subculture, as in the 'work' of the likes of Chris Rock, Eddy Murphy, et al. The politically correct theory would have the use of that epithet rigidly restricted for the usage of Negroes only, in deference to the understood rules operating under the precepts of 'cultural appropriation,' which is a cultural-Marxist construction. Needless to say I don't subscribe to those restrictions.)
So people like me are supposedly racist...racist my pimpled chrysanthemum-white ass. An astronomical amount of white taxpayer money, since Lyndon Johnson's Great Society social programs of the 1960s, has been invested in trying to raise, lift up, black society. But to no avail...the violence, social dysfunction, troglodyte ethics of inner city black Amerika continues on its precipitous declining path. Who's fault izzat? Oh, I guess white society is to blame...has to be, what else could it be?
And Jew-dominated Hollywood has been in the tank for the propaganda effort to bamboozle and convince white Amerika that black people are...GREAT. Look at Sidney Poitier, the great movie icon of the 1960s. Mr. Poitier is a very well-spoken and decent and respectable black man, like President Obama, but these few civilized blacks have been portrayed as the norm...which is a blatant LIE. Sidney and Obama are the tiny exceptions when the vast majority of blacks are like Willy Horton, the serial rapist. So now a fair intellectual discourse would begin revolving around quantification...how small IS that minority of decent blacks, exactly...how do we account for in-between blacks, good sometimes, savages at other times, etc.? Well, we can't know, because the goddamned university social science departments don't study this issue. Why? Because it's political dynamite and academics are pussies, unwilling to rock the boat. So, until we get some professors, with rock hard ellipsoid sphericals in their undies, to do some honest research, discussions like this can only give thumbnail sketches. But for all you fair minded bastards out there...do you really think white racism, especially in the last 20 years or so, can account for the majority of black dysfunction? Be fucking honest for a minute, okay? After long and troubled cogitation you will come to the conclusion that for the run of the mill African American only a rigidly enforced code of Western morality can civilize him/her.
So, aren't there ANY decent black people in everyday life? Of course there are...many, still. But they're mostly Bible believing good folks. Because only the BIBLE can tame the wild savage inside the Negro race. Education, universities, books, politics, journalism...expose black people to the tradition of European intellectual discourse and they go wild, becoming Black Panthers, or Communists, or Malcolm X/Louis Farrakhan destructive Moslem types. Give a black buck some real money like that Atlanta Falcons quarterback recently and he does some nigger-crazy thing like funding extreme vicious dog-fighting. And leave it to blacks to fuel a crack cocaine epidemic. And insist on speaking in Ebonics, ha ha ha. And what about those astronomically high black incarceration rates...oh, I forgot, it's all a result of white racism. Jeez, even the Reverend Jesse Jackson is gotta be a racist cause he famously said years ago that when he 'hears footsteps behind him on the street at night and he turns around and sees it's just white guys he breathes a sigh of relief.' That widespread attitude in black communities is a result of extremely high black-on-black crime rates...gotta be a white racist phenomenon, huh? Well, maybe only enforced gospel singing class, school uniforms, and hard slaps in the faces of young violent Vin Diesel buck nigger types can keep society functioning...but of course that's impossible in this politically correct decadent society of ours today.
And how come, when European colonialism and slavery was occurring in the 18th and 19th centuries, how come all the advanced technology, the ships, metals, guns, compasses, chemicals, scientific discoveries, etc. that made all this possible started in Europe and NOT Africa? Why weren't the African peoples able to do the same themselves and sail ships northward to Europe and try to enslave the whites? Huh? The African tribes were extremely vicious to one another (remember the Tootsi-rolls and Pizza Huttus of Rwanda?) so it wasn't morality that was stopping them. Maybe it was...wait, let me think...ummm...BRAIN POWER? Maybe because they couldn't even invent matches and only got fire from lightning strikes? Is what I'm saying baloney or maybe the African grass-hut termite infested villages weren't such hot locales of cultural innovation? Why, in traditional African societies just the notion of podiatric therapy was unthinkable!...wink
For those of you who think EVERYTHING I've written here is UNFAIR...why don't you smug liberals just examine YOUR prejudices for once. When I point out the deplorable living conditions of the inner cities, of south Chicago, Detroit, Philadelphia, Baltimore, etc. your response is to remain...SILENT. If you really, sincerely think all that decay and dysfunction is a result of white racism then you're NOT being intellectually HONEST. Sure, I'm coming across like a prick. Hey hey, life is tough. I'm provoking you to THINK! The intellectually HONEST response would be to support social science research that would discover the empirically determinably correct, within a certain degree of irreducible statistical uncertainty, quantifiable amount of black underclass dysfunction attributable to inherent 'racialist', or inherited, factors...with the remaining amount attributable to a negative environment rooted in white racism. But you liberals don't even want to do that little social science research for FEAR that ANY amount of black under-performance may have a racial basis. So who is being narrow-minded now?
