BlogShots

Jonathan Wolfman's Blog
JANUARY 9, 2013 9:18AM

NRA: Don't Deny Weapons to Those on Terrorist-Lists

Rate: 6 Flag

You may think that the NRA leadership's response to the murders of Connecticut children is inadequate. You may even deem it mad as well as rapacious. I do. However, the organization's sense of that high-powered mayhem may well be nowhere close to the lunacy of its stand on the issue of weapons in the hands of potential terrorists. The NRA has long stood against legislation introduced by New Jersey Democratic Senator Frank Lautenberg and New York Republican Congressman and Homeland Security Committee Chair, Peter King. Their proposal would close a ridiculous gap in existing federal law about who may and may not buy or own firearms.

 

     Right now, people on terrorist watch-lists may buy and own weapons.
 
     The bill to end that has gone nowhere in the House of Representatives.
 
     For many years felons, convicted domestic abusers, as well as the certified deranged haven't been able legally to purchase or own guns. Lautenberg/King would close the terrorist-list gap tight. A Government Accountability Office (GAO) report shows that people on our own terror watch-lists, since 2004, "succeeded in purchasing firearms 865 times in 963 attempts". Those who failed did so largely because they were already on no-buy lists for other reasons.

     There will be readers who will ask for the NRA leeadership's side in this. They can spend their own astonished time at its website. And while I've written before that I'm not against gun-ownership per se (my son is a champion marksman and I avidly support his efforts), I'm not a born-yesterday-naif either. The kastrationangst and base greed that compels the NRA to oppose clear-as-a-bell-sensible anti-terror (and other reasonable) legislation should be called out for what it is: the flailing of dangerous, weapons industry-enabled psychopathology.
---
---
---
For Your Interest:
This is an organization, founded by a woman whose daughter was murdered two years ago in the Tucson shootings that seriously wounded then-Congresswoman Gabby Giffords.
The organization demands that we take specific and concrete steps to put a dent in this madness.

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
I don't think there is a 'low point' to be found w these guys.
I think that radio announcer who went off on Piers Morgan Monday night should be the poster boy for the psychopathology of the NRA. They are stark raving mad.

Lezlie
Some are, yes. I am betting that many NRA mbrs were embarrassed by that rabid dope.
We are not as embarrassed as Obama and his administration selling weapons to terrorists in Mexico that are killing our own American warriors or using their own deceitful hearts to lie to the American public about the lack of weaponry use to defend our diplomats in Libya. Let us not mention the liberals using the attack on Gabby Giffords as well as the deaths of children in Connecticut to further their agenda, yet approve of millions of children’s deaths through abortions. All women who have had abortions should have their names and addresses posted in the news media for all to see, right up there with gun owners, don’t you think?

GET THE PICTURE liberals about how "OUT OF CONTROL" your ideology can get and be used against you? Repeal the 2nd Amendment? Repeal abortion rights then, but I guess that would not fit UN Agenda 21 and their call for population control!!!
Isn't obvious that the NRA stands for the single unified principal of "sell as many guns as possible." That is the only conceivable explanation to any of their ideas or the gun-industry-favorable laws they have purchased in our nation in the last three decades. The NRA has lost any credibility and politicians should divest themselves of any connection to this organization of corporate lowlifes.
Isn't obvious that the NRA stands for the single unified principal of "sell as many guns as possible." That is the only conceivable explanation to any of their ideas or the gun-industry-favorable laws they have purchased in our nation in the last three decades. The NRA has lost any credibility and politicians should divest themselves of any connection to this organization of corporate lowlifes.
Isn't obvious that the NRA stands for the single unified principal of "sell as many guns as possible." That is the only conceivable explanation to any of their ideas or the gun-industry-favorable laws they have purchased in our nation in the last three decades. The NRA has lost any credibility and politicians should divest themselves of any connection to this organization of corporate lowlifes.
Isn't obvious that the NRA stands for the single unified principal of "sell as many guns as possible." That is the only conceivable explanation to any of their ideas or the gun-industry-favorable laws they have purchased in our nation in the last three decades. The NRA has lost any credibility and politicians should divest themselves of any connection to this organization of corporate lowlifes.
They can buy a gun, but can't get on a plane. Something here is just not right~
Tommy make sure your nite-lite's on.
The NRA had nothing to do with the shooting at Newtown, or with any of the other killings that have prompted the recent calls for new anti-gun legislation. Singling out the NRA for attack every time someone is shot is strictly a political tactic. The NRA contributes money to politicians who support its views, and most of those politicians are Republicans. The Democrats want to shut down the NRA, not because they give a s--- about gunshot victims, but because they want to close off this major source of political funding. They are exploiting Newton, etc., for political reasons.

Let's get at the real problem: the inept way we deal with the mentally ill in our society.
Jon,I leave a comment for A.L.here.I'm sure you'll understand why.I am with you all the way.
Arthur Louis,that is a bit too simple an answer for a safety problem in the US.The mentally ill are not the only ones who shoot.
As the saying goes:"An open door may tempt a saint".
The US have a long tradition of gun-ownership as shown in the Western movies in form of glorification of the "holy life-saving weapon".This might be true in some cases,as defense mechanism because there are too many guns circulating within the nation.
To keep a gun for traditional reasons calls for change of thinking. All the shooting and killing during the last few years has a severe effect on society,and on top of the trauma of 9/11 comes the insecurity of gun violence.
"They [terrorist watch lists] are secret lists with no way for people to petition to get off or even to know if they're on," said Chris Calabrese, legislative counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union.

In other words, there's no due process involved with these lists. So it seems to me that it would be inappropriate to use the lists as a basis for denying people the right to purchase a gun or anything else.
When these guys insist that the bigger problem is the mental health problem, I say YES --- you guys are CRAAAZY! (Thanks for this post.)
I think they should be listed as a "terrorist group"!
What KS says...
........(¯`v´¯) (¯`v´¯)
☼•*¨`*•.¸.(ˆ◡ˆ).¸.•*
............... *•.¸.•* ♥⋆★•❥ Thanx & Smiles (ツ) & ♥ L☼√Ξ ☼ ♥
⋆───★•❥ ☼ .¸¸.•*`*•.♥ (ˆ◡ˆ) ♥⋯ ❤ ⋯ ★(ˆ◡ˆ) ♥⋯ ❤ ⋯ ★R