The Fallujah tragedy: A war crime by any other name...

Iraqi newborn in Fallujah (al-Jazeera)
Those of us who pay attention to such things (and our numbers are ludicrously small) felt sick to our stomachs upon hearing last month that at least 100,000 additional Vietnamese citizens have been killed or injured by American landmines and other leftover explosives since 1975. These fresh victims come on top of the two million or more killed in the official war itself and the thousands more affected by Agent Orange. Nor is there any end in sight. For people like me, who were born years after the last helicopter got the hell out of Saigon, it appears as if the sins of the fathers really are punished to the third and fourth generation. Except that today, in our “post-modern” civilization, where nobody can plausibly explain what any of our wars are really about, guilt and punishment are a mere accident of birth.
When it comes to the Iraq War, though, we won’t have to wait forty years to receive the butcher’s bill. Thanks to modern communications technologies, as well as to the unprecedented vileness of the munitions used in that brutal and utterly unnecessary invasion and occupation, we have the answers at our fingertips – if we would only bother to take a look. In a report broadcast on al-Jazeera over the weekend, doctors in Fallujah, a city of 300,000, are reporting a massive increase in birth defects and otherwise rare childhood diseases in that twenty-first century Guernica. (I already reported on the phenomenon in this space back in March of 2010.)
A study from July 2010 already showed a twelve-fold increase in childhood cancer in the city. It also reported that a whopping 14.7 percent of children were born with birth defects, a number more than fourteen times the figure recorded in the vicinity of atom-bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki after 1945.
Since then, the situation has only grown more desperate, according to Dr. Samira Alani, a pediatrician employed at the city’s General Hospital. She has recorded 699 birth defects since October of 2009 alone. “There are not even medical terms to describe some of these conditions because we’ve never seen them until now,” she says. She and other physicians tell of babies with eyes in the center of their foreheads and others “who look like fish.” “So when I describe it all I can do is describe the physical defects, but I’m unable to provide a medical term.” She says that most of these babies die within twenty to thirty minutes of birth. The actual number may well be twice as high, she added, since between forty and fifty percent of Iraqi women give birth at home and potential birth defects among this group are not registered.
One bizarre side effect is that today only eighty-five boys have been born in Fallujah for every 100 girls since 2005, less than a year after the assault. This is a clear sign of genetic damage, to which males are more susceptible than females. (Under normal conditions, male births slightly outnumber female births.) The same thing happened after Hiroshima.
Dr. Alani places the blame on depleted uranium (DU) munitions and white phosphorus, both of which the US used in its twin attacks on the city back in 2004 after local resistance fighters killed four American mercenaries operating in the city. The US attacks destroyed or damaged up to sixty percent of the city’s buildings, including 36,000 out of the city’s 50,000 homes, sixty schools, and sixty-five mosques and shrines. Over 6,000 residents were killed and a quarter of a million fled for their lives, many to squatter camps lacking basic services. 50,000 – mostly men and teenage boys, who were prohibited from leaving – remained in the city, where they were hit by depleted uranium munitions, white phosphorus, and cluster bombs, poisoning the local environment for years to come. This group supposedly included only 600 to 6,000 resistance fighters. According to the New York Times, the marines targeted the main hospital first “because the US military believed it was the source of rumors about heavy casualties.”
The US is around eleven times larger than Iraq, so when it comes to understanding the comparable impact of events like this on US society I find it useful to multiply these figures by eleven. So try to imagine a foreign assault on an American city of 3.3 million (e.g. Chicago and its northern suburbs) with 66,000 dead, 2.75 million sent scurrying for their lives, 396,000 homes destroyed, 660 schools destroyed, and 715 churches flattened. Add in a few million extra cases of cancer for good measure, plus upwards of 11 million excess deaths nationwide due to a foreign invasion, and you might start getting an idea of how people in the region feel about all this.
In Babil Province in southern Iraq, cancer rates among all age groups have skyrocketed. The same is true in Fallujah. “There is also a primary school that was built [near a bombed out area],” Dr. Alani says, “and from that school alone three teachers developed breast cancer, and now two of them are dead. We get so many cases from this area, right where the hospital is.”