And the reason you're so pathetically fucking AFRAID of facing this issue is because you have no faith in conservative Amerika. You think that, given a finding of a racial component as an explanatory cause for black dysfunction, arrived at through impeccably high-quality social science research, konservatives would want to engage in eugenic policies and wash their hands of all of black Amerika. Well, some konservatives would have that response...but others might just be ready for an honest dialogue on RACE. But any honest dialogue is 'verboten' by your totalitarian cultural-Marxist ideology. Well, you're going to LOSE in the long run...cuz, if a lot of black dysfunction IS predicated on biological/genetic factors then you can't hide that forever.
Look, let's be fair. In this holiday season look at all the snowflakes. Have you ever seen a BLACK snowflake...is a black snowflake even CONCEIVABLE? Of course not...because snowflakes come from the pure ethereal everlasting sphere of Heaven. And one thing I'll say for the Mormons...I was just watching the Mormon Tabernacle Choir and isn't it refreshing to see all the crisp white faces? God, what a relief. Same thing for the Minnesota Christmas choir. Blacks just don't...belong. In college they bring down the averages. But us white folks have to twist ourselves into a pretzel and applaud NEGRO INTELLECTUAL accomplishments...there's an oxymoron if ever there was one. And blacks don't even know as much as most oxen. Most ox are a plaid kind of color. And seagulls, like Jonathan Livingston Seagull, are ALL WHITE! That's because God prefers the color WHITE. And look at these dumb niggers...like Michael Jackson who was BLEACHING his skin, to look white, like God prefers. Look at all the angst in the African-Amerikan kommunity over SKIN TONE. Even Baracks Obama could just make it to be Prez because he's a MULATTO...there's cream in that coffee and it barely makes him acceptable to the community of civilized nations.
Black is the color of sin, and darkness, and COAL MINES! Mines are dug deep into the earth, approaching Hell and eternal damnation, from which the black race was sprung. Are you in favor of coal? I didn't think so. So wake up AMERIKA! We're all one big melting pot self-flagellating socialist/feminist Promethean-bound nigger-Afrikan village now, hopefully, like the Kommunist Occupiers have planned out in their 5-Year plans...so hugs an' kisses to y'all this black/white Yuletide season....
A Response to my Commenters/Critics:
Sorry but my comments box has been disabled so I will have to type some responses here within the body of my 'work.' First, I must thank everyone who took the time to try to become a lil edukated on the race issue. I want especially to thank the Ashkenazi traveler who has presented a seemingly exhaustive set of footnotes detailing all kinds of academik studies purportedly showing an I.Q. equivalency between whites and blacks. I wonder if Comrade traveler was struck by the irony that all these IQ tests and other scholastic examination of people in Africa was carried out by Western researchers, and that the reverse process was not taking place, i.e. that it was never the case that African academics were doing anthropological studies in Europe or Amerika. That fact, and the astronomical imbalance in relative civilizational/scientific/technological advance between the West and Africa has to strike any objective observer as being a fundamental question that needs to be answered. The question really comes down to how much of the cultural differences between societies of different race are attributable to genetic factors, and how much is attributable to random environmental factors that occurred in the past and are by nature unpredictable and unrepeatable in the history of a society. How big a factor is the 'biology' component in the workings of any sociobiological explanation for the different experiences and capacities of a society? My point was that academia is loath to examine this fundamental question for fear of enraging the adherents of the politically correct consensus that dominates the universities, journalism, politics, etc. ...this dominant politically correct ethos is driven by white guilt for the human rights violations of the slavery era, and the liberals of today are terrified that objective research into the biological/racial components of black underachievement/violence can only do more harm than good and that any discussion of these matters will stimulate a deeply entrenched racism lumbering in the psyches of a large number of white Amerikans. That's hardly an intellectual position of integrity and has been adopted for craven and cowardly reasons as can be divined from the vitriol of many of the commenters.
