First Day of School
This is the story of how the sweet baby girl above was recently indoctrinated into homophobia.
When my first two children were in elementary school, they were haunted by my bad decisions. Well, really ONE bad decision - I homeschooled them until they went to kindergarten. I had my first two babies when I was 21 and 22 years old. I didn't know what I was doing.
I put little signs with the words for things everywhere just like in The Color Purple – “apples,” “door,” “light,” “television,” to teach them to read. I read to them and we colored a lot. By the time they showed up for their first days of school, they could write their names, recognize basic words, identify their colors and say their ABC’s. I thought I had done well.
In this world of standardized testing, the work I was so proud of was not enough. I was repeatedly asked by mystified teachers how my children could have made it to the ripe old age of five without attending some sort of preschool or even Sunday school. I thought that if a mother could stay home until kindergarten, it was a rare and beautiful luxury. I thought it was what I was supposed to do.
My kids were treated like feral pit bulls. By the end of the first week the teachers demanded ADD testing because they wanted to do wild things like walk around and meet other children. I had no way to recreate a classroom in my home, so I just begged them to behave and became a teacher’s aide in both of their classes to monitor them. That seemed to work. After those first rough years, I found magnet schools that suited them and today they both are doing well in middle school.
The Florida Voluntary Pre-Kindergarten Program was launched the year my SmallGirlChild was born. I vowed that never again would one of my children be suggested for “further behavioral screening.” This time it would be different. She would attend Pre-K and all would be right with the world.
In Jacksonville, there are hundreds of preschools which offer the Pre-K program. Each school is given about $2,500 per year, per child. (34th out of 38 states offering Voluntary Pre-K.) The schools range from universities offering the program in conjunction with their student benefits to private schools run by churches or synagogues. I knew I didn’t want a church. I was raised Methodist. I have no problem with religion in general. My children know the basics of Christianity and we celebrate holidays. We read The Baby Bible because the SmallGirlChild enjoys people being swallowed by whales and saying, “Baby Cheese-Us.”
I didn’t want to deliver her to a church, though. I thought it might be a bit of a shock after her limited experience with organized religion. So, I eliminated the churches and then I checked the inspection violations and eliminated the ones that were seriously in violation. I looked for schools which were nearby the house and on The Man’s route to work. There were about ten.
I drove by each of them and eliminated the ones that sounded creepy. “Kid'z on Top,” and “Little Britches” come to mind. I then eliminated the ones that sounded like douchebag training facilities such as “Little Leaders.” (::shudder::) I also eliminated all the ones that had deliberate misspellings or grammatical errors. Kidz & Kidz – Unless your last name is “Kidz” and you’re in partnership with your sister, you’re out. The aforementioned "Kid'z on Top" also fell into this category. The apostrophe doesn't mean "Here comes a 'z'!" anymore than it means "Here comes an 's'!" One cannot own a preposition.

Then I eliminated all the schools with copyright violations as decorations. This one is a triple whammy because they have used the universal clock formation, yet added “13” and the place is called "Children'Z World":

I was left with SmallGirlChild’s school. A Christian - but Montessori - preschool. There was even a YouTube video from the local news about the woman who started the school 30 years ago. She was beloved, sweet and passionate about teaching kids and making them happy. She even got the “Keys to the City.” It was also, as I mentioned, free. Wonderful.
I inquired within and was provided with the curriculum and lots of brochures. It was stated that the curriculum was Christian. Most of the preschools in Jacksonville are Christian. ALL of the ones within a five mile radius were Christian. I figured that it wouldn’t hurt, especially after seeing “Bible Activities” buried among twenty other curriculum examples.
The word “Jesus” was never used on the website or the brochures, but “freedom” and “creativity” were mentioned dozens of times. She has been taught about Jesus, taught to pray and told about God. What’s the worst that can happen? Even more to the point, what choice did I have with another toddler at home?
Three weeks ago, SmallGirlChild skipped into the school – thrilled to finally be “a big girl.” Letters were traced, knees were scraped, friends were made, paper bags were given the puppet treatment. All was well – we thought.
Tonight we were watching Little Einsteins. As the Einsteins returned Saturn’s wayward ring, SmallGirlChild stated, “I love Leo.” (The head Boy Einstein) “That’s okay. Girls love boys and boys love girls. One boy and one girl.”
::crickets::
Me: “Excuse me?”
SGC: “Girls love boys and boys love girls. One boy and one girl.”
Me: “Where did you hear that?”
SGC: “I read it in my book on my bookshelf.”
(SGC has no books about homophobia.)
Me: “Is that book at school?”
SGC: “Yes, Mommy.”
Me: “Did someone tell you this?”
SGC: “Yes Mommy. My teacher says that girls love boys and boys love girls. One boy and one girl.”
::crickets::
The Man: “Baby, you love anybody you WANT to love. Nobody can tell you who to love. Love is never wrong, okay?”
SGC: “Okay, Daddy.”
After she went to bed, The Man and I had to talk about what to do. All of our four children were baptized as Methodists in my home church in West Virginia which was built by my great-great grandfather’s hands. My cousin and his life partner are their godfathers. They have been raised in the company of people of many sexual orientations.
Honestly, I don’t know how this happened. I can’t get her to put her socks on without an argument, a complete description of the desired activity and a diagram. How, in THREE WEEKS, did these people indoctrinate her to the point of her sing-songing, “One boy and one girl… One boy and one girl…”??? She's only there for three hours a day!
When we drop her off in the morning, we will be discussing this with the management. They will be informed that we do not think the discussion was appropriate and if they plan on discussing sexual orientation again, we want advance notice so we can remove her from class that day. If she comes back with anything even remotely sounding like this again, we will be forced to try our luck somewhere else.
We don’t have any other option than pulling her completely from the Pre-K program (my first Official Dirty Hippie reaction), since every other nearby Pre-K location is also Christian. I don’t want another round of “Your kid needs a leash – have her tested.” I am angry and conflicted beyond words. I don’t want to take this opportunity from her, but I don’t want her to learn to be a bigot, either.
I want her to live in a world where this is okay:
And this is not:

(This is what it looks like when Hannah Montana's best friend is blowing you! Thanks Disney!)
...NOT THE OTHER WAY AROUND!!!
61% of four-year-olds in the state were enrolled last year. There are a lot of things wrong with the program itself. Teachers are not required to have a bachelor’s degree unless they are teaching the summer session. During the school year only one teacher in the class has to have an early childhood associate credential to be accredited. The schools do not provide any meals, vision screenings or hearing screenings.
