Occupy Wall Street arrived in Washington DC this week. A DC-based Occupy closes the circle around the big money interests who buy government and the elected officials who sell it. In Washington, Occupy D
C is really two different groups. One is a small, ongoing protest at McPherson Square, the other, a much larger day-event at Freedom Plaza. Both groups agree on core principles. It’s not democracy if you can buy it, right?
Occupy is now in some 70 towns, according to Mother Jones. Finally the media are watching too, having been shamed by a grassroots Twitter campaign for not covering the story.
This is a turning point. Until now, coverage had mostly consisted of a mention, condescension, or outright ridicule (like Erin Burnett offered up on the first night of her new show.) There has also been a ton of pejorative punditry along the lines of “If they want to be taken seriously, they need to…” But the protesters simply keep going and now
mainstream liberal advocacy groups, like labor unions, are also paying attention.
But can the Occupy movement break out of its young-progressive demographic and begin to enlist a larger slice of Americans? A visit to the DC events at both McPherson Square and Freedom Plaza led me to conclude “not yet.”
After seeing Occupy firsthand, it reminds me of the early days of the anti-Vietnam war movement. I was sixteen when I started going to anti-war protests in the 1970s, so I was hardly an organizer. But I did learn a thing or two. Here’s my (affectionate) advice:
- Focus your message. During the 70’s we also had lots of different groups coming together under a single message—End the War! You’ve got dozens of groups meeting and marching together, but each is promoting its own niche, from ending foreign wars, to health care, to child abuse, to well, you get the idea.
Find a single, simple phrase that unites you all, then repeat it often enough for a person who isn’t really paying attention to know it and to understand it. Unite under one banner, not just on one piece of ground. We started out just like you and we spent years stumbling before getting to the next level. It’d be nice if you could get there more quickly. - Build a movement that has room for a majority of Americans. As a young, progressive activist you probably believe that most Americans aren’t so worthy of marching with you. And you’re probably right. But only a majority movement has any chance of undoing fifty years of entrenched government-for-sale. Your mission is actually much bigger than ours was.
- Find some kids. The event at Freedom Plaza was a fine place to have taken children. But it would not look like it to lots of middle class moms and dads. I didn’t see any kids. In fact the only stroller I saw was being pushed by some guy who rigged it to stream video.
Until people again get used to the idea of seeing nonconformists gathered in groups, it’ll be important for you to put forward the family-friendly face of your movement. Bring your kids next time,
or at least your little sister. - Add an exclamation point—Occupy! Then go stencil it on every boarded up building in the country. One thing Wall Street can tell you is that repetition is the key to message retention. That’s how they created the big lie about being “job creators.” Make Occupy! into a screen saver, a laptop sticker, and a t-shirt.
- To lead from ahead, turn around and look behind. What’s that next, larger circle you want to bring into your movement? How will you get them to join? It’s way too easy for passionate advocates to become shrill and scornful. But nothing kills momentum more quickly. To succeed, make sure everyone finds your welcome embrace. Late is better than never.
- Lose the international baby-killer vibe. That problem takes care of itself when defense contractors no longer control the government. It’s a symptom of disease, not the disease itself. No matter what you believe about our foreign policy, expecting the next ring of people to face up to ugly truths is entirely unrealistic.
Oh, and leave the mutilation photos at home. They get you nothing. Take care of the dirty money and the rest takes care of itself. - Heroes will be forged in your group. Right now you’re striving to be leaderless, but even without intending it, leaders will still emerge. Let it happen. Leaders are mostly a good thing. Never underestimate the power of a single person’s vision.
Right now, you may be doing the greatest civic duty of your lifetime. So enjoy yourself. Social change is supposed to be hard, but it is also supposed to be fun. If it’s not both, you’re not doing it right. Keep up the good work, fight the good fight, and always keep your eye on the next horizon. Save our country, will ya'?


Salon.com
Comments
Check that, yes, they do have a point -- the point is to marginalize anyone who doesn't get in line behind the corporatocracy. Unlike their critics, these rebels do have a cause -- maintaining a civilized society in which "the land of opportunity" is more than just another two-bit slogan.
