Chic Geek Daily

Balancing Geekdom, Fashion, and an American Waistline.

Kate Couch

Kate Couch
Location
Austin,
Birthday
May 01
Bio
Female, taken, agnostic. Likes cartoons, video games, and going to museums alone. Allergic to tannins and most people. Thinks the U.S. needs to be on the metric system.

MY RECENT POSTS

Kate Couch's Links

Salon.com
Editor’s Pick
DECEMBER 10, 2010 9:59AM

DADT Repeal Blocked by Cowards

Rate: 15 Flag

gay rights

 

In 1993 President Clinton advocated to allow homosexuals to join the military. This prompted DADT: Don't Ask, Don't Tell. Because the Department of Defense felt open homosexuals "would create an unacceptable risk to the high standards of morale, good order and discipline, and unit cohesion that are the essence of military capability," gay men and women had to be silent regarding their sexuality in the military. It was the trade-off for being allowed the equal right to serve one's country and it seemed like a step forward at the time.

 

 It's been 17 years since then. One would like to say we've changed a lot in that time and in many ways we have. It's debatable, however, whether or not those changes have been largely positive.

 

Yesterday the motion to repeal Don't Ask, Don't Tell failed.

 

The United States preaches itself as a nation that includes all, accepts all, and shines it's light on hope and progress. That being said it's really quite best for all this to work out if you're white, male, making a decent amount of money, and Christian.

 

The major argument against DADT is that gays would disrupt the military. I am flabbergasted by this. How many people in your family or that you work with are gay? Okay, how many people in your family or at your office are gay that you know about? If all those who are gay came forward, or merely put a picture of their same sex spouse or mate on their desk would it completely change their ability to do their job? Would it truly magically and suddenly change the dynamic of the office or home?

 

Really, is it them or is it you?

 

The Christian Post wrote ‘ “We believe that normalizing homosexual conduct in the armed forces will pose a significant threat to chaplains’ and Service members’ religious liberty,” a group of 66 retired chaplains said in a September letter.’

 

So much for land of the free.

 

I was no virgin flower when I was married, but my husband wasn't distracted about that at our wedding. Doesn't the bible say something about that, too?

 

I know I can pray and be a good, decent human being and not be distracted from doing so next to a homosexual. But maybe that’s because of my own beliefs, such as:

 

Therefore welcome one another as Christ has welcomed you, for the glory of God. (Romans)

 

Or

 

But the Lord said to Samuel, “Do not look on his appearance or on the height of his stature, because I have rejected him. For the Lord sees not as man sees: man looks on the outward appearance, but the Lord looks on the heart.” (Samuel)

 

Or

 

“All that the Father gives me will come to me, and whoever comes to me I will never cast out.”  (John)

 

Again, I am not overly religious, but I have read the bible and do believe in being a good person, doing unto others as you would have others to unto you, and so forth.

 

Repealing DADT would have at least shown that as a nation we're trying, that we're making an effort as a country to accept everyone, as we so often tout we do, to not be the hypocrites the rest of the free world is becoming so frustrated with. 

 

My only fear now for repealing DADT is one of hate crimes those homosexuals already serving in the military might now face.

 

The fact of the matter is that in many ways we as Americans still struggle to be an accepting people. Bullying, even in the rash of suicides due to it, is still prevalent and hardly deterred. And racism and hate for those who are different is every where and at all levels.

 

I was born and raised in this country by people who were also born and raised on its soil. I am very white American; English is not only my first language, it is shamefully my only language.

 

In 2002 I was pulled over in Connecticut for having an old style license plate on my car. I had just bought this particular POS from a local dealer 2 days before and those were the plates they set me up with until my new ones were mailed to me. This cop pulled me over, told me my plates were illegal as they were the old style (they weren't), called for back-up to search my car (they found only my book bag filled with - heaven's to Betsy - books!, I had now missed my class at the local University), and the back-up cop, realizing that the other cop was out of his mind, decided to leave. I remember the look of dread on his face as he got into his car, almost as if he wanted to help me. I called my father in tears, as the cop who originally pulled me over had informed me he was having my car towed and I was to be left on the side of the road at night in sleet, during winter, all alone.

