
"Parents would rather add 10 centimeters to their children’s stature than bequeath them one billion won,” said Dr. Shin Dong-gil, a Hamsoa doctor, invoking a figure in Korean currency equal to about $850,000.
From A1 of today's New York Times - on South Korean "growth clinics" where children receive hormone shots, acupuncture treatments, and other remedies for the vertically challenged. Along with folded eyelids and flat noses, Asians are increasingly shedding their yellow skin - now by breaking from their history of middling height. The latest in a trend of what amounts to a determined mimicry of the occident - where crania reach into higher strata, if only literally.
10 centimeters. That's almost 4 inches - as a Korean-American myself, I'd be fine with 2 - but at over $200,000/inch I'm not sure it's worth it. Or is it?
A correlation between height and personal income is well documented, and not just in the U.S. An added inch of height amounts to about 2% of added annual income - making height even more of a decisive factor in pay than gender. For the average American, a 4 inch height advantage translates to an extra few hundred thousand dollars by retirement. But that's still a long way from making any significant gains from a near million dollar investment.
It may be that the returns are not financial but emotional. Taller people, on average, report happier feelings than shorter people. Maybe it's simply glee over what lives of comfort their height-earned dollars afford them. But we all know what money can't buy. So does height=$=: )? Or is it some other causal permutation?
Perhaps relative height is less important than a sort of "magic height" - which for men, seems to be between 6' and 6' 2". Obama is 6' 2", McCain is 5' 7" (60% of the time, the taller Presidential candidate wins the popular vote). In 2005, the average height of a Fortune 500 CEO was 6 feet, with a whopping 30% over 6' 2" (compared with 3.9% in the general population). That year, one of these fortunate executives could expect an average of $12.7 million in compensation. I wonder if Dr. Shin is taking appointments.

Salon.com
Comments
But if everyone ends up being tall, then what?
Rated.
200K per inch?
LadyMiko - Couldn't agree with you more, I've written more about Asian/Caucasian issues in a previous post http://open.salon.com/blog/jungsoo/2009/12/21/we_the_yellow
Larry - The title reads "per inch of height" not "length", which is the dimension customarily cited when referring to penis size, didn't mean to pull a bait and switch!
Just me, but I'd take the cash. I kinda feel like that much money invested early in the child's life is probably gonna work out to alot more earnings than a few a inches of height.
However, I have always felt that there is an intrinsic advantage to "looking down" on everyone else in the universe. As a person shorter than most, I always have to look up, and in a way, this makes everyone my inner 5 year old's parent.
Alex - Great breakdown, I wish I'd thought to include that!
Natalie - Perhaps it's less about the benefits of being tall, more the detriments of being short. Reaching stuff is handy though.
ohsuzie - If the benefits of being short amount to being a hilarious tripping Lolita than I suspect most would forgo that fate.
BOKO - It does have a eugenic ring to it doesn't it...