I Only Cry On Thursdays

JANUARY 13, 2011 4:01PM

Look For The Union Label

Rate: 7 Flag

 

 

There was a time in America when you went to work and were paid.  It was a very simple, fair and uncomplicated system.  Somewhere along the line, something changed in that equation.

 

Around these parts – the big employer for young people is the local outlet mall – chock full of corporate retailers.  This monstrosity spans acres of land with dozens upon dozens of stores.  When my daughters were in high school, they would work there sporadically, and often get a full-time job during the summer.  It’s been a couple of years since either of them has had to go the retail circuit, but at the end of their mall service years, they found that it was impossible to find full-time employment because the big business chains didn’t want to offer benefits or pay some taxes, so they would just hire a busload of part-time help instead.  Additionally, they were being offered positions as “contract employees.”  Contract employees at a mall?  It sounds so important, or maybe more like organized-crime.  But, actually, it’s just another measure to keep more money in the hands of the corporations.  For me, the most bewildering part was that for the first time I was aware of the new normal in the paycheck arena – how they were getting paid every two weeks.  Since that time, they’ve both graduated from college and are on to other employment – but the practice of bi-monthly paychecks continues, no matter where they work.  This has become so standard, that no one even questions it anymore.  And for young people especially, they must assume that this is the way it’s always been.  And, what are you going to do about it anyway, desperate-American-worker-with-no-job-security-whatsoever?  Complain?  I think not, not if you want to still have a job in the morning.

 

It wasn’t always this way though.  I spent years laboring in various jobs, from restaurants  to television to office work.  I was always paid every week.  It makes living paycheck-to-paycheck in an economically unjust society so much easier.  I think so, anyway.

 

My husband is a member of a private union.   He’s not a public employee, but he’s a union man, which is really a kissing cousin to private sector employees.  For thirty years he’s been paid every single week.  I’m not sure if it’s like that across the board, as every union has its own contracts.  Anyway, he also receives benefits like sick leave and paid vacation time.  He earns a living wage (or what passes for one these days).  We have health insurance.  And if it wasn’t for his job security and the benefits he receives, I probably wouldn’t be writing this right now.  Instead we’d be living in a shelter or not have enough money to pay for the internet service we receive, and I’d definitely be a lot edgier than I am, and no one needs that.  I’m fortunate to be in this position, and so are our daughters, and we’re all keenly aware of that fact.  

 

Lately though, there has been a boatload of anti-public service union stories swarming through the media.  They blame the public employees for the budget deficits at the state level, and even President Obama has instituted a salary freeze on federal workers of all stripes, no matter what their pay scale actually is.  Public employees are people like – firefighters, police, teachers, postal and sanitation workers, home health aides, office workers, the people who drive buses and trains and do repairs on the machinery – lots of folks like that.  I’ve personally known a whole bunch of people in many of those categories, and I can vouch for the fact that not a one of them owns a private plane or a vacation home in Aspen or buys their jewelry at Cartier.

 

Naturally, instead of laying the blame for budget deficits where it truly belongs – in the laps of big business and corporations – they want to pit one working-class American against another.  Unions, both public and private, have been under assault from the very beginning, by the very same forces that want to pay their employees every two weeks to save themselves some money.   Who don’t want to ensure worker safety – in mines, oil rigs or factories.  Who don’t want to give employees paid sick leave or vacation time or health care.  They want everything for themselves – to go with their private jets and Aspen chalets.  It’s no more complicated than that.  If you go to work every day, desperate and fearful to keep your underpaid, dangerous job without benefits, well, that’s the employee model they have in mind for everyone outside of their country club circles.

 

Union members are often more fortunate than some in the private sector, because at least for unions there is some measure of job security, safety and decent pay.  Boss Man can’t just fire you at will or without cause or stick your head in a bucket of asbestos and order you to breathe.  Some might argue that this isn’t good.  “Look how few teachers are ever fired,” they exclaim – “And my son, Joey Jr. has one lousy history teacher who is ruining his life.  Teachers!  You can’t get rid of them!  They’re like bed bugs, for crying out loud!”  I’m not suggesting that there aren’t flaws in the union model what with the difficulty inherent in ridding a stupid or troublesome member, but if we’re going to fix systems – then let’s start at the top first.  Let’s address the massive, astronomical corruption in America at the business and political ends, and then we can sit down and talk about the tweaks that would be beneficial where unions of working-class people are concerned.  

