In Which I Argue the Dexter Finale Does Not Go Too Far
***** SPOILERS AHEAD***Stop reading if you have not seen the episode
I don't usually do TV writing, but I love Dexter. It is one of the few shows I watch regularly and I feel the need to defend the season finale for some reason.
Heather Havrilesky writes really great entertainment pieces and I usually think her analysis is spot on, but this time I respectfully disagree. Dexter did not go too far. I'm sorry, Heather, but Rita had to die.
The stakes were just too high for Dexter to walk away unscathed this season. He got too close to Trinity and he messed up too many times, made too many bad choices, for there not to be any consequences. Trinity couldn’t be just another kill after all of the existential angst he put Dexter through, all of the comparisons and trying to figure out who he was and wasn’t in relationship to this monster. And if we are to believe that Trinity was the big baddie that he was, one of the most successful serial killers ever, for him not to inflict some collateral damage after getting so close to Dexter just isn’t believable. Dexter would come off as bulletproof and- well- that’s an entirely different kind of show isn’t it? One where you always know how it will end, where there’s no real risk or danger and he always gets his man, just a matter of how. Kind of like Columbo. Which isn’t bad, but it isn’t Dexter.
I realize I am arguing for the necessary death of a good woman and it’s not something I take lightly, even though I found Rita to be an annoying little sugar cookie sometimes. I understood she had to be a foil for Dexter. She had to be as sunshiney-bright as he was dark and he could be really dark, so I came to respect Rita’s role. And when faced with her death it hit me like a gut-punch too. I think that’s brilliant. So few shows affect me like that anymore. I respect the writers tremendously for not letting us see it coming. I’m a pretty jaded horror and mystery aficionado and I can often see three steps ahead of a story and it annoys the bejeesus out of me. I consider it lazy writing. The whole point of this kind of story-telling is to have your breath taken away, to feel the floor drop out from under you. It should feel like the plummet from the highest peak of a roller coaster when it’s working.
Now that feeling can certainly make some people sick, so I understand Havrilesky’s discomfort. But I also have to ask, where were you in season one when we witness the moment of Dexter’s “birth” as a serial killer? That scene is far more disturbing to me than the season finale.
First of all, Dexter is older than Harrison and more able to grasp his very bad situation. He was left alone in a shipping container in ankle-deep blood (yes a wee bit over the top for me too) for days. Stop and think about that for a minute, alone with corpses including your own mother’s for days and no reason to believe anyone was going to be looking for you. And the most horrifying thing of all, worse even than the sight of a baby in a pool of blood, was the exchange between Dexter’s mother and her killers. Do you remember? As a mother it gave me nightmares. Laura begs her killers not to do this in front of her children and she receives only inhuman silence in response. She then turns to her child and whispers, “Don’t look. Shut your eyes.” It chilled me. To have so little power to protect your children.
I understood why the scene had to be so horrible though. It’s necessary to be carried along on the premise that Dexter becoming a killer was inevitable. If we come away thinking, “Wow that would really fuck him up, but a killer? I don’t know.” The whole premise of the show falls down. We have to believe that this turned him into a killer and that scene made me believe. (I think it's also possible that they are going to have Harrison follow in his father's footsteps eventually. Dexter mentors Rita's kids in the books because they are much more damaged by their father's abuse than they are in the tv version.)
Rita’s death plunges us back into the moral uncertainty that was so present in season one. We weren’t sure how to feel about this guy, Dexter. Who is he? Is he a force for good? Should we like him? He became so likable and identifiable in the following seasons that we got too comfortable. The writers had to shake us out of that because Dexter is nothing without his divided self. We should be a little uncomfortable, we are talking about killing people after all. Should that be completely unproblematic? Rita’s death brings us back to the very interesting question Dexter asked of himself early on, “Am I a good person who does bad things? Or am I a bad person who does good things?”
I think next season is going to be very interesting.


Salon.com
Comments
If not...you really ought to read up on it.
That being said, Juli, it might be a good idea to indicate that there are spoilers in your post.
Two…the spoiler (or certainly a significant part of the spoiler) came in the second sentence…long before I realized a spoiler would come without a warning. I’ve read many reviews that simply keep spoilers under covers. This one was out there before anyone could know.
I love Dexter…but we do not have SHO. We watch the series on tapes.
It would have been nice to have a warning…but that does not justify my over-the-top reaction…and I apologize to Juli and all the other readers here.
Remember, Dexter was likely going to frame Sgt. Doakes just to keep his ghastly enterprise going. There's nothing good about Dexter folks. It's good that Showtime and company put the horror back in the horror show.
Heather's review got me into a more "meta" mode, though, about the responsibility of the critic to the art she is critiquing and the audience she is critiquing for. This is where, as a non-viewer of Dexter, her review fell down for me. I do think reviewers have a responsibility to state when they cannot objectively review something. L.A. Times and NPR critic Kenneth Turan did just this when faced with reviewing The Passion of the Christ. Instead of reviewing the film he talked about, essentially, why he COULDN'T do so instead of just trashing it.
