Editor’s Pick
APRIL 4, 2009 1:06PM

I am a Sex Offender

Rate: 39 Flag

Yes, I am a sex offender.  Perhaps, then, you can understand how the recent OS blogs on sex offending have captured my attention.  With all the seeming interest, I feel compelled to offer a different perspective.  Having already written a book which deals with my behavior and its consequences, I thought it would be easy.  Well, reducing more than 82,000 often painfully-chosen words to blog size proved too tall an order.  So, instead, I am simply posting what I was going to circulate in my CT. neighborhood upon my release from prison.  It actually turned out not to be needed there.  But, perhaps, it will serve some purpose here.  As with my book, if it leads to even one further, tiny step in fostering the realization that every sex offender has a story beyond what those 2 words conjure up, then it will be worth it.

  

To my neighbors:

 

I understand that a notice has gone out alerting you to the presence of a sex offender in the neighborhood.  Since I am that sex offender and since I know that those words can be very scary, I’d like to provide you with some information, information about me and my life.  I do this not to excuse or even explain.  Instead, I do it to try, as best I can in a page or two, to put those scary words into some sort of context.

 

Almost 40 years ago, in the fall of 1969, I left Torrington, the town where I was born, to begin my freshman year at a private boarding school run by the Jesuits in Lenox,  Massachusetts.  Now, as the notice has advised, I am returning to make my home, once again, in Northwestern Connecticut.

 

What happened, almost all would surely ask, in the course of those many years that turned me from a precocious, if somewhat overweight and clumsy, adolescent to someone who is considered so damaged that neighbors are warned, jobs are withheld and, for the rest of my life, I am required to post my picture and register details of who I am, what I did and where I live on a State run website? 

 

Well, in the course of that many years, a lot happens.

 

Back when I lived in Torrington, I can tell you that mine was a respected family. My father was an automobile dealer successful at selling an automobile which is no longer produced, the Oldsmobile.  It was also a loving family.  Not picture perfect like the Cleavers, but as good and as loving as most real families I know.

 

As a child, I went to one of the many Catholic grammar schools in town.  After moving to Lenox and graduating as salutatorian from that Jesuit boarding school, I was accepted at Cornell University.  There, my further success at academics landed me at Fordham University’s School of Law in New York City.

 

New York City.  I moved to the City the year Studio 54 opened.  For those who don’t know, it is, perhaps, one of the most famous nightclubs of all time.  It was a place where taboos were broken and sensuality ruled.  It was also a place I frequented, a fitting introduction to the New York which seduced me and a fitting metaphor for what I became. 

 

Within two years after I moved to New York, I broke up with my girlfriend, who I had met as a freshman at Cornell, and came out of the closet.  Or at least I came out to myself and those friends closest to me.

 

I also worked.  Being a lawyer, I worked quite a bit.  Twenty years of that effort was spent at one law firm in midtown Manhattan where I practiced corporate law and where I eventually became a partner.

 

More significantly, I found time for two wonderful lovers.  The first remained with me for almost ten years, the second for over seven.  As testament to their honor and decency, both supported me from my indictment through my trial and beyond.

 

As evidence of how I betrayed that decency, I never stopped playing around, I never fully settled down.  In fact, given my lifestyle for the 25 years prior to my arrest, I should probably be dead or, at least, infected.

 

Whether a blessing from God or not, I’m neither.  But, for sure, none would consider what my life became a blessing.  Lost in the pursuit of the pleasures and diversions which in New York City are so easily and readily available, I became unwilling to say “enough.”

 

Up to my early to mid 40s, I pretty much attracted whomever I wanted.  In New York, that’s not so hard to do.  Still, even then, I would sometimes get impatient and wanted what I wanted right away.  At those times, I would take advantage of another of New York’s offerings and would simply go out and buy it.

 

You get the picture?  A selfish life is bound to become one that is also care-less, in every sense of the word.  And, at least twice during that selfish, care-less life, there was a young male prostitute, too young.  The most recent one, with my phone number in his pocket, all it took for my fate to be sealed was a cop with a right to arrest him giving that cop the right to go through that pocket. 

