BlogShots

Jonathan Wolfman's Blog

Jonathan Wolfman

Jonathan Wolfman
Location
Maryland, Northwest of The District,
Birthday
January 26
Bio
Visit, too, please: www.talkingwriting.com www.reortergary.com (pal talk news network) www.thejewishreporter.com

OCTOBER 3, 2012 6:19AM

Risk, Guts, Civil Rights & Our National Character

Rate: 7 Flag

 

 

Note:  Moments after this posted a few weeks back and  several comments were offered, Open shut. I offer it again because I think  the historical parallels are intriguing and meaningful.

 

 FILE - In this July 14, 1948, file photo, Mayor Hubert H. Humphrey of Minneapolis wears a Truman button as he addresses the Democratic National Convention at Philadelphia. Democrats have little hope of matching the fervor and historical import of their 2008 convention, when they made Barack Obama the first black presidential nominee of a major political party. One of the memorable moments from past conventions was Humphrey declaring its time to

Hubert Humphrey speaking on behalf of civil rights at the 1948 Democratic National Convention, in Philadelphia.





     The push for civil rights under law pre-dates any major political party's platform and, arguably, we owe our wins to much more organic, community-driven, even, strident, if not sometimes violent, action.

     Yet, as the Democrats recently met, it may be useful to recall the civil rights planks from 1948 --  the first ever from the two major parties -- and to look, now, at the current one.



1948

"The Democratic Party is responsible for the great civil rights gains made in recent years in eliminating unfair and illegal discrimination based on race, creed or color.

The Democratic Party commits itself to continuing its efforts to eradicate all racial, religious and economic discrimination.

We again state our belief that racial and religious minorities must have the right to live, the right to work, the right the right to vote, the full and equal protection of the laws, on a basis of equality with all citizens as guaranteed by the Constitution.

We call upon the Congress to support our President in guaranteeing these basic and fundamental American Principles: (1) the right of full and equal political participation; (2) the right to equal opportunity of employment.

We recommend to Congress the submission of a constitutional amendment on equal rights for women."



2012

"Freedom to Marry:  We support the right of all families to have equal respect, responsibilities, and protections under the law. We support marriage equality and support the movement to secure equal treatment under law for same-sex couples. We also support the freedom of churches and religious entities to decide how to administer marriage as a religious sacrament without government interference.
 
We oppose discriminatory federal and state constitutional amendments and other attempts to deny equal protection of the laws to committed same-sex couples who seek the same respect and responsibilities as other married couples. We support the full repeal of the so-called Defense of Marriage Act and the passage of the Respect for Marriage Act.
 
We also support President Obama's commitment to gender equality, protecting a woman's right to choose."



     Southern Democrats stalked from the Philadelphia convention in '48 when the civil rights plank was adopted. They said Truman would surely lose. He won. The South, over the next twenty years, self-deported, excommunicated itself from the Democratic Party and found a welcome home in an increasingly reactionary Republican Party.

    Yet risk won. Standing for what was and is Just won.  We see, for example, in Pennsylvania and elsewhere now, moves to limit the right to vote rightly have failed and are failing. 

    I am clear-as-a-bell that thoroughgoing equal rights for our LGBT friends, relatives, neighbors, and colleagues will win and that all women and girls will win, the poor and working-classes and the middle classes will win this November and beyond, because winning what is right, while it is about risk, yes, is always about Justice and courage and about what is inevitable in and predictive of our national character.

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Our history, however slowly, is one of the extension of citizens' rights and increasing acceptance of minority rights, not of their restriction.
Like a fine wine, the Democratic Party is getting better and better with age.
I shook hands with Humphrey in 1960 when he was running against Kennedy in the Wisconsin primary. My dad took me to a rally in Madison. Meeting "Happy Hubert" was my first experience in the presence of someone with "charisma." The man was spellbinding.
in time, the effluence recedes and truth emerges unsmeared. millions of factory workers in Indonesia are on strike today demanding essentially to be treated as human beings-will see if it spreads and the reaction of Norquist, microsoft, apple,bain and a good percent of the 1%.
Bud it's at least trying
Matt thanks for sharing that. My grandfather took me to see JFK in '62 at Ind. Hall.
kenneth thanks for telling us; i'd not known abt this
There was a long period where Humphrey`s commendable civil rights work was obscured by his Vice Presidential term and resulting silence on Vietnam. He was a fine person and his loss in 68 was my first big political disappointment. Nice analogy between 1948 and present day JW.
Abra thanks and yes; I think he ought to have been president.
our national story is one of fits and starts, great risks proposed,
these so called 'risks', seen by the clear eye of Prophecy,
being simply the acceptance of
the evolution---the unrolling---of the human potential of
moral maturity.

i am with you , jon, and it may make me a naive sucker,
sure, but i think great things can still happen in this land of
the so called Free.
james we're not at all naive; we know history
Both parties embrace mass incarceration - and encourage the selective enforcement of drug laws in poor non white places.
the rightward shift is not an illusion - it has been accomplished via internal state sponsored terrorism. Minority rights - in terms of poor and non white - have not been extended. Have we stood for what is right - ? The stats do not lie. This democratic party is not the party of 48' , 68' or even 2000.
snowden w respect, i disagree think the platform is clear and that this president's commitments are the right ones as are most of his actions
Trying and doing are not exactly the same. During trying times, we must do everything to ensure democracy prevails and this includes risking our own liberties in pursuit of others' rights which have obviously been violated for centuries. Now is the time we must unite and fight without precluding any demography from pursuing democracy in any means it deems necessary towards obtaining equality.
B. Wow! I could not have said this better. Thank you so much.
It is my understanding that your grandfather, who is also my uncle, helped organize and lead that Democratic convention in Philadelphia in 1948. I suppose I was 3 years old, and you were in the fefovoxin. (what an obscure Yiddish word that I remembered.
Rog I guess that's right!
"Fefovoxin?"
I know part of that. I know "voxin." It means "to grow."

As in this old Yiddish curse:

Zul du voxin (to use your cousin's spelling) vi a tsibbele mit kop in dred

Which means

You should grow like an onion with your head in the ground.

I'm not cursing you, just quoting.