Kathy Riordan

Kathy Riordan
Location
Florida, United States
Birthday
April 27
Bio
One woman's view of life and the universe. Follow @katriord on Twitter.

MY RECENT POSTS

Kathy Riordan's Links

What I Can't Write About
Poetry, if you like that sort of thing:
Christmas
New to Open Salon?
Where I've been, where I'm going:
Twitter from the Inside:
Posts on World War II:
Some of my work on Iran:
Some of my favorite posts:
I also write here:
Editor’s Pick
JUNE 3, 2011 8:37AM

Sex, Lies and Casey Anthony

Rate: 36 Flag

Casey_Anthony_Trial

Sixteen years ago I pledged I'd never again allow myself to get sucked into watching courtroom carnival.  The spectacle that was the O.J. Simpson trial gripped many of us.  Then the last few days I found myself watching what was happening in a courtroom less than three hours from my home--the Casey Anthony trial--and wondering if like O.J. she'll walk free, and what she owes to O.J. Simpson.

I wonder what most of us find so compelling about the Casey Anthony case, a young woman on trial for murdering her less than three-year-old daughter, Caylee, a defendant whose own defense team admits that she has serially lied to law enforcement and those around her.

It is a pathological coldness that goes beyond anything most people have experienced that has us watching.  Her near complete lack of emotion, not only in the courtroom as the state is presenting its case against her but also in the face of the initial reality that her daughter was missing, and later, found as duct-taped skeletal remains in the woods not far from her family home, mystifies. 

I was sitting in an outdoor cafe in Venice in June 1994 when I heard the news that O.J. Simpson had possibly murdered his former wife and a male friend.  For the months following that the O.J. Simpson murder trial was broadcast to a worldwide audience, I watched.  I watched right up to the end--Judge Lance Ito, Johnny Cochran, Marcia Clark and company--and that famous glove.  "If it doesn't fit, you must acquit."

On its face, as with O.J. Simpson, the case against Casey Anthony seems overwhelming.  Most reasonable people exposed to publicity about the disappearance and death of three-year-old Caylee Anthony a few years ago in Orlando would agree that at very least Casey Anthony appears to be the person most likely to have harmed her child and the person who benefitted most from her death.  She admitted to not telling anyone her child had been "missing" for thirty-one days, and for those thirty-one days, she was apparently footloose and unconcerned.  When police were finally made aware, she led them on a wild goose chase complete with false locations and fabricated people, eventually admitting to serial lies.

When her defense presented opening statements, they surprised many by suggesting that Casey was present at Caylee's death, but that it had been an accidental drowning in the family swimming pool and that her father, George, a former cop, had helped cover up the death and dispose of the body.  Then the defense drew its wild card, claiming that Casey had been the victim of sexual abuse from childhood at the hands of not only that same father, George Anthony, but also her brother, Lee.

For their part, Anthony family members have circled the wagons and loyally defended Casey most of the time since her arrest three years ago, but they appear to be disturbed by the unfolding of events and conflicted between love and loss for little Caylee and the prospect that their daughter, their sister, could be a psychopathic monster capable of dispassionate murder of her only child.  Most painful to watch on the stand was the accused's mother, Cindy Anthony, who broke down when recordings of her 9-1-1 calls to police were played for the jury.  This is her baby, and she cannot escape it.

Like those of us watching, they are all forced to put together the pieces and try to make sense of what seems to defy it, and watch a young woman so at home in her own intricate lies that one wonders if she will ever break, intrigued to see if she will ever take the stand.  "Zanny the Nanny" appears to be a reference to Xanax, and not some fabricated Hispanic babysitter for which the police vainly searched.

Will Casey Anthony walk free, like O.J. Simpson did?

She doesn't have the Dream Team exactly.  Her attorney Jose Baez seems to be swatting whatever flies he can in the courtroom, and by his own admission yesterday is surprised at the evidence that has been allowed.  Yet for all the evidence, the skeletal remains confirmed to be Caylee, the DNA evidence from the trunk of Casey Anthony's car, chloroform and duct tape and heart-shaped stickers and computer searches, it might not be enough to convince an entire jury of her guilt of actually committing capital murder.  That she obstructed an investigation has been admitted; that she lied is in evidence.  That she was woefully negligent in the care of her child is without dispute.  