The school I chose has stricter standards for teacher education, which was one of the main reasons I chose it - but what about people in smaller towns who do not have the choices I do? I chose a school that had a minimum of religious teaching. If I can’t find a school that doesn’t teach hate in a metro area of one million citizens, how can someone in rural Florida?
How many thousands of other children are being taught homophobia with funding from the State of Florida?
More of my blogs about gay rights:
A Gay Rights Victory in a Small Florida Town
Gay Rights - Denied By Hypocrites
Images:
Stupid Schools - copyright 2009 jodi a. kasten
No-Longer-Single Ladies - Amy King's Alias
(Those two ladies are Phyllis Lyon, 79, and Del Martin, 83 - they had been a couple for 51 years before being allowed to marry in San Francisco in 2004.)
Emily Osment blowing a microphone - (a.k.a. Hannah Montana's best friend) - iTunes.


Salon.com
Comments
What a waste of your and your daughter's time. I'm sorry.
People like my parents, with their bluster, made a schools change (generally not for the better, in my opinion, but change nonetheless.)
Blessings on you, Jodi Kasten. It's people like you, who actually care enough to take a stand, that help make a positive difference. I know that the same options don't exist for all parents, and it's a highly personal decision on how we handle the education system on behalf of our kids - but thank you for doing what you do.
One alternative to pre-K may be regular play groups with like-minded families. There must be some people in Jacksonville who think like you do and have small children.
My heart aches for you. Really.
-The schools with deliberate misspelling make my skin crawl, but the one with 13 on the clock takes the cake for me on this one. Wow!
Your writing shines. You are so funny. Just had to mention that.
About the point of this post--the homophobia--sigh. I think a talk with management is a great idea. As your child gets older, though, I'm not sure I'd pull her out for anything. I like it best when kids are there to question/challenge the assumptions coming from teachers. As a teacher myself, I genuinely love when a thoughtful kid challenges my assumptions and makes me think. But I suppose most teachers don't. sigh. They refer the kid to special ed for an ADHD check or whatever.
Keep on keepin' on. You are a fabulous mom.
I explained to Dave what her mentality was and Dave said he had no problem with that at all. He knew people from that era had that sort of mindset and it was not necessarily one of malice. People are always going to be taught bullshit and some will question and some will not. Still up to the individual to determine what their heart is like because everyone of the face of the earth is biased to one degree or another on something.
It's not so much what you're taught as to whether you choose to think.
And besides, we teach every child it's good and godly to put money ahead of people and no one thinks a damn thing about that.
It might be that your daughter got her indoctrination from a fellow student, though. Both my 4yos came home with wildly inaccurate tales from school at one time or another.
fight the good fight. You sound like a terrific mom.
But that's just my humble opinion.
But, there is hope! I graduated from college Cum Laude!! Your kids will too!! And, I agree with many others... What a great mother you are!!!
I'm so glad that you are nipping this homophobia in it's uptight ass. Unfortunately, it's alive and writhing within the public schools as well. Thank you for standing up to it in your community!
Stick to your guns, lady. SGC can be deprogrammed as well, she is still young.
They made assurances education about sexual orientation is not part of the curriculum. The Man then gave them the "You're On Notice" look and told them that future stunts such as this will result in us pulling SGC out of the school.
Julie - Thanks. I am telling this story for obvious reasons, but also one that isn't so obvious. I'm a southern, white, middle class mother of four with a belief in many religions and denominations. (Okay MOST religions and denominations. I'm a big fan of bonfires and the moon.)
I want the message to go out, far and wide, that there ARE women like me who will fight for gay rights and an end to bigotry. When someone tells us who we can love - they tell EVERYONE who they can love. I long for the day when we can marry anyone we choose. Until then, I can at least use what little power I have to expose the fact that the state is paying for this "education."
Myriad - I am not satisfied with their explanation of why this came up. We'll have to see if this is a problem again.
Floyd - I've never been thrilled with the level of education my older kids are getting, even in the magnet schools. The best I can do there is choose their schools as wisely as possible and be very involved. However, when they are little like this, we are at the mercy of these private daycare centers. God only knows what else is going on over there. (pun intended) Hopefully she'll figure out how to sit down and be quiet in a classroom setting and learn everything else from us this year. Too bad there's no spam filter on kids.
Owl - What scares me about this is how easy it would have been for us to never have known.
Julie - With two kids already in the middle school system here, I am well aware of the futility of fighting the system. I think that nothing changes if we don't make noise, though. I sent the URL to the Florida Department of Education. I thought it was important to see the photos. Ha!
Commcouns8 - My blood pressure raises 10 points every single time I see that school.
Dorinda - I also thought that it might be the other kids at first. We questioned her pointedly about who taught her that. She said that at least four times, "One boy and one girl." As you know, here in Florida "One Man and One Woman" is the battle cry for the "Marriage Protection" movement. She clearly said that her teacher had taught her that and this morning they admitted it. So, hopefully we've sent a good message.
I also have the feeling that my kids may get their "behavioral issues" from their Mama. ::blush::
Lainey - The real kicker is that if I wanted her to go to school full time, rather than 3 hours in the morning, it would cost $180 per week! If I wanted to put Pudge in as well, it would be $425 per WEEK to put them both in full time. I'm better off waiting two years until both of them are in school to work!
mamoore - I usually don't pick fights, but I went to the mat on this one. We'll see if they got the message. I don't know if Emily Osment's record is distributed by Disney, but she sure as hell is on the television every afternoon with my girls sighing in admiration.
Harry - I truly hope that what my kids are taught at home can counterbalance the b.s. they pick up in the outside world. Especially, as you point out, that people are more important than money.
Chuck - I really hope that what I say will mean more than what these people teach her. I guess that is the best any of us can hope for.
wildmarjoram - That was our first thought as well. But, as you can see above, it came directly from the teaching staff. Sad.
Jackson - I'm very encouraged to hear from someone here in Jax. It does seem to be the general feeling in all of our schools that the status quo should be preached loudly in all forums and fights for truth or equality should happen behind closed doors. It seems like a fundamental lesson for all children to learn the beauty of the individual rather than the gender role or orientation. Thanks for commenting.
ocular - Just wait until she tells the teachers about "Moon Meals" - the completely white and yellow meal we have on full moon nights. That'll make her popular!
MAWB - I understand the logistics of the facts. Most of the preschools and daycares here were already Christian based before the VPre-K program was introduced. However, I think they could save that business for the full-time kids.
rosie - Glad to see you! I know you know where this is coming from, my I-10 neighbor! I was schooled in Gulf Breeze and the culture of enforced religion ran wild there, too. Damn, it's hard to be a grown-up!
Bill - I think I need to teach her some new songs. That'll fix them. She is already well-versed in Erasure tunes. Hee hee hee.