 

There’s a lot more to the story, some of it, I think, interesting enough that I’ve written a book about it.  But, with a life clearly out of balance, none of it excuses.

 

Perhaps you can understand how I feel like I’ve learned some new lessons from all that has happened to me in the last 4 years.  Unfortunately, those lessons are not so easy to explain.  There’s either not enough time or not the right words or it’s just not the right place in so many ways.   That’s one of the reasons I’ve written the book.

 

What I can say here is that I believe those new lessons are the opposite of the old lessons.  Or, at least, as close to the opposite as I’ll be able to achieve in an imperfect life.  That, I know, is something I will now have to demonstrate every day for the rest of my life.  But I also believe that for those with an open heart, I need be no more fearful of their judgment than they need be fearful of me.”

Author tags:

sex offending, open call

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
This is a brave offering. Your response is measured, as I imagine it needs to be.

Painting all predators with the same brush is wrong, but for the grace of God....

I can't imagine what you have endured, but I do know what many young prostitutes have. Sadness abounds here.
How weird it must be to have to share and make public the part of your life that we normally keep private, particularly from our neighbors and acquaintances.

After being married to a man who broke the trust in our relationship and never fully mea culpaed or reassured me enough to allow me to trust him fully again, I am now engaged to a person who makes me feel safer than anyone I have ever been with. Yet, after being betrayed by my ex-husband, I still had trust issues with my fiance.

At one point I apologized to my fiance for not fully trusting him, even though really it was my ex-husband's behavior that made me so wary, and my fiance replied, "I don't mind. Trust is earned. I will continue to do everything I can to make you feel safe and in time you will come to trust me fully."

How nice it was to be with a man who understood that trust is earned.

When I read your post, I felt like I really wanted to know what you gloss over at the end. What have you done in the past four years to earn the community's trust?

You have made a great first step with admitting what happened and explaining it in a gentle but clear way, but if I were your neighbor, I'd want the details of what your behavior has been since you engaged in sex with a minor.

What watershed moment or moments have made you erect appropriate boundaries of right and wrong? What are you going to continue to do to let me know that you are still safe and haven't relapsed? Are you going to keep sending out letters updating me on how you have been the past month? Introduce yourself and have little gatherings so people get to know you? Just be a good neighbor who lends tools and helps to shovel their driveways in snowstorms and quietly lets people in?

I'm not really sure how you will earn the trust of your neighbors, exactly, but I think that the letter you sent shows tremendous strength to at least attempt to build trust and relationships. I'm sure many others in your case would not even try.

If I were your neighbor I'd really want to see this letter backed up with behavior, little daily moments that let me get to know you and understand you.
Thanks Buffy. Beyond sadness, I believe that much has been learned—and by many more than just me.

Buzz. No doubt, as I note above, a blog posting is insufficient. Beyond my book, I am working on a website where there will be a great deal of content. With al those sources, some may be comforted that “relapse” is not a concern, others may be challenged to think in different ways and some may even want to share a beer. One thing I’ve learned and been completely and utterly fascinated by is the extent to which we each bring ourselves to events and ideas that challenge. Of course, we’ve all heard that before. But to experience it so directly has been bracing.
I am a mother of a 47 yr. old man who has currently served two of a three year prison sentence for being one day late in changing his address on the sex-offender registry. He was falsely accused over 13 years ago by a child of 8 who lived with 3 criminal uncles (one a convicted pedaphile) and a mother and older sister who were prostitutes and drug addicts. The mother and sister are now dead. My son never had more than a traffic ticket when this happened. He got connected with this family because he was mentally ill, naïve and moved into one of Baltimore’s worst neighborhoods. He became friendly with the older sister of this child . He was much too trusting about people. Ken is a 100% service-connected veteran.

