Not just another Joan Walsh blog!

Joan Walsh

Joan Walsh
Location
San Francisco, California, US
Birthday
September 18
Title
Editor in chief
Company
Salon Media Group
Bio
I'm Salon's editor. I'm Nora's mom. I'm Sadie's...person/slave. And I'm your friend!

Joan Walsh's Links

My favorite sites
Editor’s Pick
FEBRUARY 25, 2009 2:47AM

I am a masochist

Rate: 63 Flag

I just got home from Midnight Hardball -- yes, it keeps the kids off the streets -- and I'm watching Bobby Jindal's "rebuttal" to Barack Obama's stunning faux-SOTU tonight for a second time (I wrote about it all here.)

Still, I think you get a few things upon a second hearing, painful as it is. Mainly, I get that Jindal was the perfect person to deliver this speech. He's a very accurate representation of how bankrupt the GOP is right now, when it comes to ideas as well as leadership. Let's be honest, this is the GOP version of affirmative action: Find someone the right shade of brown to deliver the same old tired message (see also: Michael Steele), don't think about changing the message.

But Jindal is making no sense: He's lying about Obama's plans (there will be no government-run health care) and his Katrina stories are the perfect symbolism for the current GOP: They'll rescue wealthy bankers from oblivion, but leave low-income black people on roofs. Also, Politico caught it first, to my knowledge: The sheriff Jindal lionized in his speech, Harry Lee, is most famous for gruesome racial profiling during his tenure as Jefferson Parish's top cop. His Wikipedia page has all the details. (Note: thanks to lpsrocks for reminding me it's Parish, not County -- I was reading Dave Cullen's awesome "Columbine" and have Jefferson County on the brain!)

First time around, I thought Jindal was an awful choice, but now I think he was a great choice: He's the right figurehead for a party that is refusing to understand the substance of Obama's victory, the mandate for fair, vigorous goverment, and seeing only the symbolism.

Oh, and on symbolism: I still find it thrilling to see Obama in charge, and everything that means, and I loved seeing him embrace Hillary Clinton, she of the dazzling hot pink jacket.  All the trolls who insisted Clinton was destroying Obama and the party, where are they now?

Your tags:

Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
What an awful display of bad politics in every way, shape or form. I look forward to reading your entire take on it tomorrow.

Once again, OS is keeping me up WAY past my bedtime.

nite..
That's a relief. When I read the heading I was afraid you were dating Dick Armey.
Hah! ‘she of the dazzling hot pink jacket.

You’re so right about Jindal. I had to turn him off and take my 2-year old out of the room for fear of damaging his newly formed consciousness.
nite, Brie. jimgalt, you made me laugh, thanks!
Jindal was Awful.
So, in the long run, Great.
Ha: it keeps the kids off the streets, indeed! Great work.

Yeah, I'm willing to elect Bobby Jindal King of the GOP right now, too. Oh, wait, I can't vote?

The brilliant LPS of our own Open Salon (and much NO/LA background) commented on Lee's past, too; ugh.
Embracing Hillary? Heck, kissing her.

And what Lea said.
Let's pray that Obama can make some headway clearing the carnage of the past eight years, lest we see an endless parade of wolves in the peoples clothing taking over, re Palin, Steele and Jindal types, all chanting Reagan era epithets throughout our golden years. What a way to go outta here, having to listen to something you so utterly oppose... heh-heh, OTOH I suppose it must be tough for the Pubs having to hear the Rooseveltian and Keynesian chants these days.
Saturn, I was just over on your blog, what a great job you did, and yes, LPS rocks! Randy, yes, he kissed her, why was I so restrained? It was a big ol' kiss.

I love seeing them together, although he and Joe have some chemistry, too.
But if they change the message and their stance, who are the Democrats suppose to be fighting with? There'd be chaos, dogs sleeping with cats, and all that!

We must continue the division or the world will die. Do you want it to die? Of course not! So Republicans, you keep shaking your fist at those kids on your lawn. Uh, wait, you Democrats keep doing the same.

