
Leonardo DiCaprio explains the architecture of dreams to Ellen Page on the streets of Paris.
It's nearly impossible to review Leonardo DiCaprio's latest film, 'Inception,' without spoiling it, and once spoiled, it will be nearly impossible to watch it, so I won't do that here.
I will instead take you on a journey, a journey through the landscape of the multi-layered dream that is the film.
The premise of the film, directed by Christopher Nolan of 'Memento' and 'The Dark Knight,' is entirely built on dreams--the landscape of dreams, the mechanics of dreams, the layers of dreams, the reasons for dreams--and distinguishing places in our subconscious from places in reality. To that extent, I found it fascinating--the architecture of a dream, how we create worlds of our own snatched from memories of real people, real events, add our own characters, our own plot, our own dramatic chase scenes, and then, hopefully and in most cases, awaken to realize it was, indeed, all a dream.
DiCaprio's protagonist, Cobb, is apparently something of a specialist in dreams, and shows us layers of dreams within dreams, the premise being that one can insert themself into the dreams of others either to extract information or to plant it. The supporting characters join in his dreams to achieve the difficult goal of planting an idea in another character's brain, known as 'inception.' To do this, we journey with them through several layers of shared dreams, beaches and frozen mountaintops, skyscrapers and streets, children playing, cars crashing.
Important in the plot is the notion of 'the kick,' the concept that someone can come out of the dream with a sudden jolt, falling backward, for example, as well as the concept of using sedation to facilitate certain types of dreaming.
Anyone watching the film who's had vivid dreaming in their life will relate to the dreamscapes, the alternate realities, the chase scenes, the fear of impending death, the sudden jolts, and ponder anew how much of their own dreaming is based on memories of real events, people and places, and how much is manufactured by a creative brain.
For some, there are certain landscapes that continue to appear in dreams that appear nowhere in reality, places we've built ourselves over time which become familiar to us, but only in dreams, and when we're awake, we marvel that we've gone to the same place again and again.
Cobb sees family members in these dreams, a wife who is apparently dead, and two young children who long for their father's return from wherever he happens to be (alternately in the film locations like Paris, Tokyo and Mombasa). He is tortured by the memory of his wife, played by Marion Cotillard, and counseled by a loving father, Michael Caine. Ken Watanabe and Juno's Ellen Page play important supporting roles alongside DiCaprio's Cobb as he journeys through several layers of dreams.
You'll need to understand the importance of water, sedatives, the kick, the relationship between a father and a son, flying, falling, shared memories and a rescue.
It's fascinating to me that this is Leo's second foray in a row into the land of uncertain reality. Whereas in 'Shutter Island' he was stuck in a place of questionable sanity, in 'Inception' he is trapped in a place of questionable existence. Whether there's someone in Hollywood who's just decreed Leo's the man for such films, I don't know, but he did both convincingly, and I was satisfied, and amused with the nod to 'Titanic' in the first and the nod to Cotillard's 'La Vie en Rose' in the second. My difficulty in reviewing 'Shutter Island' was the same, not wanting to traverse that long, dark hallway without giving away its secrets.
The entire cinematic experience is something akin to riding a rollercoaster while playing a high-level video game and watching three channels of television simultaneously, and takes some brain cells to keep up. If you watch carefully from beginning to end and don't surrender to the complication, you should enjoy the film enough to want to watch it again.
I recommend not getting up to use the restroom.
If I enticed you to see this intellectually and emotionally satisfying film without spoiling it for you, I have succeeded in my task. See it.
Perhaps the most important character in the film, a spinning top.
Author's note: I have read Andrew O'Hehir's fascinating and controversial review of this film in Salon. Clearly, he missed the point of the entire film, which is why it doesn't wrap up neatly for him at film's end. If you understand it correctly, it will, and masterfully so. To say more here would, unfortunately, spoil the plot. Don't make me come 'splain it to you, Andrew.
On the Web:
'Inception' - Roger Ebert, Chicago Sun-Times
"Inception:" a clunky, overblown disappointment - Andrew O'Heier, Salon


Salon.com
Comments
I'm looking forward to seeing this movie, to see if it is anything like the shifting landscape of my own world.
I know there's certain people who believe in entering others dreams, and I have experienced it myself, a really good friend of mine and I have "entered" a common dream, and the next day, we'll be like, "I had this dream..." and woosh, we both without prompting the other can explain the whole thing in perfect harmony!! :D
The casting was pitch perfect with the exception of Ellen Page, and this is only a minor quibble. I didn't mind her exactly, but she didn't pop as much as the other characters. Everyone else was kick-ass on the job, and she was just sort of...there. I will go see it again with my husband who, though not the cinephile I am, will enjoy this brain teaser.
Leo DiCaprio just gets more deliciously complex every year all the time. I am indeed a fan.
What IS the point, I think, is that this is one of those movies to which you get to bring anything you want. I brought popcorn, a small diet soda and no preconceived notions and it worked for me, which is to say, I found it damned entertaining.
mypsyche, we heard a NY Times reviewer interviewed on CNN radio before seeing it and already went in knowing it was going to be one of "those" types of psychological thrillers where the ending would make people want to see it again to see it through that lens. Otherwise, we went in blank slate. Since the ending fit with my presumptions at the beginning of the film, I was satisfied, but it could have gone otherwise.
