Kathy Riordan

Kathy Riordan
Location
Florida, United States
Birthday
April 27
Bio
One woman's view of life and the universe. Follow @katriord on Twitter.

MY RECENT POSTS

Kathy Riordan's Links

What I Can't Write About
Poetry, if you like that sort of thing:
Christmas
New to Open Salon?
Where I've been, where I'm going:
Twitter from the Inside:
Posts on World War II:
Some of my work on Iran:
Some of my favorite posts:
I also write here:
JULY 18, 2010 12:58AM

'Inception' and the Landscape of Dreams

Rate: 18 Flag

pelicula-di-caprio

Leonardo DiCaprio explains the architecture of dreams to Ellen Page on the streets of Paris. 

 

It's nearly impossible to review Leonardo DiCaprio's latest film, 'Inception,' without spoiling it, and once spoiled, it will be nearly impossible to watch it, so I won't do that here.

I will instead take you on a journey, a journey through the landscape of the multi-layered dream that is the film. 

The premise of the film, directed by Christopher Nolan of 'Memento' and 'The Dark Knight,' is entirely built on dreams--the landscape of dreams, the mechanics of dreams, the layers of dreams, the reasons for dreams--and distinguishing places in our subconscious from places in reality.  To that extent, I found it fascinating--the architecture of a dream, how we create worlds of our own snatched from memories of real people, real events, add our own characters, our own plot, our own dramatic chase scenes, and then, hopefully and in most cases, awaken to realize it was, indeed, all a dream.

DiCaprio's protagonist, Cobb, is apparently something of a specialist in dreams, and shows us layers of dreams within dreams, the premise being that one can insert themself into the dreams of others either to extract information or to plant it.  The supporting characters join in his dreams to achieve the difficult goal of planting an idea in another character's brain, known as 'inception.'  To do this, we journey with them through several layers of shared dreams, beaches and frozen mountaintops, skyscrapers and streets, children playing, cars crashing.  

Important in the plot is the notion of 'the kick,' the concept that someone can come out of the dream with a sudden jolt, falling backward, for example, as well as the concept of using sedation to facilitate certain types of dreaming.

Anyone watching the film who's had vivid dreaming in their life will relate to the dreamscapes, the alternate realities, the chase scenes, the fear of impending death, the sudden jolts, and ponder anew how much of their own dreaming is based on memories of real events, people and places, and how much is manufactured by a creative brain.

For some, there are certain landscapes that continue to appear in dreams that appear nowhere in reality, places we've built ourselves over time which become familiar to us, but only in dreams, and when we're awake, we marvel that we've gone to the same place again and again. 

Cobb sees family members in these dreams, a wife who is apparently dead, and two young children who long for their father's return from wherever he happens to be (alternately in the film locations like Paris, Tokyo and Mombasa).  He is tortured by the memory of his wife, played by Marion Cotillard, and counseled by a loving father, Michael Caine.   Ken Watanabe and Juno's Ellen Page play important supporting roles alongside DiCaprio's Cobb as he journeys through several layers of dreams.

You'll need to understand the importance of water, sedatives, the kick, the relationship between a father and a son, flying, falling, shared memories and a rescue. 

It's fascinating to me that this is Leo's second foray in a row into the land of uncertain reality.   Whereas in 'Shutter Island' he was stuck in a place of questionable sanity, in 'Inception' he is trapped in a place of questionable existence.  Whether there's someone in Hollywood who's just decreed Leo's the man for such films, I don't know, but he did both convincingly, and I was satisfied, and amused with the nod to 'Titanic' in the first and the nod to Cotillard's 'La Vie en Rose' in the second.  My difficulty in reviewing 'Shutter Island' was the same, not wanting to traverse that long, dark hallway without giving away its secrets.

The entire cinematic experience is something akin to riding a rollercoaster while playing a high-level video game and watching three channels of television simultaneously, and takes some brain cells to keep up.  If you watch carefully from beginning to end and don't surrender to the complication, you should enjoy the film enough to want to watch it again.

I recommend not getting up to use the restroom. 

If I enticed you to see this intellectually and emotionally satisfying film without spoiling it for you, I have succeeded in my task.  See it. 

 

spinning-top-inception 

Perhaps the most important character in the film, a spinning top. 