As to my pop-cultural observation of a seemingly disproportionate number of white women becoming involved with black males I would challenge the casual reader to make a count next time you are in a public venue. The number of black male/white female couples far outnumbers those of white male/black female. (By the way, talking about inferiority complexes, it's these black 'boyfriends' of the white gurlz who are motivated by competition with white males. I have chuckled when I noticed their grins aimed in the direction of white men, trying to say in their infantile way that they are challenging the white power structure. They think they have accomplished something by fucking stupid white women...how childish.) As to the gender makeup of interracial couples, black male/white female vs. white male/black female, I'm not making this up. Make a numerical count yourself. A sociological observation like that merits further analysis but, once again, will run into a vicious politically correct mindset among liberals for purportedly fanning the flames of racism. One of my many critics here says 'oh, so you know what's in the mind of these women, you are omniscient...' so as to disparage my observations. I am sorry I treaded on some sensitive toes but people do make initial observations of social phenomena that may or may not be warranted by the results of subsequent study. I also make the observation that many young males, from boys to adolescents to so-called young men, of all races, are showing a greater propensity to immaturity and irresponsibility these days. The feministas will agree with that observation because it is congruent with their ideology but will take umbrage at my interracial remarks...prejudice runs deeply in the liberal community, what can I say.
But if I was just a nut, part of a tiny minority of extremists, then I daresay I wouldn't have merited all the gracious responses to this post. The large number of outraged responders are not reacting to one individual but to the rather extensive penetration, of the attitude I have presented, within the psyches of millions of red state Amerikans, and the continuing prevalency of 'racialist' attitudes within white Amerika just 'gets your collective goat, don't it?'...wink
Everyone reading this post should look at Mr. Magnus' last comments, toward the very bottom of the comments section. He says, accurately, that 'most anthropologists recognize 'race' as just a social construction...etc.' My point is that public policy cannot be just based on the academic discipline of 'anthropology.' I explicitly refer to 'sociobiology' which is based on radically different premises. Mr. Magnus wants to just talk about skin pigmentation. There are a multitude of other genetic factors, such as the sickle cell anemia gene, etc. that, in totality, can differentiate groups of human beings according to 'racial' criteria. Just because the Nazis, and other fanatics, have misused racial categories and criteria for nefarious purposes does not detract from the validity of race concepts...unless you are ideologically hidebound like Mr. Magnus who would relegate me to a 'psychiatric consultation.' As I said earlier, the liberals' problem is not with me...it is with the milions of Amerikans who maintain race as a valid 'fact' of nature, just like they maintain that 'gravity' is another fact, the latter belonging to the domain of the physical sciences. I wonder if Mr. Magnus et al would at least be open to academic intercourse between the disciplines of anthropology and sociobiology. Perhaps not...Mr. Magnus would probably just rather applaud interracial intercourse in the underclass as the culmination of our political correctness...wink
Mr. Magnus blames me for misunderstanding the concept of nihilism. Well, a short dictionary definition of nihilism describes it as an attitude or ideology that eschews any values or morality...but as a social scientist of some kind Magnus goes on to say that it also 'encompasses subordinating the self to the group...' fa la la. Look, Mr. Magnus is not angry with me...he is angry with the 'racialist' attitude that I have described in my post that is shared by millions of Americans. Just administer a secret questionnaire to this silent majority of Americans (and I don't know if it is technically a majority anymore, perhaps just a very large minority) and these people will agree with me, not Professor Magnus. Mr. Magnus would like to live in an idealized world where incredibly bestial behavior by inner city Negroes cannot be cited as possibly being the product of racial inferiority. He insists that I, and millions of others, have adopted this position because we want to preen ourselves as 'superior' to these blacks. He ignores the many years of painstaking effort that whites have expended in trying to help such blacks, and if such whites have reached the reluctant conclusion that genetic factors may be to blame, Mr. Magnus considers this a nihilistic conclusion. Many otherwise fair Americans will, however, in fact agree that dumb niggers killing other dumb niggers and making many welfare babies is 'nihilistic' in itself, and there is no nihilism adhering to the mental processes by which this conclusion has been reached. Case closed.
