It seems that we can thank a Spanish judge for doing what our own Justice Dept. won't. Which is to say, at least look into possible violations of international law at Guantanamo. While this will probably get exactly zero cooperation from the Obama administration (all part of looking forward, you know) and may well fizzle out in the end, at least it will put a crimp in some vacation plans. I'd also say that it could make some consciences twinge, but that's more than I dare hope for.
How did we get to the point where we needed to have a foreign goverment look into the possibility of human rights violations by our own?
Oh, school starts again this week (WA runs on a quarters system, not semesters), so it's back in the saddle again.

Salon.com
Comments
It started on September 12, 2001 John and the wrong people in wrong places of power.
Rated
I an well aware that if the DoJ were looking into this I wouldn't be on the short list of people that they would tell (at least I hope I'm not). I'm not saying that there necessarily need to be prosecutions, or even that the investigation need be the public airing of a truth commission, but a little "we are investigating and if laws have been broken, there will be public trials" would go a long way.
I seem to remember during the "Bill couldn't keep it in his pants" soap opera there was a popular line that while no man was above the law, likewise no man was beneath it. It looks more and more like we not only have "too big to fail", we have "too big to investigate".
This is my single biggest disappointment in the Obama administration. Sure, in the short term it may be pragmatically a reasonable choice, but this is an important ethical question that will hang over America's head until we address it head on, if we ever do. What actually went on? And can guilty parties be brought to justice?
If only the Spanish had had the cojones to include Bush and Cheney. monkey fingered.
Yes, the lack of interest by the current Administration in getting to the bottom of the possibility of serious human rights violations is disappointing to say the least. I really think that permanent damage is being done for temporary advantage.
These actions were approved, or at least condoned by both parties, so nobody sees an advantage in pursuing it because the blade will cut both ways. It's something the pols would like to see buried quickly and deeply, figuring that if nobody mentions it, it'll go away.
It won't of course. It will just incubate and pop up somewhere else later in a more virulent form, a political tertiary syphilis.