He was an easy scapegoat. There was no evidence except her word against his. But his attorney was terrible, never told us this was a felony and never told us a lot more he could have. Ken took an alford plea. Very big mistake even though it seemed right for over ten years. Ken’s lawyer did not want to go to trial; he made that clear with his anger when I suggested we think about the plea.
Ken served his 4 yrs. probation and lived quietly until he moved into one of Baltimore's wealthy neighborhoods. His life changed radically. His name and face became a media firestorm because of the AGAIN false accusations of people saying they saw him at or near the local school. These charges were all dropped for lack of evidence and there was actually proof that he was not in the car people said they saw him in and he never owned a camera, another thing people said they saw him taking pictures of children. In the initial and then latest search warrant, absolutely not one iota of anything was found in his apartment. But, his life is ruined. Our family is in great pain and fear every day for his safety.
Please know that children need to be given polygraphs or better yet, the voice-testing (which would not harm them) when they accuse someone of this terrible crime. I worked for four years when I was younger in child abuse work and I did see occasionally a child who lied and it is horrific because most people won't be objective about this crime. These cases are not so simple and the registry is an abomination of civil rights to men (mostly) who are not dangerous people.

The innocent people (and not dangerous ones) need to be separated from those who are guilty and truly dangerous. Even if someone is accused of murder, most people will have some willingness to reserve judgement about their guilt. Not so with child sexual abuse. When I worked in abuse work years ago, I would never believe this nightmare could happen to my son. I have now learned there are too many mothers and families who have had to go through this agony.
Thanks Patricia for your honesty.

Speaking from quite a bit of experience, I can assure you there's lots and lots of fear related to this issue. And that fear speaks volumes about who we are and how we deal with our two most primitive and powerful drives--sex and violence.

Unfortunately, also speaking from experience, it seems to me that rather than decreasing dysfunctional behavior, society's attempts to control those behaviors have actually made the dyfunctions worse.
I am praying for you, if that is ok. You deserve a second chance. I feel that you will make the most of it.
Thank you and God bless, Kathy.

The major effort in my life now is to simply take part in a dialogue that is as honest and as probing as is possible for me.

I believe that if we can put the shame and guilt in perspective and open up to each other then destructive and harmful behavior will be reduced, not enabled.
James Cornelio quote: "You get the picture? A selfish life is bound to become one that is also care-less, in every sense of the word."

I get the picture loud and clear. Selfishness is the root of most problems. I suffer and try to deal with it daily. Rules are rules and the law is the law.

I do think there is a difference, however, between someone who has sex with an underage prostitute and someone who molests a child whose care they have been entrusted with. You were a grown man at the time of your offense and you SHOULD pay. I would give you a different sentence than I would a typical pedophile though as I consider your motives to be entirely different. This is not a waiver of my moral convictions, rather, it is recognizing the somewhat atypical circumstances.

Another example would be an 18 or 19 year old guy that picks up a girl at a bar who has a fake ID and who is 16, but looks older and represents herself as an older female. The guy should get punished, but the mitigating circumstances should be taken into account...as always.
The sex offender registry system needs drastic overhaul. Those that are convicted of things like sexual battery, forcible rape, child molestation, etc. need to be registered. Those who committed statuatory rape (I'm assuming that, had money not changed hands, would have been what you'd be charged with, ie the boy prostitute was at least in his teens but not of age), who got caught urinating in public, etc. should not be.
THIS IS AN ADDITION TO MY LETTER ABOVE...
The girl who lied about my son finally told the truth two years ago. She gave a deposition to my son’s attorney and she writes letters from prison begging my forgiveness and his. Why did she lie? She was jealous of the relationship my son had with her older sister who she was very attached to. And her grandmother and a nosy, neighborhood watchwoman thought my son looked “weird”. The district attorney used that same word about him to his attorney. He was phobic about dentists so had very bad teeth and also severe skin problems. Mentally ill people often don’t take care of themselves. This girl looked the victim and my son Looked guilty but it was just the opposite. He was a lamb among wolves. The girl is in prison now for prostitution and drugs like her mother and sister before her. And my son is still on the registry. His appeal was denied. It seems that it’s very easy for people to believe the guilt if someone is accused in these cases. But the states attorneys and many others find it hard to believe when someone who lied finally tells the truth in these cases. Patricia
at some point we'll realize that one size does not fit all. good luck to you in rebuilding your life.
It took a lot of courage to not only write this but post it as well. I hope it helps you as much as it helps anyone else. Good luck on your second chance.
Good luck to you in your new life.
What a gutsy post. I wish you the best with your book, which sounds fascinating, and also the best in rebuilding your life. That was quite a gesture in reaching out to your neighbors. I am now wondering how that went for you.
I think you are very brave to write this and I agree that it helped open my eyes. First of all you are human and you have taken responsibility for your actions and lack of judgement. That is to be commended.
I wish you well on this next part of your life.
There is a quality of mass hysteria around the issue of child sexual abuse which completely clouds the issue. Sexual predators are the new boogeymen, the new witches, apparently hiding on every street corner waiting for our SUVs to stop at traffic lights so that they can snatch our children through the windows and eat them. We all need bigger cars and tighter security so that the boogeymen won't get us, and to keep the witches at bay. A magical and dangerous world.
There's a variety of different thoughts here. That's good. That's what's needed. Let me add one more (though I have scores and scores).