Everybody should read Jack Heart's final comment at the bottom of this page. You fucking snivelling fag bastard liberals, that's one 'kick in your balls.' You know who used to talk a lot about kicking them in the balls...the Kennedys, when talking about how to treat their political enemies. The fact remains that Professor Magnus doesn't even want to allow sociobiology to contend with anthropology in a civilized debate. He has unilaterally determined that my arguments are invalid and the discussion is closed. It must be very gratifying to be a cultural-Marxist totalitarian like Comrade Magnus and decide that all my observations are focused on 'teenagers in malls' and to throw down the memory hole all the nihilistic inner city Negro behavior. And how self-satisfying it must be to possess God-like powers of total intellectual finality such as Mr. Magnus styles himself as having. No wonder many ordinary voters vote Republikan...wink
Oh, I almost forgot. To my fellow traveller in this vale of tears, the inimitable Harry Homeless, I have to tell you that there is hope for pimply lil white guyz like me to 'git a lil poontang/squeeze in the future.' It seems that Goldmann-Sachs managers/analysts are creating a 'booty index' for perspicacious investors to sink their nickels and pennies into. Alas, however, the financial predators and manipulators will quickly inflate the index beyond the reach of Everyman and so the lil guy will once again drop his load only to have his cheque/dick returned stamped 'Insufficient Funds/Girth.' Thank the Goddesses that Goldmann is also working on a 'homeless shelter index fund' so y'all be able to cash in soon Harry...empty that mattress quick for the IPO, Initial Penis Oblation...wink


Salon.com
Comments
Excellent post. White women ARE stupid. Most blacks are savages, some aren't, but most are. Google congo rapes, haiti rapes etc.
Visit Stormfront.org newslinks for some enlightenment.
For the creationists out there, if God is perfect, why would he create three distinct races in which the ONLY difference was skin color?
If you are a believer in the theory of evolution, how could three distinctly different races evolve whose ONLY difference was skin color.
Let me preface my next comments by saying that, due to the large population sizes involved, any discussion of racial differences must be framed in terms of averages. There will always be exceptions from the norm.
On average, white IQs run between 100-105, Asian between 102-106 and purebed African blacks average 70. American blacks have average IQs in the 78-85 range due to the fact that American "blacks" are generally 20%-30% white. You may also want to see Jefferson's "Notes on the State of Virginia", the Laws section--carefully read all of it.
Madison Avenue also recognizes racial differences in that they know blacks are more impulsive buyers than whites or Asians. Besides lack of impulse control, science has identified a violence gene which is present in 2.5 times more blacks than whites,which is the real reason for higher black incarceration rates.
There is also the observational evidence that anywhere large numbers of blacks congregate, the area quickly becomes a third world shit hole.
Other programs have shown dramatic improvement in test scores for socially disadvantaged adolescents as a result of short-term cognitive training, so that "…three months later their performance was indistinguishable from that of middle class students” (Feuerstein & Kozulin, 1995, p. 74). Studies done with Ethiopian immigrant students coming from extraordinarily poor rural circumstances tested in Israel by different IQ tests had, in pre-intervention tests, demonstrated lower test scores than the Israeli norm. However, after a short but intensive teaching process the Ethiopian immigrant children performed at about the same level as the Israeli norm (Tzuriel & Kaufman, 1999; Kozulin, 1998).
Bond (1924) early last century pointed out that the average IQ scores of African Americans from several northern states were higher than those for whites from many southern states (Bond, 1924a, p. 63). He argued that African Americans who migrated to the North must have left their "duller and less accomplished White fellows in the South." Bond also believed that IQ test scores reflected social and educational training. Inline with this belief, Jenkins's (1936) reported the results of IQ tests given to Black and White children in Illinois, and found that the proportion of students with scores over 130 was the same among Black and White children when environmental influences were comparable. A later study, involving Caribbean children, would in essence replicate these findings. The results from that study showed that when raised in the same enriched institutional environments as white children, black children demonstrated superior IQ test scores. IQs were: Black children 108, Mixed children 106, and White children 103 (Tizard et al, 1972).