Mary - We have to speak early and often to children about the rights of others. Racism, sexism, gender issues and general humanity can't be trusted to the educational system.
Thanks to everyone for your comments. The help, love and advice I get here on OS fuels me up to fight these fights. MamaPower!
I'm becoming so accustomed to equating "religion" with "narrow-mindedness" that my knee-jerk reaction is to reject it altogether.
Last night, my 13-yr-old son went to a youth-group meeting with a friend of his and I felt as if I had to innoculate him with our values first so that none of the holier-than-thou thinking would get in. I also made him pinky-swear-promise that he wouldn't come home an Evangelical or a Republican. Neither of those groups have endeared themselves to me lately.
I'm glad to hear that you're calling the school out about this. The last thing we need to do is to grow more bigotry and small-mindedness in this country.
Excellent post.
Good work staying on top of the kidz's curriculum.
And you're absolutely right--these are big and important issues, issues that permeate the whole world and everyone in it. It must be taught early and often so our kids(z) grow up as unbiased as possible! Thank you for continuing the fight--it'll pay off in the long run........I hope.
Sidenote: I was raised in KY, now live in "southern" Ohio, am surrounded by bigots and racists and sexists--Repubs all. My area is so red the Fall leaves don't stand a chance of being noticed. But the older I get, the more "liberal" I become. Makes my old friends crazy--and I'm lovin' every minute of smashing their preconceived ideas about me! So you go, girl! Rated. D
P.S. "You can't own a preposition"--priceless! Thanks for that!!
Incidentally, kindergarten is not required in every state. It's still (to the best of my knowledge) not required in my home state of Indiana--you can start the kid right into first grade at age 6 if you want. Very few people do this anymore, though neither of my folks attended kindergarten and several of my classmates did not either.
BTW, I had a year of preschool at the YMCA before starting kindergarten and I still got my name on the board near-daily for daydreaming and getting out of my desk when I wasn't supposed to for, oh, the first four grades of school. Somehow I managed to do frighteningly well on standardized tests anyway.
We all have to "unlearn" things just like how you said you were naive as a young parent and had to change your thinking.
In a perfect world she wouldn't confront these things at her age. but one way or another the whole big-bad world is coming crashing down on her. No stopping it.
I'll skip to the 'behavior issues' you're children have inherited. (You're related to my son, aren't you?)
That 'testing' bit in pre-school, they do for a reason. It's called money. The lower grades, aka pre-school up, race to get as many children in 'the program' for what they believe to be hyper-active, unruly and undisciplined curs into the program.
Most parents follow along with the recommendations of the 'teachers', take it personally, grieve and let them go ahead rather than buck the system. (Most don't even realize when their children are so young that there even IS a system, much less know how to fight it...aggressively and without fear.)
Race. They keep testing until they get the limit.
Same thing for the 'Gifted and Talented' programs. Fill 'em up! Get the full funding or lose it. Don't have that many geniuses? Hey, that's ok, put those little 'borderline' kids in there anyway... they'll do fine. Maintain the maximum number to retain the...funding.
Then, you know what? Right as they begin to enter junior high level, a miracle happens. The little curs suddenly become normal and the little geniuses have lost their luster...And.. they are retested, have huge meetings, fill out scores of paperwork, call parents, and by gohd, they are taken out of the 'program' -- Don't need the special service any more. Huh. It's a miracle.
Why is that? Money's gone, honey. Upper levels are not funded the same way....The babes are miraculously healed, and all of that angst the parents went through for 8-10 long years was for naught.
I could go on about this for days, and to my former colleagues who might be reading this, you know very well that I'm telling the truth, so keep your flack to yourself, or start your own blog and refute it. You can't. (Sorry, Jodi, for cya-ing on your post).
Now, about that one teacher. The No Child Left Behind Act mandates student-to-teacher ratios (especially in the lower grades) with strict adherence to the teacher(s) being "highly qualified" in their fields. That's a question you should pursue.
You're doing a great job in confronting the Separation of Church and State rulings regarding what your child is being 'taught' -- Keep it up and don't back down.
For the record, I took my 2 y-o out of a "Montessori" facility because the owner/director couldn't spell Wednesday (twice) and never let up.
Sorry for ranting on your beautifully written post.
BR
If she's sing-songing this now, what else will she be sing-songing in the coming days?
I do not know but you raise a dilemma about child care and schooling that is not worth ignoring. Those who wish to see social progress in America do not benefit from children who begin to think like those preventing social progress do.
By the age of 9 a person reaches maximum persuasability. Children need to develop a language that does not feed into campaigns to prevent certain groups from having certain rights and conversations about what is right and wrong should take place when children are in elementary school.
Rated.
I also hunted high and low for a non-religious preschool. They're hard to find. Federal funding going to homophobia in preschool kids is scary.
Sitting in a chair is a school readiness skill. In some states, they test kids for readiness and pay for a year of "readiness" before kindergarten.
The gym teacher enlightened her.
This propaganda, especially when kids are this young and trusting of authority, is what plants the seeds of self-hatred in gay kids. Children and young adults who hear this stuff are dying, taking their own lives every day, because of the accumulation of hopelessness and shame over the years.
So much for the sanctity of life.
That said, what you are experiencing is the flip side of what conservative Christian parents experience with some public schools. Young children are read books supportive of gay marriage. Some schools have GLBT Appreciation Day, and so on. These activities are framed as promoting tolerance and diversity, and conservative parents who complain are portrayed as Bible-thumping homophobic opponents of tolerance.
Question: are you upset about your daughter being taught a traditional view of gender relationships, or are you upset that she is being taught anything at all about the topic? In other worlds had she come home singing a song consistent with your view of relationships, would that have been Ok?
Parliament voted overwhelmingly on Wednesday to recognise same-sex marriage, becoming the fifth country in Europe to do so.
Sweden was one of the first countries to give gay couples legal "partnership" rights, in the mid-1990s, and allowed them to adopt children from 2002.
The new law lets homosexuals wed in either a civil or religious ceremony, though individual churches can opt out.
The law was passed by 226 votes to 22 and will come into force on 1 May.
I have no problem with the way anyone wants to live their life - including bigots who hate within their homes. It's just a shame they can't *keep* that inside their homes. I think it's about staying out of other people's business. We have to teach our children to be tolerant of other people's sexual orientation.
Furthermore, I don't believe being gay is a choice, but I do believe that being a bigot is a choice. Asking if I would like my children taught in a way that is tolerant to sexual orientation is like asking if I'd like them to be taught that black people deserve equal rights.
