
The associate professor's course on monastic life and asceticism gives students at the University of Pennsylvania a firsthand experience of what it's like to be a monk.
At various periods during the semester, students must forego technology, coffee, physical human contact and certain foods. They'll also have to wake up at 5 a.m. — without an alarm clock.

That's just a sample of the restrictions McDaniel imposes in an effort to help students become more observant, aware and disciplined. Each constraint represents an actual taboo observed by a monastic religious order.
"I've found in the past that students take this extremely seriously," said McDaniel, who has taught the class twice before. "I've had very few people who try to get away with things, and you can always tell when they are."
The discipline starts with a dress code for class: White shirts for the men, black shirts for women, and they must sit on opposite sides of the class. No makeup, jewelry or hair products. Laptops are prohibited; notes can be taken only with paper and pen. And don't even think of checking your cellphone for texts or email.
The course, which focuses primarily on Catholic and Buddhist monastic traditions, stems in part from McDaniel's own history. An expert on Asian religions, he spent a portion of his post-undergraduate life nearly 20 years ago as a Buddhist monk in Thailand and Laos and says he's both a practicing Buddhist and a practicing Catholic.
Restrictions outside class are introduced gradually: Students sacrifice caffeine and alcohol during one week, then swear off vegetables that grow underground in another. The latter rule stems from an extremely non-violent sect that eschews such produce because uprooting the food could kill insects, McDaniel said.
The real test is a full month of restrictions that begins in mid-March. Students can only eat food in its natural form; nothing processed. They can't eat when it's dark, nor speak to anyone while they eat. They must be celibate, foregoing even hugs, handshakes and extended eye contact. No technology except for electric light. They can read for other classes, but news from the outside world is forbidden.
So why would anyone sign up? It could be because McDaniel requires no term papers or exams. But sophomore Madelyn Keyser, 20, of Castro Valley, Calif., said that's misleading.
"In reality, it's much harder because your grade is based entirely on your participation and your integrity," said Keyser.
As a nursing major at the Ivy League school in Philadelphia, Keyser said she hopes the class will help her become more observant and a better listener to her patients.
Students also have to write in a journal every 30 minutes during their waking hours. And required course research cannot be done online — students must consult books and librarians, or have conversations with religious leaders.
Freshman Rachel Eisenberg said she enrolled because it's important "to figure out yourself before you can really help other people."
"It would give me a chance to really listen to myself and focus on my needs and feelings," said Eisenberg, 18, of Miami.

Keyser and Eisenberg are among 17 students in the class, a group carefully chosen from among nearly 100 applicants. McDaniel said he winnowed the list by contacting each student to make sure they understood what they were in for.
The numbers thinned quickly. One cited an inability to be without Facebook, McDaniel said, while another said she couldn't go a day without talking to her mother on the phone.
There are some exceptions to the rules, such as if another class requires students to watch a film. But any other infractions require confessions and acknowledgement in their journals.
In one recent class, three students were disciplined for the minor slip of having the labels of their T-shirts exposed, violating the dress code designed to enforce conformity. As a punishment, McDaniel made them compile a list of the countries where every one of their shirts was made.
McDaniel stresses he's not advocating for a total lifestyle change. He uses technology as much as the next person and is now married with children.
But if someone is forced to just listen for a month, he is more aware of how he speaks, McDaniel said. If someone can't talk while she's eating and has to count each chew, she'll think more about her food, he said.
"'It's not about individual restrictions," said McDaniel. "It's about building hyperawareness of yourself and others.'"



Salon.com
Comments
Could you be a monk for a month?
Rated
Actually it's easier to do when you're standing on your head.
Something indescribably profound happens when you live in silence, in nature, without possessions, without a laundry list of daily choice, without gadgets or newspapers. In silence, there is no desire to speak. Waking at 4 a.m. to the bell is a joy. Washing your face is a pleasure. Nothing feels denied. Sitting in one spot and watching as the light changes from dawn to darkness will reveal pretty much everything you need to know. These are not silly things, not things to be taken lightly or mocked. That this culture does so contributes to much of our suffering.
Happy weekend
HUGGGGGGGG
Jonathan,ABSTINENCE is all that matters.
You know my answer before reading my statement,I am sure.
When reading the rules,I had to laugh.
Men:white shirts,clean souls
Women:black shirts,dirty souls???
My understanding of Buddhism is totally different from what I read here.
The Zen buddhists live a very structured life,yes,but what this prof. does,sounds home made.
Of course,it is possible to import Zen Buddhism to the West,but no monk is forbidden to have even eye contact,no affection etc.