 

Author's note:    I have read Andrew O'Hehir's fascinating and controversial review of this film in Salon.  Clearly, he missed the point of the entire film, which is why it doesn't wrap up neatly for him at film's end.  If you understand it correctly, it will, and masterfully so.  To say more here would, unfortunately, spoil the plot.  Don't make me come 'splain it to you, Andrew.

 

On the Web:

'Inception' - Roger Ebert, Chicago Sun-Times 

"Inception:" a clunky, overblown disappointment - Andrew O'Heier, Salon 

 

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
I'm a day dreamer myself, a dream walker, a conscious dreamer. I think it's the source of my creativity. I've also thought that was the reason I didn't remember dreams from my sleep, perhaps that I didn't dream at all. Recently I watched a documentary film that convinced me we all dream while asleep, whether we remember them or not. Shortly after watching the film I began remembering sleep dreams again, the first time in decades.

I'm looking forward to seeing this movie, to see if it is anything like the shifting landscape of my own world.
I saw this today and found it enthralling. I want to see it again to see what I missed and how it might help me 'get' the other pieces of the movie. WOW
It looks interesting enough that when it comes out on video, I'll probably rent it, but I doubt I will go see it at the movie theater.

I know there's certain people who believe in entering others dreams, and I have experienced it myself, a really good friend of mine and I have "entered" a common dream, and the next day, we'll be like, "I had this dream..." and woosh, we both without prompting the other can explain the whole thing in perfect harmony!! :D
Thanks for writing Kathy. I too read O'Heir's review, then saw the film and thought, what is he talking about? This film is fabulous. He intimated that is was all about the visual thrills with no real substance. But I found the narrative construct to be both substantive and extremely satisfying. I enjoyed the challenge of following the action on every level.

The casting was pitch perfect with the exception of Ellen Page, and this is only a minor quibble. I didn't mind her exactly, but she didn't pop as much as the other characters. Everyone else was kick-ass on the job, and she was just sort of...there. I will go see it again with my husband who, though not the cinephile I am, will enjoy this brain teaser.

Leo DiCaprio just gets more deliciously complex every year all the time. I am indeed a fan.
Now I have to go see it. Thanks for the review, and for not spoiling it. R-
Good review, I want to see it now. Thanks for not spoiling.
Rated. I've no doubt when you recommend. Your vanity plate might say: ~~~~~ NVR WRG ~~~~ no?
hmm...your perceptions and O'Hehir's are fascinatingly opposite. I don's suppose the dreams depicted resembled the dreams I might have. Then again, my vaguely remembered and often out-of-focus dreams, aren't being manipulated, which is the point.

What IS the point, I think, is that this is one of those movies to which you get to bring anything you want. I brought popcorn, a small diet soda and no preconceived notions and it worked for me, which is to say, I found it damned entertaining.
I heard one of the directors interviewed on NPR and I can't wait to see this. Hopefully today. Thansk for your review. R
David, anyone fascinated with the topic of dreams, and what creates them, and what distinguishes different types of dreams (sedation, coma, trauma, etc.) will find this movie intriguing, and will be working to determine which is dream and which isn't, and in whose mind.

mypsyche, we heard a NY Times reviewer interviewed on CNN radio before seeing it and already went in knowing it was going to be one of "those" types of psychological thrillers where the ending would make people want to see it again to see it through that lens. Otherwise, we went in blank slate. Since the ending fit with my presumptions at the beginning of the film, I was satisfied, but it could have gone otherwise.

Tink, I think this will be one of those films that plays completely differently on video. I was actually afraid, seeing it on the big screen, I was going to come home and have very intense dreams as a result. As it is, I probably dreamt about something much lighter. Like cottage cheese.

bluestocking babe, I did not read O'Heier's review until after I'd seen the film last night, but I was wondering if we'd seen the same film. With all due respect, I think he saw it differently because he forgot the fundamental premise of the film--needing to distinguish what is dream and what is reality. Determining the reality of the film is the trick, but I believe clues abound in the screenplay.

Dave and Romantic Poetess, thank you for your kind words, and I hope you enjoy the film. I wouldn't want it spoiled before I saw it. I would just tell you what I told people coming in to see the next showing after us: Watch carefully from the beginning, and don't leave the theater for even a second.

JP, that's too funny. As it is, my vanity plate is six letters, my husband's initials and mine, so close enough. At least it's not EWING3.

