Vandalized synagogue in Russia, 2006
(Source: Crown Heights Info)
Time was when Nazis used to slather swastikas on synagogues and Jewish businesses to prepare the local population for expulsion or much worse. It’s sad that this sort of behavior persists around the world, as a new study by Tel Aviv University shows. But it’s even sadder to see Israelis regularly defacing Palestinian property with Stars of David with equal glee and with what appears to be the same brain-dead mindset.
Your local paper might not have covered it, but in the wee hours of Wednesday morning a gang of Israeli settlers attacked the West Bank village of Hawara. “Palestinians reported two torched cars on the village’s central road early yesterday,” Haaretz writes. “A small village mosque, used only on the weekend, had the word ‘Muhammad’ sprayed in Hebrew and a Star of David. Haaretz also found graffiti with the Jewish prayer ‘Praise be onto him for not making me a gentile.’” The attackers also took the opportunity to destroy some three hundred olive trees, a major source of local income.
Defaced mosque in Hawara, West Bank, yesterday
(Source: AP)
In February of 2009, a Canadian writer by the name of Marcello Di Cintio witnessed how “earlier this week, the IDF raided Jayyous. Soldiers entered the village at night, seized about a hundred young men and penned them in the school gymnasium. The troops also occupied several village houses and spray-painted a Star of David over a pro-freedom mural on a school wall. The IDF took about a dozen men with them when they left, and the men are still in custody somewhere in Israel.”
According to the Maan News Agency, in December 2008, “Israeli settlers rampaged through five villages in the northern West Bank early on Tuesday, vandalizing mosques, attacking farms and harassing residents. In the villages of Yatma, Qabalan and As-Sawiya, south of Nablus, settlers slashed the tires of more than 20 cars and also set fire to thousands of shekels worth of straw bales, used as animal feed. In As-Sawiya, settlers wrote slogans insulting Islam and the prophet Mohammad on the walls of a local mosque. [S]ettlers painted a star of David and slogans such as ‘Death to Arabs’ on the village mosque.”
A defaced Palestinian ambulance in Nablus, November 2008
(Source: Daylife/Getty)
“On 19 March 2007, Israeli settlers illegally occupied an empty four-story Palestinian building,” the Electronic Intifada reported. This multi-unit Hebron building is close to the Kiryat Arba settlement of 7000 residents and is strategically located to link Kiryat Arba to the smaller enclaves inside Hebron’s Old City. … Palestinians say that another settlement will lead to yet another checkpoint and tighter curfews, further isolating this part of the city. Already settlers have placed a wire at the entrance of the Palestinian house across the street to trip residents as they exit their home. They have stoned the house and spray painted a Star of David on the front door.”
Also in 2007, Tim McGirk blogged about his own experiences in the West Bank for Time Magazine. “Not long ago, I ventured into Hebron ... I wanted to see what [the Palestinians] thought of their Jewish neighbors. On this street, winding up a hill, it was easy to spot the Arab houses. Their windows and doors were covered in metal grills to protect them from stones, rotten fruit and the occasional gunshot coming from settlers living across the road. Over the years, a few Jewish settlers had also been shot by Palestinian militants, and Israeli soldiers had cordoned off this section, emptying life from the heart of old Hebron. The Arab houses were easy to spot for another reason. The settler kids had spray-painted a Star of David on walls of all the Arab houses. A religious symbol used for intimidation. I found this disturbing, like seeing the Klu Klux Klan’s cross blazing on a black man’s lawn.”
Blogging for the Madison Times, George Arida described a visit to Nablus in 2003: “We stopped at Joseph's Tomb, a site of archaeological and religious significance. It also had military significance; the Israelis had bombed it over a year ago (the dome and outside walls were damaged) and then had later used it as a base of operations. The soldiers had left a spray-painted Star of David on the ancient stone wall. This spray-painted souvenir was left by the Israelis on the walls of many buildings in Nablus.”
Israeli troops pulled out of the West Bank city of Ramallah in 2002. “The home of Hamdi Flaifer, 35, was in ruins after an Israeli search,” the New York Times reported. Windows were broken, furniture was smashed, sofa cushions slashed, closets and cabinets were emptied onto the floor. Just outside his front door, Israelis had spray-painted a Star of David and a number, indicating to other Israelis that his house had been searched.”