As to the sex offender registry. I assume most agree that its purpose is to warn about sex offenders in the neighborhood who are likely to, as one reader put it above, "relapse. " In fact, that's why the Supreme Court ruled those registries were constitutional even though sex offenders who committed their crime PRIOR to the sex offender registry laws were nonetheless also required to register--i.e., it is not a post facto punishment (unconstitutional) but, rather, is protective of public safety (constitutional).

Now, if you agree with that purpose then, presumably, only those sex offenders who, per the studies, are likely to recidivate should be listed. Problem is, if you look at the studies, you can find one to support any position you want to argue. And the best of those studies read like the mathematical formula for super string theory with their dynamic v. static formulations and controls for this, that or the other factor. And, if you think about it, that makes some sense. Why? Because, except for some "fixated" behaviors like voyeurism, atttraction to pre-pubescence, exhibitionism, etc (and even these can be mitigated with therapy), it is individuals with all of their past influences on their psyches who commit crimes, sexual or otherwise, not paradigms artificially manufactured by scientists to justify their paychecks and supposedly offer comfort to a fearful public.

So then, why not simply put all criminals on State maintained websites? Well, I think a number of the responses to my posting speaks cogently to that question.
I'm starting to sound like a broken record around here when I say, "you can't judge a book by its cover". Unfortunately, too many people still feel compelled to make purchases based on the best seller list, instead of taking a moment to open the book, read and turn the pages.
You are an articulate, educated man and an eloquent writer. That you also had the courage to write a book and share this story with us here on OS hopefully makes us ALL better people. Rated.
There are several levels of "dangerousness" to sex offenders and also several levels of motivation to change a behavior that must be brutally difficult. I am not especially sympathetic to people who have molested children and other vulnerable people but I know there's a difference between someone who has sex with a 17 year old and someone who attacks a seven year old. If an offender is on parole and in therapy, I would be more disposed to give that person a chance if he had offended with someone capable of defending himself/herself. That said, I'd be nervous about it until the person demonstrated trustworthiness.
I don't know what to think! I found this very brave I must say!
Just curious- are you attracted to young boys of any age? Or are you only attracted to post-pubescent/teenage young boys? It makes a huge difference. Also- have you ever been convicted of rape (other than statutory)? Your life story is fairly sympathetic. However, as a parent- I really only want to know those two things- whether you are attracted to young kids, andwhether you have a rape tendency.
IceMilk:

Your children are safe with me. If you're really curious perhaps you should read my book. It's called Two to Six and its available on amazon.

After you've read it, you may question whether it constitutes the "entire" truth. But I truly believe that you will feel as if you've read they story of a man trying to be as honest and as open and as searching as any of us humans are capable of being. Then I would hope that you'd ask why so many are not.
I can only say that we indeed live in the fear-based world so aptly described by Monsieur Chariot. That you should be painted with the same brush as a repeat/fixated pedophile is not only absurd, it is a travesty of justice. While I am grateful for it, the sex registry system should be revised. I am glad that you found understanding neighbors.
Natalie:
To you too I suggest picking up my book, Two to Six. Amazon has a "Search Inside" feature which will give you some idea. But, don't be fooled. There's much, much more to the story.
I won't be reading it. The fact is the boy was a minor, however old he was. You've said it's not the first time, so you knew you were having sex with underage boys. I refuse to contribute to a sex offender profiting from his crime, which is what me buying your book would be.
I have a picture of a gay sex addict. I don't know why since you don't give your predelection. It doesn't matter really, but tells me something since gay and straight life do have differences.

