While others quibble about whether the shooter here in Tucson was influenced by politics or not, Sheriff Clarence Dupnik has decided it’s time to stop splitting hairs.
I was stunned and inspired by his bravery in giving voice to fears and frustrations I have felt, and written about here, more than once. He has taken some controversial stands before, most notably concerning Arizona's ill-conceived immigration law. But I never expected him to put his career on the line as he did this weekend, following the Giffords shooting.
I feared that his words would be used to stir up a debate designed to distract the media and public from the real issues by the people he had just lambasted. And I was right. That guilt-driven "debate" began immediately.
But I hope we're not distracted from the real issues for long. It does not matter if we are never able to connect the dots from our political discourse directly to this heinous event. The point is, as I’ve said here before, that the discourse in this country—or what passed for discourse—reached an unprecedented level of bitterness and divisiveness, sending a tacit and dangerous message to unstable minds on the fringe that "anything goes."
As another politician said this weekend, we were reduced to, "I'm right, and you're evil." And as the anger escalated, the country became a powder keg. Loughner, one of those white men with guns I wrote about last year, merely lit the fuse.
It's telling that a few radio rabble rousers are trotting out campaign statements that Obama has made, which, if taken in context or watched as video clips are amusingly benign--downright nerdly, really--as evidence that he, too, added to the name calling and dangerous rhetoric. Odd thing is that Dupnik never actually singled out anyone, and didn't specifically blame conservatives as the main culprits in his statements.
Those who responded with those Obama quotes and other defensive denouncements of Dupnik and others merely proved that they're feelin' a little guilty just now. They're like the teenager who crashes Daddy's car after a drinking party and says, "Yeah, but...my friends all got drunk, too!" Everybody who fanned the flames is wrong here, and pointing fingers won't fix the real problem.
Nevertheless, Obama never put any of his political peers behind crosshairs on a Web site. And he never called for a “Second Amendment” solution should his political aspirations fail.
But I’m preaching to the choir here. I’d rather let Dupnik speak for himself. For me, along with the heroism shown by the woman who grabbed that Glock magazine, the three men who wrestled the shooter to the ground and young intern who used his nursing training to offer life saving assistance to Giffords…Dupnik was another kind of hero this weekend. Remember, this man lives in the state he lambasted this weekend. He’s an elected official, and his own life may be in danger now.
But please don't forget what he said:


Salon.com
Comments
As I said elsewhere, if they had a conscience, it would be guilty.
What a shame we can't bring charges agaist them for inciting, aiding and abetting, etc.
Yes, we are talking about YOU, palin, beck, limpboy and the rePIGlican side of the aisle.
Please sign the petition to indict Sarah Palin for inciting violence in the attempted assassination of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords. It was started this weekend and is directed to the Dept of Justice. It has more than 3500 signatures presently.
http://www.petitiononline.com/mod_perl/signed.cgi?IndictSP
I'm having my own little battles with family members who like guns. This is what I finally had to post to my FaceBook page:
Notice! I will not tolerate baiting on this subject! I will delete posts that are meant to distract from the real issue. Gabby was a personal friend of a close friend of mine, and Tucson is a place where I have spent time and have friends. I'm not in the mood to ride on that merry-go-round of distraction created by people who have no substance to back up their beliefs!
There is absolutely no reason for anyone to own a weapon with magazines that hold twenty rounds unless they are planning to kill a lot of people! This guy was ready to load his second magazine! People with knives or their fists or even a bow and arrow could not inflict the kind of slaughter an automatic weapon can. So YES! GUNS DO KILL PEOPLE!!!!
♥
As the facts continue to develop, it becomes increasingly clear that the Tucson attack had nothing, but nothing, to do with conservative rhetoric.
Conservative rhetoric rarely features Mein Kampf and The Communist Manifesto. The shooter's obsession with Giffords predates the emergence of Palin on the political scene--just another fact that is coming back to bite parasitic ideologues that seize any opportunity, however tragic in human terms, to score political points.
To divert focus for an instant from the evil of the shooter and the innocence and plight of the victims is reprehensible, and this post and its supporters are clearly culpable.
Elijah Rising
stop the advance of the 451s
This man makes so many good points and is so brave, I really thank you for posting this. We don't get many public officials brave enough to be this honest. He should be rewarded and shown support.
As I said in my post, though, EVERYBODY who fanned the flames was wrong. And I keep hearing the, "Well, they did it, too," defense, which most of those out there back peddling now wouldn't accept from their kids, but feel is okay for public political discourse.
I'm not surprised, though. When kids do it it's because they know they're done wrong, too. I was an assistant principal for many years, and I have a daughter who tried that on me all the time!
It is crazy and irresponsible behavior. It can not be ignored any longer.
Bless you, dear. Thinbking of you. Not easy having this kind of thing happen where you live. This:
"I'm proud of the locals who have already been working together to really do something in the wake of this tragedy--you're not seeing that on national TV, but I am just incredibly proud of our community right now."
I am proud of your community too. We see a small bit of that but the media skips over that. Hoping you a great deal of love and community in the days ahead.
Yes, I love the Sheriff. A good man speaking out when he should.
The use of force and violence in the conduct of our political and human affairs is endemic. That ineluctable fact has far more to do with some deranged American shooting a congresswoman than the most inflammatory words ever uttered. Nor, as many putative pundits are alleging, is the ready availability of guns a significant factor in this incident. Guns don't kill people; violent people kill people.
At the very moment Representative Gabrielle Gifford was shot, agents of the US government trained in the art of slaughter beyond any skills Jared Loughner could ever muster, and with exponentially greater fire power than the puny 9mm Glock Loughner was sporting, were busy hunting down and trying to slaughter strangers in Afghanistan by the busload--Afghans who pose no threat to America or Americans. Meanwhile at home armed agents of the Internal Revenue Service were forcibly confiscating the property of unfortunate taxpayers who wouldn't or couldn't afford to pay their taxes.
Representative Gifford and the people of America who participate or acquiesce in their government's violence are as guilty of violence as are the perpetrators. Military personnel in Afghanistan and IRS agents here are Gifford's and our agents. Gabby Gifford may be "a warm, loving wonderful person and a conscientious legislator," as her many friends have described her, but she is not innocent of violence. Nor is any American who explicitly or tacitly condones the violence of the US government and its agents.
When health insurance is mandated by our government, and the IRS is empowered to enforce the mandate, we condone the initiation of force and we thereby perpetrate violence against the many who would rather not participate. Our dependence on government and enforced taxation to obtain many benefits has made virtually all Americans co-conspirators in government violence. When violence comes home to roost, we shouldn't be surprised.
rated with love
And those who are protesting Dupnik -- well they seem to be protesting too much methinks.
And he's got it.
Best wishes,
John Yates
Palin better watch out! As a woman, the Right will crucify her if they need a "fall guy".....
As the words of the song say, "Let there be peace on earth and let it begin with me." I'm not waiting for you nor anyone to join me in renouncing violence. One reason: with or without others my decision brings a deep sense of satisfaction and well being. I also truly believe it has rendered me personally safe from all harm. If you do feel moved to renounce violence, you cannot have your agents doing the dirty work for you. That means you must reject, to the greatest extent possibly, any dependence whatsoever on tax-paid government benefits, which obviously can only be had through the use of force and coercion. And, again, to the greatest extent possible, you must not pay federal taxes, which fund all sorts of violence by the State and its agents.
Kika, as long as you are alive it's never too late to reject violence. As far as I;m concerned, even though the principles and benefits of nonviolence were known at least 2000-years ago, the revolution is just beginning.