My father said “Ask for his badge number!”

This cop refused to give it to me, got into his car, and drove away. He didn't even give me a ticket.

Just took my car and left.

 

My mother picked me up shortly there after and drove me straight to the police station and asked to speak to the sergeant. The sergeant, realizing one of his cops was seriously in the wrong, called the cop out to the front of the police station to explain himself.

There was the little cop, much younger, less intimidating in the florescent lights of the municipal building. 

"Look at her!" he yelled. "She's a minority with old style plates on her car! And it’s not even registered to her! It could have been stolen! Everyone is guilty until proven innocent!" 

 

(The car was, in fact, registered to my mother, who shared my same very rare maiden name. I’ve found 4 other Occhiuzzos in the United States that I’m not related to. Why this cop would think I wasn’t related to the person on the registration is beyond me. Don’t parents normally allow their teenage kids to drive their cars before they get vehicles of their own?)

 

It took about an eighth of a second before everyone else waiting in the police station had jumped to their feet, offered to call local news stations, or back us up in court if we wanted to sue. 

 

I was in shock. "I'm a second generation American, white Italian!" I stammered. The sergeant grabbed the cop's arm and said "My wife still has old plates on her car! Get in my office!"

 

I am white, American, middle class, and a very pale Italian. In fact, I'm confused for Irish just as much as thought of as Italian. If this has happened to me, it makes me come close to vomiting to think what happens to those who are gay, who are black or Hispanic or from anywhere else in this world, but residing in this country. And we can’t turn our backs on this any more.

 

So, now it’s time to take a stand. It’s time to show the rest of the world who we really are as American people. It’s time to fess up to our mistakes, to prove that we really are a melting pot of glory and goodness.

 

If we don’t we’ll continue to be hypocrites, we’ll continue to tell our children it will all be okay, when we’re not really sure if that’s true, and we’ll eventually, humiliatingly regress.

 

I want to be equal, I don’t want my loved ones to feel a need to be hidden, I don’t want a man with a bible to declare whether or not we’re decent based merely on who we love, and I want the United States to live up to its promises in that the splendor she deserves.

 

 

 

 

I do not take credit for the above image. http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/09/18/gay-people-can-quote-the-bible-too

 

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
What really amazes me, when I hear someone say, "Gays will disrupt the military, so we need DADT to maintain good order and discipline", is that they are acknowledging that GAYS AND LESBIANS ARE ALREADY THERE and that good order and discipline already exists. I guess their hate and bigotry blinds them to their own hypocrisy.

BTW, it does no good to spout bible verses back at the bigots. They don't believe them any more than they believe the ones that they spout. They are just handy excuses to hate.
I cannot express in words how upset the whole affair makes me.
Today is International Human Rights Day.
We have never ratified this here in our country.
I refuse to think about bible thumpers today. Nuff said here already.
More evidence, if any more were needed, that 'Merika has a LOT to learn BEFORE it has any right to claim to be "The Policeman of The World". Or to tell others how they should live their lives and organize their societies.

I've said before, and I'll likely say again, "Go Home - Clean Up Your Own Problems - Set An Example". This would bring you more respect, love, and welcoming smiles than any number of armed invasions and/or intervention in the affairs of others.

You cannot 'give' freedom to another for if you could give it, you could also take it away. They must, each of them in their own way, find the "freedom" that is important to them. Only then will they truly have a freedom that is theirs indisputably.
Sorry Kate; I got a bit off topic there. Good post.


