
Sixteen years ago I pledged I'd never again allow myself to get sucked into watching courtroom carnival. The spectacle that was the O.J. Simpson trial gripped many of us. Then the last few days I found myself watching what was happening in a courtroom less than three hours from my home--the Casey Anthony trial--and wondering if like O.J. she'll walk free, and what she owes to O.J. Simpson.
I wonder what most of us find so compelling about the Casey Anthony case, a young woman on trial for murdering her less than three-year-old daughter, Caylee, a defendant whose own defense team admits that she has serially lied to law enforcement and those around her.
It is a pathological coldness that goes beyond anything most people have experienced that has us watching. Her near complete lack of emotion, not only in the courtroom as the state is presenting its case against her but also in the face of the initial reality that her daughter was missing, and later, found as duct-taped skeletal remains in the woods not far from her family home, mystifies.
I was sitting in an outdoor cafe in Venice in June 1994 when I heard the news that O.J. Simpson had possibly murdered his former wife and a male friend. For the months following that the O.J. Simpson murder trial was broadcast to a worldwide audience, I watched. I watched right up to the end--Judge Lance Ito, Johnny Cochran, Marcia Clark and company--and that famous glove. "If it doesn't fit, you must acquit."
On its face, as with O.J. Simpson, the case against Casey Anthony seems overwhelming. Most reasonable people exposed to publicity about the disappearance and death of three-year-old Caylee Anthony a few years ago in Orlando would agree that at very least Casey Anthony appears to be the person most likely to have harmed her child and the person who benefitted most from her death. She admitted to not telling anyone her child had been "missing" for thirty-one days, and for those thirty-one days, she was apparently footloose and unconcerned. When police were finally made aware, she led them on a wild goose chase complete with false locations and fabricated people, eventually admitting to serial lies.
When her defense presented opening statements, they surprised many by suggesting that Casey was present at Caylee's death, but that it had been an accidental drowning in the family swimming pool and that her father, George, a former cop, had helped cover up the death and dispose of the body. Then the defense drew its wild card, claiming that Casey had been the victim of sexual abuse from childhood at the hands of not only that same father, George Anthony, but also her brother, Lee.
For their part, Anthony family members have circled the wagons and loyally defended Casey most of the time since her arrest three years ago, but they appear to be disturbed by the unfolding of events and conflicted between love and loss for little Caylee and the prospect that their daughter, their sister, could be a psychopathic monster capable of dispassionate murder of her only child. Most painful to watch on the stand was the accused's mother, Cindy Anthony, who broke down when recordings of her 9-1-1 calls to police were played for the jury. This is her baby, and she cannot escape it.
Like those of us watching, they are all forced to put together the pieces and try to make sense of what seems to defy it, and watch a young woman so at home in her own intricate lies that one wonders if she will ever break, intrigued to see if she will ever take the stand. "Zanny the Nanny" appears to be a reference to Xanax, and not some fabricated Hispanic babysitter for which the police vainly searched.
Will Casey Anthony walk free, like O.J. Simpson did?
She doesn't have the Dream Team exactly. Her attorney Jose Baez seems to be swatting whatever flies he can in the courtroom, and by his own admission yesterday is surprised at the evidence that has been allowed. Yet for all the evidence, the skeletal remains confirmed to be Caylee, the DNA evidence from the trunk of Casey Anthony's car, chloroform and duct tape and heart-shaped stickers and computer searches, it might not be enough to convince an entire jury of her guilt of actually committing capital murder. That she obstructed an investigation has been admitted; that she lied is in evidence. That she was woefully negligent in the care of her child is without dispute.
Baez made an interesting shift yesterday toward a psychiatric defense, not initially mounted. But one has to wonder, after three years of listening to her lies and then stipulating to them, how many of them he has also unwittingly bought, and whether or not he now has buyer's remorse.
On the Web:
Live-Stream of the Casey Anthony Trial - Orlando Sentinel
Death of Caylee Anthony - Wikipedia
ABC News video clip of testimony in the courtroom Thursday in central Florida.


Salon.com
Comments
I am sure a Lifetime movie is coming.
rated with hugs
rated with love
To what can we attribute this redefinition of motherhood? Just a g
Just a guess, but could it be that some women who grew up after abortion became legal see motherhood in a different light? If you get pregnant and are unhappy about it, it is never too late.
I don't like abortion, but I am not in favor of outlawing it. Still, you have to wonder if it has had an occasionally horrifying side effect.
The Casey Anthony story is even more disgusting in a way. That sweet-faced, innocent child. How could she? I don't believe in the death penalty, but that woman is as vile as they come.
Lezlie
The Casey Anthony case just makes me want to weep.
Just thinking : saves her having to pretend to look concerned.
