Judy Mandelbaum

Judy Mandelbaum
Location
Brooklyn, New York, United States
Birthday
June 01
Bio
Freelance writer, editor, and first citizen of Judy's World.

Judy Mandelbaum's Links

Women and society
Travel
No links in this category.
Fiction
Haiti
The Jewish world and Israel
War and peace
Women and Islam
History
Africa
Editor’s Pick
AUGUST 23, 2010 9:07AM

Declaring victory at the Hotel Baghdad

Rate: 7 Flag

 Baghdad
US soldier in Baghdad, 2008 (Daily Mail)

 

Just about everyone has heard of George Santayana’s famous warning* that “those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it.” Almost as many people are acquainted with Senator George Aiken’s modest Vietnam-era suggestion that the US simply declare victory in that war and then get out. Now that the US has formally ended its combat mission in Iraq, could it be that President Obama is finally learning a lesson from history?

  

The Vermont Republican’s actual words in 1966 were actually a bit more nuanced: “The United States could well declare unilaterally ... that we have 'won' in the sense that our armed forces are in control of most of the field and no potential enemy is in a position to establish its authority over South Vietnam." Such a declaration, he said, "would herald the resumption of political warfare as the dominant theme in Vietnam. … It may be a far-fetched proposal, but nothing else has worked.”

  

On the surface, this looks like what Obama is doing in Iraq. The US military prevailed over Saddam Hussein and his army seven years ago already, and no regular foreign forces are in any position to cross the country’s borders. A formal democracy has been established, a constitution has been ratified, numerous local and national elections have taken place. By most accounts, the group “Al Qaeda in Iraq” has long since lost the initiative to the “Iraqi Awakening.” Isn’t a declaration of “victory” long overdue?

  

And yet, the withdrawal of US “combat troops” last week in keeping with the 2008 “Status of Forces Agreement” may only amount to so much deckchair-shuffling as the crippled Iraqi ship of state continues to crawl forward. 50,000 fully armed, fully capable US troops will remain in the country “at least” until the end of 2011. The US Air Force will continue to patrol the skies. Contracted security services are stepping up their involvement, as the State Department announces plans to establish a quasi-military force of its own, numbering in the thousands, that will be “driving armored vehicles, flying aircraft, operating surveillance systems, even retrieving casualties if there are violent incidents and disposing of unexploded ordnance.” The agency is requesting “Black Hawk helicopters; fifty mine-resistant ambush-protected vehicles; fuel trucks; high-tech surveillance systems; and other military gear” from Congress. Hundreds of State Department personnel will continue to occupy the world’s largest embassy in Baghdad, a top-level target that will need to be protected by more than just local police.

 

Moreover, General Ray Odierno said last week that combat troops may “return” to Iraq if the current government – which, incidentally, has still failed to constitute itself since the parliamentary election in March – should prove unable to maintain order. Political and ethnic tensions remain high in a country whose infrastructure remains shattered and where anywhere between a hundred thousand and more than a million people have been killed during and after what most Iraqis view as an illegal and unprovoked war of aggression. Just yesterday one of America’s newly named “transitional troops” was killed in a rocket attack in southern Iraq. And with some 115 billion barrels of proven oil reserves lying beneath Iraqi soil, it’s unlikely the US will lose interest in this corner of the world anytime soon.

  

Of course, the problem with Aiken’s notion of declaring “victory” is that it begs the question of “victory for whom and for what?” Back at the end of the first century BCE, the Roman historian Tacitus quoted a Celtic chieftain who took a very dim view of his conquerors' Pax Romanum: “To ravage, to slaughter, to usurp under false titles, they call empire; and where they make a desert, they call it peace.” This sounds like many of the comments coming out of Baghdad today, where the city’s electricity grid has still not been restored and daily temperatures regularly shoot to over 100 degrees Fahrenheit.

 

Mission Accomplished 
"We may be through with the past, but the
past ain't through with us." (Magnolia)

  

Whether we are really condemned to repeat the past is an open question, but there’s no doubt that history sometimes does seem like déjà vu over and over again. President George W. Bush basically already declared victory back in 2003, stating “Major combat operations in Iraq have ended. In the battle of Iraq, the United States and our allies have prevailed.” But as the narrator says in the movie Magnolia, "We may be through with the past, but the past ain't through with us."