Damn, both parties need some more young blood in their parties. EEK!!

:)
The GOP has nothing left. They are out of bullets completely. You could see it on the faces of every one of them tonight, from Boehner to McCain to Lieberman - they know Obama and the Dems have the mojo and as long as they keep putting up people like Jindal to chant the same old slogans it will only get worse for them. I'm not quite optimistic yet that a party led by Harry Reid in the Senate will do much to fix our problems, but it sure is nice to see the last vestiges of Reaganism fading into the sunset.
Joan,
Great summary. I am in Europe so missed Jindal, I guess if I was a masochist I would go find it on Youtube. Loved your comments on
the trolls saying she destroys the party.

What stuns me is that their absolute denial that their policies of the last 12 years added to the years of "free marketeering" brought this catastrophe. They are like the Stalinists still trying to claim that their ideology works.
Stellaa, don't be a masochist, just listen to me and Lonnie and Saturn! I hope you're having a wonderful time.
Just wait, the next Republican super star will be so Reagan-esque it will be like deja vu all over again - good a public speaking, non hyperbolic, patriarchal/mildly authoritarian, reassuring. No outward embrace of the extreme Christian right or Limbaugh politics. A decent thinker (ever read Reagan's Letters?) with charismatic mojo that competes on the same level as Obama and no religious, age or ethical achilles. They're out there looking for him now. One thing is for certain, he'll have nice executive hair.
You noticed the sherriff reference too? Reminded me or Reagan when he started his campaign in Neshoba.
umm, i was watching housewives of ny instead.
but i have to ask - are rebuttals to president's faux SOTUs standard? bc i dont remember them as being. i have had to give up watching, for fear of having a stroke.
so, i am glad you did and filled us in.
I converted to being apolitical. Joan Walsh? Have the politicians in DC eaten too much Fat Tuesday Fat, King Cake? Their delicious cakes. Politico's never make sense. I worry when folk say they understand what a politician is saying.
I wish I had a photo of the gaudy, King Cake.
Joan and Mr. Army would feel so sweet if they ate a slice.
You send me to the bungalow? I'll imagine I'm at the village of Dylan Thomas's, Under Milk Wood. O "bugger all" was the name spelled backwards. The town was Llareggub, spelled front-words. i.e. what a bungler?
I need to go back to sleep in my quiet bungalow.
Have you ever read:`Quite Early One Morning.'?
The Welch, Dylan Thomas, wrote that after the politico's bombed Hiroshima. People still need to see the Beauty? Those politicians are nauseating. There is a ballet version to Milk Wood. Maybe I'll catch up on the news? Boogie? I think of what John Keats wrote while the creeps back then in 1940's ... UGH! I'm wondering WHY DC's Capital Hill leeches still insist on creating catastrophe after catastrophe ... 'Um stink. O.

`ODE to a Grecian Urn:
`Beauty is truth, truth is beauty.
`That's all we need to know on earth.
I felt Jindal's remarks were bizarre. As if somehow toting the events in NO after Katrina were some high water mark symbolizing some great achievement and the Republicans none stop spending policies of the past where somehow forgivable or odder yet, the Democrats fault.
Yes, Jane Smithie, the rebuttals are common. They were about all I could stand to watch during the Bush years.

I loved seeing Clinton also, as well as the entrance of Ruth Bader Ginsburg. (Did anyone else notice how Clarence Thomas went past her as she greeted people when she entered? Bad, bad form.)

I was shocked that Jindal told a story about Katrina to explain the badness of gov't. I mean, don't we all remember that Bush was in charge then? And the whole 'Brownie' thing? Does he think we all think Obama was in charge for that?

I LOVED how Obama joked and made them laugh. I don't remember Bush ever making anyone but himself laugh.
I was reading Jindal's bio last night as his career beyond the borders of Louisiana crashed with his response speech. He was accepted to both Harvard and Yale for medical school, chose a career in politics instead, and received a Masters as a Rhodes Scholar. All I can think is Harvard and Yale are relieved, and Cecil Rhodes must be humiliated. Jindal looked like the scene at the end of Blazing Saddles when the cowboy movie crashed into the sound stage where "The French Mistake" musical number was being filmed.
I tried to watch it...after two minutes I cut it off and just waited for the text of the speech to come out online.

