I took some time off from a script deadline to watch a Tivo of last Wednesday's Law and Order and it got me thinking about masculinity. So before I get back to work, I wanted to put those thoughts into some order.
The story was about the unnecessary death of a consentual participant in an informally scheduled, lunch hour, fight club type event in a New York park, which later led to a revenge “rumble” between friends of the dead man and the “murderer’s” co-workers, which led to three more deaths and twelve injuries.
For the purposes of this piece, it doesn't matter how the story was resolved. What the story suggested to me was yet another example of the need men seem to have to prove their masculinity through fighting, sports, trash talking and violence in general. From Fight Club to the incredible popularity of extreme fighting, cage matches and the exaggerated play-acting mayhem of televised wrestling, fighting is becoming the hot dog and apple pie of much of our culture.
I think that a man's expression of his masculinity has fewer places to go in today’s culture. The idea of masculinity has been so devalued that men are struggling with ways to assert it, and the quickest, most accessible way are activities unique to men, activities fueled by their biology.
And why not? In the cultural arena over the past fifty years men have been demeaned for their masculinity, their macho mocked, the importance of their essense diminished.
In no particular order, we’ve seen the definition of men as rapists, palimony suits, The New Man, sexual harassment laws, Title IX, anti-white European male sentiment, school curricula fashioned for girls, dick measuring jokes, female TV cops able to kick ass like men – yeah!, others quipping negatively about maleness (never the other way around), the arrival of gay culture on television, The View, females dominating news, Women’s Studies, Queer Studies, it's alright to cry, the military discounted, jock mockery, men dramatized as predators, abusers and adulterers, as deadbeat dads and pedophiles, derided for owning guns, for being hunters, for being meat eaters, male police portrayed for their brutality, rarely cheered for their duty, sensitivity training, stay-at-home-daddyism and the gender differences attributed derisively over the years to a patriarchal culture and not biology.
Women have a nature, too.
Add to those developments the incredible loss of manufacturing jobs, once the bastion of middle class, blue collar masculinity. Also, our increased need for material acquisitions often send both parents into the work force, further diminishing an opportunity for masculine expression as the breadwinner.
Young boys can hardly get a sense of their masculinity through simple hard work. Do they mow lawns anymore? Shovel snow? Chop wood? Paint houses? Build scooters? Do they work at these activities at home or to make money in the neighborhood? Do they still have the Soap Box Derby?
Schools have been discouraging boy-oriented activities like running, jumping and climbing during recess, if they still have recess, and playground equipment has become so maniacally “safe” that no self-respecting boy would challenge himself on it.
A young boy’s sense of his manhood is also developed by the idea of competition, which has been drummed out of much of youth sports. The score is not kept for fear of hurting the feelings of those who lose, come in second or – gasp – last. But it’s good for a boy to feel pride in winning and learn the humbling acceptance of losing.
Men hear "hip," "sophisticated" commentators joke regularly how husbands and/or fathers are superfluous (“A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle” – ha-ha), and scientific advances reinforce it.
Recent generations of men have watched the cultural definition of masculinity morph into something more feminine. And yet the biological imperative of masculinity remains in the Y chromosome, in the primeval feeling of masculinity that no amount of acculturation will ever change. And that chromosome ain’t going away.
We’re developing a male population with fewer ways to express the biological imperative of their masculinity, for all its faults, and assert it in ways that garners approval and celebration. And assert it they must! It’s the testosterone, stupid!
So, what’s a boy to do? What’s a man to do?
Sadly, those things that are left. Fighting! Violence! Trash talk! Profanity! Abuse! Bullying! The pursuit of power and control in ever more unacceptable ways! Fighting in sports has been on the rise. Membership in violent gangs is always increasing. Although social forces play a big part there, the stakes still are masculine – protecting one’s turf. There’s that biological imperative again. You don’t see gangs forming to mount a production Death Of a Salesman.
The measure of man today is being funneled into violence. Their sports have become more destructive. Their video games are all about killing and conquering. Audiences for “macho” shows like Ice Road Truckers, Ax Men, The World’s Dirtiest Jobs are primarily male. They validate by proxy what men feel about their nature, but have grown up learning to be ashamed of it.
And so many films about action heroes. Heroes! With great powers. The nourishment of a young boy’s dreams. Men want to be heroes, either as crime fighters or breadwinners.
For young men to enter into decent, acceptable manhood, their inherent masculinity and drive for power needs to be tamed, controlled and put to strong, productive use. Women, wives and mothers, are crucial in accomplishing this, as are children, schools, church, art, music, books, beauty, learning. All of that contributes to this necessary civilizing process.
But the raw masculinity that biologically defines men also needs an acknowledgment, an understanding, an acceptance and a celebration of its existence to make that process work.
That’s the part I think has been missing and we’re paying the price.

