This ends now.
I know what anger feels like, and, to be sure, I'm angry. I don't know that I've ever truly negotiated genuine depression, but this has to be it, or at least a version of it. Perhaps the two, anger and depression, are twins born of the mess that’s been made of the Dairy State’s public education system.
But again, this has to end now, right here, today. It has to end by the time I'm done writing.
You see, I’ve gone over and over it, and I keep coming up with the same reasonable conclusion: I didn't do anything wrong.
Most of the time when people write words like that they're actually covering up the fact that they really did do something wrong. I didn't. Here's what I did:
1--Turned my back on law school to teach children
2--Turned down a number of opportunities [over the past two decades] to leave the world of public education in exchange for work that would have been significantly more profitable. I turned down these various opportunities for a host of reasons, but one of the biggest ones was my desire to continue teaching children. [And now, most of those opportunities are no longer opportunities. You can only say 'no' to prospective suitors so many times before they stop asking.]
3--Wrote my own textbook to better teach my American Government course because I didn't like the way traditional textbooks were doing it. By the most conservative estimates one could render, I’ve saved my school district low five figures based upon what they would have had to pay for two hundred or more traditional textbooks over two different purchasing cycles. I wrote my textbook for free. It came as a bonus returned to the taxpayers of the community where I teach in exchange for my salary and benefits.
4--Developed my Political Theory/Philosophy course as a cutting edge, 'laboratory of government' style of learning experience that's won rave reviews from a variety of individuals both in and out of education. After nearly ten years, the course now has a national reputation and has received approval from my school board to be the subject of an independently produced documentary which is tentatively set to begin filming next year. I also wrote the textbook for this course. It’s an elective, so you’ll just have to put me down for saving my school district an estimated five thousand dollars in this instance.
5--Worked continuously to produce the best educational product possible, deriving from the philosophy that we do best by children when educators are seen as artists creating an environment that's engaging. It's this "teacher as artist" mantra I've spent 22 years cultivating for my classroom and for other teachers. I've always revised materials, choosing never to simply rest on my laurels. Repeatedly, I’ve looked for new and innovative ideas to do what we do in a more effective and meaningful way. I’ve been allowed to grow in a school culture that’s unimaginably supportive. I’ve been encouraged to teach “on the edge” where students can most readily be engaged.
I could go on, but I'll stop there. I've made the point, and the only person I'm trying to convince is myself. If you’re reading, welcome to the music in my head. This is a note from me to me.
I didn't do anything wrong. I chose teaching. I stayed with teaching.
For the record, I love to teach. I sought fulfillment from the vocation. I guess one could call this selfish, but surely one would also have to call it an exchange; moreover, it’s an exchange where I suspect I've given back plenty more than I've taken. So if the powers that be from on high don't agree with my decision to teach, if they feel I should have done something else with my life, then they're entitled to their opinion. Regardless, I stand by my decision, not due to a need to hold onto some wrongheaded notion out of foolish pride, but because I believe in my heart that it was the right path to take. There’s a function of inner peace that comes with knowing truth in the following words: I wouldn't have done it any other way.
And if knowing truth in those words brings inner peace then, on the other end of the spectrum, the pinnacle of surreal must be the need to constantly remind one’s self that one’s done nothing wrong by choosing, of all things, to teach. It’s this pinnacle of surreal which best describes where I'm at right now. Wherever this is, I don't know. I don't know because I don't recognize my own profession. I don't recognize my own profession because the lifeblood of what allowed for the above list ('Here’s what I did') has been, all at once, drained from the body of public education. It's gone. I hope to get it back. But, for now, it's gone.