I'll go check out the other post now

(Didn't you love that jacket on Hil?)
And is that Aretha hat for real?
Joan, I felt when John McCain rose to his feet upon the announcement by Obama that he would be bringing our troops home from Iraq the utter hypocrisy of the GOP was forever branded in our minds (if it wasn't already). They are a Party in shambles. No direction, no ideas, no leadership. Going...going...almost gone.
usually the rebuttal following presidential speech is the last thing anyone wants to watch, i did. having seen governor jindal on meet the press i was curious about him. the rebuttal is always contrary regarless. what i got out of the governor's speech was out of nothing he and the state of louisianna rebuilt and made something. what... i have no idea but something. like his personal story...nothing to something or someone. i thought his performance on meet the press was much more impressive. and this guy jindal is a citizen, too. unlike president obama. just kiddding. anyway back to the rebuttal. i want to keep more of my paycheck in my hands not in the hands of the government. who wouldn't. so on that point i can agree with the governor. i don't want my hard earned money going to vice president biden's pet project, hair plug research. which a summit has been called for next week. featuring the one and only dr. bosley. why should my taxes subsidizing speaker pelosi's stylists and wardrobe staff.ok. yes i'm thankful for the extra $13 i'll be getting. i have my eye on a used yugo. oh yeah, were was i. the governor. well i like indian food. and think of the challenges that would create for white house chefs. looking to 2012 i think is streching it a little. i think it's too early in the game to be predicting any republican presidential candidates.
when the president first started to speak let say the first 10 minutes i thought it sort of lack luster but the speack got better as it went on. do i feel more confident in the economy or government. no. will i be rushing out out to buy an american car. no. and a double hell no to the american car. but that's another story. do i even give a shit anymore. i'm still working on that. will lassie come home? and what of timmy? the call for more education was nice. we all need more educatin' doesn't oui. bold. it reminded me of, "just say no to drugs", and eat your peas and carrots. i guess what i'm trying to say is we're fucked. we'll maybe that's putting it a little crudely. more like we're undressed, but still have our underwear on. i understand gov. palin was going to give the speech, but todd has a big snowmobile race coming up. hey i know, i know. indian food tonight. thanks governor jindal.
Could not agree with you more. I thought I was watching MAD TV skit in which everything seems normal only there is something odd and everything gets more perverse as the kit progresses.

Jindal is an immigrant who "made it" and here he is the poster child for the very people who most likely made VERY difficult for his parents to succeed.
Joan, I missed the thing due to the fact of two toddlers--I bed early--but woke at 3am curious. And so, as luck had it, I turn the TV on just in time to see you on Matthews (replay) say, "A star was NOT born tonight" which was enough for me... I turned the TV back off and went to bed.
Thanks.
Joan - keep up the great work. I missed you last night, but I love seeing you on TV with your intelligent, fair-minded insights.

I'm glad I'm not the only one who was utterly confused by Jindal. Katrina, Katrina, Katrina...(ok, I'm channelling Shakira now...oh baby, when you talk like that...sorry)

Hurricane Katrina represents a failure of government at many levels - from the poor engineering of the levees, the unintended consequences of the MR-GO channel project (which I've blogged about previously) , to the now infamous delayed response.

But, what is stunning is that Jindal (or anyone else for that matter) has offered no alternatives that make any sense. Somehow we're expected to trust the private sector to make these things work (can you say Blackwater, Halliburton?)