Studies also show that upward of 99% of group IQ score differences between healthy black and white Americans are eliminated after controlling for cultural factors. Manly et al (1998) found that after cultural factors such as linguistic behavior (e.g. black vs. standard English) are controlled between healthy black and white Americans that IQ score differences between these populations virtually disappear; becoming insignificant in all but only one area (a reading section)! Some argue that because those who construct standardized tests come from a narrow social group that it follows that test items will contain information and structures that match the background knowledge of some people more than others (Richardson, 2000). This may explain why “acculturation” is found to predict IQ score differences better than virtually any other variable, aside from literacy levels (which is essentially another mediator of culture). Other studies have shown similar results, after controlling for cultural factors. Fagan and Holland (2002) found that where exposure to specific information was required; whites knew more about the meanings of different sayings than did Blacks, due to exposure. But, when comprehension was based on generally available information, Whites and Blacks did not differ (Fagan and Holland, 2002; see also, Fagan and Holland, 2007). This study also found that when Blacks and Whites are matched as to the comprehension of sayings requiring specific knowledge that Blacks were superior to Whites on intelligence tests (ibid).
Teng and Manly (2005) argue that tests developed for members of the majority culture are often inappropriate for ethnic minorities, especially those who speak a different language, have little or no formal education, and grow up in vastly different circumstances (see also, Williams, 1972; Boone et al, 2007). These researchers further argue that variables that directly affect test performance, such as education and acculturation instead of race or ethnicity, should be considered as explanatory variables for test performance (Teng and Manly, 2005). Boone et al (2007) obtained findings that further supported this line, as not ethnic differences, but the effects of acculturation directly and significantly influenced IQ test performance. The authors cautioned that normative data derived on Caucasian samples may not be appropriate for use with other ethnic groups (Boone et al, 2007). Ryan et al (2005) found that discrepancy in reading and education level was associated with worse psychological test performance (e.g. IQ and other tests), while racial/ethnic minority status was not.
Educational inequality in the U.S. is a pervasive part of the social system and is primarily a consequence of housing. Since the majority of states determine school funding based on property taxes, schools in wealthier neighborhoods receive more funding per student. As home values in white neighborhoods are higher than minority neighborhoods, local schools receive more funding via property taxes (Kelly, 1995). In addition, there has been a history of social policy which has limited African American’s access to avenues of wealth accumulation (e.g. purchasing suburban homes); so that black families also have far fewer assets than their white counterparts who earn the same incomes (Oliver and Shapiro, 1995). Parents with greater assets are free to use them for things like tutors, purchasing educational materials (e.g. computers), and to pay for private schools and more expensive colleges.
In a study which helped to highlight the need for better education for African American children, Serpell et al. (2006) took 162 low-income African American and white fourth graders and assigned them, randomly, to ethnically homogeneous groups of three to work on a motion acceleration task, using computer simulation or physical tools. Or to a control group that did not participate in the learning activities. It was shown that both African American and White students performed equally well on the test of initial learning, with both groups scoring significantly higher than the control group. However, it was also found that African American children’s transfer outcomes were superior to those of their White counterparts (see Serpell et al., 2006). The study demonstrated, empirically, that not only do African American children learn as well as white children, but that they may actually exceed their white counterparts in their ability to transfer learned abilities to real tasks.
Williams and Rivers (1972b) showed that test instructions in Standard English penalize the black child and that if the language of the test is put in familiar labels, without training or coaching, the black child’s performance on the tests increase significantly. Ideally a child’s language development should be evaluated in terms of his progress toward the norms for his own particular speech community (Cadzen, 1966); however, this kind of evaluation is rarely, if ever, done with respect to African Americans. Studies using sentence repetition tasks have found that at both third and fifth grades white subjects repeated Standard English sentences significantly more accurately than black subjects, while black subjects repeated nonstandard English sentences significantly more accurately than did white subjects (Marwit et al, 1977). Students in American schools are usually taught and tested only in Standard English, which can put African American students at a disadvantage. In fact, this issue was at the center debates concerning the use of Ebonics in the American school system during the 1990s.