The Catholicism I understand perfectly as a curse--as an indictment against sex itself that leads to the deprivation that causes acting out. But you aren't sharing any insight here, not really, just a few random facts, and what could possibly be no more than a promo for your book, which I'm not interested in.

I agree neither with the current attitudes of the society toward sexual predation, except that it cannot be accepted, nor those who take no responsibility for their acts. Neither of which issue you address. The case is moot counselor.
Well, as long as you don't threaten to burn the book, I'll leave you to your judgments.
Sorry, I missed the paragraph where you said what happened, but it made your case worse. That it was an underage gay prostitute due to legal proceedures at the time led to your arrest does not take responsibility for your part in the matter. And by recommending people read your book in the comments makes me think you are playing me. Stick to the facts and what YOU learned about yourself.
One word came to mind, reading your letter: coy. I am not easily seduced and so I will not rate your post or buy your book. It may be that you are rather being dispassionate; I mean you no offence but speak only from my own perspective as reader. But I wish you happy new beginnings; you have served your time and you deserve a second chance.
Your post has contributed a valuable new dimension, a voice thus far missing from the many recent OS posts on this topic. Thank you.
Hi Psycho:

I'm not sure if its my experience as a lawyer, a criminal defendant, a sex offender in a prison where they are hated more than the cops or an incipient author which has nurtured that "coy" quality, but, somehow, I survive with spirit in tact and ready to follow the path that seems to be opening before me. Hopefully, for those who are more easily seduced and who do read my book, that spirit will be seen as something more uplifting than coy.
I read the excerpt of your book on Amazon. It sounds interesting but not on my reading list. From what I could discern the minor was a 14 year old boy.
James: You have to understand something. I don't give a shit if you are the Pope, let alone an attorney or anything else. What matters to me is whether you take responsibility and are very, very clear about that.

Get this: I am not in favor of people who commit such offenses be punished like witches burned at the stake, but you crossed the line, and if you don't acknowledge it I am not in your corner.
This was a brave post, however, the explanation of why you are classified as a predator just makes me think you were correctly labeled. Those that prey on prostitutes, who by their very position are broken people, for their own sexual gratification are exactly that. --I don't mean just underage prositutes, but all prostitutes. To exploit another person who is there most likely from their own hell of past abuse is hideous. I hope that you have considered how this prostitute and others you exploited were harmed by your continuance of their abuse. If any of those young people are still alive, I hope they have some bit of joy in their lives.
The new posts on victimization and seuxal preferences are interesting and delve into extremely controversial subject matter. Though a completely compromised witness, let me make 2 general points.

On victimization. It is a given in this world that we love our victims and hate those victimizers. We tend to make these judgments oftentimes knowing only the barest minimum of facts. So, is sympathy alone the reason underlying such swift certainty? Well, I believe, that, in part, it is also due to the fact that we ALL feel the victim. After all, "in the end," we all feel the pawn of fate destined only to die. So, we not only strongly and promptly identify with one we see as a victim, but, as our media demonstrates, we seek them out and, then, almost pornographically revel in their misery. As a simple truth and as one deeply repressed and sublimated, it is often ignored. I simply ask that each person consider it.

Before moving completely on to the sexual preference part, there is a relationship between victimization and sex as well. For, prior to reaching the pre-destined fate we all shall suffer, sex, with its perverse, too frequent and almost completely misunderstood relationship to sin, shame and yes violence and even death confuses--and so frightens-- almost as much as that pre-destined fate.