Nikki, see my comments to bluestocking babe above. We all bring our own life experiences to films, and popcorn, and whatever else, but essentially, I like to go to these films with a blank slate, too, and I enjoyed it all the more because I intentionally did not read other reviews beforehand. It was coincidental that we heard a NYT reviewer being interviewed on CNN before we saw the film, but all that did was prepare me for the possibility that the ending would be a gotcha, and make people want to see it again in that context. It doesn't surprise me that O'Heier saw the film differently if he took it at face value. It's deeper than that. The question is, what is dream and what is reality, whose dream(s), from what perspective, and why? Personally, and with all due respect, I think O'Heier wasn't paying close attention and was missing the clues. It's all there. The brilliance of the film is in its subtlety. If it doesn't look like one of your dreams, or his, why is that? You might ask yourself that question.

Bernadine, I hope you enjoy, and will be fascinated to see your take on it following.
... must look on Google and see how tall Ellen Page is. [Or did Leonardo DiCaprio have a growth spurt?]
Catherine, Leo is a full 10" taller than Ellen at 5'11" (she is 5'1"). However, viewer beware. If the film is about dreams in the first place, those heights don't have to be realistic, or anything else, for that matter.
This seems to be one of those movies you have to see to understand. Nice review!
Scanner, exactly so. And seeing it, you might still not understand it. The previews are somewhat misleading. I'm just as happy I never saw any beforehand.
I'm looking forward to seeing this even more now. I'll report back. Glad to see Ellen (she's a Nova Scotian girl too) in a film with Leo.
oh wow. thanks for not spoiling what may well become a favorite.
Interesting though necessarily enigmantic review Kathy. It reminds me of a similar movie in the 1980 where some govenment agency was training folks who showed an aptitude in how to enter the dreams of others. Can't remember the title or actors - it was making the rounds on the Euro hotel channels so I don't even know if it was released in cinemas.

Your review has now made me curious to see it. I may wait till it's on DVD as I'm not sure I'd enjoy the full screen version. Thanks for the post.
Scarlett, I liked Ellen Page in the film, and here's where I'd part company with bluestocking babe, with whom I essentially agree. I don't know who would have been better in the role. Isabelle Rossellini? I think this person needed to be female and smart and hip and funny and wisecracking, but also a spirit guide, with a name fraught with meaning. Her casting worked for me.

Mimetalker, I hope you enjoy. Thanks for your kind words.
Kathy, this is a fascinating preview. Leo has proven himself to be a much more versatile and talented actor than I had imagined (well, from Titanic) and I adore Ellen Page. You have convinced me to see it!
Im excited about the explosions!
I have always been the recipiant/victim of vivid dreams and I do look forward to seeing this movie. I did not watch Shutter Island because, unfortunately I read the book first and figured out the ending along about chapter two. I am rarely disappointed with the book version of a story but this time I was so I didn't bother with the movie.

I will be watching Inception though, at my first opportunity.
Great! A movie I can look forward to seeing. I am fascinated by the bio-mechanics of dreams. I dream things I know nothing about in great and vivid detail. Thanks.

Lezlie
Oh, rated for not spoiling the plot.
Thank you for this Kathy; you have certainly piqued my interest now. AND, this morning someone on my FB posted a commented about wanting to believe the top stopped spinning and I felt like the cool kid who was in on the joke!
Did the top stop spinning or not!!!!!??????? Geez. I just came back from the movie and loved it but it was about a half hour too long. sigh.
Abrawang, I'll be interested to know what you think of it when you see it. Yes, the review needed to be somewhat enigmatic. Even a full synopsis spoils too much.

Linda, I think you'll enjoy it. I'll be interested in your perspective from a medical point of view.

Torman, I hadn't read Shutter Island beforehand, so went in blank slate. I did go back to see it twice following to see it from that perspective.

L, the biomechanics of dreams is central to this film. I hope you enjoy it.

antoinette, ha. That is interesting. That's somewhere in the category of the vampire vs. werewolf Twihards.

zanelle, it did not, at least, not before the screen went to black and the end titles rolled. It was, like many movies, at least twenty minutes too long. What would you have removed? It took Christopher Nolan ten years to write that screenplay, and everything is there. Some of those chase scenes do seem to be redundant, though.
Kathy, on your recomendation I loaded Mel in the Red Truck and drove into the Bluff this evening to watch the movie.