I would go to Tibet,yes.
In fact,I could imagine living there for a year to complete a course, but I would never enrol in a class like this.
I am almost sure that what is practised here is aiming at personality cult.
Rated for all those who join me in Tibet.
They wear the wrong colour,but then they could be mistaken for Ku-Klux-Klan-members.
I better keep it to myself in case anyone of the bloggers contemplates about the possibility of enroling.
In an over-saturated world with so many having zero internal awareness, how else will the quieter, yet no less powerful forces of our world speak to these kids?
Silence.
Simple food.
Less distraction.
Not surprised about drop outs : ) but I'd bet this is life-changing, or at least life enhancing, for those who embrace the challenge.
Interesting idea for a class, though.
--r--
(It sounds like life under Mayor Bloomberg.)
that said, it isnt as easy as one might believe. like green, i have been fortunate enough to have spent time in a Zen monastery. the hardest part for me was re-joining real life. at that time in my life, the temptation to remain monastic was pretty strong.
now? i just have a need for occasional, brief times of silence & introspection.
r
R♥
hee hee
You don't need silence at a retreat, you need a time machine : )
In my eyes,this professor is a phony.
RW,you might be right about your assumption but I think that if the Catholic church will survive,it (she)needs to be reformed.The monopol of power is outlived,and when all of the Hispanic population stops being illiterate,a great change in awareness will take place.What has done great harm to the old image of the clerus is the double face practise of teaching the dogma.
Are you saying that the only reason Hispanics are Catholic is because they are illiterate and, presumably, ignorant?
Tread carefully...
anyways,believe that the Catholic church is THE ONLY TRUE RELIGION THAT LEADS TO GOD AND TO PARADISE.
Catholics are made to believe in the "sacrament of consecration" which means that bread and wine are de facto the corpus Christi. Nuns are" brides Christi" and priests are "representatives of God",or substitutes,in other words-they are almost God-like.This is how they want to be seen and be respected as they believe themselves that they are better than the lay people.Per ordination they are,so they believe, closer to God than anyone else.
My point is:All roads lead to Rome.
RW,if you feel insulted,it certainly has not been my intention,and my words and thoughts expressed here are not directed against anyone.
Depending on our upbringing,we all are more or less part of our culture and also of our religious beliefs.
As you know,every young person needs to question the values taught to him when growing up,and after this process,he/she will work on own values by which to live.
A church needs to question herself too,and by doing so becomes
authentic.In this case I agree with you...not because of the Hispanic catholics...rather because of the Catholic church being the oldest Christian church which could in fact experience a revival.It would not even surprise me because people are in search of spiritual guidance and might find it in a church with long tradition.
There is only one denimination which precedes the Catholic church:
Judaism
The Roman Church's claim of being directly descended from Peter is challenged by these other Churches (none of whom are Protestant). We also can't forget Gnosticism, Arianism and other Christian groups that predated the formal establishment of the Roman Catholic Church.
But again, your arguments lack solvency because what you accuse the Roman Catholic Church of, also applies to all the other Christian Churches. It also applies to Islam. And it also applies to many of the Roman and Greek pagan faiths that preceded and strongly contributed to subsequent Western faiths, such as the Roman Cult of Mithras.
When I was in India,for the first time in my life I experienced what it meant to live a religious life which was authentic for a whole subcontinent.God was not an entity in other realms but was invited into every household every day at dusk as a reality that I have never experienced before and after my stay in India.
It was in India that I fully understood how wrong the Christian teachings have been to that day.Fortunately,matters have changed and we live in a time when changes become possible.
I'll leave this blog for now.
I was trying to concentrate on this particular topic regarding the Catholic church.The pope on his visit in Germany,tried to unify with the Eastern Orthodox,I know.We could go on here perhaps all day or we could hold a council.
For now I resign from this blog.
No one can dictate for another what makes a heart full of devotion in the myriad ways devout hearts are filled, regardless of the physical history of any religion or spiritual path or whether it only looks like a mental enslavement/wrong to an outsider -- to insist you "know" what's correct, as well as what's wrong, as a way to worship/be spiritual/ live gives you a lot of good company with many religiously fundamentalist/conservative/orthodox views.
I am not Anti-Christian,Anti-Western,and I don't indulge in a soap box of self hatred.
But I assume that I have hurt your feelings as Catholic.
Clash of cultures/religions
But it does sound like an interesting exercise, and not without it's merits in terms of what the students learn about themselves.
rated
I've participated and am a member and have been of a buddhist tradition that is infinitely more disciplined that what you evoke. until you have experienced it, you have no idea what you are talking about.
