There’s really no hope for this country, I fear. If there is, it certainly won’t be in my lifetime. And why do I say this, you might ask? Well, actually, no one asked, but I’m going to answer anyway. It’s because you can never, ever underestimate the collective stupidity of the American public.
We just had the most dispiriting Presidential debate in the history of so-called political discourse. Two candidates who are so closely aligned on nearly every single policy issue that they’re probably soul mates. One is a congenital liar who wears magic underwear and the other one looked bored, annoyed and like a human punching bag. Despite the media’s fondness for politics as entertainment, any fool could see that neither of those clowns up there really won on style, substance, congeniality or the evening gown competition. But, of course, someone had to win. The public demands it. And the winner was Romney.
So a week later, a Gallup poll comes out and finds that Mitt has overtaken Obama in the polls – or at least he tightened the race up quite a bit. And thus, the proverbial lemmings - that constitute the largest portion of the voting population - just move along with the tide. But then again, that’s pretty much what the entire presidential election has become. Obama gives a convincing speech – “He’s on my side. I’ll vote for him.” Romney gives a debate performance of some dubious quality - “What a man – I’m for him!” And so they react to the latest mindless stimuli.
But what causes me even more resigned despair are the people that really believe in either of these guys. And the problem is, there are millions of them. Tens of millions of true believers, ardent supporters, my political party do-or-die. And that boggles my mind. Voting against their best interests. Ignorant of what’s really going on inside the carnival of lights and costumes. People, who sometimes know just enough to justify their position and will fight tooth and nail to defend it, but miss the big picture. They’ve got one jigsaw puzzle piece in their hand, and they are sure they see Versailles. And their candidate is the best – and he’s going to win, by gum.
I’ve heard progressive Democratic or liberal people say, “I’d love to vote for a third party candidate, but until they have a real chance of winning, I have to vote for Obama.” And this makes me nuts. Who are you waiting for to make it a viable possibility? If all of the voters who have been let down by this corrupt system voted for Jill Stein or Rocky Anderson (or even Ron Paul) – it would move the goalposts – would change the direction of the Democratic party at least – or it might even finally elect a worthy candidate. But instead of doing that, they wait for someone else to magically make it happen. They don’t give their money to the Green or the Justice Parties – they give it to the Democratic Party. They vote for them, canvas for them, get out the vote for them and leave it to another election, another decade, another century for anything better to even possibly take place. If they can’t win (despite the obvious superiority of their policies and positions), they won’t vote for them, it’s as simple as that.
It’s the new boss, same as the old boss – but at least he’s a winner. The third party candidates, despite being quite often, moral, decent people who are not bought and paid for unlike our current choices, are tossed aside as losers. It doesn’t have to be this way, but it is, because people want the simple, quick, “efficient” solution. And, they want a simple winner that doesn’t require them to think too much, or do too much, or go out of their way too much.
It’s the same thing everywhere you look.
Walmart’s, McDonald’s, Bank of America – all these corporate players – people won’t lift a finger to move their money, shop at a local store instead of a big-box one, eat healthier – because it’s too much trouble or inconvenient for them. So, they keep the corporations afloat that ruin lives and health and dictate regulations and policy to their political puppets. And the people – the struggling, the poor, the marginalized, the working classes – keep making excuses for why they’re helping keep this wretched, self-defeating system afloat – without lifting a finger to actually change things or make a discernible difference. Or, they just keep raging against the machine that they’re helping to keep permanently in place.
You can’t get a majority of people to go along with anything except collective obedience, blind allegiance and unrelenting conformity. But, at least they’ll have backed a winner. Only problem is, the losers are all of us.


Salon.com
Comments
Lezlie
We want humanity to be better - yes - but shall we suffer the errors of those fools that presume themselves to be our betters? We each have been given enough rope to get the job done - and then had it taken away from us just as calves, chicks, lambs, and piglets are taken away from their mothers too. Our bond with the natural is broken as early as possible in order to teach us how to properly suffer our existence away. How to sit - when to speak, where to go home to. While that conditioning remains critical to perpetuating the status quo, breaking through it is the only way to stop suffering.
There is no profit to be made from teaching people how to be free of want, and it is not easy to keep ones mind free. But we do not need to suffer - we can discuss cultural constructs - but first we must train ourselves to live outside of them. We have been given much, and had it taken away from us. It is our job to take back our souls from the combine that has stacked our flesh like bails of hay.
Being angry at a machine is pointless. Learning how the machine works is dangerous but survivable. But there are so much better places to place ones self than at the mercy of a sick culture. I am one person who believes we luck just to be alive, and that doing no harm to our place and people is our highest calling. When I find myslef getting sucked into the want - as in wanting to fix this fucking mess - I know that I am in trouble. Because I know that the only way the machine can be beat is if we all stop wanting. It is too late to walk away. Culture has invaded every aspect of our reality - the only space we have left is between our ears - and if we stop working in that space we are just as bad as the deciders and warmongers who need to dominate that space inorder to keep the machine running.
dennis loo has a good essay about obamas real face & good cop vs bad cop. stuff Ive been sayin for years.
I voted for perot the only time I ever voted.
the sheeple have been herded very effectively.... by the wolves....
I saw a commenter on another site saying he hopes Romney wins because it will wake people up. It's based on the premise that if the American people really voted with their heart, a truly leftist candidate would win. I think it's utter BS and I see no evidence to support that. To me, it appears to be an arrogance and self-righteousness on the part of some on the left.