Yes, I want my children taught equal rights. If a church doesn't want to perform a ceremony, that's their right. But I believe that people of all sexual orientations should have the same civil and property rights that I do as a heterosexual. If no one taught their children about equal rights 100 years ago, women and minorities still wouldn't have the right to vote. There were "Bible-based" reasons for that, too.
My children will live in a world that is populated by a gay/lesbian/transgendered/bi-sexual contingent. They will have to learn how to accept that these people exist and that their lives are equal to their own. The reality is that people who arbitrarily apply the Bible (Not eating shellfish is on the same page of the Bible as the passages about gays) can no longer shout down the entire homosexual population.
I find it highly amusing that the same right-wing believers who think that the government shouldn't be able to regulate them in the form of taxes, "socialized medicine" and gun control want to control the rest of the population morally by legislating abortion, marriage, sexuality and religion.
People have the right to believe that homosexuality is wrong. That right ends where someone else's front door begins. Out in the world, you can't yell/beat/shame people into hiding that they are gay any longer. It's not anyone's right to deny people their rights because they don't like who someone is. Believing that our children should be taught that being gay is wrong is just like teaching them that being black is inferior.
I always want my children's education to err on the side of humanity, love and tolerance - no matter what the subject.
That the state funds these schools at all is wrong since they are not regulated as to curriculum but what happened to Kindergarten and then first grade. Kindergarten was started to help kids get used to being in school so why Pre-K? There are many social issues going on here. As usual your subject gets me started on a string that I can't do justice in a comment.
Good luck tomorrow and with a mom like you there ain't no way that sweetie's going to be prejudiced.
Keep fighting the good fight!
As a lesbian mom, thank you for standing up for 'us' even when you're not forced to because you are one of 'us'. It's the "straight allies" that help turn the tide - just like the fair minded whites that helped turn the tide for the African American community during the early Civil Rights movement. Those that are a member of an oppressed minority can only do so much for themselves - it takes many members of the oppressing majority standing together with the minority before real change becomes possible. :-)
We are having our annual National Dinner on October 10th where we are going to honor Judy Shepard, mother of murder victim Matthew Shepard. The fact that this woman came out of the wilds of Wyoming to become a leading advocate for gay rights is just remarkable. And she's funny, personable and genuine. We are truly luck to have her.
And don't get me started on Disney. They are selling sex to pre-pubescents in the most "Joe Camel" of ways - and are disguising it as innocent. Every purity ring they solder to the hands of each Jonas Brother or Hannah Montana knock-off is marketing - pure and simple - and incredibly devious.
Good luck. But you can override the school in that sort of thing.
-Nikki-
I'm sure there were a hundred little things like that scattered inappropriately throughout my early school life but the thing is I have yet to experience any longing for religiosity or sectarian cliquishness. Something in my upbringing proved vastly more influential than these little episodes, even though I never brought any of my experiences home to my parents for formal clarification or approval.
Kids.. they figure it out in the end. They really do. Whether or not they acknowledge you the way you want them to, or even seem to be paying any attention at all, they're absorbing it and processing it and figuring it all out. They'll horrify you with the homophobic jingle they picked up at school, then seem to forget about it, and then shock you 20 years later because they can still sing it for you, and laugh.
It's inevitable that children are exposed to conflicting ideas and inevitable that they will have to sort it out by themselves, sooner or later in life, and that the best anyone else can do is give them good tools and instruction in their use. Doing it for them is not an option.
So the bad news is that this will happen again, and that mystifying or veiling intolerance may actually add to its appeal in the long run. But the good news is that petty classroom encounters are little waves washing up and down the shores of childhood consciousness, maybe leaving bits of flotsam and jetsam here and there but insignificant compared to the patient and inexorable tide of parenting.
In general I think that parents are too nervous about the matter what their children learn at school.
In most cases here where I'm living children probably don't believe much of that to be true what their teachers tell them. They understand early that teachers are quite limited with their knowledge and attitudes. And the general level of the formal education in this country is certainly among the highest in the world and we have got the true 100% literacy rate.
But it might be different there. The general level of the education isn't too high there and the conditions and teachers' qualities in schools might be there very varied. So parents there are much afraid that the school of their children might be very bad..?
Thank you for this
rated
My view is that public schools should not take sides on issues such as same-sex marriage.
Jodi: "Yes, I want my children taught equal rights."
Well, same-sex marriage and the civil rights movement of the 50s and 60s are very different. The civil right movement was about black Americans being able to participate meaningfully in the society -- being able to register to vote, being able to vote, being able to use public facilities, having access to employment and housing, having access to the legal system, to have an adequate defense, and to be able to be judged by a jury of one's peers. Even in Loving v. Virginia it wasn't just that the Lovings couldn't get married. It was that if they did they would be subject to criminal prosecution and imprisonment, basically becoming outlaws by being married.
The civil rights movement addressed an entire complex of countless laws and social practices that were intentionally designed to deny blacks any meaningful participation in society. In my view same-sex marriage is nothing like that. The Supreme Court has never held that there is a constitutional right to same-sex marriage. Many state courts have said there is no such right in their respective state constitutions. Opposition to same-sex marriage is nothing like the racism that the civil rights movement fought, and many blacks also disageee with the comparison.
Jodi: "Believing that our children should be taught that being gay is wrong is just like teaching them that being black is inferior."
What do you think of the idea of letting parents teach their own children about sexual orientation, identity, and relationships? I don't think that public schools should be in that business, on either side of the issue. Otherwise it's just simple bias, favoring one viewpoint over the other. Why should public funds be used to favor either side?
If he or his partner were to become seriously ill, not only would they not have any legal authority to manage each other’s care, but they could be barred from being in the hospital room with their lifelong partner. In West Virginia, adopting a child is not even a remote possibility for my cousin and his partner. But, if it were, they could lose custody of their child for any reason at any time.
If, God forbid, the worst should happen, not only would they have no say in the handling of their partner’s body, they could lose their home and all of their possessions.
As survivors, estranged families can, in nearly every state, seize a real estate property that a gay couple may have been buying together for many years, leaving him or her out on the street and denied their investment.
There are hundreds of examples of this, even in many cases where the gay couple had been extremely careful to do everything right under current law, in a determined effort to protect their rights.
How does that NOT permeate every single aspect of every single LGBT life in this country? How does that not violate the most basic rights of safety, liberty and citizenship? They routinely lose EVERYTHING.
I want my tax dollars to pay for building a better society. A better society would not allow that sort of injustice. They vote and they pay taxes. It's time to give all sexual orientations the full rights that everyone else has in this country.
There are plenty of folks that don't want evolution taught in school either. It's time for ignorance to stop - mainly by all of us ceasing to ignore it because we might step on the toes of people who are more comfortable continuing our history of bigotry.