No offense. You are the one who seems to have a fascination with it, but the level of your understanding is minimal. i could go on and inform you but don't really think you are interested. it appears to be still on too unconscious a level.
R
I am reporting on a class offered at my alma mater. Sure my intro was tongue-in-cheek. If that offended you: oh well.
I have no formed opinion of what the professor has done, other than it struck me as fascinating for a college offering and I thought to share the HuffPo write up of it here.
I have to ask you again: Huh?
Who needs this? An "objective" report on what: a class in esoteric religion? I don't get it. I think you ought to know. If you kept the FOCUS ON YOURSELF it would be different, but you don't. It's like you don't exist, yet you insist on subjects that more of you. Where are you? Hello, hello, hello.
Many here post stories/info about unusul events abt which they have no strong opinions and they do that all the time, simply thinking that others may find them interesting. That's a legitimate use of this space.
Now, it's true that most of my posts evidence strongly felt opinions, some of which you've disagreed with strongly. That's ok w me, of course.
I honestly do not see the reason for your bile here this evening. If that makes me a dullard, I can live w it.
Apparently many here, today, found what is posted here interesting. That you feel I must express a definite and strong opinion abt it, other than the one I have (that I think the course is interesting), well, ok w me.
As to your last comment...I think every one of my regular, even casual readers here and in the other venues that publish my writing, have a clear sense that I very often share my opinions, openly.
If you don't, again, ok.
Have a good weekend.
I've been as plain as I can be here, and I don't plan to respond to your anger---which I do not understand--further.
take a look at some great essayists--montaigne, camus, baldwin, orwell, see how they did it. they always knew WHERE THEY WERE COMING FROM. And they had the courage to make their own beliefs known. I don't think you do that. I will grant you it is not easy. That is why today we are reading their work, and not that of the thousands of their contemporaries who were only out to please the "mob" and give 'em a few cheap thrills.
A "writer" is only as good as their knowledge of themselves, and their ability to blend that in to the world around them in a way that served the deepest values of the civilization. You should at least recognize that and if you are going to keep using all the electrons in the name of conservation you should recognize it.
Two initial comments: Wow. And to quote JW: "Huh?"
I know nothing about you, but you seem to have an inexplicably strong opinion about what Jon should be doing with his space here, and an unusually idiosyncratic view of good writing.
If you don't like what or how Jon writes, a wonderful option would be to go elsewhere for reading material. You opted instead to write insulting, lengthy, and expletive-filled comments. I don't get why you chose to be rude and off-putting. Maybe you should think about becoming more observant, aware, and self-disciplined. If you're interested, I hear there's a great class at U Penn.
I've known people (Westerners, I mean) who've done so; one stayed for about nine months.
Only the rare bad monk ever makes the news, but there are a whole lot of good ones here, and I do have the utmost respect for them.
Your statement about me is completely unfounded.
But going a month without coffee or wearing some form of Yankees shirt/jersey? Not a chance.
You don't have to be a co-religionist to be welcome at the local Trappist monasteries. You simply must be quiet, and don't complain about the food (haha, but take heart, they usually offer peanut butter and good bread). And, don't chant along out of tune.
I would love it if someone could compare/contrast Buddhist versus Christian monks. I have no idea.
FYI
Thomas Merton, Trappist monk in Kentucky, wrote about this. He saw a common brotherhood with non-Christian monks. His views were never universally accepted in the Catholic world.
A good more contempory reference might be "Benedict's Dharma", David Steindl-Rast, OSB, Riverhead Books. Maybe I will read "Benedict's Dharma" and post a "book-report".
In my experience (visiting monastaries and performing sacred music for some churches) the monastics have been far less concerned that I am not a Christian. They seem more focused on behavior - for example, maintaining silence at the required times.
There are differences, of course. Seeing a monk on the streets here isn't the head-turning event it is with Christian monks, though there are fairly strict protocols on those around a monk or monks, such as performing a particularly respectful "wai," i.e., placing your hand flat together in front of your forehead then bowing deeply from the waist, a practice also common among Thais to each other. The wider the social rank between two non-monk Thais, the deeper the bow -- in theory, every single Thai holds a unique place in the Thai social pecking order (one reason it's very difficult for foreigners ever to truly become integrated into Thai society -- they throw an unwanted kink into the system; in fact, I've come to believe it's impossible, maybe even for a Thai born and raised his/her entire life before moving here).
Don't know if this really satisfies your curiosity at all, but there it is anyway.