Taking Dexter regulars at their word, it seems that the writers did what good writers should do. If Heather, as a parent, cannot objectively review it, she shouldn't. I would urge her to seek out Turan's "Passion" review--I'm sure it's in All Things Considered's online archive--and use the experience to become a better critic.
Thanks Nikki- I agree- and I think John Lithgow was too good to just disappear neatly. His performance as Trinity was pretty amazing. I can't wait for next season
Thanks Jeanette- I fixed it- hopefully I haven't done too much damage.
Thanks Owl- it's a pretty great show. And Jane- I understand- violence is not everyone's cup of tea.
Thanks Claire- again Frank- my apologies.
Deborah- I did hear that Dexter is married to the woman who plays his sister- it made a few episodes weird for me. ;-)
Thanks Emma. Thanks IndieGirl. Undertow- that was a pretty chilling scene- the begging always gets me.
Bob- I agree about putting the horror back in. Dexter just can't get too cuddly. It won't work.
Austin Cynic - "it obeys one of Anton Chekhov's rules for writing--the ending must be both shocking and inevitable." Yes!! That is it exactly. The ending felt absolutely shocking AND inevitable. It is hard to do both and I think they did it.
If you ask me, the real theme of the season was that Dexter was getting sloppy, and when serial killers get sloppy they get.....caught.
It would be nice if the show would end while it is still good. Season three was godawful and four started weak but got very good. The depictions of violence this season were needlessly graphic. Several episodes were disturbing to watch and left me feeling uneasy, this is how it should be if someone makes a tv show with an antihero serial killer lead. Wonderfully executed. Please end the show before it gets bad, or worse, poorer in quality than season 3.
Unfortunately i suspect a lot of season five will be the net closing around Dexter and six the inevitable aftermath. C'mon Dexter staff, do it with class, taste and panache and end it while it's good.
Final thought. I love me some Hitchcock. Wonder what the master would have thought of the show? Too unsubtle? Not his cup of tea? Slyly jealous?
And you're right again in suggesting we need to be uncomfortable when viewing the tales of a serial killer.
And I respect Frank greatly, but in general, once a show airs, "spoiler" is a moot concept. Read a piece about it at your peril.
You all should remember that last season Dexter found out about a secret she was keeping from him which was never developed. She had a past.
Also let us not forget how cute she was with her man friend next door. Do you think she did not know what was happening?
Her death was brutal and sad but it was what needed to be done. Her character had no future in Dexter. It was fantastical but that is what we love about it.
Hey, classy comments - two uses of "jejeune". (I'm so jejeune I had to google the def.)
I rather thought my wife and I were the only people around who are perverse enough to enjoy Dexter( but I live in Amish country) My wife is not at all sure she will forgive the writers for killing Rita, even as she admits how unexpected and yet inevitable. I usually have plots figured out fairly well by the time the action takes place. Never saw this coming at all- yet it is brilliantly fitting. Do you suppose Rita will come back and haunt Dexter as Harry does?
No, Dexter lost his family, lost Rita, not because he was getting more socialized and more entrenched in the notion of family but because, with Trinity, he began regressing.
The horror of his complicity will most likely guide all the decisions he makes from this point forward.
No, Dexter lost his family, lost Rita, not because he was getting more socialized and more entrenched in the notion of family but because, with Trinity, he began regressing.
The horror of his complicity will most likely guide all the decisions he makes from this point forward.
But this episode had some big holes in the writing. How, for example, did Dexter come upon Arthur on that dark road so suddenly? Was he hiding in the back seat of a convertible for six hours? Was he following Arthur on those empty roads, undetected and with his headlights off, for six hours? Did Scotty beam him down? Ridiculous.
Then, we're to believe Arthur dropped by Dexter's house after picking up his freshly-painted car, found Rita at home, did her in (although the order was all wrong, since he hadn't killed a little boy), but didn't think to mention this -- even obliquely to Dexter, just to get the last laugh?
No, these logical holes in the script are the problem, not the fake blood.
I haven't read the Salon.com piece against the ending but morally I guess the lesson is if you live a life accidentally killing innocent people on occasion, karma will bite you on the ass and another little Dexter may be born in the aftermath. I thought it was a picture perfect ending in that it wasn't the dreaded "cliffhanger" but it left you thinking, "what now for Dexter and the kids?"
Ahhh the kids. That's what is important for them to work into the plot of next season. Will Dexter be a loving father or continue his serial killing ways? I think we know the answer.
RATED
Re: tomreedtoon, it's really rich to be scolded by someone who has shown themselves to be one of the most misanthropic, angry, and mean-spirited people on Salon.
Season 1: Dexter's brother, the "ice truck killer" tries to kill his sister.
Season 2: Dexter's friend Lila seeks to kill Rita's children.
Season 3: Dexter's friend Miguel tries to kill LaGuerta.
Season 4: Dexter's "friend" Arthur kills Rita.
Dexter is not only a killer, but is also a magnet, drawing in other killers, and putting his loved ones in danger. Perhaps Dexter will start to reflect on this in season 5.
As a writer and someone who works in film, I understand manipulating characters to get a story across. For television, it's a little different. Film and books are a done deal by the time the audience sees them, but in television, most writers write as a reaction to the audience and to manipulate their viewers.
R