
I think I can now safely brag that I live in the most transportation forward city in North America. I've already blogged about Montreal's near monopoly on high speed train building, and my awesome car co-op. Soon I'll write something about the newly announced plans to run airport shuttle buses and utility vehicles on hydrogen. But today I'll follow the New York Times lead, and introduce you to our innovative new bike sharing program.
At the NYT pointed out today, this is the most ambitious program on the continent. The plan for now is to make 3,000 bikes available at 300 wi-fi operated, solar powered stations spread out around the central area of the city.
Though the idea was spawned by a similar program in Paris, what makes Bixi, the Montreal version, different is that it's run by the city in co-ordination with the bus and metro system. Bikes can be removed from one station and returned to any of the others. Commit to a year's worth of bus/metro passes, and you get half off the $78 yearly subscription rate (you also get a discount to Communauto, Montreal's equally fab hi-tech car-co-op.)
Plus the bikes are kind of cool. Not built for lightness, but constructed to defeat vandals and parts thieves (made with the same aluminum we build our famous trains with.)
One more reason for me to put off buying a car.

For your viewing pleasure here's a little video about Bixi and biking in Montreal.


Salon.com
Comments
Icemilkcoffee. All these stands are portable. They'll be warehoused away in the the winter...although many Montrealers do actually ride in the winter (as an ex-courrier myself I braved a few months one year). But you need to be pretty devoted.
If a few of these sprung up around here, I certainly would take advantage of them.
you've written about a great idea. i hope someday we can become a civilized country and start using it!
Rated (for innovation)
I dunno... I kinda love my bike a lot and can't imagine sharing, but if this works for other folks then it has my vote. Anything to cut our reliance on cars. I hate paying $400 to a mechanic for a break job, knowing I could do my own on my bike for a tenth of that.
I wish they'd stop marketing all these alt-transportation initiatives based on "Dependence on foreign oil" and start marketing them based on "Dependence on shady car mechanics that want to steal your money without actually doing any repair, or at least not enough to warrant the ridiculous amounts of cash you're forced to shell out" We'd be biking, training, busing and electric in 3 years if they did.
Thanks for sharing Juliet.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/13/world/europe/13paris.html
I love, love, love my car sharing company. So I don't see why the bikes wouldn't work.
but, you do know that they are all girl bikes, dont you?
how do the menfolk feel about that?
(Did you know Montreal is one of my favorite cities? I've been there several times - but not in last 10 years. Film festivals, jazz festivals...even to stay in a little hostel there called Chez Jean. I think its such a fun, hip and good city with just the right amount of fancy. Thought about moving there but the citizenship thing was a bitch. Long parenthetical thought. Rock on.)
I imagine the logistics planning for that has to be pretty sophisticated.
Sounds like fun, which just goes to show how miserably dull my life is these days ...
Gwool. I got that sly little jab at the end. Ha! As for logistics. With my car sharing I have to bring the car back to the parking lot that's about a block away from my house (from where I take it.) From what I understand with the bikes, you can bring them back to any of the computerized stands. They're free for the first half hour, the point of which is to get people to use them a lot, thus making sure they move around the stations. I'm really looking forward to seeing how well it works.
A couple of people have commented on the "problem" of winter. I hope they keep the bikes available through the winter, and also outfit them with studded tires so they are safer. Cycling in winter is great! Sure beats shivering at a bus stop.
Bart. T.O. plans to have something like this by 2010. As for winter. The plan for now is to warehouse them between November and May. Too much wear and tear on the bikes.
http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022534705617065
took 5 years off a bike before my pain faded and normal function returned (mostly). now I only ride recumbent bikes and am much more comfortable.
I used to ride with the Florida Freewheelers and make regular 50-mile trips. But in the East Tenn mountains I can't even begin to count the ways bike-riding is dangerous. Not sure about the health benefits of something that can get you killed.
Love the idea of Bixi! Is the land flat there?
Uh, not sure what to say about the penis killers. But recumbent would be pretty hard to line up, I imagine.
Yes this wouldn't work too well in mountainous rural areas. Montreal is pretty hilly. But not too many steep hills. Biking here is a very good workout . These bikes, however, are mostly for use in the downtown core which is pretty flat. We have about 300 km of bike paths in and around the city, and more being built everyday. So bikers have a fair amount of refuge from traffic.
As for recumbents: I think they're just fabulous for long distance road work, but they're not suitable for city riding conditions. In road conditions where you're jammed in tight amongst cars, visibility from and of recumbents is dangerously poor. You can't navigate high curbs, highly uneven pavement or other road obstacles on a recumbent - and again, that poor city visibility means that obstacles may creep up on you unexpectedly. Because of their long frame, they have a very wide turning radius which is unsuitable for crowded city streets. There is a whole new learning curve for them, because of balance issues around the low center of gravity, different starting and stopping maneuvers, and avoiding dangers like heel strike and leg suck. While I don't propose that those factors are more dangerous on average than the dangers associated with an upright frame, the fact is - very few casual cyclists have ever even seen a recumbent in real life, let alone ridden one. They would be far more party to these dangers because of inexperience than to the dangers common to uprights, which they've been riding their entire lives. And even experience can't make up for the poor visibility and maneuverability, which are critical on a city street.
I hear ya on the numb crotch (even girls get it.) But you know, I don't get that when I'm using my bike for a mile or three trip around town to get groceries or go to the library. (Especially when you consider how much time you spend out of the saddle so you don't drive your seat post into your crotch when hopping off a curb, or standing for better visibility as you approach an intersection.) I get it when I'm doing 30 mile trips on country roads. I think that upright frames are the better design for short stints around town.
all your thoughts on recumbent issues are out of date. swb or short wheelbase recumbents (upright seating) are faster and more nimble than any upright. lwb or long wheelbase recumbents are less nimble but not by as much as you might think. the learning curve is under 5 min for anyone that has ridden a bike. as for visibility, that is another mostly-myth. a recumbent riders head comes roughly to the chest of a sitting upright rider. I've been on a 'bent for 10 years in a mix of environments and never had a problem being seen. on an upright was quite a different story. visibility for *all* bikes would be improves if front and back led flashers were mandated for all riders I had mine on a pole a foot above my head on my left side.
recumbents are a wonderful improvement on bike design, rider safety, rider comfort, and load carring ability. every time a cheap recumbent (bike-e) is marketed, it is a big hit with people that wouldn't normally ride a bike. But bike shops tend to push people away from recumbents to more traditional solutions. why? the same old myths you expressed here.
here is another take. most bikes are made in china. simple bent designs like the bike-e can be made locally for a reasonable cost. bents could build a local industry and the rent a bike service could act as a try-before-you-buy service. some people will not want to try anything new but some will and some will like it. it would be nice if people had an option to try.
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/montreal/story/2009/06/26/montreal-missing-bixi-bikes.html
But even though Mtl. is one of the bike theft capitals of North America, I don't see theft being a major problem. These bikes are pretty clunky. Fine for a short trip, but no the kind of thing you'd want to own. I don't see who thieves would sell them to.
Paris had this problem too the first year. But it seems to have gotten better.