Salon.com
Comments
We are miles apart on politics, but have some very similar views on masculinity. I don't apologize for being a man and I do a lot of man things, but I was allowed to be a boy first and I think that is missing today. This overprotecting from play is a bit ridiculous to me. I wanted to climb the tree and swing on the rope and dive into the river head first and jump the ditch with my bicycle. I love guns and hunting and fishing and eating red meat and even fighting when there is no other recourse. If I were a parent I would encourage such activities.
Men have taken some bashing in the last few decades. Some of it well deserved. We do some terrible things, it's true, but you can't blame the whole gender for a few bad eggs.
Take away the normal ways that men develop and they will find other ways to fill that void. I think that is what you are saying here. If that is your point, then I agree with you fully.
Hawley .... Yes, I remember reading that. As I was writing this piece -- and I think I'll put together a Part Two on it -- so many similar "footnotes" came to mind, an indication of the subject's complexity as you point out.
I like my men rugged, sportsy, strong inside and out, helpful, understanding, good listeners and as unafraid to re-caulk the shower as to change a diaper. Nothing sexier than a guy who knows his way around the kitchen and the bedroom, after pruning the bushes in the gardern, changing the oil in his truck and picking up the kitty litter and Timothy Hay for the family pet rabbit.
Let "the MAN" be the "MAN!"
Great post!!!
We were "deprived" of the trappings of modern amusements, and had to settle for creating our own enjoyment from building forts, tree houses, and 2x4 go carts with salvaged lawnmower wheels. Because I had both city and country available, a varied set of adventures were routine, and at the cost of only an occasional bike tire patch or a pair of PF Flyers. Money was for candy and other such crap, not entertainment.
Video games and My Space exchanges level the differences between male and female, leaving, as you suggest, only more extreme outlets for boys to express masculinity.
Maybe a good old Depression will remove enough of those indulgences technology and wealth encouraged to enable boys to learn those costless but priceless essential lessons.
Good post.
Technology allowed relatively cheap video cameras to be put in their hands, and they made their own horror movies, the bloodier the better (a local detective saw one of the films and actually came calling to inquire whether one of the boys had really been stabbed).
The oldest son was prone to occasionally bully his younger brother who earned a black belt in tae kwon do; but the younger never once fought back, even though there were times when I would have gladly sanctioned it.
I guess what I'm saying is I don't have the impression that either of them feels particularly confused about their manhood. And they grew up knowing if they ever made a crack about my Manolo Blahnik pumps I'd kick their asses....
Rated.
Cathy ... the term metrosexual gives me the willies, the creeps, the heebee-jeebees. If anything points to the feminization of men, it's that term and what it represents.
Scanner ... I'm sure there are many, many pockets of the country that belies what I wrote. The culprit in general, I think, is the cultural ambience created by television, film, MTV, etc., and all the media influences kids are hooked on. That's were it starts. That you're not seeing it means to me that it just hasn't gotten there. I think it will.
Paul, DJohn ... Yes, that was sort of like my childhood, city oriented. We were influenced by one another, our abilities, our likes and dislikes, what we did together, how we played together, the scrapes we got into and the tiny little life moment that to us were great adventures. I'm grateful for that, as I gather you guys are too. We're lucky.
James .... yes, some things remain the same and only shift in form. I'm glad your kids are as you described. Building ramps, jumping over their sister -- love it. I hope she feels the same way.
Now, seriously, Manolo Blahnik? That's so yesterday. Jimmy Choo is where it's at.
Embracing an expanded view of what a woman is requires adjusting our views of what a man is--not simply denying or devaluing some of the components of masculinity.
If you're doing part 2, what about cultural, racial and economic differences in approach to raising boys And girls. Are boys badly served with no father in the home? A "henpecked" (oh, you think I should just say pussy-whipped, okay) husband/father?Role modeling violence vs reason?
You've opened a big serious subject here, John. Bravo.
.
Paul... added thought ... I often think in a perverse way that a "depression" would just hit the spot to get us grounded again. Would the suffering be worth it? I dunno.
Middle ... we always have to hope, but we need a cultural shift to set things aright. That kind of change takes generations to happen unless, as Paul points out, we're hit with some kind of catastrophe that forces us to rethink for our own survival.
Squillo ... excellent point about expanding realities and not limiting them. With your permission, I'd like to expand on that in my Part 2, when I get around to it.
Betsy, Joan K .... yes, lots of ways to be all that we can be. It ties in with Squillo's thoughts about expanding our definitions.
Sally .... Thanks. Sorry you can't argue. As for the points you suggest for Part 2, I don't think I'm qualified to get deeply into the social distinctions you bring up. What I have are other ways of observing my impressions. But, I gotta finish what I gotta finish.
Love .... kisses to Frank.
I remember when pro sports figures were humble and “good sports” would help the other team up after a tussle or play. Now the other team holds you down after a play and steps on you. “No fear” seems to actually have translated to “no respect”. Long live the “True Gentleman”. That fine balance between a man able to be masculine and victorious on the battlefield or sports arena, and able to remain civil in other social environments. Only a true one knows what that is.