The Mogen Dovid is a symbol that has experienced a roller coaster of shifting meanings over the centuries. The six-pointed star was a symbol known to many religious and spiritual traditions and only became firmly associated with Judaism and Zionism in the late nineteenth century. But its power as a Jewish symbol derives less from what Jews have done with it than from what anti-Semites have tried in vain to make it into. Storm troopers painted Stars of David on Jewish businesses during their boycott of Jewish shops in 1933. In September, 1941, SS leader Reinhard Heydrich signed a decree demanding that all Jews in German-occupied Europe wear a yellow star – first to shut them up as potential defeatists, and later to mark them for extermination. After the war the new State of Israel chose the Star of David as its national emblem. Thus it has gone from a symbol of pride to a symbol of shame and fear and then back again to a symbol of pride and endurance against impossible odds.
Will it return to being a symbol of shame and fear - perhaps permanently? With attacks like the ones I described above on the increase, and now that the Israeli military has approved plans that could lead to the mass deportation of tens of thousands of West Bank residents on short notice, Palestinians are increasingly experiencing the Star of David as a threat to their very existence. This should be a scandal to everyone who remembers what the star has meant in the past. My message to Israelis is simple: Stop doing this. NOW.


Salon.com
Comments
Thanks, the news of this latest vandalism made me very angry - "on so many levels," as cartouche puts it.
As I have previously stated on my blog, you have Jews and then you have Zionist Jews---the proverbial "brood of vipers".
Worldwide antisemetism is on the rise and Israelis should carefully consider each action they take as it relates to worldwide public opinion towards them. Obama is not a Christian or a supporter of Israel, as his actions clearly demonstrate. We are the one ally Israel does not need to lose, but many Americans are fed up with the Zionist bullshit.
Things will probably end up playing out as the book of Revelation indicates, but we'll see.
1. The new military order was signed 6 months ago.
2. There are no changes to the repatriation system or the authority/means to repatriate illegal residents in Judea and Samaria. The only difference is that now the process includes a judiciary review.
3. The decision to establish a judiciary committee to review the administrative process of repatriation was taken in response to the Israeli High Court of Justice (בג"ץ) decision that there should be judicial oversight.
4. Any illegal resident who stands to be repatriated will be brought before the judicial committee within 8 days of receiving the order, they will have the right to legal council, and will be able to appeal the judicial decision to the high court.
5. When making decisions about whether or not to repatriate an individual, the administrative and the judicial committees consider family ties.
6. Currently there are very few illegal Palestinian residents in Judea and Samaria - over the past several years, as a goodwill gesture to the Palestinian Authority, the Israeli government has approved an amnesty for nearly all of the 32,000 illegal residents whose names were submitted to the population registry by the Palestinian authorities.
7. Since the beginning of 2010, there have only been 5 Gazans who have been repatriated to Gaza.
8. The current system allows Israeli authorities to arrest, detain and deport illegal residents (specifically those who came in on a tourist visa and decided to stay) - these are the same powers that every sovereign nation in the world possess. The establishment of the Judicial Committee to oversee the process is the only change.
See:
http://elderofziyon.blogspot.com/2010/04/israel-is-not-deporting-tens-of.html
http://yaacovlozowick.blogspot.com/2010/04/blood-libel.html
Kudos for your research, and you are obviously closer to events than I am. Let me point out that the order's ultimate significance boils down to how it is applied, i.e. we can look at it as either a precautionary measure or as a sign of greater things to come. As Amira Hass points out in Haaretz:
"The order's language is both general and ambiguous, stipulating that the term infiltrator will also be applied to Palestinian residents of Jerusalem, citizens of countries with which Israel has friendly ties (such as the United States) and Israeli citizens, whether Arab or Jewish. All this depends on the judgment of Israel Defense Forces commanders in the field. "
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/ShArtVty.jhtml?sw=deportation&itemNo=1162075
Palestinians test out Gandhi style protest.
Far from being outrages, I think that the use of the Mogan Dovid as an assertive symbol is an exact reaction to the abomination of the Holocaust when that symbol - in use for more than 3,000 years - became associated with degradation and death. Its use as an assertive symbol is a reclamation, not an outrage.