 

The fact is, everyone should have the benefits that public and private union workers have.  Truly, if it weren’t for the early days of unionization in America, then almost everyone would be pawns of the big business predatory system that we have now.  But instead, unions – both public and private, have taken a little something away from the masters of the universe, by demanding a decent quality of life.  Honestly, how dare workers want anything for their betterment or that of their families!  Of course, big business doesn’t like this at all.  They like the gigantic income inequality that has become the American way.  But if it weren’t for the sacrifices and struggles of union members going back decades, then we wouldn’t even be looking back at the ‘50s and ‘60s as a time of a more equitable prosperity for the middle-class.  We would’ve been living then what we’re living now – and now we’d all be Bob Cratchit from A Christmas Carol.   

 

Working people of all kinds should be standing together, and demanding the same rights and benefits that the public sector workers have, not vilifying them.  Things are getting nasty out here in regular-people America - states are closing libraries, cutting social services at record speeds, not repairing the roads and infrastructure, laying off city workers.  On the federal level they want to destroy what’s left of the social safety net and give even more benefits and tax breaks to big business and Corporate America.  If we let them set up this false narrative that public sector employees and the unions are the ones to blame for the fiscal ills of the world, thereby destroying the few remaining work-related securities and benefits that they receive, then all of us will soon be reduced to the scene in Oliver – pathetically holding our apportioned bowl of gruel and heading up to our master to beg imploringly, “Please, sir, I want some more.”

  

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
ABSOLUTELY and 100%

We also need to reform the Unions, as many of them have sold-out to the Big Corporations, which has served to Co-Opt labor and make them less potent and effective in national politics.

This is why I LOVE the SEIU. They broke-away from the corrupt AFL-CIO. This is even more important, because of the rise of service jobs in the new, dilapidated, de-industrialized America.
Also agree in this: the perceived inefficiencies and detriments and negative utility that many see as coming from Unions are dwarfed by the inefficiencies, detriments and negative utility coming from Corporate America, their corruption, greed and predatory behavior.

Focusing on the ills of the poor and blue collar is a method the upper-classes engage in, so as to distract us from the ills and corruption of the rich and the well-to-do.

r
Rwoo5g - Yes, I agree. I know the unions need some reform...you should see the president of my husband's union - the man is everything that is wrong with them, all wrapped up into one little package. But still, I think, for the benefit unions do for the few who are lucky enough to be members, that should come on the lower register of what needs to be taken care of.
"they want to pit one working-class American against another."

Unfortunately, that's proving to be an effective strategy.

As a member of a private union, and an employee of a public union, all of this misdirected blame has me quite depressed. No one is getting rich by being a union member.
Rwoo5g - You said it exactly right, as usual.

