War on Drugs an epic fail, says new report by world leaders
“The global war on drugs has failed” That’s the primary conclusion of a new report by Global Commission on Drug Policy, an impressive group of world leaders including five former heads of state, former UN Secretary General Kofi Annan, Richard Branson, former US Secretary of State George Shultz, Paul Volcker and others. This is hardly a collection of potheads.
According to the Commission the failure of the “War on Drugs” falls into four categories:
- Spending on criminalization hasn’t reduced supply.
- Arresting a drug seller never stops drug flow.
- Drug criminalization harms public health initiatives that reduce HIV/AIDS, overdoses and drug-related medical harm.
- Government spending on criminalization and jails uses money that could be spent on successfully-proven public health interventions.
Among drug war countries, ours qualifies as the most epic fail. You’ve probably forgotten that the “War on Drugs” was started by Richard Nixon, a guy mostly remembered for his other big mistakes. Since then, the US has spent over one trillion dollars without making any lasting, tangible, or durable progress. People use drugs as much as ever, criminals profit from drugs more than ever, and we jail more citizens (per capita) than any other country in the world.
The vast majority of drug users are not even abusers. They use drugs casually (mostly marijuana.) Their recreational use never interferes with work or family or civic life. Sure, more than a few users drive drunk or steal to support addictions; that’s a real problem. But they are a small slice of all drug users. The World Health Organization found that 42.4% of all Americans used marijuana. Don’t you think it would be obvious if four in ten of us were stoned every day? Tomorrow at work, look around and count the buzzed coworkers.
Researcher Louisa Degenhardt of the University of New South Wales debunks another common myth, that harsh laws reduce consumption.
"Globally, drug use…is not simply related to drug policy, since countries with stringent user-level illegal drug policies did not have lower levels of use than countries with liberal ones."
Yet funding the war has been taken for granted as public policy ever since Nixon first declared it.
By far, our biggest jump in drug incarceration came after passage of Ronald Reagan's Anti-Drug Abuse Act in 1986. That’s when we began, in earnest, to conflate use with abuse. Since then, Americans jailed for drug crimes have risen by about half a million more each decade. And today, the average drug sentence in the US is 12-20 times longer than the rest of the world. Taking Nixon’s bad idea and making it much worse—that’s the Reagan legacy.
Naively, we have placed this hugely profitable sector of our economy off limits to legitimate entrepreneurs, regulation and taxation. That’s had a great un-civilizing effect. Drug gangs are big winners in our drug war. “Drug violence,” however, is related to the business, not the product. Think American Prohibition, hugely violent until it ended. Then not.
The other big winners are those who work in law enforcement, the judiciary, our (increasingly privatized) prison system, or parole and probation. Today, half of Americans in jail are there for drug crimes. We jail more citizens than any other country in the world. Including, it is worth mentioning, Iran, Syria, and North Korea. That’s where the one trillion has been spent—on a big sucking welfare program for cops, judges and jail guards. (Now, though, there’s even some backlash among those groups. They’ve organized in every state.)
“Let’s start by treating drug addiction as a health issue, reducing drug demand through proven educational initiatives and legally regulating rather than criminalizing cannabis”
former president of Brazil and commission member
Fernando Henrique Cardoso.
Among other recommendations are:
- Stop criminalizing drug users if they harm no one else.
- Test legalization models as a barrier to organized crime.
- Decriminalize marijuana because there is no reason not to.
- Respect the human rights and dignity of people who use drugs.
Most importantly, they suggest we “break the taboo on debate and reform.” It’s OK to admit we lost the war—a good thing even. And it’s way past time to talk about other approaches, even if they don’t feed a punishment instinct.
More than a decade ago, I asked an ordinary Canadian what he thought of the war on drugs. Without missing a beat, he said, “You’re making war on your own citizens. We’d never do that.” Maybe it’s time we start to look northward for some common sense. Or maybe we just need to start asking the right questions. Even a stoner ought to be able to figure this one out, eh?


Salon.com
Comments
But, as you have pointed out, the drug war has not been a failure for those employed in its army.