Picasso's "Guernica" (1937)
How can we even begin to think about such an atrocity against civilians and domestic resistance fighters? Earlier on in this essay, I compared the assault on Fallujah with Guernica, the Basque town that Hitler’s German Condor Legion bombed in 1937. Is this comparison justified? Sometimes I wonder. During the Spanish Civil War, Guernica was a small town of only a few thousand people. While the Luftwaffe destroyed most of it, the saturation bombing probably killed fewer than 500 inhabitants all told. I suspect the world would have forgotten the incident entirely were it not for Picasso’s iconic 1937 painting, the ultimate antiwar image.
It's doubtful that very many people today have ever heard about the bombing and the painting. Still, US Secretary of State Colin Powell and UN ambassador John Negroponte apparently thought the image was still explosive enough to have the tapestry copy that hangs in the UN General Assembly covered over when Powell gave his infamous presentation to the organization in February of 2003, where the former general shilled the US invasion of sovereign Iraq on the basis of its alleged possession of “weapons of mass destruction.” Yet another case of the pot calling the kettle black, except that this time the kettle wasn’t.
America's public response to all these events is downright sociopathic, but I guess we are conditioned to blame the victim from an early age. As John Tirnan, the author of The Deaths of Others: The Fate of Civilians in America's Wars, pointed out in the Washington Post last week,
Today there is virtually no support helping rebuild Iraq or Afghanistan - no campaigns by large charities, no open doors for Iraqi refugees. Even Iraqis who worked with the American military are having trouble getting political asylum in the United States and face a risk of retribution at home. The US response to so many dead, five million displaced and a devastated country is woefully dismissive.
By the way, Tirnan sets the total number of military and civilian victims of America's wars since 1945 at between six and seven million.
So is al-Jazeera's Fallujah story just a typical example of Muslim anti-American horror propaganda, as some readers of this article will claim? I wish. Dr. Alani and other scientists involved in researching the extreme surge of birth defects and cancer cases in Fallujah published their findings last year in a report for the London-based, peer-reviewed journal Conflict and Health, which you can read here. The team of scientists, in cooperation with laboratories in Britain and Germany, discovered heightened radiation levels in local soil and in the hair of the surviving residents, which they attributed to DU munitions. According to the report,
it appeared that the cancer and leukemia death rates in the entire all-Iraq 0-4 group were about three or four times the levels found in western populations for this age group. These rates were three times higher in the South where Depleted Uranium (DU) was employed in the major tank battles near the Kuwait border (53 per 100,000 per year) than in the North (18 per 100,000 per year) where there was less fighting and where DU was not employed to such an extent. Furthermore, cancer and leukemia rates were highest in the 0-1 year group, which is unusual; the main peak in childhood cancer is generally found at age 4.
These birth defects are not limited to Iraqis, however. The report also pointed to
significant excess congenital heart defect and hypospadia rates in 11,961 US Gulf war veteran live-born offspring compared with military controls.
What goes around comes around, as more and more US and coalition military personnel can attest. If the assault on Fallujah isn’t a war crime, do you have a better name for it?


Salon.com
Comments
r.
I use to facilitate Veteran War Groups.
I had one sad 'gig in `Veterans Affairs.
`
I still attend them and become so sad.
We view through the dim glass darkly.
It's not always easy to view via a Moon.
`
Yin/Yang. Male/Female. Life/Death.
When face to face with Life we views.
View` light/dark. Balanced Universe.
`
*
Full winter moon
the icicle
the icicle's shadow
`
Geraldine Clinton Little
*
I read the haiku in a book:
`
Title: haiku mind - 108 poems
Cultivate Awareness - author
`
Patricia Donegan
`
I Love her Mind
Thank You too
For what You do
`
It's a habit to see:
Shadow side view
Light is there too
`
I'll share with vets
Thanks for research
We need each other
`
View Beauty too.
Beauty is Truth.
Life is luminous.
`
Later . . .
There's work to do.
View Moon in sky.
Sunshine come too.
One would think that the girls might see this ratio as threatening, or perhaps it is a typo and the author meant '100 girls.'
You're right, it's a mistake and should read 100. Sadly, I'm on the road and my iPad won't let me make the correction.
Gee, I wonder why?
.
This is one more example of the dangers of using live fire wargrounds to test our munitions, where it's the enemy who pays the heavier price if things go sideways. I think this sort of reporting deserves more attention and more voices.