And, Louisiana continues to ask for (& NEED) billions of dollars in federal funds for recovery and rebuilding of its infrastructure as well as the restoration of its wetlands.
I found his appearance so ironic, I could barely attend to his words. Jindal, refuses money on the very night that parades and outrageous, drunken antics roar down Bourban Street, barely touched by Katrina, while practically the rest of the city has deteriorated into a molded and crumbling shambles. Pathetic.
Joan great and i will read your story on the BIG salon. read mine here please.
Joan, good stuff I will read your article on the big Salon, please read mine here.
Sorry, the Comment thing has gone a bit berserk. Maybe it is one of my MACS. Would not publish my first comment for 5 minutes then both of the above came up at once.
Joan,
Jindal’s response was, among many other things, extremely uncomfortable to watch. It’s unsettling to observe a person morphing into a caricature of themselves. In that sense the Governor was a perfect representative of the GOP. Whatever they once sincerely held dear they have, in large part, allowed themselves to become a mere facade of - trading substance for slogans and actual ideology for deceptive bumper sticker rhetoric.

It’s nothing short of delightful to have a President who communicates with passion, conviction and empathy - instilling a sense of what we still can achieve as individuals and as a country if we are willing to work for it.

The contrast between substance and shadow is rarely more clear (or creepy) than it was last night.

It’s always good to see you on “Hardball.”
In my time zone, I was able to watch the president AND the real housewives of NYC. So I got the full spectrum, the sublime to the ridiculous.

America is awesome. And we can solve our fiscal problems. We are good for the money. That is why its ok.
Yep, the repugs are bankrupt and soon to be extinct. On OPB when Obama talked about taxing the companies who now export US jobs, a repug senator could be seen grimacing. Like Obama said, those days are gone for good. I loved Obama's vision which carried him beyond the 8 years we have him. Transcendent.
"They'll rescue wealthy bankers from oblivion, but leave low-income black people on roofs."

This way of thinking shouldn't readily make sense to sane people, born of loving homes, for it will feel alien to them. But it makes a whole lot of sense to those prone to see wealthy/leaders as neglectful "parents," whose love and attention they imagine they'll finally get once they've given them EVERYTHING, and who imagine the poor as a child's needyness personified--the embodyment of the Original Sin, the reaching for more, the reason for being/feeling cast out.

It's what the Republicans are all about--not money, but what money represents. Unfortunately, it's what a lot of people who voted for Obama are about, too. Hillary's better: Hope Obama's embrace doesn't smother.
I had to watch CNN on my laptop last night because the lamp burned out in our DLP tv and the replacement hasn't yet arrived, and I was unable to see MSNBC.

When I saw President Obama walk up, quite purposely, to Justice Ginsburg I saw something quite personal and symbolic. I saw him symbolically signaling a return to the rule of law, embracing respect and honor, concern and the kind of government that cares collectively about the well being and the rights of each citizen. I saw this because that is what you have to see when you look at Justice Ginsburg. I also saw that he will replace her one day with a Justice who is her equal intellectually and judicially. He telegraphed the future of the Supreme Court.
Joan,
I "wik"ed Mr. Jindal and was interested to see that "Bobby" is a nickname he adopted for himself at 4,
watching "The Brady Brunch". Apparently he's
kept that association in his mind for 35 years...

Good metaphor for the Republicans:
Lost in the Flood.
Dylan's "High Water" from "Love and Theft" came to mind:
"coffins droppin in the street/like baloons made out of lead...
They got Charles Darwin trapped out there on Highway Five/
Judge says to the High Sheriff/
I want him dead or alive/
either one, i don't care"...

Time to get beyond all this tiresome black/white/brown stuff,
I daresay. Everyone's a television or movie or music
self-production these days.
"Black" or "brown" is too big a generization.
Doesn't tell me anything about the man,
or woman... now, to know who were your tv idols:
that tells me something....
we're all products of popular culture, but so what?
That's what art is for...
Picture Bobby Brady on the Brady ranch's roof,
as the waters rise...
picture the rescue ship, the new Pequod:
the new captain,
throwing ropes & lifejackets, even steel hooks,
to bring the little brat onboard...
Yes, the title made me think that the hat in the photo had made you decide you were going to marry Armey. ;)