If this doesn’t quite register, let me explain. Here’s the path good teachers take. They work hard to get tenure because tenure ensures academic freedom. Once they have this academic freedom (underwritten by tenure) they work hard because they have it. They teach on the aforementioned ‘edge,’ where all engaging educational practice belongs. This translates into the teacher being able to take lesson planning risks in order to reach frequently disengaged students. The state of Wisconsin has, all at once, chosen to eliminate the very safety net which allows for this educationally engaging risk taking. The state of Wisconsin has, all at once, chosen a public education system much more like that of South Carolina. The state of Wisconsin has, all at once, lost track of the very reason why its public schools are regarded so highly in the United States of America. Tenure is what provides the underpinning for teaching innovation and creativity. It's a direct result of collective bargaining and has been developed over the course of decades. What is it exactly that you think is going to happen to the lesson plans crafted in the many classrooms managed by the many good teachers you have in your public schools, Wisconsin? Do the words “play it safe” resonate? They better. In a tenure-free public education system, “play it safe” will be the new normal for talented teachers who have committed their careers to the profession.
And please spare me the private sector analogies. The bottom line is this: I can have my best year of teaching ever. I can be operating in the 99th percentile of teaching quality every hour of every day of the academic year. I can do this and you won’t see the “return” on my work for years. It won’t show up in my quarterly sales figures. You can’t pay me a commission based upon the measurable profits I’ve generated for the school district. You need to embrace this whole “teacher as artist” mentality if you want good schools in Wisconsin. The private sector analogies, should you be so shallow as to subscribe to them, only draw you out as the amateur you are. If you want good public schools then you need to step up your thinking to a whole new level of sophistication. When dealing with particularly complex topics in the classroom, my students and I have a Denzell Washington inspired saying we like to use: This is chess, not checkers.
Wisconsin has chosen checkers with Bobby Fischer at the other end of the chessboard. Turn your back on tenure and reveal yourself to be of sophomoric depth in terms of your ability to play at a table where the level of thinking is as nuanced as a successfully executed public education system.
If the storms that lurk on the horizon are to set upon my professional being and cast me down and out, so be it. I'll keep my head up and a smile on my face when it happens. I am me. This is what you get, and it includes the unapologetic narrative composed of the decisions I've made in my professional life. If those decisions aren't good enough for you, if you find them misguided, then you're the one with the problem, not me.
So hit me with your best shot. Maybe you'll knock me out of the institution of teaching. But your best shot can't kill me. I'll get back up off the ground while you scramble to replace me and others like me. Or maybe you'll succumb to the backlash (propagated by thousands and thousands of people like me) and I'll end up back where I belong: In my classroom with the empowerment one needs if one truly wants talented educators to be utilizing their skills to the best of their collective abilities.
Do it. I invite you. Hit me. I assure you that you'll be doing it for no reason you'll ever be able to live with in the long run.
Or, if you’re ready to play chess, give me back my tenure.
John Jacobson is the Social Studies Department Chairperson at Shorewood High School in Shorewood, Wisconsin.


Salon.com
Comments
Why in hell is it more important for us to blow up stuff halfway across the world than pay teachers a living wage, and fix the holes in the school roof?
Our national priorities are seriously scrambled. Hang in there, and keep teaching. You sound fantastic. I wish my kids were in your school.
If you are the best teacher, why would you NEED tenure?
I suppose that it is a nice benefit, &c. But I would have to wonder about someone that chose the field because of a guarantee of a permanent job.
IMO, that is one reason that people go 'postal.'
Also, perdidochas and tai bring up a good point. I know that, here in TN, although the tenure law has changed radically, tenure has not been taken away from teachers who already have it. What does the Wisconsin law have to say about that?
That being said, you have worked hard and it does have its own reward. But, when someone does not understand that teaching requires tenure to create academic freedom, they have stopped listening a long time ago. Running education like a business is dangerous, very dangerous. There are going to be personality conflicts, ethical conflicts, and well as values conflict. There will be a lot of firing of talent for those reasons alone. Human society today in the US is not reasonable. It is ran on emotion, hatred, divisiveness, and fear.
I am the sole support of a family of four. My husband is ill with cancer. This past May, I made the difficult decision to leave my school district position and begin working for an online charter school. I now work through the summer and earn less than I once did, but the workload is more reasonable and the hours are strictly M-F 8-5.