I, as an avid consumer of Nancy Grace, Jane Velez-Mitchell, Dr. Drew et al., am watching them have a field day with this. Baez's allusions to childhood sex abuse is taken from the feminist jurisprudence handbook - "men damaged her" - to try to get sympathy from the jury. On the other hand, most reportage centers on the many "criminal psychologists", body language "experts", and profilers who observe the "demeanor" of a "narcissistic sociopath" - essentially a DIAGNOSIS of guilt. While I don't disagree with them, their increased presence in legal trials disturbs me. I'm old school and prefer it to be simply a "whodunit."
Traditonally, infanticide is a rare crime - one that is committed more often by mothers than fathers. (Speaking of which, all us ghoulish spectators want to know who the father is.)
Casey could easily walk free. Despite the mounds of circumstantial evidence against her, there is no direct line of causality between the child's death and anyone.
What compels me to watch? The whole family dynamic. I have understood that psychopaths are born that way...there is something missing at birth.
Sociopaths are made that way...trauma and dysfunction in the household leads them down strange pathways.
The grandmother, Cindy, appeared to have gotten her "act" down. I saw her on other occasions, including the Gonzales lawsuit deposition, and she was nothing like the "grieving grandmother" that she portrayed on the stand last week.
There is more to discover. As Casey is clearly a sociopath, who built that sociopath? I am not even going to give her parents a pass.
Beyond that, there's no determined cause of death, no fingerprints, no DNA, no witnesses, no confession, and at best mere speculation as to motive. By all accounts she had a very loving and affectionate relationship with her daughter, and there was no boyfriend who was dumping her because she had a child, as in the Susan Smith case.
95 percent of the prosecution's case rests on Casey's lies and demeanor. This is because with a "normal" person, these would be indications of guilt. But the problem is that Casey is not a normal person; she is weird. For her, weird IS normal, and thus is not necessarily an indication of guilt.
I think it's going to be hard to get a murder conviction. Even if a jury thinks she probably killed her daughter, probably isn't good enough in a criminal case.
An innocent mother, no matter how young, no matter how wild a partier, would be freaking out to the police their child was missing-- on the first day....but not this girl, not at all.
...and no one knows who the Dad of the child is? Hmmm, maybe I'd better start listening again...it's like a crime novel being acted out in installments on the news when the country just keeps watching cases like these....
So now, I'm avoiding the whole trial right now.
I got better things to do, like watch my toe nails grow!! ;D
Rated. No Tink Pick, maybe next time, pick something happier, like mushrooms!! :D
This is why all movies pretty much need a villain, like the scene from Scarface,"Say goodbye to the bad guy."
I too, get sucked into these dramas, though it embarrasses me to admit that. And, let's not forget "Angel Face" in Italy!
You said it best. So many of us are obsessed. I've been waiting for the trial for the last few years, and I'm fixated. For me, the fanscination stems from ye olde "problem of evil." The notion of (seemingly) rational people doing the unspeakable begs us to rethink our position in terms of religion, ethics, etc. I just cannot wrap my brain around a murder/drowning of a child. I'm hesitant to use the word "evil," as it was abused by our former President to justify his own agenda. At the same time, this is the word to which I continue to return in this case.
Broadly speaking, compassion, love, mercy, empathy, and other (what I think of as) reflexive human traits seem to be more of the exception. Are we living in a time when sociopathic behavior is the new normal?
Well done, Kathy.
There are some legal eagles on there who manage to get the details first. Beware, once in, you may never come out. ;)
This is excellent. You presented everything in this complicated case so well, and with the perfect tie-in to OJ.
Great!!!
Andrea
Still, I do not want her or anyone to get the death penalty.
It's a sick, sad fact but women throughout history have killed their children. In fact, in Colonial America the most common reason women were executed was for "concealing the birth of a bastard" which meant they hid their pregnancies, gave birth in secret, and then buried the body. Women would claim that the baby was stillborn and medical science at the time not being able to prove otherwise, concealing the birth was made a felony punishable by death. I know of one case where the body of a baby was found in the town well and two women were suspected of having been pregnant. Both were arrested, questioned and confessed. They led authorities to where they had each hidden the body of the child they gave birth to but neither baby was the baby in the well and both women were hanged. I can think of many cases just like these from antiquity to the modern day so I don't think it's abortion. Look at women who have killed their children in the recent past and many of them expressed a strong Christian faith such as Andrea Yates or Dena Schlosser while it was reported in court hearings that Casey Anthony wanted an abortion, or, failing that, to place her child up for adoption but her mother wouldn't "let" her though Casey Anthony was 19 at the time Caylee was born.
I think the big difference between the Casey Anthony case and the O.J. Simpson case will be the jury. Unless Casey Anthony's jury is made up of a true jury of her peers, that is, sociopathic teen moms, then I don't think she stands a chance of being found not guilty.
I think the Haliegh Cummings case is far more interesting though I think the letter sent early in the investigation from a friend of Misty Crosley stating that Haliegh had taken Oxy pills she had found and OD'd is probably pretty close to the truth.