I also think this, along with many other things, should be used as reasons to hold Bush, Cheney, Rice and Rumsfeld accountable for treason and high crimes. Will that happen? I doubt it, but it should.
Along with that, we have so poisoned, not only the ground and the environment of Iraq, but the minds of the people that to even come back as a group of caring people who'd like to do our best to make things right would only invite more tit for tat in the form of vengeance strikes by outraged (and rightly so) Iraqis in the names of their families.
Maybe it wasn't every American that was responsible, but there's plenty of blame to go 'round. It might make the world see us in a different light if we did something completely out of character and actually held our "deciders" responsible for these horrible things done in the name of the almighty dollar.
Once again, I feel shame for having the label, American Citizen attached to me. Thanks for pointing this out, uncomfortable as it is, the truth needs to be told.
-r-
For example, of course the Vietnamese prime minister is going to blame all of his country's post-Vietnam War woes on the United States. He wants to spend our money to clean up a country his governing party fought so hard to help ravage in the first place. Are the Russians paying anything to help with the clean-up? How about the Chinese? After all, didn't they supply hundreds of millions of dollars in weapons to the North Vietnamese to stoke that war? And do you honestly believe that 100,000 number is accurate, or that all of those mines that allegedly killed those 100,000 people are U.S. mines? I certainly don't. Where's the investigative balance? Where's the nonaligned sourcing of the various claims? Where's the shared blame (since there's almost always shared blame in a war)? If there is none, essays such as this undermine any validity they may actually have.
"How can we even begin to think about such an atrocity against civilians and domestic resistance fighters?" did you say "domestic resistance fighter"....? huh? I believe the correct word for that is "terrorist" or "enemy combatant".....
ps congrats on getting the front page headline. Ive been writing about so called warcrimes by the US warmachine over 2yrs on here but somehow just didnt get the same attn. maybe I should change my Y chromosome or something.
Thanks for stopping by. Regarding your comment, let me make the following points:
1) This essay is about the Fallujah situation, not the Vietnam War, as evidenced by the title and the body of the text.
2) Having said that, we obviously can't know the provenance of all the leftover munitions in Vietnam. But that's really beside the point. War begets war, munitions beget munitions. If we had not insisted on continuing the war long after both its objectives and its very justifications had proven untenable, I doubt very much we would be reading these headlines today. Yes, we would be reading different headlines, but that is the stuff of counterfactual history, and we could speculate endlessly while Vietnamese citizens who weren't even born then lose their limbs in rice paddies. Since we continued and escalated the war, we bear much of the responsibility for the consequences, arguably the main responsibility. But please forgive me if I do not reopen and magically heal the festering sore of the Vietnam War within the introduction to a simple blog post about Iraq. (Regarding what the Russians and Chinese are doing and not doing in regard to munitions disposal in Vietnam, you are welcome to write a blog post on the subject and I would be very interested to read it.) In Fallujah, the situation is much clearer, since the chemical and DU munitions at issue all came from the US. Yes, we made the WMDs used in Iraq, and they will continue their acts of destruction for decades to come. But how many Americans are aware of this, let alone bother to inform themselves of it? We all know the answer to that. That's why my essay is just a voice in the wind, but I'm glad at least a few people are paying attention to it here.
Upon detonation, the uranium is spread all over the place.
The irony is that the United States decries the possible threat of Al Qaeda using so-called "dirty bombs," yet our depleted uranium munitions are practically the same thing as a dirty bomb, albeit smaller.
And since we use far more of them, far more often, we actually cause far more civilian death from mini-fallout.
R
Depleted uranium rounds have their issues, as although their weight makes for greater penetration, there is a question of aftermath too.
it's a good thing your head is so small.There is not enough room for worries of this kind,let alone night mares.
Modern world expects us to get used to the impossible.
Who pays for the operations in a case like the deformity above?
We in the Western world have to accept nuclear reactors,with cases of leukemia and cancer.Those people in said affected areas have to accept illnesses and deformities caused by the mighty warlord.
Rated
You wrote: "If the assault on Fallujah isn’t a war crime, do you have a better name for it?" Victory. I am a simple imperialist. Baathist Iraq was ripe for the Islamic pucking such as what actually happened in Iran. One authoritative regime was simply inherited by the next maniac regime.
