In how many states may students walk dorms and classrooms with guns, open and/or concealed?
35.
70%.
And now, in Colorado, the site of two mass gun murders in collective memory, the University of Colorado and the state legislature and with the Aurora theater killings still fresh, have knuckled under to the gun lobby reversing the state's thirty-year-old university and college campus gun ban.
As a result, this fall the Boulder and Colorado Springs campuses will have to
. have segregated, special housing for students with guns;
. order safes for guns for every special-housing dorm room;
. allow guns to be carried, concealed or not, throughout campuses.
This may seem at best odd in Colorado since in a 2010 referendum voters there approved by 70% to close the gun-show loophole that had allowed unrestricted sales outside the system of state gun-registration.
Have so few a shred of sense in that thin air...nor in the thirty-four other states that perpetuate this madness?
Possibly, and yet Coloradoans have three times in the past four years wisely rejected adding a 'Personhood Amendment' to their state constitution. That would ban all abortion for any reason and would also outlaw all embryonic stem cell research. It would, too, throw into confusion your legal birthday, and thus
. your social security eligibility date
. your medicare eligibility date
. your driver's licensing age
. your eligibility date for joining the service
. the date on which you may first vote
. the date on which you may first buy alcohol
. the date on which you may access your pension (public/private)
as well as every other aspect of your legal life for which your birth date matters...unless, of course, the legislation specifically preempts the unknowable date of your conception with what you know is the date on which you were born...and yet none of the Personhood Amendments that have been floated and voted on make any such distinction.
Why?
Because for benighted zealots, zygotes (spiritually blameless little blobs) are fundamentally more precious than are people (always spiritually blameworthy).
These clearly unintended, avoidable, and baldly idiotic consequences of a 'Parenthood Amendment' may be why Coloradoans voted down the amendment twice and earlier this week even failed by nearly 4,000 to garner the requisite 86,000 signatures to place the question on the ballot yet again.
This is a well-earned slap to Personhood USA, the group responsible for the failing votes for this inane idea, even last November in Mississippi.
So, Colorado...
Open/Concealed Carry in Classrooms?
Okay!
Endow blobby little Zygotes with Personhood?
Nope!
This is where we are, in America: I suspect Colorado's legislature and voters paint a pretty solid portrait of us at this fractured moment in our national political culture.


Salon.com
Comments
Herr Rudolphus can tell you about gun shows. Basically, the laws for background checks are different for stores and individuals selling through places like the want ads. At gun shows, the regs are exactly the same for stores and individuals as they are elsewhere, but there are more individuals handy to choose from.
Those personhood amendments are silly. Aside from playing havoc with the census, would it also mean that visiting couples who conceive in the U.S. are now the proud parents of a young American? Virgina (is for lovers) better watch out for a population explosion.
These divergences are what caused Western libertarians to bolt from the Republican party in the late 19th century and become radical populists.
A clever Democratic Party would run opinion polls and see how potent an issue this is in the midwest and whether they could utilize it to split a sizeable number of libertarians from the GOP prior to the election. It would require, though, the Dems to minimize handgun control laws and focus on the abortion issue in order to not alienate those they would woo.
My guess, though, is that the Dems would be unable to pull this off, because they have too many people they need to please in any given election. This means they have to cover too much ground at any given time, which prevents them from having the tactical and strategic concentration, flexibility and dynamism they need on select issues.
You can outnumber your foe 2 to 1. But if your forces are spread thin, and his are concentrated, he can smash you in detail. This not only applies to war, but to business and political campaigns as well. Just replace soldiers with money/workers/lobbyists and the battlefield with an economic landscape/resources/issues.
The state is also the home of the famous anti-government Sagebrush Rebellion. That said, they do tend to vote Democrat from time to time and are represented by Harry Reid, who has cleverly found a way to bring these Libertarians and individualists into the Democratic fold.
That he is doing so poorly in elections (barely winning), though, has less to do with his strategic approach, I believe, than with the fact that his old-school backroom retail, old-boy approach no longer works in the wholesale, media, showhorse approach demanded by a tv age Las Vegas.
Also, look at this graph. It shows that the conservative US southern states tend to have the worst gun violence in the nation. New England, as a region, is hands down, the safest in the nation. Up there, too, in NY state and Oregon, as well as Illinois, which is surprising.
The rest of the nation seems like a war-zone, with varying degrees of militant, criminalistic anarchic intensity.
I thank Kosher for expressing well the reality of the "Gunshow Loophole"- ie there is none. In fact, individuals at Gunshows as well as in private transactions do not have access to the background check system, but ARE required to make reasonable assurance that the sale to an individual complies with all laws ( eg- in many states, one may not knowingly sell a firearm to a felon, or to an out of state buyer) (Oddly enough, in federal law, it is unlawful for a felon to obtain a firearm, but no mention is made of the lawfulness of providing one to a felon)
As for abortion, I don't agree with it, but it's none of my business. I personally feel that there is a point at which the Aborigines of Australia and the Native Americans ( and if memory serves, the tribes of Israel ) distinguished as the "Quickening", the point at which a soul "moves into" the fetus and it becomes a "Baby". I believe this is usually about 5 months. I tend to view pre-quickening abortions as the removal of unwanted growth, and post quickening as the taking of Life. But Humans take Life all the time for various reasons, most of which are, once again, none of my business.
Given the opportunity, I would gladly vote for a Pro- Death candidate , ( ie pro abortion, pro guns) but, as you say, no one runs on that platform. Where people like Libby and I close ranks is over the rights and treatment of Individuals as sovereign fonts of governance. Power to the People, as it were. ( I tend to be a left over Hippy/Country Cow Freak) There are certain things that are a matter of individual conscience. Abortion is one. The Right and Duty to enforce the defence of Self ( all Selfs, especially the defenseless- from predators always, from government as necessary) is another.
R
Thanks , my friend!
That could get interesting.
Instead of Birthers, we could have Deathers.
We could include Kevorkian's stands in our platform.
We could have bumper stickers that said Drop Dead
We could recruit all those people who are so into Vampires
This might work. Herr R, you up to organizing yet?