If you were inclined to Google "lessons" and "Weinergate" this week you'd find enough to complete your summer reading. Even before the semi-disgraced politician's late Monday confession that yes, he had irresponsibly tweeted a crotch shot to a young woman not his wife and then failed to take responsibility for it, people were writing about the lessons, the lessons they'd learned, the lessons they hadn't learned, and they hadn't even had full disclosure.
Some were quick to give the congressman the benefit of the doubt given the source of the initial scandal, while others assumed it was just another big man gone down, with possibly more late night giggle factor.
Whether they took to Facebook, Twitter, blogs or the late night air, the lessons were there along with the jokes, stirring in the middle of the bigger sex and power scandals of Dominique Strauss-Kahn, Arnold Schwarzenegger and John Edwards. It seems to be summer camp for the bad boys.
We've had enough examples of politicians gone awry in recent years to be giving too much benefit of the doubt despite the source. While the "innocent until proven guilty" serves well in a court of law, in the court of public opinion in the Twitter age it's relatively meaningless. I generally take as rule of thumb the guideline I follow when standing in line at the supermarket: if it's on one tabloid, it's questionable--two or three, and it's going to the bank.
Whether Anthony Weiner's tearful confession was prompted by genuine guilt, family conflict or other factors, it follows a pattern well crafted by others--deny, deflect, dissemble, and then ultimately, seek redemption. That these people deny at the outset or place the blame elsewhere seems to hearken back to childhood and broken cookie jars, a gambit for buying time with mom before dad comes home and gets out the belt.
We are not likely to suddenly get a new breed of politicians honest at the core or invulnerable to flirtations with the irresponsible. We are not likely to slow down the speed that news, opinion and rumor are delivered to us. We are not likely to see personal standards in Internet communication raised to the level of dress codes at the Vatican. Everyone from teenagers to world leaders is tweeting and TwitPicking, FourSquaring and Facebooking, without regard to the consequences. (Note to Congressman Weiner: You are not Adrianne Curry, or a Calvin Klein model.)
In the grander sweep of political scandal, Weiner is small potatoes, but reminds us that the lessons are these: there are no lessons we didn't already know. Don't do anything you don't want to see on a billboard or read as a headline the next day. Take responsibility for your actions. Don't assume.
And for the sake of all things holy: If you're going to tweet your underwear, make it worth our while.
On the Web:
Lessons I Won't Learn From Weinergate - Joan Walsh, Salon
What I Still Haven't Learned from Weinergate - Joan Walsh, Salon
Chest in Show - John Stewart, The Daily Show (video)
(image credit of Anthony Weiner, D-NY: Getty)


Salon.com
Comments
Amen sister! All this-- possibly a career-ending scandal over a picture of a man's clothed crotch. As I said over at Cranky's place, I just wish I didn't know some of this stuff. Public officials have been doing idiotic things since forever, but they used to have some semblance of a private life. In today's twitterverse...TMI.
Great post~
R
rated with hugs
Hee!
I'm utterly astounded -- yet again -- at the stupidity of people who live in the spotlight. Amazing.
Psst, I hear Mary Lin (OS's infamous spammer) has nudie pics of our Ed I. Tors past, present, and future. Mention offer code "foot-long" and get an extra 10% percent off. Don't ask me how I know because I won't tell ya.
Lezlie
Weiner is a joke now, and totally mishandled this (to say nothing of his original lapses in judgement and breaking the trust of his wife). How can anyone take him seriously again?
I'm becoming disheartened that we end up electing these clowns to office.
If you have to hold a press conference to deny or confirm...something is definitely wrong.
Not to pick a fight with Mr. Louis, but Breitbart's "scrupulous" standards are news to me. He was involved with some of James O'Keefe's videos, which have been consistently criticized for being heavily edited to change the context. He was also the one who released Shirley Sherrod's remarks out of context, starting a ridiculous viral slandering.
Ok Ok. I'm leaving already. Don't push me.
This it is as if Weiner came out and said, the dog ate my homework and the next day CNN does a huge piece on: Dogs Eating Homework.
Good work, investigative journalists! And thank you Joan Walsh once again rushing, rushing to defend a pervert at the expense of women everywhere. At least you are consistent.
http://open.salon.com/blog/sgt_mom/2011/06/03/friday_follies_absolutely_the_last_word_from_me_on_wienerg
well, yes and no.
we don't know the sordid improper ungentlemanly details
of this particular example
of "bigger (mouth, intolerance, jhutzpa) they got
harder they fall".
we need to know, for we forget.
credit weiner for being an object lesson,
a heuristic device (haha)
maybe
1.MotherState america is settin em up and knockin em down good and hard.
or
2. men have a mighty clever "christ" strategy of humiliating
themselves so much that women finally get them
in their glory and their rock botttom.
both, i hope!
Please visit and share with a friend.