This gutting reminds me of the classic ... first they came for the, etc, etc, etc . When the Freemarketeers came for the unions and blue-collar workers, no one complained except blue-collar workers. But now that they've come for the middle-class, and in the process laid waste to the American Dream, everyone -- Left and Right -- is up in arms. Well, only the Right is up in arms -- so far.
Can it be that the Freemarketeers overplayed their hand? God, I hope so! And proof of that is that your post is accompanied with a googlebot ad for American Express. How fitting!
Then when it came, I thought that it might be a shooting star kind of thing...a fast burn out.
Now...I am beginning to think it will take hold in a way few movements have ever taken hold.
The revisions to our society needed to correct the inequality of wealth and income are monumental. The ain't gonna come without disruption on a HUGE scale.
I hope this is the beginning of something very much needed...and almost impossible to attain.
Good luck to all the young people involved.
First he writes a blog post defending the indefensible police attacks on PEACEFUL protestors, and now he wishes those same protestors luck.
Mealy mouthed frank showing his passive-aggressive dementia, AGAIN.
GREAT post, Jimmy - don't let the morons deter You from Your courageous posts.
-R-
more in my blog, occupy wall street, my speech to the masses
I had a fascinating conversation with a young Russian who pointed out that America is a third world country in times of public wireless access.
I was troubled by their cavalier attitude toward park permits, etc. I gently tried to pointed out that true civil disobedience consists of breaking unjust rules and accepting the consequences. It does not consist of fucking up Manhattan traffic.
Only Right is up in arms. I would love to know exactly who owns each and every gun in this country. My guess is there is quite a number of liberals that do.
Here are 2 links for all of you. One comical but true and one serious from the liberal's favorite radio station. The serious one is long but worth listening to or reading. Of course you will blame Wall Street, conservatives and those that suit you need to be correct. But the fact is our gov. has screwed this all up for many , many years now on both sides.
So are they coming after the middle class now. Well that is one way to see it, but I think the "who" is not as simple as Wall Street.
People you voted for screwed up just as people I have voted for.
It is not nearly as simple as the Wall Streeters put it. It is not simplistic how we fot here, but it is simple to see it is screwed up.
Here are the links.
Funny:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-mAUQYn6DjM
Serious
http://www.npr.org/2011/10/04/140948138/how-the-financial-crisis-created-a-new-third-world
I do find it strange that no one is sitting on the capital steps in Washington where the real problem is. Wall Street didn't bail out Wall Street, Congress and Obama bailed out Wall Street and others as they chose the winners and the losers in America. The protesters are protesting hard working people that got up in the morning went to school, graduated and found a good job. The crook are in Washington living the elite life making themselves millionaires on insider trading which is legal for them.
If the protesters wanted to do some real good, go to Washington, demand term limits, demand that the money trail be investigated; that is the link between congressional programs and campaign contributions to the individual congressmen. You might be amazed that the wife of a person working in the Energy department made a couple million on the Solyndra as the outside counsel working for the government. Of course we know the deal itself was Pay for Play. There are thousands of such corruption in D.C. That is where the very intelligent protesters should be but don't take the unions, they love that corruption as they are part of it.
The connection hasn't been made between Wall Street chicanery and empty real estate and unemployed workers in the same way, and I doubt can be made without a lot of effort and organization. I don't know if a critical mass can be achieved. Occupy! has to be happening in front of Big Bank offices across the country. R
Can I add to the list?
#8 Demand for a Porta-Potty drop off.
I joined in Occupy with a group of friends and we were sh!t out of luck on the waist removal front. Literally. Afterward I saw a segment on John Stewart about the exact same subject... except they didn't mention us protesters need Demand a Porta-Potty. I'll be back Occupying on Sunday. I'll be wearing a skirt this time around and carrying an empty container that will probably have to be put to use... I drink a lot of water.
My current windmill of choice is corporate personhood. It seems to me that getting rid of it would be the first step in eliminating dirty money.
What do you think, oh large-brained one?