In his eagerness to put a wrap on the history his predecessor so grandly set in motion, Obama’s de facto declaration of “victory” may only mark the transformation of the grand neoconservative dream of an Iraq that was to have been a “beacon of democracy and a friend of Israel” into just the “Hotel Baghdad,” where we can check out anytime we like, but we can never leave.

 


*Santayana’s famous dictim is frequently misquoted. What he actually said was: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
W00t! Rated for quoting Tacitus!

Hells bells, girl, I'd give you the thumbs up for that alone.

Unfortunately for thee and me and the human race and planet Earth herself, the neo-cons are more inclined to heed the words of papal legate Arnaud Amalric at the siege of Beziers -

"Caedite eos. Novit enim Dominus qui sunt eius" (Kill them all. For the Lord knoweth them that are His)

(ooh! yes! yes! It's Dueling Quotes Monday at Poopy Salon~!)
More than a million people have left the country, reconstruction remains almost entirely undone, the government is in limbo because more than five months after the election they still can't get their coalition straightened out, and Iran has far more influence in the country than we do. Dismal failure. And exactly the same situation is brewing in Afghanistan. Far from being the kind of demonstration of how America could still project its power abroad that the Bush administration and Washington media hoped for, these two conflicts have become telling in a very different way for the rest of the world. And humiliating for us.
rated.
Soo... the US invaded, deposing Iraq's popular leader (not just deposed, but tried and convicted by a kangaroo court in a war zone and then hanged), wrecking their infrastructure... and now we're leaving, at least in a theatrical sense, while our mercenaries take over until after the November elections?

We ARE the problem in Iraq. Is it impossible to reassess the harm we've done and determine that the smartest thing to do is to GTFO already? What's that? Not until we rescue the last drop of our oil which is somehow underneath THEIR soil?

OK, now I get it...
terrific post, Judy reminds me how you frame this, of the great Luis Bunuel film his masterwork The Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie (1972) the guests at the dinner party
just
cannot
leave
... rated
I will believe that the President has achieved something/anything when we're out, I'm still waiting for the man I supported, funded, and voted for to effect some substantial "change' that I can believe in.
It's not too late for him to justify my faith in him, but the clock is ticking loudly.
(R)ated for the Tacitus quote also.
i'm waiting for you to use 'mercenaries,' rather than 'contractors.' amazing how that word disappeared when america became the employer. america's armed forces are now working for the capo di tutti capo, and have become uniformed hitmen.

one is continually surprised at the sophistication of much earlier times, but should not be, it works both ways: the men at the top behave today just as their models did long ago. i'm assigning the 'caligula' role to dubya, obama will be 'claudius.'
Other than fred's continual waffling (could he be frank apisa in disguise?) ALL the courageous comments deserve ratings as much as Your blog-post does, Judy - thanks for this.


-R-
That is why we need to turn on their lights, finally. Very good point, because if in the Scottish Highland, it made sense to make a waste, and call it peace, Iraq is useful for energy, and of course, basing.
www .needaseller .com
Hello everybody,The company launched the National Day Carnival as long as 200, both beautiful gift, surprise here, do not miss, welcome all the friends come to order. Our service purpose: "Customer is God, and everything is God-based." Free to pay the freight, 100% Free Shipping.
New era cap $15 Bikini (Ed hardy,polo) $25
Sunglasses(Oakey,coach,gucci,Armaini)$16
Tshirts (Polo ,ed hardy,lacoste) $16
Air jordan(1-24)shoes $33
Handbags(Coach,ed hardy,lv,d&g) $35
Jean(True Religion,ed hardy,coogi) $30
Hot products this month:NHL Jersey,NFL Jersey,NBA Jersey,MLB Jersey,Sunglass AAA,Not of the update ...
www .needaseller .com
Free to pay the freight, 100% Free Shipping.
Tiffany provides a wide collection of Discount Tiffany Jewellery at the most favorable prices, Buy Cheap tiffany jewellery including Necklaces, Ring
Tiffany sale
He: Hey, guess what I've stopped beating my wife!

He's friend: Really, thank G-d, how'd you manage?

He: I've hired a bunch of hell's angels, huns, and cretins to do it for me. This way I can keep my hands clean, AND say I lived up to my promises.

He's friend: oh.
Like I've always said, though I really just made it up, it's next to if not impossible for a cretin to comprehend nuance, much less both sides of a complex issue, or really much of anything for that matter but hate.
by the way, if you are going to the famous quotes box, you might also like to embellish your writing by discriminating between 'begs the question' and 'invites the question.'