Baez made an interesting shift yesterday toward a psychiatric defense, not initially mounted.  But one has to wonder, after three years of listening to her lies and then stipulating to them, how many of them he has also unwittingly bought, and whether or not he now has buyer's remorse.

 

On the Web:

Live-Stream of the Casey Anthony Trial - Orlando Sentinel

Death of Caylee Anthony - Wikipedia 

 

 

ABC News video clip of testimony in the courtroom Thursday in central Florida.

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
You lay this case out well, Kathy. I recently saw a video of a mother placing her hand over her baby's face in an attempt to smother it--while she leaned her head nonchalantly on her other hand. She said she wanted the baby to quit crying. I wanted to cry. Your term, "pathological coldness," is well chosen. I suppose a mother's coldly calculating murder of a child is one of the few taboos we have left.
The woman had a maternal responsibility for the child. I think that it is just incongruous to so many people that her behaviour flies in the face of that responsibility and supposed maternal feelings.
This case has held me captive and every darn day I wonder which way it is going to go.
I am sure a Lifetime movie is coming.
rated with hugs
Well done post on this never ending saga. I wish I knew how someone gets to be like Casey and be so cold to the miracle of her own child.
rated with love
While workmen were at my house yesterday I had the live broadcast on all day. Riveting and disturbing. Having had the misfortune of a psychopath infiltrating my family(http://open.salon.com/blog/lschmoopie/2010/06/23/the_boogeyman_is_real) I understand this better than most.
I am an oldtimer, and I don't remember this type of case from when I was following the news closely in the middle of the 20th century. Now they are not uncommon. There seems to be a new breed of mother out there (Susan Smith is the prototype, Casey may be her acolyte) who feel that their children are nuisances, and consider annihilation the proper fate of a child who gets in the way of a romance.

To what can we attribute this redefinition of motherhood? Just a g
(Oops, that left my hands prematurely.)
Just a guess, but could it be that some women who grew up after abortion became legal see motherhood in a different light? If you get pregnant and are unhappy about it, it is never too late.

I don't like abortion, but I am not in favor of outlawing it. Still, you have to wonder if it has had an occasionally horrifying side effect.
Thanks for this fine article Kathy. I remember the OJ trial too. I had just separated from my tour in the Air Force and was trying to figure out my next move. With oodles of time on my hands I watched the whole thing and was mortified when he was found not guilty. I still chafe when I think about it. Thank the gods he ended up in prison where he belongs.

The Casey Anthony story is even more disgusting in a way. That sweet-faced, innocent child. How could she? I don't believe in the death penalty, but that woman is as vile as they come.
I find courtroom drama intriguing most of the time, but this time I fear justice will not be done because of some legal technicality or some juror who takes a liking to Casey. That's hard to imagine, but it was also hard for me to imagine how anyone could believe OJ was innocent. I personally think our legal system is broken beyond repair.

Lezlie
It will be interesting to see how this turns out. Any way it does, that is one mess of a human being.
A shame that a sociopath like Casey Anthony ends up getting nonstop coverage - it's just what she wants and she is winning whether she is convicted or not. Her crime is unimportant to her. As long as she is in the spotlight, she is satisfied. Think how devastated she would be if the media circus went away. Might just be what's needed to elicit a confession. Just saying.
I think that she is mentally ill, but sociopathic as well. You can be both. I also think that her father may have molested her, and her brother makes me feel uncmfortable, something about him. I also think she may have drowned in the pool. I do not believe in capital punishment, and so do not want her or anyone get the chair...
Of course, I meant Caylee may have drowned in the pool.
I can't stand to watch this, so much about it is bothersome. *sigh*
The only good thing that could come out of an acquittal in this case would be it might finally make Nancy Grace's head explode. I accidentally hit Nancy's version of reality while channel-surfing the other day. Apparently she is incapable of saying "Casey Anthony" without prefacing with the term "TotMom". In Nancy's world everyone is guilty, because she says so. The fact she turned out to more than likely be right about the Van Der Sloot kid in Aruba has fed her enormous ego (and ever more enormous head).

