DECEMBER 4, 2009 9:12AM

Too hot to handle? Censorship at Huffington Post!

Rate: 1 Flag

 

Two days ago, I left a comment on The Huffington Post website about the article titled "ClimateGate: The 6 Most Dubious Claims About The Supposed "Global Warming Hoax." My comment basically consisted of a single sentence referring to a post I wrote on this subject a week ago:
 
Global Warming: A 'figure' is worth 1,000 words

Soon after I posted my comment, another HP reader left a comment for me saying nice things about my post and giving a link to the original report where I'd gotten some of my information.

As expected, my (simple) comment attracted a lot of attention. That's always a good thing, especially when it comes to these kinds of topics, except that when I looked for my comment three hours later, it was gone. So was the one in reply to it with the link to the report.

Apparently, for people who think global warming is a hoax, polite comments linking to official research on the subject is considered website abuse. Interestingly, all the rest of the comments were still untouched.

If you're interested, you can try to track down the comment I posted:

When did polite discussion of an important topic such as climate change become abusive?

Does it warrant censorship?

Have we as a society fallen so low that we can't even have debates anymore?

In short, this was pretty pathetic.

 

joomla site stats

 

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
HuffPo has always been highly capricious in deleting comments. That's why I don't comment there anymore.
Thanks Harry. Indeed, HoffPost screens their comments. In this case, the comments (mine and this other guy) were flagged as inappropriate or abusive. Weird...
HuffPo is a notoriously uptight, restrictive site, for claiming to be so progressive. Like Harry, that's one of the reasons I don't post there anymore
Placebostudman: Thanks for dropping by. If it happens again, I may also stop commenting.
The only place that I comment on HuffPo any more is on Tim Giago's posts and even then I don't always comment publicly. Tim's a sweetheart and there are occasions when my comments need to be private so I just email them to him.
MrsRaptor: Thank you! I'll check Tim Giago's columns/articles.
Kanuk... Tim's articles are *always* related to Native Americans in some way and usually informative.
Thanks again MrsRaptor! Looking forward to reading his material.
yeah, huffpost comment police s*ck. hence, many have discovered open salon and moved here. geez and huffpost has no info on how to write for their site. lame, man. huffington is just as much as an elitist as those she purports to challenge.
vnz: Thanks for your comment. I forgot to reply earlier (given my latest post). I believe other people actually run or manage her website. I still like to listen to her when she goes on Bill Maher for instance, but I see your viewpoint.
SO I was just banned from the HP after sending an email to ask about my comments being censored. WIthout explanation or warning, the next thing I knew was, I was banned and all my messages were erased.
Here is my blogpost about it: http://theradicalsecularist.com/?p=294
HuffPost hates criticism of religion above all else.

Just look at the section they devote to one nauseating apologetic after another. Unless you are enamoured with faith in some postmodern, truth-is-whatever-you-say-it-is fashion, you have a low probability of getting criticism posted.
I made a comment that Eric Cantor told JTA some in the GOP wanted to change Israel's foreign aid to the defense budget to avoid any cuts. This was reported on the JTA, Jewish Telegraphic Agency, a non-profit news organization. I gave their website where this information could be found. My comment didn't even get on. People who are not editors should not be making editorial decisions.
In my latest experience at the Huffpost they censored not only biblical scripture quotes, but would not allow even the references where other could read them for themselves to be listed. Obviously the huffers think the Bible unsuitable as part of a discussion.