PICKING

I have my fork and I know how to use it!

Jim White

Jim White
Location
Florida,
Birthday
November 02
Bio
I use my fork to pick horse stalls on a regular basis. We all need to take a fork to the state of political affairs and reduce the accumulation of manure. I'll also be picking on the right wing authoritarians and picking at issues that have been ignored for far too long. Most importantly, our country is in the process of picking its next set of leaders.

MY RECENT POSTS

Jim White's Links

MY LINKS
No links in this category.
JULY 4, 2008 8:32AM

Pick Which George the Declaration is Discussing

Rate: 7 Flag

Two hundred and thirty two years ago, a courageous group of men drafted a fateful document, and after pledging “to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor”, they signed the Declaration of Independence. In so doing, they launched our country into existence. Many of us are quite familiar with portions of the Declaration, especially the opening “When in the Course of human events” and the climactic declaration “it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.”

Probably less familiar to most Americans is that a large portion of the Declaration is comprised of a list of abuses suffered by the colonies. In reading this list of abuses by King George III, it strikes me that many of the same abuses have been inflicted on the United States, and the world, by George W. Bush. When you read the Declaration’s list of abuses, it sometimes is hard to pick which George the Declaration is discussing. Selected passages from the Declaration appear below in italics, with my comments appended in normal text.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

That sure sounds a lot like signing statements to me.

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their Public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.

Bush repeatedly has refused to provide Congress with necessary information to make informed decisions, usually claiming state secrets or executive privilege. As an example, consider the difficulty Congress had obtaining documentation on the Terrorist Surveillance Program. The difference here would be that George W. Bush has the purpose of frightening Congress into agreement rather than fatiguing them as George III did.

He has obstructed the Administration of Justice by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary Powers.

George W. Bush’s Department of Justice, under Attorneys General Ashcroft, Gonzales and Mukasey has been notorious in its obstruction of justice and politicization of the administration of justice. The examples are too numerous to list.

He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil Power.

Bush relies exclusively on General Petraeus, rather than Congress, to set the policy for military action in Iraq.

For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:

For protecting them, by a mock Trial from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:

Although this is not happening here, Bush has made sure to put into place laws in Iraq exempting US military personnel and contractors from prosecution for any crimes committed there, although it now appears that contractor immunity is about to end.

For depriving us in many cases, of the benefit of Trial by Jury:

Recall that it took action by the Supreme Court to remind Bush that both US citizens and foreigners are entitled to the right to challenge their detention.

For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences:

Bush is worse than George III, here. Extraordinary rendition is used for torture, rather than scam trials.

He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

This sounds like Bush’s EPA and plans for additional offshore oil drilling. He hasn’t been guilty of burning towns, but his version of FEMA sees fires as a chance for propagandizing.

He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation, and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & Perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.

Bush’s mercenaries are domestic, coming from Blackwater and other lesser known contractors. The rest of this seems like a very accurate description of Bush, with his war in Iraq and longing for a war in Iran.

So, there we have many of Bush’s crimes being examples of history repeating itself. The question becomes on this Independence Day, what is to be done about it? Our Constitution provides the perfect remedy, impeachment for the high crimes and misdemeanors outlined here and elsewhere. The problem, of course, is that Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi refuses to allow the initiation of hearings or a vote on impeachment. Our Congress clearly lacks the courage and leadership displayed by the signers of the Declaration of Independence. I truly hope they find that courage before it becomes incumbent on the citizens to display their own.

 Update, July4:  It looks like these folks have produced an updated version of the Declaration of Independence.  Here they are reading it for us:

 

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
brilliant post, terrific analysis
Wow..just...wow. and oh my god.
I believe that, by refusing to entertain even the idea of impeachment, Pelosi and Reid have made themselves complicit. It's that simple.

They know that crimes have been committed and continue to be committed yet refuse to take action, or allow action to be taken, to stop the commission of those crimes.
I think you are right, John. The circle of those who are complicit likely is a very large one.
I think we all know what George Bush is by now. What gets me is our Democratic congress and their inaction. Although their majority is small, they could be doing so much more. The Republicans surely would if it was the other way around.

Someone send some chutzpah to Congress, stat!
EXCELLENT POST! Thanks so much!!
Did Ralph Nader care to comment on all of this. He was the one back in the 2000 election who said there was no major difference between the Democrats and Republicans. Well, Ralph I can tell you that we wouldn't be discussing this topic if Al Gore had been elected and not selected as George Bush was. As far as impeachment goes it the duty of Congress to convene impeachment hearings and trials if the Executive has broken laws. They are not living up to their duty and they treat impeachment like it's something they can do if they want to, but it isn't mandatory. The way I comprehend impeachment laws this situation requires mandatory action. That does make them complicit, unfortunately. It's all about polls, looking good and getting elected, no one seems to care for what is right. By the way George Bush is related to the Livingston family of which Philip Livingston, one of the Signers of the Declaration of Independence, was also a member. I don't think Philip would be very impressed with this Livingston descendant.
designanator: Congress is looking at the wrong polls. Believe it or not, the Republican-leaning Rasmussen polling organization published a poll yesterday showing that 59% of voters think the Constitution is fine as is. Furthermore, they also said "Fifty-nine percent (59%) say the bigger danger in the world today is a government that is too powerful. " Congress's lack of action flies in the face of what the people want.
Link for poll: http://tinyurl.com/644we6
Jim, thanks for enlightening me on that poll. Congress clearly follows the beat of a different drummer.
And way down at the bottom of the Declaration is a comment that sounds like it was written for the current U.S. Congress:

"We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us...We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity."

Pick which legislature, too.
Thanks for this post, Jim! ...and the links.

NPR again had reporters, commentators, etc. reading the entire thing yesterday, including what's posted here.

You can hear it all at this link.