I'm still shaking my head at Serena Williams' dramatic departure from the US Open in a semifinal against Kim Clijsters last night.
The Belgian Clijsters, who is making a powerful return to women's pro tennis after a two-year leave of absence, was up a set and almost to match point when Serena double-faulted on a foot fault, giving Clijsters two match points. Serena then unloaded a string of angry profanities on the line judge, who walked over to the chair umpire. (The AP quotes Williams as apparently having said to the lineswoman, "If I could, I would take this (expletive deleted) ball and shove it down your (expletive deleted) throat." The lineswoman is reported to have said she interpreted it as a threat against her life.) As a result, Williams, the defending US Open champion, was given her second code violation of the match, handing the win to Clijsters, 6-4, 7-5, who didn't even realize what had happened until Serena crossed over the court to shake her hand.
According to multiple news reports this morning, Serena has no regrets.
As Katharine Hepburn famously said: "I don't go in much for regret."
Maybe she doesn't regret it, but I'll bet the stadium it isn't how she wanted to exit this US Open as its defending champion.
UPDATE: I see news sources are reporting that the US Open has decided to fine Serena Williams $10,000 for her outburst and are reviewing whether or not further penalties are appropriate. She was also fined $500 for breaking a racket earlier in the match.
Video below:
Serena Williams loses semifinal match on code violation after foot fault
Close-up video of the confrontation between Serena Williams and the line judge
Eurosport's extended footage of the same, with aftermath of the match between S. Williams and Clijsters
Serena Williams press conference following the semifinal match with Kim Clijsters


Salon.com
Comments
Lea--Exactly.
Bob--All points well taken about the PR missteps and the kind of year she's having. To answer your questions, I'm no good at tennis, but it's one of my favorite sports to follow and watch. A favorite memory of mine is attending the US Open several years ago; I blogged about it peripherally on an earlier entry about the death of Princess Diana ("Such a Death"). I loved being there in the stadium, and always channel that since when I'm watching on television a world away.
It is difficult to tell but her left foot is dangerously close to the line...Generally, a foot fault occurs while bringing the power foot forward. In this case it would have been Serena's right foot...Also, most foot faults occur on the first serve where players are looking to generate as much power off of the power foot/leg as possible. Serena appeared to be just trying to slice the ball into play with no real power or effort...If there was a foot fault it was due to a carelessness mental error...In short she wasn't thinking.....
I believe the chair could have overruled and caused the pointto be played again.....We may never see an analytical video of the "infraction" which causedthe outburst.....No athletic contest should be won or lost in this fashion....Too bad for both Serena AND Clisters.......
Great capture of the pertinent videos, thanks....Rated!
http://open.salon.com/blog/bob_eckstein/2008/08/29/open_salon_at_the_open_a_post_from_the_us_tennis_center
We always planned to go to Wimbledon one day, and ended up doing the US Open instead, which I loved. That was our Wimbledon. . .without the Pimms, the strawberries, and the grass courts. And the royal box. We had a great time.
Thanks for putting the link to your US Open post here. As evidenced on Sally's thread, I'm no good at posting links in comments, so you'll have to give me a lesson.
To include a link, make a post here or on a blog and add a link the regular way. Then copy the hmtl version of it by viewing it in html version (it's a selection when composing a post & erase the post you created just for this sake). Then paste that ugly coding in the comments and it will straighten itself out when it publishes. Try it. Use an earlier post of yours as a test. Good luck.
No excuse Serena, a terrible failure in character.
http://tinyurl.com/r4f4v6
Ron--Thanks, as always, for your kind words. I'd want to see that foot fault again with a better eye, agree that it was a heck of way to go out. I think Kim Clijsters would agree with your line, "No athletic contest should be won or lost in this fashion." Well said.
Bob (again)--As you can see, I'm now resorting to tinyurl to post links in the comments, so here's the link to "Such a Death," tinyurled, if you're interested in reading it:
http://tinyurl.com/lbwsag
But speaking of books and links, I suggest we all buy your book! Please check out Barry's new book fan page!
Thanks, Kathy, for the post.
Can't wait to show him this.
To the rest of you, I'm gratified by all the comments on this thread, and appreciative of them, particularly since there were several other Serena posts that came on Open Salon as they day progressed. It's been fascinating to read the discussion on all those particular threads. I will be interested to see what happens after the US Open officials review the situation.
Serena stands VERY close to the line when she serves. No one forces her to stand this close. She could easily stand back a couple of inches and its unlikely she would ever foot fault.
(by the way, the foot fault called on Serena was NOT on match point. She was serving at 15-30). Serena was defaulted because:
a) she smashed her racket in anger in the first set (twice)
b) she verbally abused a lines person.
This resulted in her losing a point, which happened to be match point.
To defend Serena's actions takes some real blindness. Why is it ok for a very large person to shake their tennis racket in the face of a small woman and say: "if I could, I would stick this F-ing ball down your F-ing throat"... and she did this not once but twice.