We simply knocked humpty dumpty off the wall. All the Jihadist's Horses and all the Jihadist's men can not put humpty together again. Speaking of radiation. Persian Iran just might have radiation ideas about the Arab populations of it neighbors. Once it takes care of Israel, of course.
Chuckle. Islam is always at war. Mostly between the various sects that have developed after The Four Rightious Caliphs. This must drive Jihadi's nuts as to where to use nukes first. Saudi Arabia is in possession of Mecca and Medina. Israel is in possession of Jerusalem. Then there is Syria. A Sunni population subjugated by The Sh'ite Alawites and Iran.
Lots of fireworks lined up. Personally, I suspect the Saudi's will facilitate Israeli neutron bomb attacks on Iran. But that's just me.
http://www.google.com/publicdata/explore?ds=d5bncppjof8f9_&met_y=sp_dyn_le00_in&idim=country:FRA&dl=en&hl=en&q=france+life+expectancy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_power_by_country
I paid attention and your presentation is pathetic. DEPLETED URANIUM? Not one single geiger counter test. Phosphorous shells? Who the hell uses White Phosphorous shells in an urban environment? Not saying it was not done.
However, if you want to be taken seriously by those who are in opposition to you, you have a lot of work to do. That take work.
Spoken like a true imperialist! Thanks, that adds just the right spice to the comments section. Believe me, I appreciate your honesty. It sure beats neocons shilling "bringing freedom to the people of Iraq."
Thanks also for calling my essay "pathetic," apparently because I mention DU and White Phosphorous attacks on the city, "not saying it was not done" (?!). But it was done, EJ, you can read more about it here:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4483690.stm
WP shells fired on a civilian area, a clear war crime, which the government lied about as long as it could. Now THAT'S what I call pathetic.
Let us stipulate the "War Between The States" might not have been a worth while. We lost about 600,000 citizens in that war. Without that war the Confederacy, including Texas and perhaps those territories to its West, would have formed a separate slave nation.
Accordingly, the Northern States would have benefited from cotton processing and export, and the Confederacy would have become a rich natural resources power. Everyone, except the slaves, would have benefited. And you, I suspect, would have been condemning the United States as an evil accomplice.
I do not know whether you believe there is a war of civilizations going on, or whether you are simply supporting the other side. Either way, history will unfold without you.
Just for my information, do you understand Islam to be a religion, or a political ideology.
Speaking of pathetic. Once again, your source on birth defects relies on one single physician who simply provides his opinions. Clearly, you are counting on Choir Members on this thread to genuflect. I leave it for you to comfort your choir members in this matter.
I have bigger fish to fry. Specifically, Iraq was a typical Monster Arab Alpha-Male Gangster State. It has been reduced to, perhaps, a several thousand Beta-Male Gangster State.
The Western Project amounts to little more then this: bend the bastard Alpha Males on the planet to the lash of us lesser males. I will forgive you for, perhaps, feeling diminished as a result.
You are making me change my mind about things. While I thought we were doing good around the world you are making the point that we are screwed no matter what we do.
So going forward I think we should start some withdraws back to our boarders. Fuck Iraq. We will just let a dictator continue to use chemical weapons on his own people, run rape and other gross things that civil people don't talk about.
Why should we help in Darfur? I thought we should help there but I now think we should just let all those women continue to be raped over and over. It's not like women can only have sex so many times then they can't do it anymore. So how about we just let them continue to be raped. Who knows we might cause a problem and we wouldn't want to do that.
The next time we get a Hitler or Pol Pot maybe we should just let them build their ovens or start their killing fields. Hey, I'll bet all those bodies in buried in Cambodia made good fertilizer for the crops. No reason to take a risk that somebody may be exposed to DU.
Look I feel sorry for anyone who has a birth defect be it 1 or 100,000. So the next time we have decide if we should go into Serbia we are going to let you decide which is the greatest problem. I just pray you are right every time.
Sorry, did we invade Iraq to "help the people"? I thought it was all about "weapons of mass destruction" and "a smoking gun in the shape of a mushroom cloud." Colin Powell with *drawings* of "mobile biological weapons laboratories" at the UN etc. But sometimes your memory can play tricks on you.
Just because we didn't find them doesn't mean that he didn't have them. It only means we didn't find them. There have been reports that he moved them out of the country.
So did he gas his own people?
Wasn't his cousin nicknamed "Chemical Ali"?
