Civilians pay the price of latest Afghan offensive

NATO troops operating in Helmand Province
NATO and Afghan army forces launched “Operation Moshtarak” (“together”) in the opium-rich Marjeh region of southern Afghanistan on February 13, 2010. The 8,000 ground forces and 7,000 supporting troops are ostensibly engaged in a campaign to clear the town and surrounding areas of Taliban fighters. The British commander in Helmand Province, Brigadier James Cowan, called the offensive, which integrates NATO and Afghan forces more closely than ever before, “the beginning of the end of the insurgency.” That may or may not turn out to be true. For now, it most definitely marks the end of security and a normal life for tens of thousands of local residents caught in the crossfire.

Photo by Zohreh Soleimani
NATO commanders announced their assault months in advance in the hope that Taliban fighters would slip away and never come back. But local families have also abandoned the town and now have no place to go. By the time the offensive started, some 1,573 families (about 10,000 people) had left the town of Marjeh and nearby communities for the Helmand capital of Lashkar Gah. This time the Afghan government has decided not to set up a special refugee camp for displaced persons from the area. “We don’t want to make this a protracted emergency where people would remain in a camp indefinitely,” Dawood Ahmadi, a spokesman for the governor of Helmand, told IRIN News last week. According to the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) last Tuesday, some 300 families from Marjeh and Nad Ali had so far arrived in the Khashrod district of Nimroz Province and at least 110 families in Nawa district fled to to Bolan district.
In the meantime, refugee numbers have swollen. 22,000 displaced persons are now choking the streets of Lashkar Gah, most of them finding refuge with family members. Those with nowhere to go have sought shelter in abandoned buildings. Marjeh’s population has been halved from around 80,000 to just 40,000. Escape is difficult, both because of the lack of options and the fact that the Taliban has mined much of the area outside of town.
Conditions in Marjeh are appalling. As one local man told IRIN News, “All shops and markets are closed and there is no food for people to buy locally.” At least twenty-one civilians have been killed in recent days, including an attack in Marjeh where twelve civilians died when a rocket hit a house. More civilians died in an unrelated incident on February 22. According to a statement by the Afghan cabinet, “Initial reports indicate that NATO fired Sunday on a convoy of three vehicles ... killing at least twenty-seven civilians, including four women and one child, and injuring twelve others.” There is no word yet on how long the current offensive will last and what good it will do anyone. When the refugees from Marjeh can return home – and what will greet them on their arrival – is anybody’s guess.
The American and British armies call this sort of warfare “courageous restraint,” since it is specifically designed to avoid civilian casualties, although this really begs the question who is really being “courageous” here – the heavily armed and supplied soldiers or the defenseless civilians, most of them women and children, who are struggling for their very survival and who still believe their lives are more than mere statistics. It’s really all a question of perspective. “I think we will succeed,” General Stanley McChrystal said in a recent interview with The Times of London, “and over the long period of the campaign, I am very confident that the Afghans will succeed.” But which Afghans is he talking about, and just whose “success” is he so confident of? For the people of Marjah these days, success is based on whether you manage to find something to eat for your family, or whether you can escape the latest drone attack with your children’s limbs intact.

In related news, on February 18 a New York Times op-ed contributor called Lara M. Dadkhah complained that “an overemphasis on civilian protection is now putting American troops [in Afghanistan] on the defensive in what is intended to be a major offensive [and] the pendulum has swung too far in favor of avoiding the death of innocents at all cost.” I’m not sure what planet this person is from, but she’s not from mine. Is she from yours?