Where you put it is another matter. Having personally scrubbed swastikas off walls where they do not belong, despite the fact that I am well aware of the fact that the swastika has been venerated by Native People here in America, by Indians, Egyptians, Persians, and, among others, ancient Jews.
You can find specimens of the running cross embedded in floor tiles in ancient Hertz ilia, and other excavations of ancient Israeli sites.
The greater matter lies in the psychological use of these devices. When the Nazis painted swastikas on Jewish-owned buildings, they were saying, "This is ours. We own it," in an effort to establish their suzreignity over the possessions of others, expressing the view that these locations had been usurped by interlopers.
The Israelis who go around painting their favored symbol on walls belonging to others are doing the same thing, expressing the same psychological impulse, as cats and dogs mark their territories.
However, I tire of those who expect us to represent some higher standard of morality than others ascribe to. You cannot be a beacon to the nations if someone else smothers your light.
It is typical to say that the killing of Israeli people are justified because of this reason or that. I say there is no justification. Yet, when Israel retaliates, they run to the U.N., cry 'over reaction', seek sanctions and toss a few hundred missiles.
When someone with a pretty name as Judy Mandelbaum shows both sides of a story, I'll take note. Until then, she is Judy bin Brooklyn.
Read Harv: http://theHARVview.blogspot.com
{{
Is The Bible More Violent Than The Quran? http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=124494788&sc=nl&cc=progserv-20100406
......
"By the standards of the time, which is the 7th century A.D., the laws of war that are laid down by the Quran are actually reasonably humane," he says. "Then we turn to the Bible, and we actually find something that is for many people a real surprise. There is a specific kind of warfare laid down in the Bible which we can only call genocide."
It is called herem, and it means total annihilation. Consider the Book of 1 Samuel, when God instructs King Saul to attack the Amalekites: "And utterly destroy all that they have, and do not spare them," God says through the prophet Samuel. "But kill both man and woman, infant and nursing child, ox and sheep, camel and donkey."
When Saul failed to do that, God took away his kingdom.
"In other words," Jenkins says, "Saul has committed a dreadful sin by failing to complete genocide. And that passage echoes through Christian history. It is often used, for example, in American stories of the confrontation with Indians — not just is it legitimate to kill Indians, but you are violating God's law if you do not."
}}
Reikistar -- I can think of no better move the Palestinians can undertake to win redress of their just grievances than to adopt a massive campaign of non-violent protest. The reasonable left in Israel has been all-but-moribund for a decade now, in no small measure owing to the methods Palestinians have consistently chosen to express their "resistance," and there is really no hope of reaching any kind of peaceful resolution without active leadership from the Israeli left. I wish the article you point to gave better reason for hope, however:
"Hind Awad, 22, a campaigner for an international boycott of Israel, said non-violent methods had historically been a 'major tool' of the Palestinians.
"'I also think that under international law, armed struggle is just, for people that are living under occupation,' she added.
"A recent poll suggested that nearly half of Palestinians support armed struggle.
"Many of these, like Hossam Khader, a long-standing activist with the Fatah movement which dominates the PA, believe Israel would not have agreed even to negotiate without years of Palestinian militant activity."
I rather suspect Khader is wrong. The history of the Palestinian experience to date has been one long demonstration of the futility of mindless violence. Surely he can't really be looking around at his situation and concluding that things are substantially better now than they've ever been, which would be the necessary outcome if one were to prove that violence is working. Israelis are far more susceptible to being shamed (the counter-example of Ehud Olmert notwithstanding) than they are to being cowed, because they know that, regardless of what the world thinks of them (or, more accurately, *because* of what the work thinks of them), they have nowhere else to go. Sadly, however, a non-violent resistance comingled with a policy of suicide bombings and random rocket attacks, is not, in the end, a non-violent resistance.
It's always depressing to see well-intentioned articles about Israel, such as this one by Judy Mandelbaum, bring out the anti-Israel haters, such as "rwnutjob," who seem to think that reducing Israel and Israelis to "Zionist bullshit" somehow promotes Palestinian sovereignty.
"rwnutjob" should recognize too that a great number of "Israeli Zionists" yearn for reconciliation with Palestinians willing to renounce violence. It seems RW's preferred mode of discourse is the ad hominem attack. His name-calling is really offensive.