The Casey Anthony case just makes me want to weep.
This might seem like a frivolous observation from afar, but I've noticed her eyebrows getting smaller and smaller until now they are two small downward frown inflections.
Just thinking : saves her having to pretend to look concerned.
Well done. Those of us who have had toxic mothers whose own identities were lessened rather than strengthened by a daughter can comprehend the horror. I feel she is an emotionally sick woman who acted out in the most horrible way.
Dr. Elayne Rapping has written a very interesting little book: "Law and Justice as Seen on TV" that touches on many of the developments of these modern circuses. I think the evidence shows that the child was missing and that the child was in the trunk of Casey's car and I anticipate conviction on a lesser charge of reckless homicide or whatever and a life sentence. Traditionally we don't like to fry women with a clean arrest record, but you never know.

I, as an avid consumer of Nancy Grace, Jane Velez-Mitchell, Dr. Drew et al., am watching them have a field day with this. Baez's allusions to childhood sex abuse is taken from the feminist jurisprudence handbook - "men damaged her" - to try to get sympathy from the jury. On the other hand, most reportage centers on the many "criminal psychologists", body language "experts", and profilers who observe the "demeanor" of a "narcissistic sociopath" - essentially a DIAGNOSIS of guilt. While I don't disagree with them, their increased presence in legal trials disturbs me. I'm old school and prefer it to be simply a "whodunit."
Traditonally, infanticide is a rare crime - one that is committed more often by mothers than fathers. (Speaking of which, all us ghoulish spectators want to know who the father is.)
Impossible to fathom how the Casey Anthonys of the world can exist.
Well done, Kathy, but this case is compelling because the more that is known about the Anthonys, the less that is known about who killed and buried the child!

Casey could easily walk free. Despite the mounds of circumstantial evidence against her, there is no direct line of causality between the child's death and anyone.

What compels me to watch? The whole family dynamic. I have understood that psychopaths are born that way...there is something missing at birth.

Sociopaths are made that way...trauma and dysfunction in the household leads them down strange pathways.

The grandmother, Cindy, appeared to have gotten her "act" down. I saw her on other occasions, including the Gonzales lawsuit deposition, and she was nothing like the "grieving grandmother" that she portrayed on the stand last week.

There is more to discover. As Casey is clearly a sociopath, who built that sociopath? I am not even going to give her parents a pass.
Noah, my understanding is that the FBI was similarly interested to know who the father was, and ruled out that it was the accused's brother, Lee Anthony. So we know who it isn't, but apparently not who it is. If paternity has ever been firmly established, I'm unaware of it. The defendant claims that the father "died." I suspect paternity is relevant in this case.
So far, we know that Casey Anthony lies about everything, even when there's no reason to, whether or not the topic has anything to do with her daughter's death. We also know that she has a foul-smelling car.

Beyond that, there's no determined cause of death, no fingerprints, no DNA, no witnesses, no confession, and at best mere speculation as to motive. By all accounts she had a very loving and affectionate relationship with her daughter, and there was no boyfriend who was dumping her because she had a child, as in the Susan Smith case.

95 percent of the prosecution's case rests on Casey's lies and demeanor. This is because with a "normal" person, these would be indications of guilt. But the problem is that Casey is not a normal person; she is weird. For her, weird IS normal, and thus is not necessarily an indication of guilt.

I think it's going to be hard to get a murder conviction. Even if a jury thinks she probably killed her daughter, probably isn't good enough in a criminal case.
There is in fact DNA evidence in this case, but whether or not it is sufficient for a capital murder conviction remains to be seen. Casey Anthony's own defense team's willingness to concede she was present at the death might be her undoing.
It's the 31 days before she reported her child missing that got me....once I heard that, I quit listening to the whole story.
An innocent mother, no matter how young, no matter how wild a partier, would be freaking out to the police their child was missing-- on the first day....but not this girl, not at all.
...and I'd have to agree with Patrick Frank, that there might be prior molestation involved. Something about the whole family feels wrong (while I also cringe at 'deciding' this just from a TV viewing...)

...and no one knows who the Dad of the child is? Hmmm, maybe I'd better start listening again...it's like a crime novel being acted out in installments on the news when the country just keeps watching cases like these....
I got suckered into this case when it first graced the TV screen of the employee dining room of my last employer. When the facts came out, I screamed at Nancy Grace, SHE DID IT!!! PUT HER IN THE BACK ROOM, BEAT THE CRAP OUT OF HER TILL SHE TELLS US WHERE THE BODY IS AND THEN, AFTERWARDS, FILL HER VEINS FULL OF ARSENIC AND MERCURY!!

So now, I'm avoiding the whole trial right now.