On sexual preference. Let me simply point out that Calvin Klein doesn't strip down 50 year olds and plaster them on huge billboards across Times Square in order to sell his tighty-whities. Let me also point out that for a middle-aged man to act out on his attraction to youth and beauty is not only greedy and distasteful (for some, in the extreme), but also pathetic. Now, is there a difference between an 18 year old (remember Woody Allan and Charlie Chaplin?) and a 16 (or even 15 or 14) year old that should cause a greedy, pathetic, distasteful action to become criminal? For some, the answer's a given. For others, there's some gray here. As a compromised witness, let me point simply to a book called The Case Against Adolescence written by a completely un-compromised withness named Robert Epstein.

I'll now stop with what the experts might refer to as a style of denial called "intellectualization." Whether you can believe it ot not, there's none of that (or very little of it, at least) in my book. I try to be brutally honest and face the beasts within my soul. I do offer this challenge though. Read it and tell me if you feel you can do the same.
I have read Jim's book, TWO TO SIX, and it is astonishing. Not only is it well written, it is remarkable for its honesty and courage. Jim does not flinch for a moment. I could not put the book down and found myself in tears from time to time. It is clear that this is a story with many issues that need to be address if we are to think of ourselves as enlightened.

Thank you, Jim, for giving the world your story. I hope many will read it and that out of this will come new dialogue, new conversation, new awareness. You are brave. You have my respect.

Silk's Musings
James, you had me up until the point where you started directing people to your book instead of answering their questions. At that point, sir, your apparent plea for compassion was exposed as spam for your book. Compounded by the revelation that your prostitute was 14, and my initial inclination to offer you compassion has been entirely dampened.

I can imagine looking at a 17 year old and believing he was really 20. Maybe even a 16 year old. But a 14 year old? That's barely pubescent. There's no way I'd believe you might not have known that a 14 year old was underage. As such, you contracted his services knowing full well that it was illegal (far more illegal than normal prostitution) and deeply, fundamentally immoral. You can't pretend that he was a mature, cognizant party offering a service with no form of coercion. Fourteen year olds do not enter into prostitution in their right minds. By participating in the system that allows such children to be abused, you are responsible not merely for your particular transaction, but for promoting and sustaining the subjugation of these children and ruining their lives.

I would not be afraid that you would randomly attack my children. They do not fit your MO - too young, wrong gender; further, you don't seem to prey on random children but instead channel your desires into avenues that you feel are justifiable (i.e. people who are selling themselves to you.) I agree that the one-size-fits-all sex offender registry suits few and does more harm than good in general, and that turning you into social pariah for life doesn't do us any more good than it does you. What good does it do society if you can't get a job and your neighbors teach their children to be unnecessarily afraid of you? I'll agree with the logic in that argument... but you lost my sympathy with your spam and the actual details of your situation. I'll preserve my sympathy for people who were arrested for mooning someone or peeing in public, or a 19 year old who's girlfriend told him she was 18 when she was really 16.
It is nice to see that you are owning up to your mistakes, but you are doing far too much shilling for your book. Sounds like you have tired of legal practice and want to be successful as a shock! writer so you can quit your day job.

I cringed the entire time I read your confessional. I would make a terrible priest. I also did not enjoy the follow up discussions in the comments sections in which people with a fetish for adolescents try to rationalize the lack of difference between 14, 16 or 18. There is a world of difference in maturity level. And a 14 year old prostitute, male or female, is not exactly someone acting with informed consent however convincing is their seductive act. Rather, that child is damaged goods trying to survive in a heartless world, exploited by the admittedly selfish and uncaring.
Hello PA:

Very passionate and I appreciate that. I think if you look a little more carefully, you'll see I hardly mentioned my book until a reader seemed quite interested in the details of what I did. As I state in the post itself, I was not going to do a "synopsis" of my book and, for the same reason I give in that posting, I had no intention of doing "the details" in my response to comments. So, to satisfy that reader's self-admitted "curiousity," I referred her to my book which, up until that point, I hadn't even given the title of. It was the blog after blog posted on OS about sex offending which motivated this posting. Perhaps that's only understandable when one offers a unique perspective on a less challenging topic. I would hope not, however.

