Hotdishing

Kate Mohler

Kate Mohler
Location
Chandler, Arizona, USA
Birthday
May 03
Title
English Instructor
Company
Mesa Community College
Bio
I'm from Minnesota, but have lived in Wisconsin, UP Michigan, Pennsylvania, Washington State, and Alaska. Now Arizona is home. I have a B.A. in English from Bemidji State University in Minnesota (um...go Beavers!) and an M.F.A. in creative writing (Arizona State, '94). I teach English at Mesa Community College in Arizona. Besides teaching, I write, read, bond with my cats Sara and Lucy and Leo, listen to music, tackle home projects, and travel when I can. Love a good roadtrip, but always looking for a reason to fly away. I am about to purchase my first camping equipment.

MY RECENT POSTS

Kate Mohler's Links

Salon.com
Editor’s Pick
JUNE 25, 2012 8:23AM

Sad and Dusky

Rate: 6 Flag


Now that Sandusky has been arrested, charged and convicted for the crimes he committed—and since it took so long to play out in the media, with Paterno now gone as well—I wonder how many of us still sit back and say, “Great, another evil man ended," put away like another bad memory, as if everything will now get better.

I never looked at Sandusky like he was an evil man: never met him, never met his wife, never met his victims. While I sautéed mushrooms and onions in the background, I listened on the evening news as Sandusky’s life closed down around him, his choices regarding boys and the cracking of their backs and then “their turns” all pattering like black rain against the windows of my house.

There was no joy, for me, to see Sandusky caught and sent to prison. Gladness to see him removed from harming boys again, but no joy.

I hear the name “Sandusky” and see his picture on TV, and it’s like looking into any man’s face.

I was not molested as a child, if you discount the neighbor boy who trapped me in the wood shed for ten minutes when I was five and he was twelve. He was just curious. I had a responsible feeling about it at the time: I knew it would be bad to make trouble because my grandparents were visiting, and we wanted everything nice at the house.

A little fondling in the dog shed shouldn’t matter so much. And it didn’t, to me.

I was eight or nine years old when I found out that one of my older sisters had been trapped in our Catholic school gym by a gang of boys, her shirt hiked up, her pants pushed down. I immediately realized the cruelty of that act. Teachers should have been more attentive.

My sister didn’t stay at Our Catholic, quickly transferring over to Our Public. The boys would stay at Catholic and would graduate from there, most of them anyway. My previously sunny sister would get one year’s respite, until they got her again at the public school the next year.

Ideas grew as I too grew, from eight to twelve to a teenager whose older siblings knew more than I did, just because they were older than I was. Stories came out about other girls in my family who had been compromised.

My first reaction was to track down the compromisers and shoot them, but they were all ghosts by then. My second reaction was to comfort anybody who needed it, and nobody seemed to want it anymore.

Years went by and I was called to jury duty in Phoenix, Arizona. I got to the courthouse on time, watched the Barbara Walters special on overhead monitors, ate my orange, then followed the crowd when our number was called until we reached an upstairs courtroom.

I gathered my knitting.

I had gone in against my will, and would have left happily at any time. I was 28, and there was an accused child molester on trial, a Mexican who didn't speak English. I didn’t know exactly what he’d done, but I knew he should be able to get some kind of a fair trial here, not that I wanted to be part of it. I’d been learning some dodge and escape rules from my formal training in rhetoric in graduate school, so I stood up—alone, one out of maybe fifty people sitting in my section—when the prosecutor asked if there was anyone who might not be able to serve for any reason.

I stood up and said in the gallery, more like a tiered movie theater: “I can’t be on the jury because I think attraction to children is a mental glitch, not a crime. I think he needs help, not prison time.”

I was quickly dismissed from any civic service in Maricopa County after that, and have never been called since. I went back to living my normal life, with a speeding ticket or two.

***

When I was 20 or 21, if 19 matters anymore, I finally reached the legal drinking age in Minnesota. I was in college at the time—in the same small town I’d grown up in—and another kid took me aside to say, “Hey, the bartender was abused by a priest when he was a kid, and he’s in a lawsuit, so like, don't say anything.”

Many years later, when I owned my own DVD player and had a mail-order subscription to DVD’s, I got the one called Deliver Us From Evil…the one where the candid priest talks about abusing all the kids he did. I watched, fixated.

I wondered how all of that could happen without parents noticing.

I sent it back to Netflix with one raised eyebrow.

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
A refreshing take on all this nonsense, Kate.
"A little fondling in the dog shed shouldn’t matter so much.
And it didn’t, to me."
Kids are much more sexually precocious than we realize,
although we should have listened to Freud.
We have organs whose main purpose is
to deliver pleasure. That is a fact.
What that "pleasure" is for, how we rationalize it in our heads,
how we pursue avenues not allowed,
in either thought (for we all have)
or action (here is where it is a 'crime')
is a mystery.

this indeed will get you kicked off the "island" , to use
"survivor" terminology:
"I can’t be on the jury because I think attraction to children is a mental glitch, not a crime. I think he needs help, not prison time.”