Good thoughts. You know, what I do not understand at all ... are there no honest and good people who are Republicans? I don't mean to ask such a ridiculous generalization, but they certainly don't seem to be able to find anyone to speak for them who isn't already highly morally bankrupt. Crazy. I know that they must have some good people out there somewhere. Right?
Even the cheerleaders on Fox admitted Jindal failed to inspire any passion. You are correct in asserting there is nothing left for them to say. Doing nothing doesn't work, and even they know it.
I commented over at Saturn's place that Jindal had me slapping my head in disbelief---but that's okay---I'm all for a GOP with a face made up with the likes of Jindal, Plain and their primary cheerleader, Rush.

OTOH. Midnight Hard Ball! Yikes! That has to be exhausting after a long day of following the "developing news." Too bad Obama didn't emerge when some of us were a lot younger---keeping up with him is exhausting.
Ouch, a midnight session in the TV studio. Hope you slept in to recover.
The Republican thing baffles me still. My brother in law is a Republican, for reasons that still utterly mystify me. He's well-educated, he's a great guy with a good sense of humour and as someone who works for the Oregon Highways department he should be in the perfect position to see the damage that the Bush Administration did to the infrastructure of the USA. But he was a strong McCain supporter.
Maybe my wife, who of course has known him for longer than I have, is right: "He's a great guy, but when it comes to politics he's an asshole."
I love reading your take on things Joan, have for a long time. It just feels like you're a family member who gets it.

But I'd like to give a shout out to an OS treasure. I'm continually pleased with the content, analysis and writing of Saturn Smith. She consistently puts out the highest quality journalism--she also is fair in her parsings, calling both sides of the aisle on the carpet. Really--she's one of the best here. It's nice to see her getting consistent promotion from the editors here too.
You make masochism rather attractive.
It's funny to read all these comments about the demise of the GOP. I seem to recall that the GOP was saying the same about the Dems in 2004.
I thought Ed Rollins (on CNN) had the best comment on Jindal's speech: "It was a very good night for Sarah Palin."

(They also talked about how while it's considered a "launching pad" in national politics, this rebuttal speech never helps anyone's career and should be avoided like the plague.)

The Repubs are hilariously literal these days. Hillary did well? Let's put a woman on the VP ticket! Black guy elected Prez? Let's put a black guy as party Chairman! Ditto Jindal - Think we're a party of old white guys? We'll show you diversity!

Never has their devotion to surface vs. substance been more apparent for the bankrupt philosophy that it is. (Of course, W. was all surface - right name, right face, nothing behind it.)

But I agree with Sandra: Watch out. They'll find their next Reagan eventually. And if the economy's still a mess in 4 years, that person has a good chance of getting elected.
After watching Jindal's speech, I was torn between being amused that the Republicans would pick someone so out of his depth and feeling slightly embarrassed that the rest of the country would once again see a politician from my home state make a fool of himself.

I wonder if Republicans realize that they're being insulted by the choice of Jindal to "rebut" Obama's talking points... such an obvious calculation (Jindal =/= old white guy) would bug the crap out of me.
I couldn't agree more. Thanks for writing this, Joan, so I didn't have to! ;)
joan, you are not as much of a masochist as the g.o.p. that continues to insist that the government is the problem...when in fact, it was (and continues to be) their form of governance that is the problem. (!)
Hi, Joan. Good job on MSNBC again.

The overwhelming impression I got from Jindal's speech was how condescending it was. The substance was insane, but what got me was that sing/song way he talked DOWN to us. I swear to God I was supposed to think I was back in second grade. That is a Republican trait that we don't acknowledge enough. They actually believe that they are a superior species. I expected to substantive crap, and he delivered the obvious. But the condescension. Whoa. That was too much.

Monte
Jindal-Keyes 2012!!!!
About that kiss - I thought it was quick and perfunctory and O scarcely even looked at her, and had an expression on his face that reminded me of that "You're likeable enough, Hillary," crack. And besides he kissed every woman he got within range of...
About that kiss - I thought it was quick and perfunctory and O scarcely even looked at her, and had an expression on his face that reminded me of that "You're likeable enough, Hillary," crack. And besides he kissed every woman he got within range of...
O looked comfortable and in charge and, like, a grown-up, and there was this whole chamber full of people cheering.