The fact is either Obama or Romney will be the next President. This is not like shopping for a car, when you can say "I'm not buying one now because I don't like any of the models." I have to decide based on who will have the greater impact over the next 4-8 years. I don't buy the argument that there's no difference between the candidates. There are too many similarities for comfort, and in some areas, including many economic issues, the difference is minor. But I see a gulf between them on social issues. When I think about the disgraceful Citizens United ruling by the Supreme Court, I realize that if Al Gore had been elected, we would have had different justices who have rejected that ruling. So while I respect your thoughts on the matter, I vehemently disagree.
Unfortunately, they are Americans. A very smart analysis and a powerful rally, I like your politics and thought process...God, I miss logic. R
If the price for a vote for a third party is a result that screws up the country as badly as George Bush did, it still isn't worth it. If the thirt party wants to get somewhere, let them take all their resources and start with a local or state election or two and begin to build from the ground up rather than trying to start at the top. Yes, I like Jill Stein, better than I like Nader, but there's no way in Hell she wins, and I'm more interested in saving my country than in making a statement.
I think part of the attraction of being a 3rd party participant is the presumed righteousness purity of belief and seeing The Big Picture brings. Of course, seeing The Big Picture never includes seeing it well enough to know how to influence it, but those damn lemmings are to blame for jumping off the wrong cliff.
The Powers That Be might not want more than 2 parties, but they're not to blame for 3rd party failure anymore than are The Lemmings. Fringe political parties are fringe because they can't attract enough members, usually because The Purity of Belief has too many too-complex issues that don't motivate voters. Or they harp on one issue to much to be considered capable of governing in a sufficiently comprehensive sense.
I am sympathetic with you in general, but unless and until a 3rd party or other movement realizes the problem is more along the lines of changing their approach and positions, not the impossible task of changing The Lemmings, they are every bit as irrelevant as anything or anybody can be.
Being politically righteous lends no claim to moral high ground, because with no political appeal it's just a more stylized way to be ineffectual. You're in no position to criticize The Lemmings, but you're free to complain about The System, for what it's worth, politically speaking.
But vote for whomever you wish, I'll not complain.
The last 3rd party candidate to do well was Ross Perot largely because he was self funded and was allowed to participate in the debates. Now we have a corporate controlled debate commission that doesn't allow 3rd parties, no matter how popular they are. The system is rigged.
Excuses, excuses.
It doesn't take a billion to get noticed or TPTB graciously offering airtime to fringe candidates. When 3rd party candidates have gotten airtime it was because they had enough followers and today that can be done more easily and cheaply than ever.
Instead of making The Great Conspiracy Against The Good part of the litany of complaints platform, try getting enough followers. If you can't, it's not The Lemmings fault, or the TPTB, it's your own failure.
3rd parties always think that because they have a Better Way, it should prevail in spite of not having popular appeal. Read the Green platform, or the Libertarian. They're so enamored of their ability to think they devise a position on everything and so get nothing accomplished. The People are hungry for change, but in and on their terms. You lead a horse to the barn one handful of hay at a time, but the 3rd party dumps a bale and when the horse is disinterested, they blame the horse, blame TPTB, blame anything and anyone but themselves. After all, they represent righteousness--it can't be their fault.
Been hearing to this 3rd party whining for years. It's the only thing most hear because The New Ideas For Everything and the Purity Of It All requirement are always more than people will pay attention to.
OWS is a great microcosmic example of how 3rd parties fail. It began with a simple message, and soon had to include the issues of everyone sitting around the campfire. It became bloated and incomprehensible, therefore incoherent and collapsed under its own weight.
3rd parties are mostly for people who like to bitch endlessly and get nothing accomplished...but endless bitching. I don't mind that, but they're in no position to criticize anyone, for reasons previously stated.
Fist bump to Alaska and Thoth
As soon as people stop accepting this pathetic lie then we can take steps in the right direction assuming we also make sure the votes are counted and the issues are addressed etc.
I thank Tom Cordle for introducing a concept he calls "pyrrhicism," which is to say thinking a Pyrrhic victory is somehow noble. It's not, it just means you don't get what you worked for.
There is nothing stopping any third party from expending a whole lot of resources in a couple of state races and putting a few people into Congress. Starting with the Presidency is not a sensible formula with limited resources. Expecting the public to figure out the value of issue stands is currently unreasonable because a good half of them can't accomplish that even within the two party system. And that's not because they think neither makes more sense than the other.
I've forgotten more than you'll ever know about politics and I come from a family that has done more to advance left causes than you or I will ever accomplish. Real activism and real change, not a society of endless complaint.
OWS started with a simple message that resonated with a majority of Americans, but no scheme for advancing that message. Then people such as yourself -- the leftist clique full of Great Truths about The Problem -- loaded it up with their Laundry List of Laments and turned OWS into a subsidiary of the left's ineffective Outrage Industry. Bloated by causes upon causes and stripped of a simple message, OWS performed some street theater and then the show closed.
You're just another middling leftie fanatic, just as full of victimhood as the raging righties and just as clueless about the realities of the American political landscape. So you, along with the Libertarians, Greens and et and al, exchange news of the Great Oppression, soak in self righteousness and lash out at The Lemmings who won't commit to the Cloistered Clique of Constant Complaint.
Until those complaints include some introspective examination of why you don't have any popular appeal and the realization it's you, not The People who must adjust, you guys will never change shit, so what's your point?
The funniest thing about your self-inflicted stigmata is it leads you to lash out at people within the proximity of your viewpoint, as if Purifying them will compensate for your tragically inadequate political abilities.