I find your comment petty-minded and rather incoherent, but it is beyond tacky to plug your blog here. Please resist.
You can't worship God AND money. You can't be a Zionist (as I use the term) and a Jew. Pick which one you prefer and stick with it.
I do. I also don't think the rw would have much traction with the general population if the Palestinian "resistance" had taken a different, more effective form.
So Dave, nice research there, but the fact that the IDF are going about their business in much the same way as street hooligans in the ghetto's of all metropolitan cities is undeniable.
For them, the Star of David is the "new swastika" .. a way of marking their territory, the same way a dog would have a piss against a tree.
At least the dog does this out of instinct, not because he was indoctrinated by some governmental institution who thinks they have a moral and ethical high ground, mixed with a lot of holy/unholy mambo-jumbo, because they just so happen to occupy a piece of land that has cost countless of lives across the span of our recorded history.
On a related subject, were you maybe in the IDF Dave?
>You can't be a Zionist (as I use the term) and a Jew.
Amen. Goy means nation, btw. Israel is filled w/goyim.
To paraphrase Anne Frank, I believe that at heart, all people are the same in their propensity for evil.
Great article Judy. You are an übermensch (unlike me). so rated
@ Further Left - you disgust me. Take your filthy hate speech and spout it in some far flung corner where like-minded maniacs stagnate.
http://www.jewishjournal.com/articles/print/is_uc_irvine_safe_for_jews_20100413/
I was going to hold up the examples of pseudonymous heroes rwnutjob and Further Left as evidence of the persistent need for a Jewish state of refuge, but I've decided that Further Left's expressions of Judaeophobia are so over-the-top that he/she must be trying to play some sort of double agent game. (Case still stands for rwnj, though.)
2011 will be the year of a marriage of convenience between we on the far left and our opposites on the far right to join forces. You think 15 million is an atrocity? Think again. We will be laughing.
It is telling, I think, that in the case of Jayyous, the Star of David on the school wall was not spray-painted by some crazed Israeli settler, but by members of the IDF.
Allo again Dave, sorry for only replying now.
Well, I am not arguing with anyone, it would be a waste of time to argue about something with someone whom I would most likely never have the opportunity to discuss it face to face, I am merely commenting and conversing about other peoples thought's and ideas.
With that said, I can go on and explain why I pointed out that which was the core of the article for me.
People, part of a group that belongs to an organization with a specific set of goals, who go around, terrorizing other people with a different set of goals, and then leave their mark.
I know you didn't deny or endorse the defacement's the article spoke of, but, from my point of view you tried to justify the way things are done by the IDF, almost an apologetic kind of way, hence my question if you were in the IDF.
"Is Salon the new Der Sturmer?"
As David Lieberman says above, "you're not very good at this."
Marcello,
My pleasure, and I look forward to your book on "walls"!
Reiki,
That sounds promising! I plan to explore it further.
Emily, Julie, Natalie,
Thanks!
Everybody else,
Thanks for commenting. I leave the vitriolic pro-Zionist and anti-Semitic messages up since they do rather highlight what's at stake in this issue.
As the economic situation at home gets worse, I hear many Americans say we should pull out of the region all together, withdraw all troops from Afghanistan and Iraq. Withdraw all foreign aid from Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Israel, Jordan and the like, and reinvest the money at home, where we will see immediate returns. Most of the money we spend there is borrowed anyway, so why pay interest on loans from the Chinese and Arabs, if peace never happens? Its like using a credit card to gamble in a casino. Its worse than self-defeating.
We can only spend so much money ant time on a situation where both sides are not taking the initiative for peace. America is in free-fall. Our days of Empire are at an end. One day, the legions will have to come home. Once we are energy independent, and dont need to ingratiate ourselves with the Saudis, the Arabs will not be able to have America come to their rescue when the Israelis brutally counter-attack them. With an isolationist foreign policy, and massive reductions in foreign aid, and increased restrictions on civilian wire transfers to the region, Israel will have less and less American money and military equipment to rely on.
Perhaps it is America, and its mere existence as an arbiter in the region, that is an enabler for violence and escalation on both sides? Perhaps if we stayed out of the region for good, they would all start getting along that much faster?
I hope peace one day grows in that land.