We'll be talking about this week's political stories for months to come...
About once a year, so much big political news happens that a single column can’t be devoted to a single topic. This is that week. So lace up your running shoes…
In gay rights, two important things happened. The least of these would be huge in any week – the Maryland Senate voted to provide marriage licenses to gay and lesbian couples. The governor has already announced he will sign the bill and it’s expected to pass the House, making Maryland the sixth state where gay couples can marry, by as soon as this July.
But that event was overshadowed by the Justice Department’s decision that the Defense of Marriage Act – a law more properly called the Discrimination against Gay Marriage Act – is unconstitutional and not worthy of defending. Despite the reporting, this sort of refusal to defend is not unprecedented. The law even provides for it, requiring the Department of Justice to notify Congress whenever it happens. But it is highly unusual. And it amounts to an official endorsement of equal rights for gay couples. Combined with the repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, first term of Obama Administration is sure to be remembered as the civil rights era for gay Americans.
In partisan politics, the Governor of Wisconsin – self-styled union buster Scott Walker – let slip that he’d considered planting troublemakers among the dem
onstrators but decided he didn’t need to. He thought he was having a private conversation with dirty-industrialist David Koch, a major campaign contributor. This, of course, is a tactic not seen since the Nixon Era, when Nixon and FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover recruited operatives to infiltrate anti-war demonstrations and incite violence as a way of turning public opinion against peace demonstrators. Nixon would later try to rig an election to ensure he won a second term and then resign in disgrace when he got caught. Just sayin'.
In international news, Libyan protestors have taken over much of the country, despite the Dictator Gaddafi’s use of planes to bomb protestors and mercenaries to shoot, rape and beat them. You may remember that George Bush bragged about making nice with Gaddafi. Nice. Most lately the dictator is trying to link protestors to Osama Bin Laden and drug use. It’s his last ditch effort to rally western governments to his side. But it seems pretty certain he’s finished.
At home, Obama opponents are highly critical of his tepid statements about the Libyan revolution. However with large numbers of Americans still in-country, it would be highly irresponsible for our president to paint a target on their back.
In economic news, GM’s TARP-financed recovery led to its first full year of profits since 2004. The latest estimate says the entire $700 billion TARP loan program will cost less than $25 billion dollars. TARP -- a political disaster – is shaping up to be a huge economic success.
And in juicy political scandal, the Rolling Stone is reporting that Lt. Gen. William Caldwell, a three-star general, ordered Psy-Ops (Psychological Operations) troops to figure out how to manipulate US senators, including John McCain, Joe Lieberman, and Al Franken. Reportedly, the goal was to get a bigger war budget.
Head games are a part of every war, but usually they get played on the other side. The choice of McCain was a kind of “aha” moment for me. I’d always thought that he came back from his war theater visits with a kind of rabid look in his eye; I’d blamed it on Post-Traumatic Stress. Lieberman would also be easy to manipulate, given his zealous defense of all things Israel. Franken? Who knows?
One wonders how long this has been going on or how deep it goes. There is some reporting that the military had already tried a cover-up, punishing soldier whistle-blowers. Expect Caldwell to be fired within ten days but the story to unfold for a good bit longer.
Whew! With all the national and international developments, domestic milestones, and emerging scandal, journalism has never been more necessary. Maybe you ought to subscribe to your local newspaper. If you still have one, that is. But that’s another column entirely.
Art courtesy of Mario Piperni. See more of Mario's great political art at mariopiperni.com.


Salon.com
Comments
I had not heard about the Gen's activities - jeesh....
I am extremely concerned about the happenings in Wisconsin and Koch, et al's money-lending (after all, they will get it back - in spades) especially as I am a state government employee (another state) whose contract is coming up for negotiation next month with renewal in July (hopefully).
I am trying to find out some organizations/places to make donations to stopping this union-busting where the money can do the most good. I don't even have a clue where to start. I get some emails from different groups, but don't know how effective or real they are. Do you have some insights here?
Thanking you in advance.
Nixon was quite rightly hounded out of office for lying to the American people about his role in the Watergate break-in and, in the process, breaking numerous laws in his efforts to conceal his administration's role in the matter.
While the Watergate fiasco was certainly a "dirty trick," it did not constitute anything close to rigging an election, which is most commonly defined as vote-tampering.
Far from being guilty of rigging the 1972 election, Nixon LOST the 1960 election to Kennedy specifically because of vote tampering in the state of Texas, which diverted enough electoral votes to JFK to put him over the top in the electoral college. Remember that LBJ was a Texan and had been accused of vote tampering numerous times during his various election campaigns.
What Nixon did was stupid, short-sighted, and immaterial to the outcome of 1972 election. Claiming that he was guilty of rigging the 1972 election is spurious and injurious to your reputation since the facts contradict your statement.
Your is the Monica Crowley revision of history. While I'm happy to correct Monica's revisionism, this historical side trip is little to do with my post, I think.
Lessilly, I'd give directly to a public employees union in Wisconsin. Here's one http://www.wseu-24.org/
rig an election. He was obviously guilty of breaking and entering and
wire tapping. It matters not where he broke into nor what info he was after. He cloud have broke into Coca-cola and was looking for the formula. Unlike the "hate" crimes we have today, these is no special
elevation of the crime because he was after campaign secrets.
Campaign secrets are bullshit anyway. Why would a party not be open anyway. That is largely what is wrong with our system.
Politicians know they intend to use at least bullshit ways to spin and
attack opponents and at worst go well beyond that.
If I had my way they would all be wire tapped by wiki leaks and
all of it leaked on a daily basis.
The Constitution never recognized the notion of political parties
or even primaries. I don't think any state should spend a penny
toward the notion that primaries are to be sponsored in any way.
If any group of people want to call themselves a party and want to determine who to run, they should do it totally on their own dime, time and resources. They should not use gov voting booths nor should any notion of fraud be entertained. Because is not in any way part of the process for electing the president. The "party"
can cheat it self all it wants.
Let the meet in a basement and cheat themselves all they want.
And the notion that a party has to be of significance to get the gov help and to get a name on the ballot is absolutely bullshit.
I should have the right to open all the state polling places in order to determine is my party wants to support me or my brother. If not
is is clear violation of the equal opportunity clause.
Point is , so what is one party wants to spy on the other. It is all bullshit. This happened when I was a kid. At the time I thought this was like he broke into the Pentagon and going to sell secrets to the Russians. So he spied on bullshit campaign strategy.
That is not rigging an election. It is playing crappy campaigning
games. Which they all do anyway.
Seems to me that since you have defined yourself what mart vs Stupid is,, you would realize that it is smart to have them all behave like adults instead of children.
But you fail to even consider that idea.
Why is it that every politician lies directly to our faces a multitude of times while campaigning? Well it is obvious. They are afraid to always say what the believe in. They want to say what you want to hear whether they believe it or not. They will say anything that sounds good to who ever they are speaking to at the moment.
I say quit whining and let they spy in each other all they want.
An inconvenient truth I guess.