
I often get so caught up in my thoughts and problems that I forget there's a little person who watches most every move I make; when he's not busy destroying (or contemplating destroying) everything that gets in his way. My gut tells me most parents are like this, except for the crazy, over-achieving ones that somehow get on television with their kids who can read by 15 months, and exist only to make the rest of us feel like shitty parents.
Newspapers have been a part of my morning ritual since I've been able to read. I started with the comics section and slowly worked my way to the third page, where Mike Royko waited to explain the down and dank meat of journalism - straight from the Billy Goat Tavern. Royko eventually died and the comics page turned to crap. But, I still read newspapers because by then, they had become so ingrained with my awakening that I couldn't function without a morning load of information.
Twenty years after I picked up my first newspaper, I still begin my mornings with the front page tossed carelessly somewhere on the kitchen table, usually approximate to where I intend to collapse and graze. Instead of the Chicago Tribune, though, I have the Arizona Republic.
As I found out this afternoon, Hellspawn has picked up on my paper habit. The glasses, aren't my fault. I live with my parents, see, and they're old with old eyes and old eye needs.
In twenty-four years, when Hellspawn is as old as I am, I know that he won't begin his mornings with the paper, like I do. He'll have some kind of space-aged wizardy. Maybe he'll be able to beam the information directly into his head. Or, maybe he'll handle one of those advanced Kindles, sort of like what they use in Star Trek, The Next Generation.
I don't know if I feel sad for the gap in his morning routine. My thoughts on newspaper journlism is akin to Glenn Greenwald's. Journalists and their publications haven't really distinguished themselves these past twelve years and some times, I can't tell the difference between my morning news and the Drudge Report. Information on the internet comes much quicker, and with reputable, better sources. Since overhead tends to be less, I don't have to worry about whether or not the articles I've read were outsourced to India (no offense to any Indian readers. I just prefer local news to be sourced locally). And, I can choose blogs that suit my inherent liberal bias. Talking Points Memo and ProPublica saved my very pasty bacon this past election year. The Arizona Republic was all McCain, all the time.
I refuse to believe that the death of print journalism will be the end of quality journalism. People need information and will look for it online, from individual sites that suit their information needs. And, sites like Open Salon publish a thousand Roykos.
Still, even as I read news from my Blackberry, in addition to local news in the Republic, I can't help but feel nostalgic not for print journalism itself, but for the elements of print: the feel of the paper in my hands and the smell of it, organic and pulpy.
Especially fresh in from the morning rains and sprung from its plastic cocoon.
Whatever device we use in the future to get our information, I'm pretty sure that no parent would let their destructive toddler hold it. The newspaper, on the other hand, can stand up to some abuse.


Salon.com
Comments
(Love the photo.)
I can't get along without my news, and still someone comes along with something that I haven't heard about. "Well...it's in the news..." they say, as if I live in a cave.
I believe if journalists hadn't had their collective heads up their asses, we wouldn't be nearly as deep in the hole as we are today. As it stands most news organizations are so petrified of being called liberal that they'll print lies and dreck just to pander to the right wing base.
Zuma: I'm young enough that the Underwood typewriter reference went...woosh...over my head.
The upside to this is that many people, and I include myself in this group, read their local newspaper from cover to cover. If there is an article from the AP concerning a plane crash in India, then the reader will either glance at the story, or read it from start to finish. If there is an article in the sports section about a local university's women's lacrosse team, then the reader may check out the story because it appears in the column next to the box scores of the major league action from the night before. These are examples of how people, especially young people become aware of events that occur outside of their areas of interest.
Granted, I would be upset to read about a tragedy in India, but I would never go to an Indian website to find out if a plane crashed in Mubai last night. In the same manner, a more mundane article about a sport which I have no interest in may not keep me from reading the women's lacrosse story if, for instance, the local team was playing for the national championship.
What I am trying to say is that with newspapers, we learn things "accidentally", if that makes sense. This is an important way for young people to learn about other people, in other areas of the world. Wthout "un-interactivity", I'm not sure that this type of information gathering will ever grace this earth again.
Digg.com and Reddit.com are other examples of news aggregate sites, but I don't think they're as moderated as Fark.com. Unfortunately, selecting the right news aggregate site requires some technical knowledge and a bit of ambition to find decent news feeds.
The next generation will probably benefit from advances in news aggregation.
I don't know how long this will last, but I'm really glad my son has a few more years of newspaper reading in him.
Being an accidental geek (hey, it beat selling my ass on the street), I've always been fascinated by the point where information technology doesn't just provide more and faster, but shifts paradigms into new conceptual territory. The way on-your-desk, real time graphic expression of numbers led to the development of chaos math is a good example.
My best guess is that for Hellspawn's generation, knowledge will consist even more of knowing where to find the answers rather than knowing the answers. Even in a simple field, there's already way too much information for any one person to hold. Increasingly, knowledge is what happens on the boundary between the individual and the (pardon me) datasphere.
I just wonder what people will use to toilet train puppies.
Bryan: Flirt.