It worked out better for me, I suppose, but many others continue overworked, undercompensated, and exploited. Sure, without tenure, school districts could more easily shake off the less stellar teachers, but far more often in practice I've seen older teachers pushed out merely because they are "expensive" compared to the younger ones coming up. I'm shocked at Peelinganorange's characterization of older teachers as "pieces of worthless crap." As an itinerant teacher, I've known some shining stars, many excellent-to-very-good teachers, some okay-to-passable, and a few real wastes of space. This spectrum of ability occurs across age ranges and years of teaching, I've noticed.
It really bothers me that this kind of dialogue must even take place, and that teachers continue to be the convenient scapegoats of the Tea Party and Republican leaders. If the top 25 bandits in the financial industry were put in jail as their miserable deeds deserve, and their 2010 salaries/bonuses distributed among those in the teaching profession, not only would justice be served, but the education budget shortfalls of all 50 states would be greatly repaired.
I too would like for the government to not be very involved in setting school policies on teacher careers, textbooks, and curriculum. My solution would be to have the government exit the school business and privatize it with subsidies for poor students. This way, different types of schools could be established and parents who want more religion in school could have it while those who want less rote testing and more creativity could seek that out. Teachers would be able to seek out schools who have similar philosophies. Choice would allow everyone to win.
My suspicion (could be wrong) is that you disagree with this approach. If so and you favor the current near-monopoly the government has over schools, then you need to accept the reality that a bare majority of voters get to tell you what you can and can't do. The idea implied in this post that you get to define your own standard and expect everyone else to pay for it is not reasonable.
ok, as a fellow child of the sod and of the chosen people (it's an unbeatable combination for the reading / writing / teaching / music / poetry apparently) i say do what you gotta do. this is kinda blatent, but feck, that's where we are. look and see. believe or don't. but don't you say you weren't warned that apocolypse and revolution have happened before, and they'll happen again.
this is exactly where the values of gringo society are completely out of whack. it is NOT better to be famous than smart. except here, in usa, because then you (and yer better half, and the wee bairns) can go to the doctor when ther sick. and maybe they'll have mercy when yer dragged before the bench.
this has happened before. we, as human beings, have seen it over, and over, and over again. Didnt you read yer keats -abeche-weisel, or realize that those cradle songs yer mama and yer mams mam sang were in a minor key?
Education is neither entertainment not consumption. but perhaps it is too late, in a country of 350, 000, 000 or a billion or whatever former fetuses /future corpses. but dont say you werent warned, or given plenty of a chance to change yourself today in very small ways.
or, consume somemore, and faghetaboutit.
Of course one way or another that can’t be too long since it is destroying the environment which the human race needs to survive; maintaining a constant state of war which is keeping us on the verge of self destruction as a result of nuclear or other forms of disasters; and even the glorious economy is self destructing as I write due to mind boggling volumes of corruption.
Don’t worry this won’t last long the only question is how much damage the corporations do before people start saying, “Hmmm maybe that wasn’t such a good idea after all.”
Having taught high school (history and business courses) for a short period in California after I retired, I wanted to teach for all the right reasons, but quickly found out the incredible amount of work involved in doing it properly. I didn't last. I was too old and three generations removed from my kids. And so I left it.
But in the process, I discovered, I believe, that education, particularly at the administrative level, is an industry, replete with backbiting, bureaucracies, and nonsensical rules.
The principal at one school I worked at was making in the low 6 figures at the time she retired. No problem with that. She was a good principal. (I know this because she happened to be a close friend of my sister.) But to retire (at 60) and get $90K a year for her retirement (exclusive of SS) was, well, pretty damned generous of the State of California.
My master teacher, when I was student teaching, did absolutely nothing to guide me along in my first two semesters. When I came into the classroom, she disappeared to the lounge. Every day!
You can see that my experiences were pretty much negative, but I stand *absolutely* in awe of dedicated and effective teachers who have mastered the art of teaching, for that is what it is. And I met quite of few of them. At times, even I was absolutely exhilarated with the process. When I, the newbie, had engaged students (and I did in some classes I taught) I was in hog heaven. There is NOTHING better than watching that "aha!" moment in a kid's face.