"I'm not interested in your dopey religious cult."
I realize that you probably hear this a lot, but you're such a great mother. amazing story and it does show how fast kids can learn the crazy stuff. I'll never forget when my nephew came home from first grade claiming his two big dreams were to get married and to own a hummer.
**crickets**
Great piece, Jodi!
You have my sympathies, and sympathetic outrage. Even discussions that include leashes and children in the same sentence have to be better than seemingly innocent indoctrination of small children.
Sheesh.
The truth is that sometimes this stuff comes up incidentally, despite its not being part of a curriculum. Kids bring in all manner of questions and comments about their lives and about their notions about how the world works. Teachers are often the sounding board, especially at these young ages, and so they're forced to address them, even if obliquely. If I had my druthers, whole lesson plans would be tossed in favor of exploring their thinking and helping them discover the truths about them. This is called "constructivism," and neuroscience tells us it's the way people learn. They must struggle with concepts, turning them back and forth and adding nuances before discarding old beliefs. It's just as true for math and social studies as it is for such "non-academic" topics as relationships.
Please don't misunderstand; given the age of Jodi's daughter, I certainly wouldn't get into a graphic discussion of gender or gender-related legislation. And my comment is mostly a criticism in the general sense of liberalism's hollow victory in the schools. It's true that the right "lost" the fight about religion in schools, but the left really didn't win. There's not much critical thinking going on in most of them.
First, I can't believe that kids who don't go to kindergarten are considered so far behind others! "In my day" (as we ancients say) kindergarten itself was optional. And we didn't learn to read until 1st grade. I thought educational standards were declining?? I guess this is one more thing I get for not having kids -- ignorance of such matters.
I'm so sorry that you're dealing with this and I hope you find some solution that doesn't seem on the horizon right now. It does seem a particularity of where you live that there are no non-Christian options -- that seems tantamount to religious discrimination to me. Given that you are actually somewhat open to Christianity (at least culturally) and are so discomfited, I can only ponder what the Jewish, Muslim and Hindu parents in your area feel! I guess they have to have their own religious schools for their kids. Times like this I wonder if I'm really in America, where we have religious freedom, not to mention separation of church and state. But then, there are still far too many people who argue that "we're a Christian nation" - bah.
oh, and thanks so much for the picture of Martin and Lyon. They were a much-loved couple around here, and one I invoke when people argue that only marriage represents commitment for partners (something I hear too often, being a het person who chooses not to marry my partner). So, what, these two weren't committed to each other for 51 years before they married?! Sadly, one (I can't remember which) died about a year or so ago. But good that they got to have that ceremony before then.
I think that the program might best be offered through an extension of the public schools in addition to the private preschools. I would at least like to have that choice.
Maybe you think it's an outrage that Christian parents "brainwash" their innocent children about Jesus before they can decide for themselves what to believe in, but you're no different. Are you not also forcing your own opinions down the throat of your child before she has a chance to decide for herself what truth is?
As Sandra says, bigotry is everywhere. I think she'll get a large dose of people in her life that think that homosexuality is unnatural. Undoubtedly my dad will see to that.
I want her to have the freedom to be able to accept that what is right for her may not be right for someone else. Tolerance is the key and the freedom to think instead of being indoctrinated is priceless.
The State of Florida would be sued into oblivion for doing this in a kindergarten class, but they will pay for it to be done in Pre-K. I think that's wrong. What we teach our kids in our homes is our business. What the state pays for them to be taught is *everyone's* business.
Furthermore, "One Man and One Woman" is the battlecry of the movement to deny LGBT people the same civil union rights as heterosexuals. It is discrimination. I do not want my child taught discrimination in a state funded program. When we questioned the management, they apologized profusely and promised that it would not happen again. If it's so right, why are they apologizing?
I also want to be extremely clear about "protecting" my child. She is well-aware that there is bigotry in the world and she will become more aware of that with each passing day. I am not an overly protective parent. However, there is a separation of church and state in our country. State funded schools should not be preaching their definition of marriage to four-year-olds.
It is SHOCKING that people who teach this can be paid by the state AS EDUCATORS.
It warms my heart to know your little girl will have a fighting chance at loving whoever she chooses!
For that matter, I don't like everything I read in the United Methodist doctrine.
Hopefully, these school folks will straighten up and stop with the indoctrination. Hopefully, I say, but I'm not really all that hopeful.
In my Kindergarten class, no one gets to kiss anyone and all questions are deferred to parents.
"I always want my children's education to err on the side of humanity, love and tolerance - no matter what the subject." Yep.
You souldn't be so surprised to find religious sensibilities permeating the warp and woof of the preschool system. The makeup of preschool follows the will of the people, not the state.Let us not forget that the separation of Church and state also precludes the state from imposing its will on American people, (the majority of whom, DO believe in God). With state's adoption of a secular humanist ideology and its attempt to impose that will on the people, we'll see rebellion after rebellion between those who believe in a Creator, and those that believe they are the creators. That's where we're at in America today.
My husband and I got together with a bunch of friends and started our own preschool for that very reason, but that's not what I want to say, mainly.
When we began caring for foster children, one of the first big lessons was how to say, "In our family, we ..." Sometimes it was, "We believe X." Sometimes it was "We wash our hands before we eat," or "We don't hit, ever." But we had to deal with the knowledge that these kids wouldn't always be in our family, so we had to equip them with tools to deal with a variety of situations (including, unfortunately, living with people who did hit). They weren't going to be well served by our teaching them that our way was the only way to think.
With the little ones it was enough to say, "Yes, Nadja has two mommies; let's talk about all the different kinds of families we know about." Or, "We believe in Jesus; Najib's mother believes X, and other people believe Y. That's kind of cool, isn't it?" The kids were just checking in to see if we had observed the same thing they had; once thus assured, they'd shrug as if to say, "Yeah, I thought so."
And sometimes we had to explain why someone (like my father-in-law) was wrong about something: Calling Jews "dirty" and Indians "drunk," insisting that "they" hate us for our freedoms, etc. We pulled our kids out of more than a few situations, but I was surprised at the number of times they were able to accept that someone was wrong about one thing — sometimes a big thing — but wasn't without worth. They could figure out that it was ok to love Grandpa as long as they didn't act like him, or that it was ok to trust their teachers to take care of them but not to teach them about God, or whatever.
So, I'd say, give her a little credit for having absorbed a whole lot of what you've been trying to teach her. (Note: This may not be apparent until after she's graduated from college, but it's true, I promise.) By all means, go deal with the school, and good luck with that. But don't worry too much about your daughter.