In my view, anyone ever making a statement like this at any time is either a person without any sense of decency, or a raging narcissist.
This notion of "everyone makes mistakes" and Serena happened to have hers in front of a camera also is a stretch.
Serena has been a professional appearing in major events for ten years. She has made $25 million and enjoys an incredible lifestyle. The lines person she berated makes about $50 a day and gets a free meal. This is called a person with power using it to intimidate a person who has little or no power. There is no excuse for this behavior.
It is sometimes useful to imagine a different person in a situation to judge how fairly you are perceiving the circumstances. How would you feel if 6'3" Jokivic twice said to this tiny, obviously timid woman: "if I could I would stick this F-ing ball down your F-ing throat".
I'm pretty confident the posters who defend Serena would not be defending Jokivic. And the reason is clear. As McEnroe said, you can't defend the indefensible.
My personal opinion is Serena pulled a Mike Tyson. When Tyson saw he could not beat Evander Holyfield, he bit Holyfield's ear twice. He did this because his ego could not stand being beaten. I believe Serena did the same. Clisters had dominated the match and Serena was being beaten by a woman who had been away from tennis for two years!. Serena (who wore a T-shirt saying: Dynasty has Nasty in it) simply showed her true colors.
I guess Mrs Hyde only surfaces when she's 'at the office' so to speak.
The real victim here was Kim Clijsters , who had an obvious and deserved win tarnished by this obscene outburst.
http://open.salon.com/blog/kressskin/2009/09/13/serena_williams_you_cant_be_serious
It was a foot fault, or it wasn't. I really despise the idea that somebody important gets to break the rules because - I don't know, I guess it is because of the entertainment value of her not losing the point, and the show going on
The only person who argued that "you don't call a foot fault" in a situation like this makes his living on television, where if the match goes on more commercials can be shown, and who got to be on television because he accentuated his skill at tennis by being such a world class jerk - thus disconcerting many of his opponents who learned the game under less ruthless circumstances
It took the women another ten or fifteen years to learn the game - starting with Seles and her grunting, and then the Williams sisters, and the Russians, and now a substantial minority, if not majority, game the system with timeouts to consult with the trainer, grunting/squealing like stuck pigs - it goes on and on.
One great thing about the final this afternoon was NO squealing
1) At that point in the match, a foot fault is not an acceptable call
2) It wasn't actually a foot fault - watch the replay her foot is decidedly behind the line
3) It's a far leap from Serena's statement to serious death threat - especially in that context
By the rules of tennis, she had a reason to be upset. Therefore, it makes little sense that she has become this anti-model for sportsmanship. We tolerate much worse from athletes that have little to no base for their ire. So what gives? Is it that we have a double standard for acceptable behavior in sports that allows men to be brash while women must maintain a cool demeanor? Or is it that Serena Williams and her sister are not conventional and reacting negatively towards them is easier than delving into the reasons why we want them to conform? Or is it simply racism?
And, yes the last question is relevant, not because it is an easy "card" to play. Rather, it is relevant, because there seems to be so much vitriol aimed at her for this and so little aimed at a person like Bobby Knight, John McEnroe and others known for their poor conduct. Let's face it: when we get our knickers in a knot over expletives that we hear on a daily basis, but let a drunk/high celebrity driving the wrong way on the freeway - there is something wrong. Get your priorities straight, and leave her alone.
Rated
I see the call of a "foot fault" as being called by someone who "needed' to be noticed, etc.
I played and replayed that serve many many times and, NEVER was I able to ascertain an actual violation.
I do believe that the phantom call SHOULD have been overruled by the chair.
Unfortunately, Serena's outburst prohibited the proper sequence to be followed as, it changed the focus from the WRONG CALL to her outburst.
My opinions are ALWAYS ignored here and NEVER replied to however, I will STILL give it as follows;
Had something like this occurred in a golf tournament, it would have been handled in an atmosphere of decency and WITHOUT rancor.
There are many many situations during a PGA/LPGA event which call for rulings.
An official is called over and there is a discussion.
Many times, the golfer him/herself will call attention to his/her own violation.
The majority of the time, an incident during a tennis match is handled without rancor.
THIS was NOT one of those times.
Serena's own outburst prevented a discussion of the call.
THAT was too bad.
I find her name to be somewhat comical and anathema to her cunduct in this instance as, she was anything but serene.
I feel for Kim Clijsters as, she is so proffesional and a decent person.
The interviewer didn't do much if anything to alleviate her discomfrt after the event either.
The final ended as I expected it to end however, I would have enjoyed Caroline giving her a harder time of it.
Two decent people though.
Well, I've wasted YOUR space and time her butt, it was enjoyable being the only one who will read what I had to say.
I'm going fishing to day and golfing tomorrow.
There will be NO outbursts other than at myself for a bad shot.