So, I too was reminded of this past era by the Occupiers! And now at 59 I am with them all in spirit. And the denigrators and mocking pundits may just have to wipe egg from their collective faces before too long.
Almost by definition, the "left" will not organize in the way the right does, which is why the right so often wins. It's not a "reasonable process," and I'm afraid no injunctions for it to be otherwise are going to have much effect, yet the impact on the cultural level and among the educated, informed and creative is undeniable.
The guys on Wall Street know they're getting away with a crime against the rest but their attitude for the most part is "catch me if you can" and it works very well for them all over the world. Money talks, the rest walk.
My point? If I'd listened to anyone's unsolicited advice back then, none of my subsequent stumblings and discoveries would have been possible. I had to follow my own lights, the way a writer follows his or her muse.
I see lots of good advice being offered here by many well-intentioned and experienced people. But my question is, who asked for it? Who asked you? If you really want to affect these new-style (and they are very new-style) protests, my question is, where are you? Are you doing anything, or just . . . offering advice, which costs nothing.
As far as I can see (and I was present at Foley Square last week) no one is asking for advice and therefore no one is listening to it. Nor should they. Let them find their own way, make their own mistakes, discover themselves in their own way and in their own time.
Let me throw this item in the mix: I know some middle-class citizens, some elderly, who are wondering if they are targeted as the corporate problem, since they have spent years saving and investing (with banks and corporations.) When (was it Perry or Romney?) said corporations are people, I think he was referring to stockholders and the employees who file papers, make phone calls, clean the floors of corporate buildings... I have not heard any comments about average, month-to-month bill payers associated with corporations in these ways.
I mean, should "Aunt Edna" feel bad that she joined an investment group with other ladies and owns a percentage of 1000 shares of Walgreens stock?
Perhaps as the movement is clarified, we'll know. R
It sounds like this is happening in Chicago and they've even drawn up an agenda. Here's a link:
http://www.suntimes.com/business/8144210-420/occupy-chicago-spreads-message-through-downtown.html
1) Focus the message-Chris Hedges put it well, the message is one word:REBELLION. My sign said I Want A Government That Is Not For Sale. It was a consistent theme-get money out of politics. I agree there were many causes and messages and they all stem from the same thing: corruption, greed, money.
2)The theme is We are all the 99%. That seems like a pretty good theme for building a majority.
3)If you couldn't find kids, you must have had your eyes closed. My 4 yr old was there for 3 days and he played with other kids. There were mothers nursing and strollers all over.
4)I like the Occupy stencil idea.
5)Consensus was a driving factor in the decision making process, giving everyone a voice.
6) I talked to a lot of people who were disappointed that the wars of imperialism were not a larger focus. The majority of Americans are against the wars. I agree the dirty money is the issue, but a lot of people still need to see the links and that is why all the issues are important because they lead to the same place: Dirty Money.
7) I am the leader of the movement. And so are you. And so is everyone who is a part of the 99%. That is beautiful. It is empowering. A single leader can be killed, disgraced, marginalized. But if one leader falls, the other 99% are there to carry the flame.
Is it just that we were too early in detecting that Obama had nothing to do with an authentic Black American experience, or any actual experience at all? it's perhaps time we stopped sorting ourselves by "Left" and "Right" and found another standard of judgment to rally to. May I suggest Moral and Immoral as a distinction that resonates with "The Silent Majority", not so silent these days? Or perhaps "Just" and "Unjust", though that is something that will spark debate as to "definition". Maybe "Constitutional" vs "Unconstitutional"?
How about if we all just take the Golden Rule as a starting point? Not the one that says"Do unto Others as You would have them do unto you" That "justifies" all too much self righteous posturing. How about the phrasing that says, "Do not do unto others that which is hateful to you", or better yet, "hateful to them?". But then, that's why the Bill of Rights was written in terms of what the government cannot do, not in terms of what it must "provide" as a "right". It doesn't mean we must let moneychangers get away with changing our work (money) to vapor and profiting in the process.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h6xrMZwnS-o
Worth watching... subscribe if you like it.
http://www.youtube.com/user/MrParkerEast