High Lonesome - I'm not worried that one incident is going to warp her forever. Somehow in our family we've managed to raise the two older kids without incident. I do use the tactics you are discussing and they are spot-on. Relation rather than opposition is always more constructive.
::hate::
First. Your child obviously worships Satan. The look on face just screams: “I'm going to eat your brain.” Don't feel bad. It takes a highly trained eye such as mine to spot these things early on. Around the age of 13 the signs will be abundantly clear to you and The Man Servant.
But lets try and deal with your completely inadequate response to the challenges that organized education has presented you with.
Them: “Ms. Kasten, -if that's your real name,- your children have to submit to ADD testing.”
You: “No problem. You take it, they'll take it. Deal?”
(Side note. Your children are feral pit bulls and don't ever think otherwise. Don't believe it? Drop a bag of M&Ms on the floor between them and try and retrieve it Stumpy.)
“I had no way to recreate a classroom in my home...”
Look. If some guy named Jerry Spunkmiester can shoot Teacher's Pet 3 and The Escaped Convict and the Wardens Wife 6 in a garage in the San Fernando Valley on the same day for three thousand bucks, you oughtta be able to pull this one off.
“I vowed that never again would one of my children be suggested for “further behavioral screening.” “
So how exactly are they going to know whether to take the blue pill or the red pull? Let's try to think ahead here shall we?
“In Jacksonville, there are hundreds of preschools which offer the Pre-K program. Each school is given about $2,500 per year, per child.”
Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah... Do they have a 52” flat panel plasma TV or not? The days of keeping kids entertained all day with Barney songs on a five year old Wal Mart CD player or over.
“The schools range from universities offering the program in conjunction with their student benefits to private schools run by churches or synagogues.”
Or as we like to call them in the free world: Reeducation camps. Lets move on to “option B,” self medicating, and a DVD of various test patterns. Same result but cuts down on the carpooling.
“...SmallGirlChild enjoys people being swallowed by whales and saying, “Baby Cheese-Us.””
Clearly she already understands the concept human sacrifice and devouring the body of Christ and is a full blown religious fanatic. Get her out on tour and rake in the bucks while the gettin's good.
“...they have used the universal clock formation, yet added “13” ...”
Actually, this is the preschool version of the Doomsday Clock. Elmo says: “Take your nap or else.”
“The word “Jesus” was never used on the website or the brochures ...”
Yeah. And Elton John never put the word Gay in block letters on an album cover. Yet everyone was so shocked when he came out. (Elton's probably still shaking his head going: “They couldn't have all been that dense could they Bernie? I mean the glasses, the hats. The fricken' feather boa. Even I'm not that gay Bernie.”)
SGC: “Girls love boys and boys love girls. One boy and one girl.”
She's clearly doing God's work since it's pretty clear to her that you don't. Having two children before your birthing hips were full developed, and even if you were married, you were probably fantasizing about being single during the conception. I don't know how you look at yourself in the mirror, then tell that child you love her.
What is it with those two old gals in the picture? Is that love or a Vulcan mind meld?
I thought Hanna Montana was best friends with the Jonas Brothers. Hmm... Well... Maybe you've got something there.
I'll tell you the one thing I've learned from children, (besides how to still get anything I want in my forties by throwing a tantrum,) and that's that whatever you teach and tell them, good or bad, is going to stick with them longer than any school, teacher, or church does. The fact that she argues with you about socks and not about anything with them is your best indicator of where she's at.
It means she cares enough about what your saying to put up a fight.
According to current 'scientific' educational theories children learn things in some kind of logical patterns so that concrete practical things are learned first and formal, abstract and moral standards last. So that children become able to learn about moral ideals only after they are about 10 to 15 years old. (I'm not at all sure if that kind of theories are really right, because very small kids are able to understand numbers well and those are very abstract things... But in any case those Piaget's and Kohlberg's ideas about human learning are widely accepted in so-called 'Western' educational institutions. In North Europe where I'm living those educational standards and ideals are of course much better instructed and forced to all teachers than in America, where the general 'scientific' standard is not as high and much more diverse, but in general the theory is the same. )
So for example teachers in kindergartens are not much worried about teaching to children 'right moral standards', because they think that small children cannot learn them, they are trying to teach to them concrete practical things how to behave themselves. And they are in general not trying to teach to children if it is 'right or wrong' to do this or that way, but trying to instruct children just 'to do concrete things certain ways'. (For example 'boys love girls'.)
Nobody knows well if those 'concrete behavior patterns' as learned when children are small are later transformed into 'moral ideals' how the things should be done 'right ways'... But of course many teachers are hopeful that it would happen...
For example my own view during my school times was that most the moral standards of the teachers were plainly wrong and not to be accepted. Teachers were just trying to indoctrinate children into right wing world view, where all kinds of inequality was just 'correct'. So I was probably never much influenced by my school teachers. At the university I realized quite quickly the same thing.
So I'm not much worried if children are learning some different things at school compared to the ideas at home. It is a part of the learning that people have got different ideas, for example teachers and parents.
My feeling about that 'boys love girls' thing is that it is quite funny. Those children in kindergarten are so young that they probably don't understand much about the whole idea, what teachers are trying to tell. That is maybe the reason why they are parroting the phrase, it sounds just funny?
I'm with Myriad...why is that being taught there anyway at this point? I guess bigotry has no age limits. Better start early. The early homophobe gets the worm.
I've decided to focus on what made me laugh here, because the rest angers me and it's really early. I shall read this again today, for a post-chuckle:
"I drove by each of them and eliminated the ones that sounded creepy. “Kid'z on Top,” and “Little Britches” come to mind."
HA! Double ha!
Frankly, if you are this liberal, I wonder why you continue to live in North Florida -- heck, it's about as conservative as places in the US get, and very Christian as well. Move to Boston; there should be plenty of non-denomenational pre-schools there, and plenty who will cheerfully teach your kid "Heather Has Two Mommys", even though THAT is as physically impossible in the real world as pretending evolution never happened.
Secondly -- your kid does not need pre-school and kindergarten in most places is voluntary, not mandatory. (BTW, not utilizing pre-school is NOT home-schooling; stop being pompous.) If you have an educated, caring parent/caretaker at home (mom OR dad OR grandma, etc.), and a reasonable standard of living (safe clean place to live, enough food, medical care), then a child is absolutely fine being at home, and learning things naturally. The educational system in the world that is universally highest ranked -- out achieves us at an alarming ratio -- is FINLAND. Look it up. In Finland, school STARTS at 2nd grade, age 7. Why does that work so well? Most Finnish moms stay home until then, kids get a ton of one-on-one attention and by 7, they are mature enough to sit still, pay attention and really learn. This blows away all the crap about starting kids earlier and earlier, piling on homework in 1st grade and so on. We don't know squat about how to educate kids anymore in the US; it's a national disgrace.