Didn't "Chemical Ali" tell the people that he would attack them for 15 days with chemical weapons, and follow through with it.
So how is it that Iraq didn't have chemical weapons again? The fact is he had them and he has shown he would use them. Us finding them doesn't mean a thing.
We need a paradigm shift from power and control patriarchy to partnership and cooperation humanism. They say when 100 monkeys finally grasp the truth, then the whole monkey nation gets it and the truth and awareness finally spread at that tipping point like wildfire. When the US public finally got the Vietnam fiasco (after millions killed and disaplaced, and so many US soldier lives destroyed literally or the quality of them destroyed permanently by the psychological and physical trauma), the collective ego bubble was burst, or, let's say greatly reduced, helped by maybe 100th monkey Walter Cronkite. But then my generation (not yours) after working for this awareness did not stay vigilant and the cockroach neocons eventually joined by the opportunistic and equally blame-able neoliberals managed to make the USWarMachine even more vile and powerful and deadly, got us back to the full-out war games and as Donegal says, the people of America for the most part refuse to acknowledge or leave their sociopathic (accessory to mass murder) USWarMachine enabling "bubble." I remember the slogan "enough." I used to wear the button when I was struggling with the same issues during the anti-Vietnam war period. It certainly says it. The atrocities keep on keeping on. Good vs. Evil in this life, and if you haven't figured that out, guess which side one is thus on? Ripples of truth and conscience must keep being spread, ripples such as this article created. best, libby
Okay, show me the mobile weapons labs, show me the chemical weapons. The only chemical and radioactive weapons in Iraq were the ones we brought. The US Government certified this after many months of searching, and nothing has materialized since. To paraphrase Donald Rumsfeld, absence of evidence truly is evidence of absence, at least on this planet. "Spectral evidence" is only permissible in witch trials, not in international politics. Ultimately, the truth gets out.
libby,
Thanks so much for your kind and powerful words! They mean a lot to me.
You call thousands of dead bodies killed by blister agents (mustard gas) "Spectral evidence"? I call it just evidence. BTW, you just ignored that point in your reply.
While the left wants to keep their heads buried in the sand some of us had to attend the classified threat assessments and training. While I deplore what Julian Assange did with Wikileaks that the left so loved and admired him for, it works both ways.
The documents from Wikileaks reports that in 2004 bought containers that contained liquid sulfur mustard. The leaks go on to report that three years later that American troops were still finding WMD in the region. An armored Buffalo vehicle unearthed a cache of artillery shells “that was covered by sacks and leaves under an Iraqi Community Watch checkpoint. “The 155mm rounds are filled with an unknown liquid, and several of which are leaking a black tar-like substance.” Initial tests were inconclusive. But later, “the rounds tested positive for mustard.”
Wikileaks has amassed almost 400,000 documents with thousands having to do with chemical weapons. Most did not pan out as weapons but the leaked documents did show that even late in the war, WMDs were still being unearthed. In the summer of 2008, according to one Wikileaked report, American troops found at least 10 rounds that tested positive for chemical agents.
So who are you going to believe? I think I'll believe your side and the Wikileak documents. I think I'll also believe the classified briefings that I attended which said the same thing.
I also find it amazing that you live where you do with just about anything you could ever want or need within a few minutes and your total belief seems to be America is the worlds boogie man.
So Judy, in a weapon where it only takes a drop, how much do you need to have a WMD? Maybe we should go to northern Iraq and ask the Kurds who had 5,000 killed in Halabja. What do you think they will tell us about the use of mustard gas, sarin, and VX? I think they will call them WMDs.
What say you.
I forget, when did we invade Darfur?
We didn't invade Cambodia to get rid of Pol Pot. We carpet bombed the country creating the conditions for Pol Pot to be able to gain power.
That said, it hasn't worked out exactly as we would have liked. Since the secession, the Chinese are now the largest purchasers of Sudanese oil. This isn't bad for US imperial interests, though. This means an imperial nation can help develop the oil resources and more oil, they hope, will put some downward pressure (however minor) and gradually escalating global oil prices.
Thanks for admitting that Iraq had WMDs.
How he got them is not so much as an issue as he had them and he used them.
Saddam hadn't used those chemical weapons since the 80's with the blessing of the US. How he got them is a big issue.
Creare Site