Jeanette - I know what you mean. The public unions seem to always take the brunt of the attacks, even beyond unions like my husband's. It has always made me so angry and frustrated when other working people will blame the "greedy" unions for some disruption in service or a higher cost on a service(as it was when the MTA workers went on strike a few years back in NY), when it's not them all, but an inequitable system - tax cuts and loopholes for the rich, subsidies, backroom deals etc. I get so sick and tired of seeing working-class people pitted against each other, and people too often falling for it. I don't know any working person in a union who could even laughingly be called rich. And if someone is comfortable or financially secure - then the meme goes - that is supposed to be eliminated for the fairness of all working people - the whole thing is insane. Depressing, yes, I hear you on that for sure.
Unions created the middle class. Before them, employees had few benefits and no protections. Sadly, far too few people know what unions have contributed to all working classes.
Did you see the photo essay in The Guardian about Detroit? Talk about depressing. Once impressive libraries and hotels just abandoned, just so sad. And yes, blame the union workers. Certainly the fact that municipalities are going bankrupt has nothing to do with the billions being shoveled at Afghanistan and Iraq, and the billions withheld by corporations who do business in North America but give absolutely nothing back. I have a skilled job where I get paid twice monthly. It makes life very difficult. My ex works for the USPS and gets paid every 2 weeks, which I used to when I worked for a smaller company that got eaten by this larger one, and life was easier. My daughter has a union job and gets paid weekly, making life easier still. My ex years ago, about 15 years or so, called his supervisor a lying sack of shit to his face. He still has his job. I once told my supervisor in a group email that I wish we had a faster transcription program (we get paid by production) and was fired. So yes unions need some reform, but working people are the backbone of America, and we are suffering, and so is this country.
Fay - Yes, absolutely! The stories of unions and the workers that died to achieve some measure of economic justice for themselves and their families as well as all of those who came later - is not really told any longer. Unions are an easy target for the big corporations and government who would love to destroy them it seems - as they're the only voice left for workers - but the voice is growing quite dim.

latethink - Boy, oh, boy - in your comment you just about summarized everything that it took me about 1,200 words to say - wonderful! Your personal story is testament to what I'm saying. Absolutely none of our fiscal problems have been caused by unions or their members. If anyone in government were serious about budget deficits they would, as you say, end these monstrously expensive wars, raise taxes on the rich and close other tax loopholes, as well as stop allowing jobs to be sent overseas and then rewarding those who do it. Our "overlords" won't be satisified until every man and woman is a low wage earning debtor. That's sure how it feels to me, at any rate.
Absolutely right, Kate! It's thoroughly disgusting. It's pretty much the same here in Canada, too. In fact, I have never paid once a week. Many moons ago, when I worked in retail and restaurants, I was paid every two weeks, but ever since I've had "real" work as a teacher or a librarian, I've been paid only once a month! And not just in Canada, but also in Germany, Kuwait, The Bahamas, Colombia. When your salary is already low to begin with and you're being taxed up to 42% of your salary, as in Germany, it is very difficult to get through the month. Still, in Germany, one actually benefits from the money paid into the system and one lives a life of dignity.
The late great Howard Zinn would approve this piece....as do I.
Stellaa - Thanks - and that makes two of us!

lizw9 - I hear you loud and clear. As you say, in some other countries, at least the underpaid, struggling working-class gets something for their taxes...but, still - to get paid once a month!! Unbelievable - yet horribly believable all at the same time.

mr. Fawkes - Thank you. I mourn the loss of Howard Zinn - and am reminded of that loss constantly. But at least he left a great legacy of truth - for those of us who want to know and understand. He should be required reading - unfortunately, in the U.S. - illusion is too often preferred over fact. Thanks again.
I have this vision of you standing on your desk holding up a little sign that says: UNION.!! Great read. Keep writing it, my friend..
r
Barb
I couldn't have put it better myself. As a member of a public employees union (NJ Firefighters Mutual Benevolent Association) in NJ) I have watched our current governor blame public employee unions for current budget crisis. He has tried to turn the public against us and has had some success in that area. The print media has supported him because they see unions as the cause of their economic woes. I don't get it. Why don't people focus on fixing what's wrong with non-union jobs and not breaking what's right with union jobs?
Shawn - I love the way you said, "Fixing what's wrong with non-union jobs and not breaking what's right with union jobs." That's really it in one sentence. I don't understand people turning on the unions either...it doesn't make any sense at all. "Let's see who should I blame for the lousy economic conditions... Oh, sure...I'll blame my neighbor...he/she's a working stiff like me?" And my condolences on having Christie as a governor.
the problem is, relying on unions doesn't work: here we are.

america needs democracy, but will not get it. american education and media conditioning have forged steel tracks in the head, and some stories don't have happy endings.
Al - I hear you...but I do sort of equate unions with a sound, more equitable democracy. As for happy endings...you're probably right, but time will tell for sure. Thanks for the comment and rate.
Nice story. Good values.
Dan - Thank you! Very nice of you to say!