If you can afford to stay home, and like being a SAHM, anyone as caring and articulate as you are, Ms. Kasten, can be a perfectly good teacher/guide to your young children. You don't need to constantly defer to "professionals", especially when you obviously do not see eye to eye with them.
For what it is worth, Florida like 45 other states (and soon, more) does not recognize gay marriage, and Floridians have clearly voted against it. I'm sorry you disagree with that. But it's the law. That's why we have democracy. You got to vote; you lost. Yours is an extreme minority opinion. Most people acknowledge that marriage is a very specific relationship between a man and a woman. Yes, there are gay partnerships, and many very loving and committed, but they are NOT MARRIAGE. I agree that gay couples need some legal protections -- most are already available if they bother to get an attorney -- and those cases you speak of, where couples like your brother are stripped of property, are indeed unfair, but in order to prevent that unfairness, it is NOT necessary to call a gay couple "married", and indeed, it is very offensive to the majority of us who recognize that marriage is unique relationship between a man and a woman. (Heck, your 4 year old intuitively recognizes this.)
It's time to stop calling people "haters" for accepting basic human biology and millennia of human civilization, rather than bowing to the latest "fad". Please listen to mishima6666; he is both wise and moderate on this subject.
Lastly, gay activist author Dan Savage wrote about exactly this in his most recent book. He has an adopted son with his partner; when the boy was about 5, he came back from kindergarten (a super liberal Quaker kindergarten) announcing that "boys have to marry girls and vice versa". And this was a kid raised by a gay couple! Taught the most liberal dogma imaginable. In a school where he cut his teeth on "King and King" and "Heather has 2 mommies!" WHY? because as with your Smallgirlchild, even the adopted son of a gay couple knows instinctively that human beings are male and female, and that marriage is a unique partnership of that, the only relationship that can EVER produce a unique human being who is made up precisely of half the DNA of each partner.
You do not have to hate -- I DO NOT -- to recognize this basic human truth. Your little one is smarter than you are; listen to her.
Frankly, if you are this liberal, I wonder why you continue to live in North Florida -- heck, it's about as conservative as places in the US get, and very Christian as well. Move to Boston; there should be plenty of non-denomenational pre-schools there, and plenty who will cheerfully teach your kid "Heather Has Two Mommys", even though THAT is as physically impossible in the real world as pretending evolution never happened.
Secondly -- your kid does not need pre-school and kindergarten in most places is voluntary, not mandatory. (BTW, not utilizing pre-school is NOT home-schooling; stop being pompous.) If you have an educated, caring parent/caretaker at home (mom OR dad OR grandma, etc.), and a reasonable standard of living (safe clean place to live, enough food, medical care), then a child is absolutely fine being at home, and learning things naturally. The educational system in the world that is universally highest ranked -- out achieves us at an alarming ratio -- is FINLAND. Look it up. In Finland, school STARTS at 2nd grade, age 7. Why does that work so well? Most Finnish moms stay home until then, kids get a ton of one-on-one attention and by 7, they are mature enough to sit still, pay attention and really learn. This blows away all the crap about starting kids earlier and earlier, piling on homework in 1st grade and so on. We don't know squat about how to educate kids anymore in the US; it's a national disgrace.
If you can afford to stay home, and like being a SAHM, anyone as caring and articulate as you are, Ms. Kasten, can be a perfectly good teacher/guide to your young children. You don't need to constantly defer to "professionals", especially when you obviously do not see eye to eye with them.
For what it is worth, Florida like 45 other states (and soon, more) does not recognize gay marriage, and Floridians have clearly voted against it. I'm sorry you disagree with that. But it's the law. That's why we have democracy. You got to vote; you lost. Yours is an extreme minority opinion. Most people acknowledge that marriage is a very specific relationship between a man and a woman. Yes, there are gay partnerships, and many very loving and committed, but they are NOT MARRIAGE. I agree that gay couples need some legal protections -- most are already available if they bother to get an attorney -- and those cases you speak of, where couples like your brother are stripped of property, are indeed unfair, but in order to prevent that unfairness, it is NOT necessary to call a gay couple "married", and indeed, it is very offensive to the majority of us who recognize that marriage is unique relationship between a man and a woman. (Heck, your 4 year old intuitively recognizes this.)
It's time to stop calling people "haters" for accepting basic human biology and millennia of human civilization, rather than bowing to the latest "fad". Please listen to mishima6666; he is both wise and moderate on this subject.
Lastly, gay activist author Dan Savage wrote about exactly this in his most recent book. He has an adopted son with his partner; when the boy was about 5, he came back from kindergarten (a super liberal Quaker kindergarten) announcing that "boys have to marry girls and vice versa". And this was a kid raised by a gay couple! Taught the most liberal dogma imaginable. In a school where he cut his teeth on "King and King" and "Heather has 2 mommies!" WHY? because as with your Smallgirlchild, even the adopted son of a gay couple knows instinctively that human beings are male and female, and that marriage is a unique partnership of that, the only relationship that can EVER produce a unique human being who is made up precisely of half the DNA of each partner.
You do not have to hate -- I DO NOT -- to recognize this basic human truth. Your little one is smarter than you are; listen to her.
Signed, a gay contrarian.
Anyway, good for you. As a non-parent, I can't imagine the challenges, but it sounds like you're up for the fight. Go get 'em!
I do NOT own a frilly apron.
My "real job" (when I'm not pissing people off by asking silly questions like why the state is paying for religious education) is as a food writer. My muffins send their deepest apologies for my ridiculous and paranoid assumption that marriage should not be defined in a state sponsored preschool.
I'll be putting my tinfoil hat back on now.
The big bad world is so scaaaawwwy!
::Programming Note: I will be closing comments on this piece later this afternoon. I've crashed two different browsers with this piece this morning because of the size and I've gotten some email from folks who are having trouble loading the blog. So, if you'd like to insult me, my family, my subtitle or my muffins, please do so quickly. Thanks!::
Either way, I wouldn't feel right about using up all the ones and zeros, when in today's environment it's just such a crime to waste things.
Racism will be our undoing, and to still be a racist nation, an extremely racist nation, in the 21st century, while hypocritically claiming to be the bastion of equality, justice, and freedom means we will get what we deserve. No great nation is a racist nation. Period.