Tink, I think this will be one of those films that plays completely differently on video. I was actually afraid, seeing it on the big screen, I was going to come home and have very intense dreams as a result. As it is, I probably dreamt about something much lighter. Like cottage cheese.
bluestocking babe, I did not read O'Heier's review until after I'd seen the film last night, but I was wondering if we'd seen the same film. With all due respect, I think he saw it differently because he forgot the fundamental premise of the film--needing to distinguish what is dream and what is reality. Determining the reality of the film is the trick, but I believe clues abound in the screenplay.
Dave and Romantic Poetess, thank you for your kind words, and I hope you enjoy the film. I wouldn't want it spoiled before I saw it. I would just tell you what I told people coming in to see the next showing after us: Watch carefully from the beginning, and don't leave the theater for even a second.
JP, that's too funny. As it is, my vanity plate is six letters, my husband's initials and mine, so close enough. At least it's not EWING3.
Nikki, see my comments to bluestocking babe above. We all bring our own life experiences to films, and popcorn, and whatever else, but essentially, I like to go to these films with a blank slate, too, and I enjoyed it all the more because I intentionally did not read other reviews beforehand. It was coincidental that we heard a NYT reviewer being interviewed on CNN before we saw the film, but all that did was prepare me for the possibility that the ending would be a gotcha, and make people want to see it again in that context. It doesn't surprise me that O'Heier saw the film differently if he took it at face value. It's deeper than that. The question is, what is dream and what is reality, whose dream(s), from what perspective, and why? Personally, and with all due respect, I think O'Heier wasn't paying close attention and was missing the clues. It's all there. The brilliance of the film is in its subtlety. If it doesn't look like one of your dreams, or his, why is that? You might ask yourself that question.
Bernadine, I hope you enjoy, and will be fascinated to see your take on it following.
Your review has now made me curious to see it. I may wait till it's on DVD as I'm not sure I'd enjoy the full screen version. Thanks for the post.
Mimetalker, I hope you enjoy. Thanks for your kind words.
I will be watching Inception though, at my first opportunity.
Lezlie
Linda, I think you'll enjoy it. I'll be interested in your perspective from a medical point of view.
Torman, I hadn't read Shutter Island beforehand, so went in blank slate. I did go back to see it twice following to see it from that perspective.
L, the biomechanics of dreams is central to this film. I hope you enjoy it.
antoinette, ha. That is interesting. That's somewhere in the category of the vampire vs. werewolf Twihards.
zanelle, it did not, at least, not before the screen went to black and the end titles rolled. It was, like many movies, at least twenty minutes too long. What would you have removed? It took Christopher Nolan ten years to write that screenplay, and everything is there. Some of those chase scenes do seem to be redundant, though.
I LOVED IT!
It has been a long time since I was challenged while watching a movie. This one you had to pay attention and you had to actually think to follow the plot. No spoiler here but if you like movies that engages your brain as well as your visual senses....GO SEE THIS MOVIE ,PEOPLE!
I walked away thinking about how intelligent and pleasing this film was. There are some very condescending reviews of this film circulating, suggestions that people who go see it are too stupid to enjoy this.
You won't find the Hollywood assembly line churning out films like "Inception" in mass quantities. It's not a boob-filled "R" rated comedy, a action film limited to the amount of visual effects the creators were able to pack in or a film counting on an already built-in audience because it comes from a popular work of fiction.
Inception is why I love movies. And, dare I say it, why people in this country go to the movies.
Rated.
Kevin, I appreciate the fact you stopped by after your excellent piece on the film. I'm with you, entirely. This was brilliant stuff, great brain food, and I don't know what those others were smoking. I went in with low expectations and was thoroughly satiated. The one thing I'd heard about it in advance was that it was a film that begged to be seen at least twice. I'm likely back to it again today. I did challenge myself to see it consistently through in a framework, and that served me to the end. Thanks again, Kevin. You rock, and so did your piece on it. Hollywood doesn't make films like this. They should.
Good to hear your thoughts!
mary, that spinning top is important throughout. So are the walls of water everywhere, or water coming into a scene. I'm so glad both of you enjoyed the film, as I expected you would.
I went back to see 'Inception' at the early matinee this afternoon to see if my theory of the plot held, and it does, completely. It's an even better film on second viewing, and I was able to appreciate the soundtrack even more.
This is a brilliant film, a masterpiece. I believe those ten years writing it weren't wasted. Anyone who wants to know my own theory of the plot (who has already seen the film) can contact me privately for it.
Great take, concentrating on the dream aspect of the story, rather than trying to delve into specifics. I decided to completely stay away from plot points in my review, as I just felt that to say anything was to spoil something. There are many, many things I am glad I didn't know going in. Kudos for navigating the spoiler minefield successfully. -Rated.
I can't wait to see this a second time, hopefully in IMAX. I'm glad to hear it holds up to scrutiny the second time around.
It's interesting, the way that you anticipate your next dream, the night that you first see the film isn't it? Kind of makes you look closer at how you perceive your own reality and dream world.
-Centauri