
Dear Miley, Avril, Abercrombie and/or Fitch, and the late Mr. Levi Strauss,
I call on you people because you are who dresses the Generation known as Y. I have a question for you and other clothes makers of today: Why do you make your clothes so our children’s butt crack sticks out even with the use of a belt?
It’s hard to find a decent pair of jeans that will last for a junior-sized body. A tween and teenager of today is not going to shove their budding body into a pair of belly button-rise jeans that us mommies are more comfortable wearing. The youth of today prefer those tiny little hip-huggers that when I hold them up to me I wonder if I’d have to shave certain pieces and parts of me just to wear. All of the jeans built for a narrow-hipped junior these days are far too low. What’s so great about the butt crack that you people feel that kids these days should just let it all hang out? It’s a butt crack. It’s mere inches above their poopers. It is still a private part of their body. Couldn’t you add just a few inches to the butt part of the jeans so everything would be covered?
You know, back in my days of being a junior-sized person (and oh, those were the days) jean-makers would make the back of the jeans just slightly higher than the front so the jeans would still go below the naval. I have to admit that it is more comfortable to wear jeans that are lower in the front since it makes for better mobility. Having the knowledge that if I should happen to stoop over my butt will remain inside the jeans is a real plus in my book. Half the time, the jeans can be almost ugly but if my butt stays put, then I’m buying them.
I’m tired of running around the house yelling, “Your ass sets are showing,” as a way to alert my girls that their bums are sticking out. I think my girls are adorable, but I really like to see them fully clothed. If my husband had his way the girls wouldn’t leave the house in anything less than a full turtleneck and ribcage high pants. I’m not about punishing the youth of the day, but am just trying to reach a compromise between the parents and Generation Y.
I know that times have greatly changed since I was a teenager but have they really changed this much that we’re making it okay for our girls to go around with their butts exposed. I remember my mother asking me if I was going to wear “that” out of the house. Usually “that” meant a baggy pair of jeans paired with an even baggier shirt. She used to tell me, “If you’ve got it, flaunt it.” Have the designers of those days finally taken my mother’s advice and ran with it? Things here are going a bit too far and way too low. Even a pair of pants that fit “properly” are showing too much rear cleavage. Are you making our kids the butt of some joke or something?
If you people are going to continue to make your jeans this way, could you at least reinforce the belt loops since this is how my girls pull their pants back up? Better yet, could you put a handle on the pants so the girls have something to hold on to while they walk around the mall and text their friends? I’m two steps away from sticking long-stemmed roses down the next butt crack I see.


Salon.com
Comments
At least there's several shirts there to cover up something (except in the front, where the cleavage would make a hooker blush). Remember when you didn't mix patterns or colors too close on the color wheel? I guess that's not cool anymore. The more the merrier, I guess.
Could you write one to the cartoon makers next? I mean, I love how all adults are idiots on every kids' show.
It's part of the whole sexualization of childhood thing. Little girls want to look like that Mickey Mouse chick whats-er-name...Cyrus? And she looks like cheap Walmart trampy Barbie inspired...
It sounds strange to say after having just defended American smut to a gentleman on another blog post, but there it is.
Here's my take: Sensuality is cool; sexualization of kids for purposes of commoditization is not so cool.
Plumber crack is back. Ick.
For girls, it's jeans that are designed with a low waist so that even if you get the right size and wear them right, there is "butt cleavage" aplenty.
Guys seem to just get jeans where the waist is too big and them let them hang half way down their butt - or more. The only silver lining is that their stupid boxers tend to cover up butt crackage.
My girls aren't quite there yet (10 & 12), but I'm hoping the "fat plumber" look miraculously goes out of fashion in the next few years.
But, like Facebook, it will stop being cool if all of us started doing it! So, maybe if my kids start doing this, I'll just go all droopy drawers on them - and that'll put an end to it! Especially if I threaten to pick them up at school every day with my butt hanging out!
that look for boys was pioneered by men who had no further need to run from the cops. They live in a place where pants naturally droop because the men are not allowed to have belts.
I have gone to K Mart because they actually carry pants that come to her waist, but I know that K Mart clothes would probably make any fashion conscious teen or tween girl commit hari kiri with a hairbrush.
of course, my kids have seen my yearbook & hasten to remind me of my own (albeit more modest) horrifying teen-aged fashion choices.
http://www.walmart.com/catalog/product.do?product_id=8054976
Hey, maybe they could hook the huge belt buckles to the long chains around their necks and make a new kind of bling-bling suspenders!
R
I'm sorry, but I giggled out loud at this.
I've tried the low-rise stuff, despite my advanced age, and can't figure out how anyone with a big arse and small waist like myself is supposed to keep them on. A belt? Around there? Just to _add_ bulk? Sure! Great idea! :-O Mine just feel like they're inching downward slowly but surely with every step.
Maybe that's why young girls wear them--they make them feel like they're in danger of losing their jeans, just like the boys are? :-/
Ok, so it's really a fake SNL commerical, but it's pretty amusing:
http://www.hulu.com/watch/2310/saturday-night-live-coin-slot
rated~
For the coin slot spot outside of the US. God, this is funny . . . .
Heeheeheee...
http://joshfulton.blogspot.com/2009/11/what-is-us-doing-with-irans-frozen.html
Now it is great for us guys to be able to stroll the plazas and the food courts and the open lawns on a warm day and enjoy some butt views.
Yet, there has been a fashion trade off here. Until the last few years there would be a percentage of babes who would not be wearing a bra, some even with open sleeves. But while pants of come down (so to speak), seeing full boobage has become far too rare.
Now us guys have to put up with seemingly dozens of straps flying all over the shoulders, while we see tank tops and layer upon layer hiding the boobs. Even though many a full bra is exposed, we don't get to see nipples like we used to.
After these past few years, I say it's time make straps NOT in fashion. Less on top, and THEN it's OK to raise the jeans. Let's be fair!
I tell 'em what Crash Davis once said... "Think classy and you'll be classy."
Of course, the fact that the Abercrombie & Fitch CEO is a sixty-something guy who dresses like a surfer and dies his hair beach blonde, doesn't want "fat" people shopping in his stores and likes to surround himself with nubile adolescent (or barely out of adolescence) age boys MAY have something to do with the design of his clothes...