In a speech given over the weekend to a sold-out crowd in Calgary, Sarah Palin admitted that she and her family used to take advantage of the Universal health system in Canada (which is officially illegal, if she, as a US citizen living in the States used a Canadian health care card). As discussed in a Globe and Mail article yesterday:
The vocal opponent of health-care reform in the U.S. steered largely clear of the topic except to reveal a tidbit about her life growing up not far from Whitehorse.
"We used to hustle over the border for health care we received in Canada," she said. "And I think now, isn't that ironic?"
Remember that our dear friend Sarah was the one who claimed that the health care system in Canada has 'death panels' to determine, apparently, who gets health care and who doesn't. And yet she and her larcenist family (unless they paid for it which I personally doubt, otherwise why not get it locally?) were able to 'hustle over the border' whenever they wanted. Talk about biting the hand that feeds you.
And no, in case you're wondering, there have never been 'death panels' in Canada. If you need care; you get it.
For those interested, my latest (serious) post on this topic can be found here:
The case against the U.S. health care system


Salon.com
Comments
STILL.........
As for the death panels, on more than one occasion I've felt the need to mention the case of my late husband who, diagnosed with terminal cancer at age 88, was immediately lined up for chemo. When he declined, the system got him set up with palliative visits and ultimately (tho he died beforehand) palliative placement.
IMO, even if the Canadian health care was closer, the fact that the family used it multiple times shows that it was good enough to come back (for more).
Anyway, thanks again, I really enjoyed reading.
Stephanie
But: There seems to be an assumption among most Americans commenting on this story on Open Salon and at Daily Kos that Palin was fraudulently obtaining free health care in Canada. Nothing in her statement caused this Canadian to even consider that possibility. I don't know if it's rooted in an American superiority complex found even among liberals, the assumption that there could be no good reason to get health care in Canada except for the fact that it's free. Actually, it's probably more rooted in ignorance about the health care systems in Canada and the assumption that we have a "national system" administered by the federal government.
I lived in Washington State for four years and after returning to my native Ontario I had to wait three months before I was entitled to coverage by OHIP (the Ontario Health Insurance Program run by the province). During that time I, luckily, had private insurance paid for by my employer. (Such private insurance for basic medical care is not a common thing here, just geared toward visitors and new residents.) During those first three months, I had to visit a hospital ER. I had to pay the costs myself, directly - a couple hundred dollars. It was amusing to watch the one person in the hospital's payment office dig around to find the credit card machine. Then I had to submit the receipts to the private insurance company and I got reimbursed by them later.
So, sure, it's possible that there was some fraud going with Palin, but the mere fact that she want to Canada for medical care is no indication of that. Such cross-border travel for health care happens fairly often in the Canadian and American west and north, where there are small settlements in the middle of nowhere. If the nearest city or town with a full hospital is on the other side of the border, it is normal for people from very small places on the other side to go there for care, and this traffic happens both ways, and it has nothing to do with the benefits or drawbacks of either the American or Canadian systems.
Even in non-remote places, this happens. Windsor, Ontario is a city with more than one full hospital, but it is just south of Detroit across a river, so many Windsor-area people will be sent to the Detroit hospital for very specialized, technical care. And London, Ontario has university/teaching/research hospitals doing groundbreaking work in some areas, some involving pediatric procedures, so it's not unusual to hear about children from the US being sent to a London hospital for specialized, innovative treatment for a rare condition.
Of course, such cross-border medical visits are only cited in the American health care debate if they are in the Canada --> USA direction.
More info: I had to visit the ER again recently, now having OHIP coverage. I showed my Ontario Health Card (very much like a driver's licence) to the triage/admitting nurse and other than that, there was no paperwork or anything related to insurance that I had to discuss. After I'd seen an ER doctor, I just walked out. I never got a receipt/invoice or saw the bill. Why would I?
And congratulations on getting "Editor's Pick" status!
Luluand: Thanks to you too!
The Spaulding Twins: Agreed. This should not change people's mind.
ben: very good point. I talked extensively on this and other topics on health care in previous posts.
Just watch- if Sarah Palin says national healthcare is OK, then her moron followers will suddenly proclaim it's OK. Just like the windfall tax on oil companies suddenly became a good thing among the know-nothings once it was found out that Gov. Palin instituted it in Alaska.
Oddly enough, the hospital reconsidered. Possibly after firing a fundraiser or two.
Honestly, we don't need Sarah Palin or any of her family here...we have enough morons to go around already.
The only drawback I see with the United States adopting a Canadian style health care system is the expenditure: Canada (for obvious reasons!) doesn't have the same kind of bloated defense budget the U.S. has, and can afford to provide for its people.
My friend Sterling Portier (a black vegetarian who died of AIDS at the end of 1995) commented in early 1991 that there were flaws in the Canadian system, and he seemed skeptical of the Left adopting it as an economic model.
But hey, if it's good enough for Sarah Palin, it should be good enough for the rest of America, right?
Maybe Palin's words will convince the rest of her party to heed the President's call for bipartisanship on this issue; especially since we (Dems) lost a filibuster-proof majority in Congress.
The systems in Canada definitely have their flaws. However, expenditures is not a reason why it wouldn't work in the US. Total health care spending in Canada by all levels of government plus by employers, insurance companies, and by individuals is less per capita than total spending in the US. If the US were to adopt a Canadian-style system wholesale, the US government and people would save a significant amount of money.
Of course, I realize that starting from scratch and adopting such a system wholesale in the States is not practically politically feasible.
http://www.cbc.ca/politics/story/2010/03/08/palin-canada-health.html#ixzz0he7jtNtA
Here's a thought: Instead of dragging your bloated, infected, gun-toting asses across the Canadian border to steal our socialized health care, how about a few less trips to McDonald's instead, EH?
Myriad: Thank you for the link. I guess we’ll see where this story is going. Given the uproar, she may decide to change her narrative. This reminds me of Brock Lesnar, the former WWE wrestler and current UFC heavy weight champion, who recently compared the Canadian health care system to those from Third World countries because of a bad experience in a Manitoba’s hospital. When asked which one, he refused to say where it happened. This was a cheap shot in my humble opinion.
Narconon
So, sure, it's accessible that there was some artifice traveling with Palin, but the simple actuality that she wish to Canada for medical affliction is no adumbration of that. Such cross-border biking for bloom affliction happens adequately generally in the Canadian and American west and north, area there are baby settlements in the average of nowhere. If the abutting city-limits or boondocks with a abounding hospital is on the added ancillary of the border, it is accustomed for humans from actual baby places on the added ancillary to go there for care, and this cartage happens both ways, and it has annihilation to do with the allowances or drawbacks of either the American or Canadian systems.
--------------------------------------------------------------
pulse oximeter :: weight loss solution :: lose weight tips
The alone check I see with the United States adopting a Canadian appearance bloom affliction arrangement is the expenditure: Canada (for accessible reasons!) doesn't accept the aforementioned affectionate of aggrandized aegis account the U.S. has, and can allow to accommodate for its people.
My acquaintance Sterling Portier (a atramentous vegetarian who died of AIDS at the end of 1995) commented in aboriginal 1991 that there were flaws in the Canadian system, and he seemed agnostic of the Left adopting it as an bread-and-butter model.
But hey, if it's acceptable abundant for Sarah Palin, it should be acceptable abundant for the blow of America, right?
Maybe Palin's words will argue the blow of her affair to heed the President's alarm for bipartisanship on this issue; abnormally back we (Dems) absent a filibuster-proof majority in Congress.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Gym Membership Hertfordshire :: Youngblood makeup ::