^R^+++
Rotten politics, rotten politicians, rotten results. Rotten racism. Imagine what would have happened if it turned out you were an immigrant? They're the latest victims of the backward part of America's witch-hunting ways.
Is it weird that I want someone to give a speech on the floor of Senate sort of like Matthew McConaughey's speech at the end of "A Time to Kill" where they line up a long, heroic battle scenario where a soldier saves the lives of someone's son, and then after all of that business the speaker flips the tables and says, by the way that person who just saved your son's life is gay. I think that would hammer the message home.
@ Evan:

* Leonard Matlovich: Purple Heart & Bronze Star
* Miriam Ben-Shalom: Highly Rated Drill Instructor
* Jay Hatheway: Green Beret
* Paul Thomasson: Joint Service Achievement Medal, Navy Commendation, Navy Achievement Medal

I can easily keep going...
Preach on Sister! Bravo!
This tugged at my heart on so many levels. Great work and congrats on the EP.
The UK several months ago allowed openly homosexuals to join their military and to announce they are Gay if they so choose. As of yet, nobody has identified themselves as Gay. I want all rights equal for Gays but a group of Gay activists have decided to target the military and assume once again that the world is really how it ought to be and not how it is. How it is is quite simple, announcing you are Gay is an invitation to get the shit kicked out of yourself or worse, killed. This holds true for men and women who barracks and bath together. It cannot effect many people as the military ranks composed of Gays has shrunk substantially since the end of the draft. Being Gay is a way to escape the draft as during the Vietnam War potential draftees arrived at physicals wearing panties and some kissed the draft sergeant. As a Democrat, I wish you would back off this issue. It doesn't stop Gays from serving and hurts the party. The more you push, the more the moderates migrate right.
@ David Price: Fuck the party. DADT is an affront to basic human rights. I realize that as a privileged, straight, white, male you don't appreciate this fact, but that doesn't mean it's still not a fact. If the Democratic party doesn't have the balls to stand up for basic human dignity they have much bigger problems then "blue dogs" (as was demonstrated during the last elections).

P.S. The moderates aren't migrating because of anyone's support for gay rights, dude. They are migrating because they are freak'in DINO asshats that couldn't give a crap about what is right because it doesn't put money in their greedy little pockets.
@David Price
You win the prize as most ignorant asshole of the day. Big news flash for you dipwad men coming into their draft board with panties on or kissing Sergeants didn't mean they were really gay and has nothing to do with the issue at hand.
The greatest military reason to repeal DADT: If gays can serve openly, they will be more committed to the institution they serve because they won't have to hide who they are. It's a morale boost and boy o' boy the USA military could use a syringe of that shit right now.
Anthony Duvall, tell me where you live and I'll come and reach down your throat and pull your heart out you pussilanmous little shit. You wouldn't say that to my face.
Everybody knows that before long, DADT will be repealed. So what are the narrow-minded, vindictive old buzzards waiting for. Nice legacy guys. You held up its repeal for a year or so.
Just read the comments, wow.

David Price - You sound pretty sensible in a lot of your posts but your views on gays in the military seem stuck in the Alice's restaurant era. Was DADT to you a grudging concession? Pushing for full acceptance will piss of the bigots and lose votes so best to shut up? I doubt you'll accept the analogy but it sure reminds me of the folks who thought that the pigmented people in the 60s were getting too uppity and if they'd only keep their place then the Dems wouldn't lose those treasured supporters like Richard Russell and George Wallace. Would you have counseled LBJ NOT to lose the South for a generation?
If you had ever been the military ie combat perhaps you would have a different view on DADT. When I was in a foxhole-bunker- on patrol I wanted to be sure the person with me was more interested in looking for the enemy not at my-------. Moral, pride and trust are things you must have in a elite combat unit. Are you willing to sacrifice that in the name of political correctness or some contribute right for homosexuals?
Yay! I'm glad they repealed it. Now when does it actually stop working?
i believe the american empire needs a core group of blood-thirsty thugs, border-line psychopaths, who can be trusted to go where told and kill the people there, no questions asked. such men revel in the attributes of machismo, and despise any softness of character. so the elite try to protect this group's image, with dadt as a last line of defense.

it may seem pointless, since women are now in the military, but these men are most threatened by gays, not in reality of course, but psychological factors are vital.

in any event, psychopathic gays will eventually establish themselves as role-models in the service, and this 'dadt' will be a quaint bit of history.

as to real humans, of whatever gender interest, stay out of the service unless you are starving: it is not an honorable profession.