The war on drugs is just another money making war and this country is a war based economy.
this war has won lots of votes, created and sustained law enforcement bureaucracies, and disenfranchised millions of potential democrat voters. beginning to look more sensible yet?
When you have created a system (the Prison Industrial Complex) that keeps itself "alive" by stealing the lives of its own citizens you have a huge problem on your hands.
The PIC has become a giant parasite and acts out against it's own citizens in accordance with its parasitic ways.
Our Puritanical paranoia helped to stoke the fire of the drug war for decades and now the fire is out of control, consuming lives and livelihoods in its quest for god only knows what.
Rated.
trying to fit into an oblique hole.
he knew acid was the greatest threat to humanity.
he knew pot was like one of his whisky slurps.
nixon saved us from ourselfs.
nixon went to war with hoover.
nixon broke the constitution to eavesdr0p
nixon was not a great or good man,
but they shoulda dosed his ass
Was it meant to be a success?
(sorry for any spelling mistakes in first comment)
It's no coincidence that we have this incredibly destructive War On Drugs going on at the same time we are all the targets of a multibillion dollar propaganda machine trying to get us all addicted to as many different kinds of drugs as possible. Like the street corner drug dealers, the pharmaceutical companies hate competition, and like the street corner drug dealers, they have their armed enforcers to keep it out. We now live in a society in which smashing down a citizen's door and summarily executing him in a hail of machine gun fire is the new normal, something we are expected to accept without even an explanation.
Also, the PRC was very effective at reducing opium consumption in China. 19th Century China was crippled by opium addiction. One of Mao's major reforms was to detox China and wean it off of opium. This worked. One of the greatest achievements of the PRC, in my opinion.
Stop criminalizing drug users if they harm no one else.
Test legalization models as a barrier to organized crime.
Decriminalize marijuana because there is no reason not to.
Respect the human rights and dignity of people who use drugs.
There are so many ways to use cannabis than just smoking it. Demand this simple definition of marijuana which actually shows respect for our Constitution.
16. The term 'marijuana' means all parts
of the smoke produced by the combustion
of the plant Cannabis sativa L.
For more information, google Talking Points for the Peloton.
http://open.salon.com/blog/the_shadow_of_light/2011/06/04/a_high_school_criminal_banker_from_boston_part_ii
http://open.salon.com/blog/the_shadow_of_light/2011/06/04/a_high_school_criminal_banker_from_boston_part_i
I am preparing a Federal Court challenge v. FCC challenging their unconstitutional jurisdiction over our First Amendment right to access for political speech. In the same petition I am challenging the broadcast licenses of ABC, NBC, CBS, PBS, and FOX for their "willful and repeated failure" to have allowed me access in the last election.
Having said that, I am going to adapt this beautiful essay to my presidential platform plank.
As I see it, by Executive Order all of these drug prohibition laws can be done away with and sensible national laws put in place. I see 50,000 medicinal dispensary shops where one could also have a sandwich, a sweet drink, listen to music, visit with friends.
These 50,000 shops would employ no less than a half million people-fresh tax payers. I can see a kid, with limited education and an empty resumé, in the front window of a shop, cleaning the plant, preparing baggies, spliffs, and blunts - in his or her DREAM JOB!
The tax revenue can be earmarked to underwrite medical education for those who are qualified besides medical research. There is an issue of fighting inflation: if these dopes wanna lay around, out of circulation, burning their money . . . let them!
There is another question: Would I, as president of United States smoke dope? The answer is, I smoke every dope within ear shot. Stupid people burn up when ever I talk.
http://michaelslevinson.com
Suggestions that the Chinese have been successful at eradicating drug abuse are belied by the fact that there are 2.5 million opiate addicts in the country which gains substantial revenues from international drug trafficking. And then there's the long standing legend about Mao having hundreds of thousand of addicts shot to death. Some solution.
The only real soluti0n to the problem of drug abuse is to LEGALIZED EVERYTHING and be done with it.
Sure, some people will die, but they are dying anyway. We don't have to make the criminals and well as addicts.