Salon.com
Comments
Many "questions" are hidden in this awful atrocity.
Where do the seemingly limitless supply of "Taliban" weapons come from?
Who is profiting from the supple of millions of land-mines?
From my perspective the dynamics of this "war" need further extrapolation.
Before we start pounding away at women and children - regardless of how we "spin" it this really is the case.
Could "we" not spend more resources on finding out who is funding the Taliban?
Who is supplying weapons?
Who is buying the massive drug crops and who is benefiting monetarily?
Are these drugs landing on the streets of the "allies" fighting this war - and destroying their children?
This war cannot continue if there is no money, drugs and weapons.
Choke these off and stop "choking" defenceless civilians.
Your last two posts have been excellent, please do not be discouraged by comments from the "Brain Dead". (Even if you include mine amongst them :-) You are far, far above that.
"For the people of Marjah these days, success is based on whether you manage to find something to eat for your family, or whether you can escape the latest drone attack with your children’s limbs intact." So sad, but true. Not exactly the way to win hearts and minds.
As for the NYT Op Ed columnist who wrote "the pendulum has swung too far in favor of avoiding the death of innocents at all cost." This is absolutely sickening. What is the NYT doing allowing this. Oh wait, they pretty much always support war. So much for the liberal press.
In the end, whether it is worth it or not depends on whether Afghanistan can get a functioning government, in which millions of people die if that doesn't happen.
I think the point I'm trying to make is that soldiers don't have it great, neither do the civilians, and it probably doesn't do any good to compare the two. In reality, if the Taliban would lay down their arms and join the political process via peaceful means, life would be easier for all parties involved.
The better discussion to have is whether it is 'worth it.' I don't think it's about Afghans suffering at the hands of a US offensive. It's about Afghans suffering temporarily now in return for a *possibly* more peaceful life in the future, and what the alternative is if the US had not started this offensive.
Having said all this, I do appreciate your attention to the suffering of civilians. I get annoyed that the coverage in the US emphasizes one US soldier death over the deaths of hundreds of Iraqis or Afghans, and I acknowledge your feelings for the suffering that's happening in the region. My only suggestion is that you also direct some of your anger towards the Taliban as well.
"take your complaint to 100 million other regular people who are just concerned with the difficulties of everyday American life (like paying goddamned taxes) and see how much Afghan civilian atrocities turn anybody's crank."
Sorry, I don't catch your drift at all.
@agore
"Civilians are paying the price for the presence of Taliban. In the last Big One, a much larger number of civilians paid that price for the existence of Nazis."
I'm not sure I understand this one either. It sounds like you're saying "you can't make an omelette without breaking some eggs." Has anyone seen this omelette? Who gets to eat it, and when, and at what price?
@Mal Noble
Thanks, you raise excellent questions.
@Jimmy Ho
"I do appreciate your attention to the suffering of civilians. I get annoyed that the coverage in the US emphasizes one US soldier death over the deaths of hundreds of Iraqis or Afghans, and I acknowledge your feelings for the suffering that's happening in the region."
Thank you, that was the entire intention behind my article.
"My only suggestion is that you also direct some of your anger towards the Taliban as well."
I certainly intend to do so. Check out my articles on "Women in Islam" for a discussion of related issues.
@everyone else
Thanks for your kind comments!
http://open.salon.com/blog/gianfalco/2010/02/23/nato_a_new_strategy_after_27_civilian_afghan_casualties
May we cross-post one another's blog addresses on our blog pages? Mine, as I think you know, is www.open.salon.com/blog/jlw1.
I look into your avatar's image.
I've met few who carry sad compassion.
I thank you. You are of a 'higher order'.
Please.
Take care.
I ask me/you to find appropriate`Word.
Then, sometimes I say to me`It's all in vain.
But, it's not in vain. You peer`deep and hurt.
I/we and others do too. I raise my hand upward.
I am happy we/me/others share this Earth together.
okay?
Now, since I woke up today, I've bantered, and grieved,
and gotta get beds og flat-seed Planted. Congrats @ EP.
If I raise my two-hands-upward, pause, please know, ay.
So, arms upward, outstretched, and I'm so appreciative.
I mentioned my son and I were at the pre-Earth-Summit.
I always remember that New York wonderful experience.
My son too were token, small-family-farm representatives.
Michael is modest. He attended Art College & then Cornell.
Plant Science and art school, then from secure Gig in DC.?
Michael came Home to improve an organic market-garden.
There is so much to speak of - Then, there's quiet work too.
I'm rambling,
a bantering,
appreciative.
simply said,
Thank You.
Wonderful!
@Jonathan
Sure, let me think about where to place it.
@fitness: "Why pick the U.S. to live in?"
So if I mention the actual impact of our actions on civilians halfway around the world it's "America, love it or leave it" again?
You're very welcome...
Just imagine if such a situation was here in
the USA.
Wedding Favors
Love yaa
Thanks for sharing.
Notebook Cooler
Laptop Cooling Pad
Good Gifts For Girlfriend