I got better things to do, like watch my toe nails grow!! ;D

Rated. No Tink Pick, maybe next time, pick something happier, like mushrooms!! :D
At dinner with friends I couldn't quit talking about this case. One friend shared my horrified fascination but the rest of them just wanted me to quit talking about it.
xenonlit xl may be on it - not a blip in the cell-phone umbilical? This was her first lying season? Oh, she's been like that since she was a kid. ya sure ubetcha
So many psychos so little time, what is the matter with these people? They have too much, and expose their true nature almost as if by accident. They want to reveal their true identys but are afraid they will be seen for what they really are. She was a young mother, the jury will see that, she wanted to go out and have fun, party and do stuff that would be quite normal, even for people that have children, who get a babysitter to do so. They may acquit for the sake that no body saw the manical activities that led up to this forsaking murder. The mother and father were too close to the picture to see the way in which their daughter could not recover from her damage. Had she been a different person, she might have mentioned that she wanted to get away for a day or two and have time to herself to think. There are simply too many ways in which to paint this awful story, regardless a life that didn't have to be taken was. That is the crime, it's a strange case in which the people involved were really all involved at all times, but couldn't see the silence towards Anthony's insignificant growing pains, and challenging motherhood cries to grow up and take responsibility, not everybody is able or capable to do so because they have been told to do so. Manical movements are still thought out carefully, for all involved.
Oh she's definitely a sociopath. Something hinky's going on with her family as well, but no one lies straight-faced for as long as she did (and continues to do) without being completely without a conscious. I don't know what really happened -- I don't think we'll ever get a truthful answer from her -- but anyone who can shrug off the "disappearance" of her child for over a month deserves a lengthy prison sentence if merely to get her out of society before she breeds again.
rubber necking is an inevitble human trait, like schaudenfraude, probably because we can say,"Hey, things are so great right now, but, my mug shot is not on the six o'clock news either, so... things aren't as bad as I thought after all."
This is why all movies pretty much need a villain, like the scene from Scarface,"Say goodbye to the bad guy."
Hi Kathy. I too remember watching, or at least listening to most of teh OJ trial as i was working from home about four days out of five. Caset's story is far less plausible than OJ's and from the bits I've read on CNN, it's contradicted at every turn. Is there really some chance she'll be acquitted? OJ also benefited from several instances of police bungling. While no one incident was that grave, it added up. And as you point out, the Dream Team outclassed Darden and Clark. I haven't heard of police/investigator missteps in this one. Has there been?
Great post. I've been watching this trial (I also watched the OJ slow speed chase on the 405 in LA). I cannot understand how Casey Anthony's parents didn't see through her lies during the time her daughter was missing. It was lie after lie after lie. I'm hesitant to say she'll be convicted because all it takes is one to hang a jury...
Working in law enforcement and aspiring to be a lawyer, I have followed many cases. Not much shocks me anymore, and this case is no exception. But I'm worried. Even though her guilt seems obvious, this is not a slam-dunk by any means. Her endless fabrications are damaging, but the state still has to physically link her to the crime. I still recall the nausea I felt when O.J. got off. Please GOD, don't let this narcissistic sociopath walk!
"swatting whatever flies he can in the courtroom" great image there. Perhaps Baez did not mount an insanity defense in the beginning because HE was sane to start with. Now, he has been driven nuts as you proposed. Nuts, "buyer's remorse," what's the difference? The psychiatric defense may be his own, not the defendant's. Nice piece.
I too, get sucked into these dramas, though it embarrasses me to admit that. And, let's not forget "Angel Face" in Italy!
Kathy,

You said it best. So many of us are obsessed. I've been waiting for the trial for the last few years, and I'm fixated. For me, the fanscination stems from ye olde "problem of evil." The notion of (seemingly) rational people doing the unspeakable begs us to rethink our position in terms of religion, ethics, etc. I just cannot wrap my brain around a murder/drowning of a child. I'm hesitant to use the word "evil," as it was abused by our former President to justify his own agenda. At the same time, this is the word to which I continue to return in this case.