I LOVED IT!

It has been a long time since I was challenged while watching a movie. This one you had to pay attention and you had to actually think to follow the plot. No spoiler here but if you like movies that engages your brain as well as your visual senses....GO SEE THIS MOVIE ,PEOPLE!
So glad you liked it, Torman. I feel vindicated in recommending it to you. I agree it's great brain food, very stimulating. I was actually concerned mid-movie that it might be too much so. I've spent much of the day today reflecting on it and the clues throughout the film. What a screenplay, ten years in the making. I didn't have intense nightmares last night; I felt like I'd solved a mathematical problem and could sleep well.
Kathy! Thank you for this piece! I dream VERY vividly...sometimes while sleeping - I also have very strong impressions and intuitive feelings, so it sounds like this movie will be one I will savor. Yes, you've succeeded in seducing me to see this film. I'm looking forward to it and happy to have an endorsement! I hate being disappointed in a movie, but now I'm eager to grab the hub and hop to! Terrific review! (You non-spoiler you!) :}
Interesting to see how you framed your review. I like how you introduce this film to readers by concisely laying out the way Nolan handles the "landscape of dreams." I left out a lot of the terminology for those interested to learn when they view the film.

I walked away thinking about how intelligent and pleasing this film was. There are some very condescending reviews of this film circulating, suggestions that people who go see it are too stupid to enjoy this.

You won't find the Hollywood assembly line churning out films like "Inception" in mass quantities. It's not a boob-filled "R" rated comedy, a action film limited to the amount of visual effects the creators were able to pack in or a film counting on an already built-in audience because it comes from a popular work of fiction.

Inception is why I love movies. And, dare I say it, why people in this country go to the movies.

Rated.
APM, I hope you enjoy it. I'll be interested in your take on it, especially the dreams, and the dreams within dreams.

Kevin, I appreciate the fact you stopped by after your excellent piece on the film. I'm with you, entirely. This was brilliant stuff, great brain food, and I don't know what those others were smoking. I went in with low expectations and was thoroughly satiated. The one thing I'd heard about it in advance was that it was a film that begged to be seen at least twice. I'm likely back to it again today. I did challenge myself to see it consistently through in a framework, and that served me to the end. Thanks again, Kevin. You rock, and so did your piece on it. Hollywood doesn't make films like this. They should.
I liked the movie quite a bit, but I also went into it wanting to like it and ready to trust Nolan to create big, amazing worlds. I think if -- like O'Hehir -- I'd gone in with the job of being objective or critical about the movie, it wouldn't be too hard to pick it apart. Yet given the benefit of admiration for the director, for his cast, and for his ambition as much as his execution, I did enjoy it, and I've enjoyed thinking over the ideas it expressed.

Good to hear your thoughts!
Loved the movie and your review. And you're right, that spinning top....R
Saturn, you're right. It helps to go in blank slate.

mary, that spinning top is important throughout. So are the walls of water everywhere, or water coming into a scene. I'm so glad both of you enjoyed the film, as I expected you would.

I went back to see 'Inception' at the early matinee this afternoon to see if my theory of the plot held, and it does, completely. It's an even better film on second viewing, and I was able to appreciate the soundtrack even more.

This is a brilliant film, a masterpiece. I believe those ten years writing it weren't wasted. Anyone who wants to know my own theory of the plot (who has already seen the film) can contact me privately for it.
Kathy,
Great take, concentrating on the dream aspect of the story, rather than trying to delve into specifics. I decided to completely stay away from plot points in my review, as I just felt that to say anything was to spoil something. There are many, many things I am glad I didn't know going in. Kudos for navigating the spoiler minefield successfully. -Rated.

I can't wait to see this a second time, hopefully in IMAX. I'm glad to hear it holds up to scrutiny the second time around.

It's interesting, the way that you anticipate your next dream, the night that you first see the film isn't it? Kind of makes you look closer at how you perceive your own reality and dream world.

-Centauri
Centauri, thanks. It does indeed hold up to second viewing. I was able to appreciate the soundtrack all the more this time and picked up a couple of details. Mostly I went to see if it supported my theory of the plot. Would love to discuss it privately with you.
Leonardo looked a bit older than his age here. Thanks for sharing this great review. You made clear points that can encourage me to watch it too.Matthew Graham