Then move to J - comes all by himself out down the hallway, looking like a boy, and gives a silly speech in an uninspiring way.

And I just don't get the tax cut mantra. Doesn't the government need money even in good times? There's highways and air traffic controllers and courts and ... and ... And how does cutting taxes on high-income people make jobs? They'll hire an extra maid?
Is there a GOPer who has a less inspiring speaking style? Of course, the SUBSTANCE of what he spewed was pure, unadulterated, 100% dreck, bilge, and recycled offal. But, the MANNER in which he spoke! DREADFUL! DREADDDDDFOOOOOOLLLLL! He dropped his tone at the end of EVERY SINGLE SENTENCe. What a horrible orator. He had no ability to inspire, clarify, or otherwise bring non-believers to his table. After all, if a political speach is NOT compelling to those who do not believe yet, what possible value does it have?

Please, Bobbie, run for president!!
Joan, Obama embraced Republicans too. He embraces everyone. Hillary hasn't destroyed the Democrats (yet) only because Obama aligned her self-interest (the only kind of interest a Clinton is capable of) with that of the party.
48% of the people in this country voted against Obama. There may be tired old faces sitting in the halls of Congress, but the dissenting position is alive and well, and no more willing to back out of the fight than any other ideologically constrained group. For all of us who support Obama, it's dangerous to forget that the group which put Bush in power, the Evangelical Right, is as organized and committed as ever. We need to continue what's begun, and not stop. I for one am in favor of putting in some constitutional amendments while the chance is there.
Joan, I have to admit fault with my past Hillary criticisms. I never said she was ruining Obama or the party but I did think she was a detriment and I was wrong. I am very impressed by her job performance and professionalism.

BTW, did you get my email?
Jindal was very disappointing. I have followed Jindal for years, met him once at a fundraiser, and he remains the only political candidate I have ever contributed to.

Jindal has a brilliant and incisive mind, and that is why his decision to give this speech confounds me. Jindal had nothing to do with the Bush era and nothing to do with the Katrina rescue effort. There was no reason for him to apologize for the GOP or to carry water for it.

Jindal ran for governor in LA as, in his words, "a problem solver." His schtick was never populism, it was pragmatism. By sticking with the party he gets some points inside the Beltway with loyal Republicans, but outside nobody cares. He needs to abandon this nonsense and go back to his "whatever works" approach. That's the way to rebuild the GOP.

I'm really embarrassed for him. Somebody needs to slap him and explain to him that Reaganomics was a function of its time. It worked because the Cold War was on and the computer age was dawning. Today none of that is happening and there is no chance that the old ways of the GOP will work in the 21st century.

I know a lot of people say who cares, but Jindal is a very gifted politician and I hate to see talent like that go to waste. America needs intellects like Jindal, but if he won't get off the Republican right rail, he's done.
Good call, Joan, though we could have done without the obligatory laudatory reference to Hillary -- what does she have to do with any of this?

As for Jindal, anyone interested in a look at the man behind the mask should take a look at this:

http://cenlamar.com/about-cenlamar/lamediawatch/bobby-jindal-the-story-they-dont-want-you-to-read/

While Jindal is a lot more intelligent than Palin, he's also a lot more of a funadmentalist -- though both of them seem perfectly willing to fudge on their dogma when it suits their politically purposes.