A friend's son-in-law was recently a winner of the Milken Prize for excellence in teaching. Along with the local and statewide notice he got a check for $25,000 from the Milken Foundation. Couldn't happen to a nicer guy. He teaches with a necktie on, too! Just like my teachers used to teach. (http://www.ode.state.or.us/search/page/?id=225)
When I moved to Oregon, I tried to sign up as a sub in the local high school. The hoops that the state and district wanted me to jump through, like pay for my own police background check and immediately pursue a masters degree (to substitute teach!) was too much for me. It just wasn't worth the trouble for 75 bucks a day.
The profession of education is, to a large degree, broken.
That said, I am absolutely for public employee unions, including teachers but somehow "reasonable-ness" seems to have left the room. There doesn't seem to be balance.
So, I'm not going to "hit you with my best shot." I'm going to give you a giant pat on the back and bow to you with my great respect. Hang in there. This, too, shall pass.
You must know this. I was in a union for four years, and it was sure obvious to me that the slugs with seniority knew just how much leeway the system would give them, and they walked that line like a tighrope walker crossing Niagra Falls. Who had to pick up the slack when they called in sick or were put on the easy jobs because an old "back injury" was allegedly flaring up? The conscientious workers like me.
The tenure issue would have never been raised if test scores in so many places had not been going down at a rate inversely proportional to the amount of money spent on education. And now that almost every federal, state and local agency is suffering from a cash crunch, it was inevitable that the budgetary microscopes coming out in droves would notice.
Who's really to blame here? I'll tell you who. It was every slug who gamed the system, and every person who backed a "brother" slug when the heat was on.
When you give artistic freedom to someone with no particular artistic talent or creativity, you get crap. When we have a model that is hoping to hire a large number of people with an attribute few people have, you have to lower standards.
What the education system needs is a model based on the idea of competent craftsmen. Houses need to be sturdy and well-built. Competent craftsmen build most houses in America. Artists, like Frank Lloyd Wright, build very few. Imagine what you'd get if you asked your standard builder to give free flight to his imagination. Would you want him to take risks for the sake of art?
Next, teachers don't operate in a vacuum. Curricula need to build on past learning and prepare for future learning. The artist model isn't a team-work model.
You talk about taking risks, but risk means there is a possibility of failure. Most parents would be happier with a guaranteed good education than one that has spots of sheer artistry and occasional failures.
So, no, I do not want the vast majority of teachers to take risks. I want them to stick to what is proven to work. So risk-taking is not much of an argument for tenure.
The next argument people trot out is completely dysfunctional school management that teachers need tenure to be protected from. In this case, the solution is to fix the management, not to fix part of the symptoms and leave the problem in place.
With the exception that you mention of an administrator having a personal grudge, there should be no reason to worry. It works that way in the private sector as well.
Maybe some of your worry is about the fact that you could get let go. When I started working for IBM we were told we had a job for life. And as others has noted, this led to many slugs. IBM had to wake up in the mid '90s and let them go. I didn't like the feeling that I could get laid off, but I had to live with it. And I never gave them a reason to let me go. Like you I over produced from the beginning anyway and never intended to stop.
We have all gone to school and all know teachers. We all know there are some that do not belong in the classroom. Certainly there of some who fit the bill that you know. Why not look at this a a positive? Wouldn't it be great if you were the rule rather than the exception.
I am quite surprised at the number of folks here that see the
negative side of tenure. This does not seem to be the usual response here.
I believe that unions are essential to protect the interests of workers. And, while I support an extended period of employment prior to granting merit-based tenure, I do ultimately support it.
Your posts illustrate the reason I believe in merit-based pay, or at least merit-based bonuses. Some teachers go the extra mile [or, in your case, 100], and should be recognized and financially rewarded as outstanding examples. If you become too disheartened over there in WI, consider a move; we'd love to have you here in NY.