Researchers provide considerable evidence showing that traditional psychological assessment is based on skills that are considered important within white, western, middle-class culture, but which may not be salient or valued within African-American culture (Helms, 1992; Helms, 1997; Hilliard, 1995; Boone et al, 2007; Teng and Manly, 2005). Kwate (2001) argues that IQ tests are antagonistic and incompatible with an African centered conception of intelligence and mental health, while a study by Obiakor and Utley (2004) showed that culturally diverse learners are often excluded in educational programs in the U.S. through misidentification, misassessment, miscategorization, misplacement, and misinstruction-misintervention. When test stimuli are more culturally pertinent to the experiences of African Americans, performance improves (Hayles, 1991; Williams and Rivers, 1972b). For example, research shows that “Black Culture” depicts problem solving as an integrative hemispheric endeavor rather than a linear, analytical process (Bell, 1994), and that in this culture "psychological closeness" is necessary for one’s involvement in the phenomena which he seeks to understand.
Studies using empirical methods also find that cultural differences in the provision of information account for racial differences in IQ scores. Fagan and Holland (2007) asked African-Americans and white Americans to solve problems typical of those administered on standard IQ tests. Half of the problems were solvable on the basis of information generally available to either race, or on the basis of information newly learned; while other problems were only solvable on the basis of specific previous knowledge. In this study specific knowledge varied with race and was shown to be subject to test bias (Fagan and Holland, 2007).
Lew
~wanders off, cussing at stoopid %#$@in' laptop~
We could argue endlessly about whites being genetically superior to blacks: Time traveller will roll out his facts and rw his each contradicting the other, we will get no where! The truth of the matter is black people are here and they are here to stay, they have always been here, just like we have always been here, probably before the Indians who are recent immigrants via the Kuroshio Current, at least most of them. The Mormons told you that we came here together and proceeded to wipe each other out in a war of annihilation. The mitochondrial DNA and archeological evidence now bares this out. Now everybody's back right where their supposed to be. Do you think this just happened by accident or are you willing to concede that this whole show is being run by powers greater than yourself. If those powers, and if you read my last 3 posts it’s a pretty small if, did put us back right where we started, it would seem to me that they were dissatisfied with the previous outcome and to willfully repeat that outcome would be to invite retribution which will destroy us all. There is enough evil in our midst to exorcise without turning on each other. The black man didn’t destroy my economy nor did he soil the earth with contaminants and neither did the white man for that matter. We have a mutual enemy, a very small minority of those who are not us are among us, using us the same way we use farm animals and crops. Who knows what heights we could achieve if we were ever able to rid ourselves of this parasitical infestation, but I would like to find out and I am willing to lay down my life to do so.
"...Most anthropologists recognize that race is a social concept, not a biological one. That is, it stigmatizes some individuals as different and reinforces the privileges of others. There is no evidence that there are large groups of biologically distinct human beings (i.e. subspecies) that correspond to what people refer to when they talk about "race." Furthermore, to base any kind of biological category on a single physical characteristic, such as skin color (which, in itself is incredibly varied and determined by multiple genes), is clearly nonsense..."
The link is provided above. Your preoccupation with the white supremacy fantasy is non scientific. Your solutions can be found in a psychiatric consultation.
As far as the turtle and rw are concerned if you ask me they hold their own pretty well in arguments with you (the turtle is now at a distinct disadvantage as they have disabled his comments) and I am blacker than all of you including Bill Beck. How many of you have a black son in law? Traveller would you mind very much if your daughter went out with a black man? Comon man, a shwatzer, who are you kidding I grew up in Brooklyn and worked in the garment district. I know what Jewish people think of blacks behind closed doors. Your hypocrisy and sniveling condensation towards them makes me sick and it makes them even sicker. The turtle is 100% right. You were all in such a rush to show how enlightened you were you went and threw yourself at the feet of the first black who ever ran for president. Did any of you even bother to read Webster Tarpleys book about him before you commenced with your groveling? Did any of you need to know anything about him except Chris Mathews was in love with him? I doubt it or you would not be shocked by Obamas actions. Tarpley nailed it! Good work now we are stuck with the brown Dubya.
I was in Wyoming prison for 2 years that’s the medium for Attica, its called gladiator school in the NY underworld. I saw white guys who expressed the sentiments of the liberals on here come and go. Do you know where they went? They went to protective custody or the cemetery. I used to hear them screaming when they were raped at night. If you don’t believe that story here is my prison number 90T4542, its not something you forget. I don’t lie, ever, not even to myself. Most of you would have begged God nightly for a guy like rw to come and save you (I sure as hell wasn’t going to), I also seen that happen. The turtle is right about another thing too. I see a complete lack of pride in your own culture. George Soros has made you ashamed of yourselves. Why do you think your sons walk around like markymark with their pants around their ankles and your daughters would prefer to date black guys? You embarrass them! They are disgusted by your softness, and me to. That’s why my daughter dates a black guy because her father always preferred the company of black men to white hermaphrodites when she was growing up. With those words I bid you all not so fond ado. I am done here.