Broadly speaking, compassion, love, mercy, empathy, and other (what I think of as) reflexive human traits seem to be more of the exception. Are we living in a time when sociopathic behavior is the new normal?
As an Orlando resident I have been trying to ignore this story for years. #1 her dead child was born around the same time as mine #2 this case has sucked tax dollars from day one. I am sure other children have been neglected and died in Orlando since the sad death of Ms. Anthony's child. The woman seems to be enjoying being a TV star. I saw the first and last footage I will ever see at the nail salon yesterday and that was because my feet were in water and my nails were half done.
If she walks, I'm leaving the country. R
Kathy, good analysis. Casey Anthony appears to be in another world. Perhaps her mind is.
There is a long, long history of filicide in human society. But the murder of children by their parents has been shrouded for some centuries by the highly-venerated myth of unconditional love between mother and child. Today, advances in forensic technology and crime scene investigation force us to lift the veil on that myth. We are seeing some ugly truths that most people would prefer not to see.
I picked the right time to get a debilitating case of the shingles so I have no choice but to try to hold still parked in front of the TV until the pain abates. I am hooked on the trial as well. I live right in the geographical center of all of her "landmark lies" in Central Florida and my squeam about the whole thing is that we all unknowingly share airspace with real monsters all the time.

Well done, Kathy.
I know I should be following this case but I just can't bear it. I actively avoid it. It's just so evil.
If you want to feed that obsession further (as I did for 3 years on the Natalee Holloway case), check out the myriad discussions on refugeesunleashed.net of several interesting cases including the Anthony case.

There are some legal eagles on there who manage to get the details first. Beware, once in, you may never come out. ;)
I heard the horrible news from Geraldo last week that the cops never gave Casey her Miranda rights reading. And that that will be the key that will allow her to go free, with time already spent in prison. When this whole charade is done [how come her parents and brother aren't screaming innocence about her ridiculous accusations of sexual abuse and Caylee drowning in the family pool: are they aware this was just a defense ruse to give reasonable doubt? Seems like the family knows Casey did it, that she is indeed a sociopath but they still want her to come home, even though she murdered their grandchild/niece] So in the end, like O.J., it looks like she will be allowed to go free in all of her - yes - psychopathic ways. But like O.J. will she end up in prison for another crime later on? I just feel so badly for how that child ended up.
Deb, she was Mirandized, but according to her defense attorney, not early enough. That is in dispute. Law enforcement officials maintain she was not initially in custody when she was questioned, and therefore, Miranda rights would not be appropriate at that stage.
Not to defend her, but Case Anthony fis the profile of a sociopath, remorseless, without empathy or feeling for others, even her own child. It's a horrible shame that someone this sick had a beautiful little girl that she had most likely killed. So many women out there who can't have their own children would have made wonderful mothers to that poor child.
Hi Kathy,

This is excellent. You presented everything in this complicated case so well, and with the perfect tie-in to OJ.
Great!!!
Andrea
I confess I have found myself watching this thing at the gym (fortunately there is no sound.) You are right there is something deeply creepy about her face.

Still, I do not want her or anyone to get the death penalty.
"Just a guess, but could it be that some women who grew up after abortion became legal see motherhood in a different light? If you get pregnant and are unhappy about it, it is never too late."

It's a sick, sad fact but women throughout history have killed their children. In fact, in Colonial America the most common reason women were executed was for "concealing the birth of a bastard" which meant they hid their pregnancies, gave birth in secret, and then buried the body. Women would claim that the baby was stillborn and medical science at the time not being able to prove otherwise, concealing the birth was made a felony punishable by death. I know of one case where the body of a baby was found in the town well and two women were suspected of having been pregnant. Both were arrested, questioned and confessed. They led authorities to where they had each hidden the body of the child they gave birth to but neither baby was the baby in the well and both women were hanged. I can think of many cases just like these from antiquity to the modern day so I don't think it's abortion. Look at women who have killed their children in the recent past and many of them expressed a strong Christian faith such as Andrea Yates or Dena Schlosser while it was reported in court hearings that Casey Anthony wanted an abortion, or, failing that, to place her child up for adoption but her mother wouldn't "let" her though Casey Anthony was 19 at the time Caylee was born.

I think the big difference between the Casey Anthony case and the O.J. Simpson case will be the jury. Unless Casey Anthony's jury is made up of a true jury of her peers, that is, sociopathic teen moms, then I don't think she stands a chance of being found not guilty.

I think the Haliegh Cummings case is far more interesting though I think the letter sent early in the investigation from a friend of Misty Crosley stating that Haliegh had taken Oxy pills she had found and OD'd is probably pretty close to the truth.