Jindal had better watch his six because the Rs will use him, as they are using Steele, and discard him when it gets down to the nitty-gritty because the base is not going to embrace a "high-yeller" ex-Hindu with a funny-sounding name.
I thought Michael Hebert's comment was interesting. What he says makes sense. I'm one of those who, knowing nothing about Jindal, only saw a highly improbable person walk out and... well, it's all done now. But the perspective Mike puts on Reaganomics within its cultural matrix, and Jindal's responsibility to the future of his party, gives me pause. I do believe that we need a strong two party system, so I'm not really inclined to applaud what appears to be the core meltdown of the Right, though the Ideological Right is something else altogether. I stand against all Ideology, no matter its polarity.
Joan, you mentioned Hillary and her dazzling hot pink jacket. The only troll getting anywhere near Hillary is Freaky, obviously her new fashion coordinator.
Thomas Jefferson: A government big enough to give everything is big enough to take everything
Jindal is just another GOP tool, regurgitating GOP boilerplate. And yes, it was embarrassing. No Republican am I - but instead of laughing at his poor, disconnected performance (laughing at Republicans is great fun, after all), I just wanted to turn it off. Which I did.
If they wanted a populist appeal to their base, Palin was the obvious choice. More viewers of both parties would have stayed tuned just to see her.

As for the painfully obvious affirmative action move, maybe they also chose Jindal to capitalize on Slum Dog Millionaire...
As usual you are spot on in your observation, and my first reaction is this the best that they have. They are truly the party of no and are quite bankrupt in their vision of America.The Katrina reference was baffling at best.I say Jindal Palin in 2012.
"Bankrupt" is good, but degenerated is more blogolific.
Stellaa, watch it on youtube. You will laugh. It's like an SNL skit. I mean, the guys on SNL are probably thinking, uh, we couldn't have come up with something like that.
Jindal looked like he was talking and filling his Depends at the same time.
I was watching both speeches on MSNBC last night. When they switched from the commentary after Obama's speech to Gov. Jindahl walking down the hallway, somebody's mike was still live (I think it was Keith's) and they muttered something like "Oh dear God" - did anyone else catch that?
I want to know why you would try to support an argument against government involvement by telling a story with two protagonists who are elected officials.
Jindal was a hoot, but then again Kathleen Sibelius bored me to tears last year. Maybe there's a not ready for prime time element to this job.
On the other hand I get the feeling that the more seasoned Repugs know that Obama is untouchable for now and that who ever leads this obstructionist campaign will only annoy people. So Steele, Jindal, and Cohen have been elevated to prominence as sacrificial lambs to Obamas charisma allowing the true leaders of the party to lie in the dugout waiting for opinion to turn. this tokenism in the most literal sense.
I agree, don't just dismiss the Republicans too quickly. They will regroup, recast themselves and call back the 'faithful', especially if the economy is still seriously hurting in 2012, as someone here said.

Rove has not gone away, you know. He's still out there somewhere, waiting for the next one to manage. Worst thing Dems. and progressives can do is get complacent and cocky! En garde.
I can tell you where they are. Their out hiring spys to try and dig up anything and everything they can to use as bad pr on THE MAN.The gop is has been overwhelmed by the sheer energy of aman who has Decided to make things happen.LONG LIVE ROCK
Nothing keeps a politician on his toes better than worthwhile opposition, so even though I'm a liberal, I'd really like the GOP to have something to offer. But after Jindal's speech, Paul Krugman was right to call the GOP the party of Beavis and Butthead, snickering at Democratic sound bytes.

There was Jindal/Butthead, mocking disaster prevention systems even after Katrina flattened half his state. There was Butthead/Jindal refusing unemployment assistance to the needy in his state - allegedly over some moronic GOP principle, but actually because helping the needy would make his opposition look good. And there was Butthead/Jindal/Butthead talking about reviving the GOP when he should have been talking about saving America.