I have replied yet again to your observations. All I'm suggesting is that disciplines like sociobiology be permitted to make the scientific inquiry into possible linkages between measurable genetic factors and social constructions like 'intelligence', 'propensity to violence', etc. Why are you so afraid of open inquiry Sir?
JP"
Above is the most recent PM that you have sent to me. Your disingenuousness is demonstrated in your own words. Your last line asks, why am I "afraid." In fact, nothing in my comments indicate fear, and the mere fact and presence of my comments indicates that I do not "fear" the subject. Your words are a silly, childish psychological ploy, refuted by their own presence. How can you question me "fear" to comment on a subject as an answer to my comment? It is an absurdity.
Now, as to your question, "All I'm suggesting is that disciplines like sociobiology be permitted to make the scientific inquiry into possible linkages between measurable genetic factors and social constructions like 'intelligence', 'propensity to violence', etc.", I call it a question because you appear to be asking, why does a social study not apply to an individual? The answer is simple. Because it doesn't. There is variance in all populations. We are not grains of sand with the uniform structure of SiO2 molecules. We are complex living organisms with varying characteristics and behaviors. Your desire to take a population study and derive or even predict specific information about complex living organisms will give you more useful information if you are comparing one grain of sand to another grain of sand. But as you seek to compare a specific human being to another specific human being by virtue of a population study confuses the difference between simple, inanimate grains of sand, and complex, self aware biological organisms. It is reductio ad absurdiam, and proves nothing. Your own sad little blog post acknowledges exceptions to your race based theory, which confounds your theory all by itself. The reason that you can't use population studies to prove some inherent superiority is because, 1) individuals are not uniform within populations ad grains of sand are uniform of a specific chemical structure. 2) the concept of superiority is a social construction, so it cannot be extrapolated beyond its logical bounds. 3) the separation that you site are your separate populations are social constructions, and not biological. You either get it or you don't.
I'll say it another way. The blood in your left index finger is the same as the blood in your right index finger. You cannot find biological differences in your right hand from your left hand because they are the same biology. They are of the same body. The same applies to humans. We are one specie of human. We of "of the same body" as it were. If you write a silly, racist blog with your right hand, it does not mean that your right hand is less intelligent than your left hand. Your silly racist blog is an example of silly, anti-social behavior, which can be explained by some social cause, poor education, narcissistic personality disorder, etc. But it is not a biological cause. To attempt to fashion a difference between your right and left hand on its biological essence would be reductio ad absurdum. Such is the case when you try to migrate from a social study to describe the biological essence of an individual. Racism is reductio ad absurdum. There is no "fear" about addressing your silly assertions. There is only the certainty that a person such as yourself does not access information in order to orient yourself to reality. You merely grab at bits and pieces of nonsense to construct monstrous piles of crap, such as this blog post, and twirl it around to get attention. This, again, is nihilistic. Facts are available to everyone. You can orient yourself to them. Instead, you choose to contract some grand theory based upon teenagers that you see at the mall. Reductio ad absurdum. No need to PM me again.
Now as for your assertion of being "blacker" than anyone, well, that is even more idiotic.
You must be thrilled to have inspired such interest in your recent post. I’m surprised only a couple of the people who commented have caught on to what you are really about…
1. Inspiring passionate discourse and free thinking
2. Making FULL use of your right to free speech
3. Writing-out the hurt of a lonely man jealous of having to compete with those big black cocks (once you go black you never go back)
Since, as you pointed out, Eugenics is clearly off the table, you should be thanking all those stupid white women with their Mulato babies for diluting the black race with their pure-snowflake genes. Perhaps you and your NF brotherhood should in fact begin encouraging more, not less of this inter-racial breeding?
I can see it now the marketing plan you can roll out: “ladies, choose your next fuck while we remove your corns!” That is a holiday special I think many stupid, bored, middle class white women would appreciate.
I suspect that the white woman who left you in the dust for some big black stud was rejecting your need for high drama at any cost, predilection for saying things you do not actually believe, tendency for dishonesty and had nothing much to do with your skin color or his.