Second, as a college instructor of psychology for 30 years, including human sexuality, human biology and psychology agree the human race is basically bisexual, although many lean strongly one way or the other on the sexual spectrum. Human sexuality is far, far, far more complex than "only heterosexuality". Again, read your history. Read about the ancient Greek city-states, Sparta and Athens, and their far more natural approach to human sexuality, not to mention the Souix, a Native-American tribe and their acknowledgement of four genders, and then, of course, the Japanese during the Samurai war lord period when Samurai warriors had sexual relationships with either sex, nor was there a word in their language for homosexuality.
You're speaking what I call, "RepublicanSpeak", based on fabrications, distortions, lies, attacks, smears, manipulation of emotion, etc. No real facts, evidence, figures, statistics, or qualification. You must be a big fan of Bill O'Reilly and Ann Coulter, the champions of lies and distortions!!
And yes, YOU ARE A HATER!!!!!!
Upp, nope, that's not gonna work. Back to the whole Godless heathen thing. Because cavemen and Da cavebitches weren't married. (Cavebitches: The whole gender equality thing hadn't quite gotten off the ground yet. Oh wait. That's right. They were on that whole cooperative effort trip: You hunt. I'll gather, dust the cave, take care of the kids, shove the old folks into a rest cave and send 'em a piece of Mother's Day bark with a cute little Pterodactyl in a bowel of spaghetti carved on it. And you go out and get skewered by a Mastodon.) But lets be honest. Not married, no real commitment. in the eyes of God. How long is that going to last? A million, two million years? Puh-lease.
It was pretty much just Fkthda crusin' with the posse back then.
Yo dawg. Was up homo erectus?
Yo, yo, yo man, (and I use that term loosely,) we gotta come up with sometin' better than that dawg.
Yo Homie, chill.
Okay, yeah. That's better
Yeah, whatever ya homophobe. You and Mktult still together?
Naw dawg, she just my baby mama. Some holy man's bangin' her. (Some things never change huh?) Lets be fair though. They did pretty much have the playing field to themselves until the advent of the modern day evangelizing Congressman and Senators. What's a servant of God to do with so many sheep to flock? Call in some help.
Not like what we have now though, with only 50% of the meant to be married people finding out they were evidently meant to be divorced. I mean, at least some of those were church weddings weren't they? Hey, whata' ya gonna do, right? Some people just refuse to get with The Plan. Let the smiting begin.
Look, I admit. I was with you on the whole, no gay marriage thing, until I found out it didn't mean I HAD to be gay. What a relief let me tell you, because chaps make my ass look fat.
Besides; crashing browsers are for weaklings. Shoot the curl baby this wave ain't gonna last forever. (I don't know what that even has to do with this. I'm just out of good closers for the day.
For you...
We're hypersexual, as I'm sure you've been told, so we'll probably try to "turn" you, and we certainly wouldn't hesitate to get it on in front of you. We can't help ourselves.
Our daughter... well, let's just say she was once a chip off the old blocks. She lives in Germany (a Nazi??), and actually got herself educated, which we think is wrong, wrong, wrong. She's married to a MAN, and that just burns me up! We're on the verge of cutting her off because she went against our most solemnly held beliefs, against our agenda to turn all people gay so we can feel normal. She took her master's in peace and conflict studies and wants to work in humanitarian aid. Fucking bleeding heart!
Listen, our marriages are just as valuable as yours, and to state otherwise IS HATE. People who are legally married have many, many more rights than domestic partnerships. For example, we gay folks pay higher taxes because we can't file jointly, so the government is taking our money in larger quantities without getting even the most standard benefits in return. Do you think that would be okay for biracial couples? How about two people from different faiths?
You can holler all you want, but this train is coming into the station, and it will happen in your lifetime. When you're 70, you might have had enough contact with gay people to understand what bigoted crap you're slinging around. If you don't bend, you will be out of touch with the population at large. Think about how racists seem like such throwbacks, how shameful it is for us as a country. You will be in a similar position unless you learn to adapt. What you spout is shameful.
Fear and hate make people do the strangest things. I feel nothing but pity for someone who truly believes that teaching children to accept people of different sexual orientations sets them up to be molested. That's desperate and I have NO doubt that the commenter truly believes that.
Let's allow these Americans keep their homes, love without fear and enjoy the same rights as everyone else. They have all the responsibilities of other citizens - let's give them the same rights.
Rated,
Marcela
"I can’t get her to put her socks on without an argument, a complete description of the desired activity and a diagram." Yep - completely cracked me up - the 4 yr old and I just spent two days arguing about socks! He thinks they're entirely superflous. I don't. I won. Finally....
"The educational system in the world that is universally highest ranked -- out achieves us at an alarming ratio -- is FINLAND. Look it up. In Finland, school STARTS at 2nd grade, age 7. Why does that work so well? Most Finnish moms stay home until then, kids get a ton of one-on-one attention and by 7, they are mature enough to sit still, pay attention and really learn."
Some comments. I'm living in Finland.
First:
Most Finnish mothers don't stay at home until the children are seven years old. Some years back we used to have the highest number of working women in the world and still now it is certainly among the highest. Moms normally take the children into a kindergarten here and they go to their work one year after their child was born.
Secondly:
According to the international ranking tests Finnish schooling system is really the best in the world.
Frankly I don't believe much on those international tests. I happened to work in that institute, which did those tests in Finland at that time when those test were introduced. In my opinion those tests especially in the fields of mathematics and natural sciences are just rubbish. The tests didn't measure if the children could really do the exam questions or not, but if they could understand the written problem or not.
It is quite widely accepted that Finnish children are on the top of the world in writing and reading and understanding written texts. But in general in international contests Finnish children are really bad in mathematics. (This has something to do with the thing that writings and writing abilities in general are highly respected in this country.)
Having said that Finnish I think that education in general is certainly with quite high standards. But maybe it doesn't meant that schools or formal educational institutes are that good.
Some more facts.
According to international surveys our children have got the highest dissatisfaction over the schooling in the world. We have got in this country the real 100% literacy. The highest in the world. (But that is probably not because of our good schooling.) Most children in this country learn to read much before they go to school.
I don't believe much on formal schooling.
I studied myself a lot, at four faculties at an university, teaching at the university level more than ten years. So I have got some experience about formal education. If people have got some kind of 'degrees' it proofs mainly that they can somehow read and write. Nothing more. It has nothing to do with their intelligence, wisdom and such things.
I'm not much worried about the thing, if somebody in school or in kindergarten is teaching some stupid things about sex to children. In general children certainly learn about sexuality somewhere else than in school, not to speak about kindergartens. Four five years old children are not so much interested in sex that they would listen the instructors in the kindergarten much if they wanted to teach them about sex, homosexuality and heterosexuality. They have got other things to do at that age. And if they listened they would not understand much about it.