You know how sometimes you have to finish reading a terrible book to be done with it? Jindal's performance was so unspeakably disgusting that my TV is alive today only because I don't keep weapons in the house. But thank heavens, now I'm done with waiting for the GOP to have something worthwhile to say. Buttheads.
If Jindal was supposed to be the GOP's rising star, he's not anymore. You can bet there are some party leaders huddled in their war room right now, frantically dialing Eric Cantor. And you're right about Clinton/Obama--now there's an example of professional governance.
If Mr. Jindal would stop sucking up to the rich for a moment (he
changed his name and religion) one might actually feel sorry for him. Okay, that's going too far; how about a Palin/Jindal ticket? Lots of laughs, lots of lip gloss, more plumbers who aren't... But the president seems stuck in reality; thank God.
I don't think I qualified as a "troll," but I *did* think that Clinton's insistence on continuing to campaign after it became highly unlikely for her to win was a big mistake that would hurt Obama. I was wrong. I admit it.
Joan is absolutely right. As long as Repub's keep sending out sheep like Steele, Palin and Jindal reiterating the same shrill chicken cackle, there won't be any worries for Obama and the Democrats in 2010, 2012, or ever.

Did you also notice the pinkness? I thought I was the only one!
I agree. The rebuttal should have been given by Joe Biden or perhaps by Nancy Pelosi, who was obviously in a high state of excitation.
Wow Gordo, quite the zinger. Did you think of that one all on your own or did a kid help you with it?
Content aside, I had a huge problem with the delivery. He was wooden as well as uninspiring - and his speech rivaled the horrible monologues often seen in bad high school dramas.

You'll notice that when he's able to prepare he appears much more spontaneous and natural - so , is this what happens when he's not coached by a team of PR professionals? In this situation there was no chance for coaching or preparation - once Obama was finished he had to go - immediately - with what he was given without any chance for review.
I used a kid, AR, and not a very bright one. I wanted to be sure that you would understand the message.
Surrounding yourself with slow children seems to have deluded your sense of intelligence more than you think there Gordo.
Somehow certain people think that racist ideas coming from the mouth of a 'non-white' person just sells the idea so much better.

The sub-current, undertow if you will, of the republican party is totally racist, classist and a lie.

There was a reason that southern democrats gave up racism. And why republicans took it up... Hatred sells and hate politics sadly still work very effectively in this 'civilized society'.
It's the same philosophy they used with Palin; "well, she's a WOMAN, what difference does it make about her politics, women will follow their own".

This time they're just doing it with a "brown person".

Silly rabbits.

Great post as usual....!

ds
Joan, this is off topic, but I just gotta tell ya--It makes me happy every day that I log on to Open Salon and see you in Aretha's Hat!!! SWEET! I realize that eventually you'll probably ditch that image, but I'll never get tired of seeing it....
We all know: They ain't got nuthin'.

Even THEY know they ain't got nuthin' if they can read the polls.

And I still like Obama about as well as I did when I voted for him ... which is to say, he's already disappointed me on some things, even pissed me off ... but it's sure nice not to be embarrassed to be "murrican quite so much.
Jindal looked like someone handed him index cards that only said "cut taxes,cut taxes cut taxes, etc. Don't you think it strange that the republicans only fix for everything is "cut taxes". Another thing. If Jindal doesn't accept the money from the stimulus package for the unemployed, he will be tarred and feathered and run our of New Orleans. The republicans just look silly and irrelvent.
And now we learn from Ben Smith at Politico and others that Jindal's story about helping Sheriff Harry Lee was, uh, well: just a fantasy, folks. It didn't actually, ya know, happen.

But what a great commercial the Jindal speech would be for whatever he was on that deprived him of affect and left him in a dreamy stupor.
What a silly little flak. Bankruptcy is what you get when Odumba tells us his trillion dollar inflationism is any different from Bush's, and China stops buying T bills and converts its worth-less dollars to real estate.

One can only hope whores like Joan are the first to be ripped to bits in the food riots she will share some culpability for. I know I am going to make sure people know where you live so they can demand you open your pantry.
This sort of thing, in contrast to Obama's efforts to reach across the aisle and build consensus, only succeeds in making the GOP look small and petty. I hadn't heard that bit about Harry Lee, though. Gotta look that up.
I don't mean to ask such a ridiculous generalization, but they certainly don't seem to be able to find anyone to speak for them who isn't already highly morally bankrupt. Crazy
- odetteroulette

There is one I can think of, his name is Barney.
Google Columbine Family Request
http://columbinefamilyrequest.org/