Of course if you are correct about the attraction of “stupid white women” and the “numbers” succumbing to the black “charm” perhaps, even a superior white male like yourself many have something to learn from the “monkeys.”
Now as a Goddess I make trends not follow trends, so I’m off to see about becoming a good little Maldivian Muslim girl (brown IS the new Black). Being a black stud’s love muffin was sooooo last week *wink.*
PS..I’m sure a doctor could help you with any little, tiny, tiny “problems” that might have been preventing you from physically competing with the “brothers.” It is amazing what white medical science can do these days!
PSS…looking forward to a return to your policy discourse, much more your thing, jealousy does not become you JeJune.
Here's my Jack Heart imitation:
You liberal hermaphrodites just don't get it, only Nutsack and JP and I do. Here’s the turtle trying to warn us against miscegenation of the races (and it’s OK for me to say that, I’m not a racist, there’s no way anyone who repeatedly mentions his daughter is dating a black dude could ever be a racist you idiots) yet you mock him and you'll live to regret it when the UN bluehats emerge from Cheyenne Mountain and impose their ruthless subhuman domination from sea to shining sea, oh yes, mark my words, you’ll regret it then and so will that black dude dating my daughter, God I love black people, even the ones from Compton who as I mentioned earlier have never seen a white woman in real life, I do love them so, one day you’ll all be butt-raped by them but I won’t be, RW will save me just as he could have saved those contemptible libtards in prison if only they’d listened.
I've seen visions of Apache helicopters at the Battle of Kadesh you fools!
And yet, there's not a single mention of Hittite attack aircraft in most college history classes. Coincidence? I think not. Then there are the cryogenically preserved guanacos observed near Lake Titicaca by a Portuguese meteorological research team in 1987 - that's something the Bilderbergers and their lackeys at the Trilateral Commission don't want to discuss, but all you sheeple don’t have the wits to ask WHY. Further, when Princess Di was killed, her chauffeur was still alive 'til his neck was snapped by Prince Willem-Alexander of the Netherlands on the orders of Queen Beatrix, who by the way is known to be a direct descendant of Joseph of Arimathea. Joseph, as has been well-documented, engaged in infernal congress with a succubus on Mt. Sinai and that's before the Colossus of Rhodes had been destroyed by an "earthquake" because the Illuminati had stumbled upon a Scythian proto-microwave at a falafel stand right next door. You blithering liberal chimps JUST DON’T GET IT, but that will never stop me from raving on about it ‘til my keyboard melts and your heads are spinning like Linda Blair’s from the sheer volume of crap that pours out of my brain as a result of way too many years spent devouring every ridiculous conspiracy theory and pseudo-history and crackpot metaphysics I could get my hands on. I don’t have a filter that tells me when I’m making no more sense than that guy who hangs out behind the dumpster in the alley and though I hate to throw my pearls before you Soros-deluded swin you’ll never stop me, never, do you hear me, OH SHIT, WHAT’S THAT VOICE, DO YOU HEAR THAT VOICE, OH NO, IT’S THE SHADE OF ALEISTER CROWLEY, GET BACK ALEISTER, I KNOW YOU’RE NOT REALLY EVIL BUT DON’T COME ANY CLOSER, NO NO NO NO NOOOOO ~~~~***---AIYEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!
Not a bad summation nana, although it looks like you could use a beer and a good blowjob. (BTW, how are those yoga classes cumming? Have you learned how to suck your own dick yet?--after all, it's not going to suck itself)
The reason you cannot understand Jack or Jejune's points is the same reason an amoeba can't figure out advanced physics.
Hang in there though, God loves you.
FUCK..think I'll go write some (more) really ridiculous shit.
Too funny
Enjoy your train ride.
....Aaaaand here it is!
(love my brother)
Do tell, what is your boy Obongo's excuse nanatehay?
You know what though.. if there is truly a pbf market, you would prob bring a higher price than most... surely more than nutjob..sack.. whatever. Your head alone.. jus' sayin'
We're all pretty big on the 1st Amendment around here.
Ever tried saying this sort of thing outloud? On a street corner somewhere?
Guessing not, as you made it home from the facility to your keyboard.
Too much bone? We'll be the judge..s of that.
Kina like the white girls, after a while you get accustomed to
"too much bone."