I agree. there ought to be facilities to treat such people.
They tell me: most will go back to it.
I say: that is because we don't know enough about it to treat it,
but we better damn soon....
child molestation cases clog up my hometown newpaper,
be they high & mighty (the church)
or low & mean , on the streets, or the hovels
desperate people live in, above the streets..
congrats on editor's pick.

and let me clarify, bec you might, just might, have lit a fire here...
we shall see...

re. children's sexuality..we have pleasure as kids.
through alot of things.
first: the mouth.
then: the anus.
then:the genitals.
then:????

this pleasure in no way justifies abuse of it...
children need to be taught pleasure is a-ok, but sometimes,
bad people might want to make you feel good
when you have no desire to feel good
at that moment, and this is a
very bad thing.

to ignore childhood sexuality is to fuck up the whole agenda, i think.
It's amazing to hear all the faux condemnation of Sandusky's abuses while at the same time wishing abuse for him, to have the other inmates "take care of him", etc. Just as many monsters in every day life as in jail. First remove the abuse from your own heart before speaking or it's yourself you condemn.
Ms. Mohler, you've only faced rape from a distance. Your article never said that it happened to you. I'd also guess you've never been bullied in junior high or high school. If you had, you would have known far more than the humiliation and violation. You would have known that the bastards almost always get away with it.

In my case, I didn't even bother reporting my abuse. He had two levels of immunity; he was black and he was a football player. Either one would give him a complete pass by the teachers and administration, let alone the police. I didn't even tell my parents.

And all of life is like that. The bastards almost always win. In this case, a bastard lost. And happily, he belonged to one of the classes that almost abused me but didn't, gym teacher/coach.

We don't get much in this life. About all we get is the occasional chance to see justice done. In this case, it was, and if Sandusky is raped or killed in prison, perhaps you will mourn for him; I'll take the rare step of drinking a beer, and toasting a rare triumph for blind and crippled Justice.
Congratulations on the EP! And congratulations on a very courageous position--if my reading is correct. Sandusky's crimes are horrific and have caused harm beyond what we can calculate. Our society's outrage is certainly justified, but even as justice is served, there is no happiness here. Nothing will fully mend the injuries of the victims.
Interesting take, but I think one key point is missing: Sandusky knew what he was doing was wrong. H knew of his affliction and instead of bearing the responsibility for getting himself any help, he instead acted upon the behavior he knew was wrong because the man went to great lengths to conceal it. And going a step further, he set up a "charitable" foundation for boys, a guise akin to lambs being led to slaughter. Mental illness aside, he bears full responsibility for the criminal aspects of his behavior by virtue of his own inaction in regard to getting help; society owes him nothing.

That being said, you take a courageous point of view. I agree that little is know about pedophilia and that as a society we bear the collective burden of learning about this and other forms of mental illness. As well, remediation in the form of therapy (though most experts concur that pedophilia cannot be "cured") rather than the one-size-fits all form of simply incarceration is far more beneficial to society at large. After all, a lot of these people get out eventually and return to us.

Congrats on the EP.
R
Enjoyed your post and the comments it drew. I found cheering crowd after the verdict annoying because I share the belief voiced by a mother of a youngster preyed upon in the Sandusky matter that there are no winners here. I would go further to suggest nothing done after the fact can change the destruction imposed and the opportunities for heroic acts squashed by selfish, immature, self-serving narcissistic life patterns expressed by Sandusky and the enablers in this tragedy.

The verdict was a bittersweet triumph of truth and sanity for me
because I live in a county where high profile trials seem too often to have been decided in favor of apparent and abject criminality (Los Angeles) if the accused was popular.

I just hope that more parents and guardians especially of at risk youth such as those seeking help from charities like Second Mile or The Boys Town in Omaha, Nebraska will protect their kids from the Sanduskys of the world. We all need each others help; there is no shame in that human condition. So, no parent ever need feel obligated to sacrifice the innocence of their youngster in exchange for help. In our country everyone has their guaranteed rights regardless of their financial position or any other feature of their life. We are all equal under the law. Perhaps that is the lesson this tragedy is meant to illustrate.
A well thought and written post. Congratulations on the EP.
Rated.
As horrific as the Sandusky's of the world are, I find the true evil in this case and I am sure many others with little or no light shone upon them is the inactions of others close to the scene.
I was always a Paterno fan but, they man had to know on some level. He did is little as he possibly could which is almost more disgusting than doing nothing. His actions were almost to provide cover for himself not protection for the meek and innocent. What kind of environment allows you and those around you to somehow look the other way?
The punishment to all those in this circle should be severe. The list is long and some of the names are prominent. "For evil to truimph,good men do nothing.." When do you stop being a good man who just lacks action and cross over to the dark side?
"I can’t be on the jury because I think attraction to children is a mental glitch, not a crime. I think he needs help, not prison time.”

Having the 'attraction' may be a mental glitch, acting on it is a crime.
Okay. Your post has received an Editor's Pick. I have read it through twice, something I seldom do. And I honestly still don't know what your point is. (Your writing is exemplary; I just don't know the answer to "so what is she saying?")

Was your statement to the judge during voir dire what you actually believe or was it designed to get you out of jury duty? Because Sandusky wasn't charged with "attraction to children." He was charged with rape, among other things.

I also believe he and what seems like thousands of others suffer from some sort of "mental glitch." And I do not think incarceration is in any way effective in 1) rehabiliting Sandusky, 2) unraping and unterrorizing his victims , or 3) making Sandusky understand himself any better. However, what it does do is prevent any further harm by him until we can get a clue about how to therapeutically treat these people.

For you, getting explored by a twelve-year-old in the dog shed at five was no big deal. For someone else, that same experience could have been life-altering. Playing "doctor" is part of childhood for YOUNGER children. A twelve-year-old is sometimes pubescent. I wouldn't necessarily agree that all he was being was curious.

If I am being obtuse and completely missing your point, please tell me that. I never feel joy when someone is convicted of heinous crimes; cheering, for me, is obscene. But justice is justice and we all claim to seek it.

Lezlie