john walker

john walker
Location
china, tx, U.S of A.
Birthday
December 04
Title
Finder of all things lost
Company
excellent
Bio
Immigrant from Southern California (the land of fruits and nuts) to Southeast Texas (where men are men and so are some of the women). Musician, songsmith, poet, short story author (no I'm not unemployed) sometime liberal - sometime conservative, white male (does that disqualify me?) thinker of deep thoughts, surf cowboy. Mayor of a small town in Texas (really!).

MY RECENT POSTS

FEBRUARY 9, 2010 12:23PM

...Are Destined to Repeat It

Rate: 7 Flag

 

 

This whole thing began in the 1980’s with Ronald Regan.  He embraced what the pundits call the Southern Democrats.  In addition, he gave them a new name; a new and important powerful sounding name.  He called them the Moral Majority. 

 

The Moral Majority believed in God, country, hard work, self-reliance, family and a strong military.  They also felt under siege.  Everything they believed in was being attacked, first by their own children and then by liberal politicians who had been emboldened by the anti-establishment movement of the 1960’s and 70’s.  Laws were being passed which favored only minorities.  The Government was giving their tax dollars to atheists who submerged crucifixes in jars of urine and called it art.  Their tax dollars were going to pay for, in their view, the murder of unborn children, and welfare queens who made a living by having children out of wedlock.

 

So while the liberals were railing against the Military Industrial Complex at least the Moral Majority could see some benefit to the expenditure of those tax dollars.  On the other hand, they witnessed, up close and personal, the single mother with a backseat full of bastard children driving down the street in her new Cadillac.  They could see and feel the assault, whether perceived or real, by the Left on their way of life.

 

The Left mocked these people, called them stupid, ignorant, hayseeds, racists and ignored their concerns.  The Left shamed them for being white; blamed them for stealing land from Native Americans, enslaving Black people and subjugating women.  The Left attacked every value the Moral Majority held dear, attacked them personally and left them ripe for a champion.

 

One can say many things about Ronald Regan but none can say that he was not a savvy politician.  He realized that these were not just Southerners.  They inhabited most all of the nation.  From small towns and hamlets to large industrialized regions, he recognized a vast horde of disenfranchised voters waiting to be conscripted into service as conservative cannon fodder. 

Ronald Regan gave them promises of......”hope and change.”  He exclaimed that it was their values that had built this country.  He told them he “felt their pain.” He would be their mouthpiece.  He would make them proud to be Americans. He would champion their cause.

 

He would go on to hold the White House for eight years and his Republican successor for another four.  The longest such reign in my lifetime.

 

Of course, the other thing that Ronald Regan did was to never try and actually change any of the things that so troubled the Moral Majority.  Ronald Regan like so many other successful politicians before him knew that the electorate needed a cause, an enemy, a reason to become and stay mobilized.  The pot must be continually stirred to keep the ingredients from settling complacently to the bottom.

 

Fast forward to 2010. 

 

The same concerns that Ronald Regan addressed but never attempted to solve still plague much of the electorate. Most Americans still oppose unfettered abortion after the first trimester.  Most Americans still oppose same-sex marriage.  Most Americans still believe in God.  Most Americans still believe that the Government should stay the hell out of their business.

 

These people are no longer called the Moral Majority but the Tea Party.  And, while they may be headed by a legion of Mad Hatter’s in the form of Becks, Hannitys and Limbaughs they are many and they are motivated. 

 

Sarah Palin is attempting to become the face of the Tea Party; The Ronald Regan of her generation, if you will.  She may well succeed. 

 

The Left, once again, has taken to mocking them, ignoring them, hating them and condemning them.  I would suggest that the Left does so at its own peril.  By disenfranchising a huge segment of the population who proudly consider themselves the backbone of the greatest nation on earth, the Left may, once again, find themselves ousted from power and handing a mandate to the far right.

 

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
I fear those who would dare impose their "morality", their "faith", their limitations; those who would curtail the freedom of others to choose their own "morality", their own "faith (or lack thereof), their own limits. Your notion of the sacred may not be mine; my notion of the sacred may not be yours. Both merit equal respect. Neither should be imposed on the other.
Nice victim mentality.
"Both merit equal respect. " I think that's the crux of the matter, Word. Neither the Left nor the Right seems willing to respect the values of the other. It is human nature, I suppose, that in order to validate ourselves we often look for others to invalidate.
I think you're onto something here. People can be disaffected and feel as though they're walked over for many reasons, and then they will stand up for what they see as right. And if chastized for doing so, their hearts will harden.
All I know to do John is stay as informed on the mess here as I can.
You description of the 'sheeple' here is dead on.
Heaven help us all.
Calling each other names solves absolutely nothing.
Now we are two Americas. And the divide just keeps getting bigger and bigger between the two halves.....
Athome, Mission:
Yes, I believe hearts are hardening and we, as a nation, are becoming ever more divided. If I may, Pilgrim, borrow words from the Act of the Apostles, we must find a way to set our hearts ablaze. I, and I think many others, were hopefull that our new President might be able to accomplish that feat. Alas, my hope is quickly fading.
I also cannot help but point out the irony of those Moral Majority types who would curtail said "welfare queen"'s possibility of aborting or even preventing an unwanted conception because their notion of the sacred says every meeting of sperm & egg is already a sentient life form worthy of all the state dollars that it will eventually require to raise it.
Not to mention the fact that said "welfare queen"'s child may well become the cannon fodder needed to keep the military complex stocked in cheap and disposable sentient life forms that the state has invested all of those tax dollars in for the past 18 years.
Not to mention that the aforementioned "military industrial complex" apparently lacks any notion of sanctity of life and syphons off a vast percentage of the tax dollars they so object to paying.
Or that the "military industrial complex" serves primarily the drive to impose their notion of the "sacred" (symbolised by the cross and the dollar sign) on the rest of the planet.
I'm just saying...
Word, you know I have the deepest respect, admiration and affection for you, but you're preaching to the choir. And by the tone of your response your words could have been followed by "you dumb asses!"

And I suppose my point is that while the Liberals will embrace you those you need to reach will reject you and your message because of the tone in which it is delivered.
My dear John, I agree. Someone other than me needs to find a way to make that message palatable to those who might find something new and interesting in it. I know I am too attached to my own views in this regard. I cannot translate this message into a form that will be palatable to others.
I admire your ability to modulate and translate that message into something that audience might want to hear. But I think the phrase "common sense revolution" may need to be co-opted as the name for such an effort.
I agree with you totally. The Left underestimates Palin, who I think has the single highest probability mass of being the next elected president.
Zkskandar: The why of the crufix is not the issue. The issue is that this foolishness was employed, along with a host of other anecdotal evidence, by Reagan and the Right in order to distract attention from the real issues facing the country.
I think you're right, Bonnie, although I am not very optomistic.

Yes, Don. I also think she is highly underestimated. She scares me.