As to those details, I have no idea how you seem to know that the young prostitute was 14. Or, frankly, where you get some of the other assumptions which you seem to make rather freely about who I am, what I did and who I did it with. What I do know is what I said before, we evidence our own fears when we judge others. And even if I haven't completely overcome my fears, I have, at least, acknowledged them. Have you?
Jennifer:

I'm not sure what your expertise is when it comes to adolescence. Other than having been one, I admit to none. I do refer, again however, to Robert Epstein's book. But no matter what he might say about the cometence or incompetence of adololescents, I admit above, and repeat again, middle-aged men hitting on teens is greedy, repugnant and pathetic. It is, however, the infantilization of adolescents and the complete and utter inability of "adults" to discuss sexuality honestly which makes adolescents susceptible to be "hit on." Instead of competence, we offer our children confusion. We refuse to honor, or even recognize, their intelligence by empowering them with hoenst and forthright insight and education. And that's because we are scared of that deeply powerful, primitive drive. So, instead, like with everything else that scares us, let's just deal with it by criminaizing it.
patricia w,

I would say as a citizen of this country and a believer in the fundamental rights enumerated in our founding documents, your son has an inalienable right to seek redress for grievances. If there is evidence demonstrating possible innocence that was not presented at trial, there are grounds for a mistrial, an overturning of the verdict, or even for charges of malicious prosecution. If the entire case was built on the testimony of someone who recanted, then by all legal standards, the conviction is absolutely in question. I would suggest a good lawyer should make the argument to a federal court that the Constitution forbids Congress from making any law that limits a citizen's right to seek redress for grievances, and that this means in your case that a judge can only rule on the evidence and not use laws restricting the right to appeal as justification for denying a new trial. I would also suggest that it means your son's presence on the registry cannot be used as evidence against him, because you are disputing the validity of the case itself, and so in a legal context, his guilt must either be demonstrated, or his name removed. Obviously people who commit violent or demeaning acts that damage their victims should be restricted in some ways, but someone wrongly accused deserves every protection of our constitution, just like even someone rightly accused does in the initial prosecution.
Suddenly we should all forgive you and feel safe because you are educated and wrote a book (which you are shamelessly pushing here). No, quite the contrary for me, at least.

I fully agree that the registration requirements and criteria for registering are unfair. The registration requirements are homophobic and ruin the lives of people who aren't violent or otherwise threatening to our community. If every person who was caught urinating in public was required to register then it would be quite a different story. That rant aside...

Why can't you be forthright with the questions asked here? You instruct people to by your book. If you were dedicated to being candid and open you would answer the questions posed here, not aim to profit from your crimes.

As you clearly have figured out through your well-crafted letter to your community, perception is everything. If my neighbor left me that note I would think that he was a patronizing jerk who feels entitled.

You didn't think for a moment that you were doing something wrong? You didn't think this kid was under 18? Reports here suggest your victim was 14. If that's true then what you did is unforgivable. I don't know many 14 year olds that look over 18. Did you stop to think about what the long-term consequences for him would be? Did you stop to think about the circumstances that had led him to sell his body on the streets of NYC at 14? Or, and surely I hope you don't, are you going to reply with either a. "He told me he was 18." or "read the book."

What would have happened if you were never caught?
Imean, that's the best question I've been asked on this blog and you may not believe the answer but I believe I wanted to be caught
As a convicted, yet unregistered sex offender, I must say that you are brave in coming forth. I was accused of molesting my daughter after she climbed into bed with me. I was going through marital problems at the time and this was a big issue during my divorce. While I was asleep at the time, how can you prove it. Being threatened with 20 years in prison or a plea deal, I chose the plea deal.

What I find interesting is that sex offender registries lump all people as the same, even though their conviction happened 20, 30, or more years ago and they have not been in any trouble since then. I would say they are not a danger anymore but they are still listed. In many cases, while they no longer live in one state, they are still found on that state's registry. You are an example of that, even though you no longer live in New York you're still listed there.

At the same time, I find articles of people convicted who have been police officers or other public officials and they are not listed on the registry. I find today that their are people who plea out with a condition that after they are released from their sentence, they are also released from registering, while those convicted prior to the laws passage are required to register, sometimes for life.

The Adam Walsh Act is even more punitive. Over all, I must agree with you that people need to take a look at this issue with reason and not emotion.